Young Republicans are idiots and maybe worse

29,219 Views | 412 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by Serious Lee
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Killer_21 said:

shack009 said:

Killer_21 said:

93MarineHorn said:

Teslag said:

Killer_21 said:

Teslag said:

Some young republicans say vile things in a group chat. Some young democrats shoot conservatives in the neck for engaging in dialogue.

And then some young Republicans run over teenage girls with their car for daring to speak about y'alls lord and savior Charlie Kirk. Is that how this round robin game works?


I must have missed the waves of support this supposed incident got from republicans as your side did with Kirk's assassination. And the assassination of the MLK of our generation hardly compares to some rando murder.

They still don't understand that it's the SUPPORT that the Left gives their psychos that is the difference between us & them. They cheer and encourage violence against the Right.

And your side validates, endorses, and minimizes any encouraged violence against the left. These text threads are harmless and "just jokes" when it's your side perpetrating it, but when the left has edgy jokes it is violence against the right? Give me a break and go clutch your pearls harder.

"Edgy jokes" are using a word that 13% of the population uses constantly and saying anything about Hitler that isn't the harshest of criticism.

Meanwhile the left perpetrates and celebrates actual murder and that's the same "edgy jokes."

Grow up and/or be smarter.

So the teenage girls mowed down by a truck for speaking about Charlie Kirk, that is not violence in your mind? Protestors in frog costumes being tear gassed for exercising their 1st amendment right, that's not violence? US citizen Children in Chicago being violently removed from their home and ziptied, that's not violence? Melissa Hortman and her husband being assassinated that's not violence? The charlie Kirk assassination was awful and was condemed across the board by Democrat officials. For all the grandstanding and hand wringing about rehtoric from your side you'd think a clear and obvious case of violent rhetoric from your side would be condemned, but of course it isn't. Because it is not the left that provokes and stimulates violence, it's the right. Simply read the president's tweets and tell me what kind of rhetoric that would classify as


You mean the president that tweets "mean things" and your side tried to kill him twice? That president?
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sorry some people said mean words in a private conversation that might have possibly hurt the feelings of people who weren't involved that conversation had they known what was said.

on behalf of all americans i offer an apology as a gesture more than equal to the harm those words caused.
Killer_21
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Killer_21 said:

93MarineHorn said:

Teslag said:

Killer_21 said:

Teslag said:

Some young republicans say vile things in a group chat. Some young democrats shoot conservatives in the neck for engaging in dialogue.

And then some young Republicans run over teenage girls with their car for daring to speak about y'alls lord and savior Charlie Kirk. Is that how this round robin game works?


I must have missed the waves of support this supposed incident got from republicans as your side did with Kirk's assassination. And the assassination of the MLK of our generation hardly compares to some rando murder.

They still don't understand that it's the SUPPORT that the Left gives their psychos that is the difference between us & them. They cheer and encourage violence against the Right.

And your side validates, endorses, and minimizes any encouraged violence against the left. These text threads are harmless and "just jokes" when it's your side perpetrating it, but when the left has edgy jokes it is violence against the right? Give me a break and go clutch your pearls harder.


The only thing the right encourages is dialogue. And for that we are murdered.

Sure encourage dialogue where a 30+ year old debates college children and edits out any of the times they make him look like a fool.

Encourage dialogue like tear gassing peaceful protestors in halloween costumes? Encourage dialogue like shooting a clergymen in the head with a pepper ball?

Is that what you call dialogue?
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Melissa Hortman and her husband being assassinated that's not violence?

You have not seen anyone on the right celebrating the murders of two local politicians we'd never heard of before, nor calling for more crimes like it.

We do, in fact, call for real consequences for violent criminals - and are fought every step of the way by Democrats at all levels of government, along with their thug militias in the streets.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Sure encourage dialogue where a 30+ year old debates college children and edits out any of the times they make him look like a fool.

The events were livestreamed, smart guy.

And it is utterly insane to equate your alleged video editing with the rampant political violence of the Left.
Killer_21
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jugstore Cowboy said:

Quote:

Melissa Hortman and her husband being assassinated that's not violence?

You have not seen anyone on the right celebrating the murders of two local politicians we'd never heard of before, nor calling for more crimes like it.

We do, in fact, call for real consequences for violent criminals - and are fought every step of the way by Democrats at all levels of government, along with their thug militias in the streets.

Senator Lee was mocking her murder the same day wtf are you talking about.

Thug Militias LMAO. Yeah real violent gang of thugs those inflatable frogs.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Law enforcement trying to crowd control a violent terrorist organization is worse than Hitler jokes.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Killer_21 said:

Teslag said:

Killer_21 said:

93MarineHorn said:

Teslag said:

Killer_21 said:

Teslag said:

Some young republicans say vile things in a group chat. Some young democrats shoot conservatives in the neck for engaging in dialogue.

And then some young Republicans run over teenage girls with their car for daring to speak about y'alls lord and savior Charlie Kirk. Is that how this round robin game works?


