CharleyKerfeld said:
Jack Boyette said:
CharleyKerfeld said:
Jack Boyette said:
Davanji84 said:
Jack Boyette said:
Davanji84 said:
Jack Boyette said:
Davanji84 said:
Jack Boyette said:
Davanji84 said:
AggieVictor10 said:
Davanji84 said:
2000AgPhD said:
Anybody on here vote for Trump because they thought he was a choir boy?
He's done/doing a bunch of crap I didn't vote for. So the "you knew he wasn't a choir boy" narrative doesn't work for me.
You voted for all of it.
Technically speaking, you would be correct. But I'm a quick study so won't make that mistake again. Starting this November.
So you're going to vote for a democrat instead?
If there is a democrat or independent that I think is better for our state and/or the country, you bet I will. You wouldn't?
Uhhh, no, I wouldn't. You just revealed yourself, pal. You're not a Republican and never were. No Republican would jump ship to vote for the promotion of the disastrous policies of the democrat party because Trump posted something on f'n social media. Good Lord.
Your humorous Jack. No need to conceal anything. Been a Republican my entire voting life(and that's a long time). This administration has driven me to free agent status until the Republican Party earns my trust back. No more complicated than that. And, we agree, the Lord is good.
It's clearly more complicated than *you're able to handle.
Please list the things this administration has done to cause you to go vote for a party that promotes mental illness, communism, and wants to take everything from those of us that dare to be successful.
You've got to be either really stupid or incredibly dense to do that.
Your reading skills appear to be challenged sir. Did I say that I would vote for a communist? Did I say that I would vote for a candidate that promotes gross wealth distribution? I said that I will vote for any candidate that I feel is best for my state and/or country. Doesn't matter if that candidate is a democrat or independent or non-MAGA republican. What I won't do is vote for anyone who blindly supports the current administration. That is, indeed, not complicated.
This idea that a Democrat would be best for your country is exactly the point. You clearly don't understand how politics works, that's obvious to anyone.
All the guy is saying is if he saw a better candidate out there than the Republican, he would vote for them. He didn't say a "Democrat" That's just you banging your pot.
No, he clearly said he was open to it.
I can't believe there are college graduates that still vote for politicians like they're voting for homecoming king. "He's a good guy" is an absurdly juvenile mentality to use to decide who to vote for in a political climate where both sides vote in lock step with their party.
He said this: If there is a democrat or independent that I think is better for our state and/or the country, you bet I will. You wouldn't?
Which means he'd be open to voting for a non-Republican if they were the best candidate for the job. You being opposed to it makes it seem like you would vote for the Republican candidate no matter what based on party allegiance.
Both answers make sense, but what would you do if the Republicans ran someone and you disagreed with all of their policies?
You see, this is the difference: I understand that that wouldn't ever happen. Ever. Politics, in this day and age, is about fundraising, party politics, and one side vs. the other. This isn't Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. The fact that you think it makes any sense at all for him to do this, or consider doing this, illustrates my point.
You don't like a Republican candidate? Fine. Volunteer for his or her Republican opponent in the primary. Vote for them in the primary. But if your candidate loses in that primary…and your solution is to vote for the Democrat….you've made it clear you have no concept of how modern politics works, and that you don't truly care about Republican principles.
I shouldn't have to explain this to anyone that pays even the slightest bit of attention.