I must have missed the waves of support this supposed incident got from republicans as your side did with Kirk's assassination. And the assassination of the MLK of our generation hardly compares to some rando murder.

They still don't understand that it's the SUPPORT that the Left gives their psychos that is the difference between us & them. They cheer and encourage violence against the Right.

And your side validates, endorses, and minimizes any encouraged violence against the left. These text threads are harmless and "just jokes" when it's your side perpetrating it, but when the left has edgy jokes it is violence against the right? Give me a break and go clutch your pearls harder.


The only thing the right encourages is dialogue. And for that we are murdered.

Sure encourage dialogue where a 30+ year old debates college children and edits out any of the times they make him look like a fool.

Encourage dialogue like tear gassing peaceful protestors in halloween costumes? Encourage dialogue like shooting a clergymen in the head with a pepper ball?

Is that what you call dialogue?


That faux clergyman looked like a total loser and probably coulda used a few more dashes of seasoning to the dome
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

Sure encourage dialogue where a 30+ year old debates college children and edits out any of the times they make him look like a fool.


1. They were livestreamed and saved in their entirety.
2. Charlie wasn't always 30. He started doing them at 18.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

Encourage dialogue like tear gassing peaceful protestors in halloween costumes? Encourage dialogue like shooting a clergymen in the head with a pepper ball?


Law enforcement isn't there for dialogue. They are there to protect order and application of the law. Simply stay out of their way and let them round up illegals.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Thug Militias LMAO. Yeah real violent gang of thugs those inflatable frogs.

I see you don't care about being taken seriously. You've been incredibly disingenuous and dishonest throughout this thread.
Stone Choir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Killer_21 said:

shack009 said:

Killer_21 said:

93MarineHorn said:

Teslag said:

Killer_21 said:

Teslag said:

Some young republicans say vile things in a group chat. Some young democrats shoot conservatives in the neck for engaging in dialogue.

And then some young Republicans run over teenage girls with their car for daring to speak about y'alls lord and savior Charlie Kirk. Is that how this round robin game works?


I must have missed the waves of support this supposed incident got from republicans as your side did with Kirk's assassination. And the assassination of the MLK of our generation hardly compares to some rando murder.

They still don't understand that it's the SUPPORT that the Left gives their psychos that is the difference between us & them. They cheer and encourage violence against the Right.

And your side validates, endorses, and minimizes any encouraged violence against the left. These text threads are harmless and "just jokes" when it's your side perpetrating it, but when the left has edgy jokes it is violence against the right? Give me a break and go clutch your pearls harder.

"Edgy jokes" are using a word that 13% of the population uses constantly and saying anything about Hitler that isn't the harshest of criticism.

Meanwhile the left perpetrates and celebrates actual murder and that's the same "edgy jokes."

Grow up and/or be smarter.

So the teenage girls mowed down by a truck for speaking about Charlie Kirk, that is not violence in your mind? Protestors in frog costumes being tear gassed for exercising their 1st amendment right, that's not violence? US citizen Children in Chicago being violently removed from their home and ziptied, that's not violence? Melissa Hortman and her husband being assassinated that's not violence? The charlie Kirk assassination was awful and was condemed across the board by Democrat officials. For all the grandstanding and hand wringing about rehtoric from your side you'd think a clear and obvious case of violent rhetoric from your side would be condemned, but of course it isn't. Because it is not the left that provokes and stimulates violence, it's the right. Simply read the president's tweets and tell me what kind of rhetoric that would classify as


Why would I condemn what ICE does? I support all of that.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

That faux clergyman


Leftists must be really impressed by all the priests and nuns they see out celebrating Halloween.

Of course, that would require actually going out instead of prowling reddit, MSNBC and Colbert highlights for internet warrior talking points.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
shack009 said:

titan said:


Nothing anyone said about Trump before his first 2017 inauguration carries much weight. All were operating under false impressions largely driven by the celebrity persona to date. Its what people said since 2020 and seeing what he would be like that have relevance.

I actually have higher standards for people who claim to be smart or want to run for public office. Vance was basically a leftist calling Trump Hitler and an authoritarian fascist.

He changed his entire public persona between 2016 and his senate campaign. You'll have to forgive those of us who are skeptical.

The standards implied are useless. Bongino had this right. Most of them are opportunists and egotists, and to a voter the only concern should be to see them as tools. Which tool is willing to do what needed. Litmus tests are pointless, no one will pass them. By the same token what they say doesn't matter---if they say all the right things by the same Bongino rule, if they then vote with the Left it doesn't matter. The McCain vote on Obamacare might be a good example.

Vance was not a Leftist. He hardly could be given his background. What he was was someone who believed what was being put out. He was a NeverTrumper --- a different kind of inflexible, and they were very common in 2016 because they were put off by Trump's rhetoric and manner. Ted Cruz is a good example of one who saw him very differently once President and realized that against the common enemy of the Regressive Left and their almost 100% biased to their side press, he was the one for the time.
Killer_21
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jugstore Cowboy said:

Quote:

That faux clergyman


Leftists must be really impressed by all the priests and nuns they see out celebrating Halloween.

Of course, that would require actually going out instead of prowling reddit, MSNBC and Colbert highlights for internet warrior talking points.

Man it must be really nice that all violence against your side is perpetrated by the lunatic left wing terrorist mob and all violence perpetrated against anyone else just isn't real.

That's a nice little reality you've made for yourself.
Fat Black Swan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Man it must be really nice that all violence against your side is perpetrated by the lunatic left wing terrorist mob and all violence perpetrated against anyone else just isn't real.

That's a nice little reality you've made for yourself.

In a reply to a comment about costumes!

But you do seem pretty fixated on costumes, since there is no Antifa and no Left wing violence, just kids dressing up in costumes



to attack police and disrupt law enforcement operations on behalf of hidden interests.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Agreed. See actions, overall effectiveness or NOT, is what counts.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?
Stone Choir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?


You're not a constitutional conservative, you support the civil rights act, which is mutually exclusive to the constitution. That is, they are completely incompatible.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?

They don't even support the Constitution because it allows freedom.

Freedom is the anthesis to their belief system.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?

Not sure what your question has to do with anything I said, but I'll answer it with this: Do you know even a single thing about the people who wrote the constitution?
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?

They don't even support the Constitution because it allows freedom.

Freedom is the anthesis to their belief system.

"The Constitution allows for freedom" is easily the most Boomer Con thing to ever be posted.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WTF is a "boomer con"?
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?

Not sure what your question has to do with anything I said, but I'll answer it with this: Do you know even a single thing about the people who wrote the constitution?


Yes. They were political geniuses but some of them held some pretty awful viewpoints like it's okay to own people. Now obviously judging the morality of people anachronistically shouldnt be done, history should view people within the lens of their own time But that doesn't mean we have to be racist *******s in 2025.

But hey you do you, if raging against Jewish space lasers makes you happy then knock yourself out.
Stone Choir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shack009 said:

Rapier108 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?

They don't even support the Constitution because it allows freedom.

Freedom is the anthesis to their belief system.

"The Constitution allows for freedom" is easily the most Boomer Con thing to ever be posted.


I always find it funny how they never understand the same people who wrote the constitution also wrote the 1790 Naturalization Act nor do they ever bother to look up all of the letters any of them wrote.

When you post them, they revert back to "well they didn't think the Irish and Italians were white…" exactly like a leftist does.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

WTF is a "boomer con"?

If you have to ask...
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Part of that is because it is not realized what per-suppositions existed about different groups back then. Even aside from any bigotry, talking about capabilities. Or even supposed dispositions. The Founders were living in end of 18th Century cultural assumptions.But the making distinctions in quality of who was to be admitted is found as late and well said, as Teddy Roosevelt.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?

Not sure what your question has to do with anything I said, but I'll answer it with this: Do you know even a single thing about the people who wrote the constitution?


Yes. They were political geniuses but some of them held some pretty awful viewpoints like it's okay to own people. Now obviously judging the morality of people anachronistically shouldnt be done, history should view people within the lens of their own time But that doesn't mean we have to be racist *******s in 2025.

Why would you think I think their morals were bad?
Quote:

But hey you do you, if raging against Jewish space lasers makes you happy then knock yourself out.

Such low-IQ boomer conning...
Stone Choir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

LMCane said:

THIS IS MY REPUBLICAN PARTY! From the Executive Directors of the Young Republicans:

"We are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the Politico article published today.

Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations.

We must hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity, respect, and professionalism.

- Board of Directors

Disgusting statement and it's nauseating that anybody on the right agrees with it.

Y'all are just leftists masquerading as right wingers.


So in your mind it's impossible to be a constitutional conservative without being a racist?

Not sure what your question has to do with anything I said, but I'll answer it with this: Do you know even a single thing about the people who wrote the constitution?


Yes. They were political geniuses but some of them held some pretty awful viewpoints like it's okay to own people. Now obviously judging the morality of people anachronistically shouldnt be done, history should view people within the lens of their own time But that doesn't mean we have to be racist *******s in 2025.

But hey you do you, if raging against Jewish space lasers makes you happy then knock yourself out.



So you're not actually a constitutional conservative then since the Founders explicitly stated it only applies to just and moral people and is not applicable to others. John Adams was pretty explicit about what he meant here.

This is why it did not work in Liberia. It was never intended to be universally applicable to all people on the planet.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Teslag said:

WTF is a "boomer con"?

If you have to ask...


I'm gen-x, a few years shy of being a millennial
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Ironically it might work in as different a place as Japan. I guess sort of has.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
titan said:


Part of that is because it is not realized what per-suppositions existed about different groups back then. Even aside from any bigotry, talking about capabilities. Or even supposed dispositions. The Founders were living in end of 18th Century cultural assumptions.But the making distinctions in quality of who was to be admitted is found as late and well said, as Teddy Roosevelt.

Imagine what they'd think today....
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.