YouBet said:

---

AlexNguyen said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Well, that's interesting. So, partisan politics by the left wing, anti-Constitutional side of the SC.

---

If the decision announcement was allowed to be slow-walked to prevent action during this year's midterms, it all falls on the shoulders of Chief Justice Roberts.

---

Well, if so, that's just more proof that he's a peacocking clown that needs to be replaced. He cares more about image than the constitution.

---

There is no leverage on CJ Roberts. There is no super majority for impeaching him even if anyone was serious about it.

AlexNguyen said:

---

YouBet said:

---

AlexNguyen said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Well, that's interesting. So, partisan politics by the left wing, anti-Constitutional side of the SC.

---

If the decision announcement was allowed to be slow-walked to prevent action during this year's midterms, it all falls on the shoulders of Chief Justice Roberts.

---

Well, if so, that's just more proof that he's a peacocking clown that needs to be replaced. He cares more about image than the constitution.

---

There is no leverage on CJ Roberts. There is no super majority for impeaching him even if anyone was serious about it.

---

I'm just expressing my desires.

YouBet said:

---

AlexNguyen said:

---

YouBet said:

---

AlexNguyen said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Well, that's interesting. So, partisan politics by the left wing, anti-Constitutional side of the SC.

---

If the decision announcement was allowed to be slow-walked to prevent action during this year's midterms, it all falls on the shoulders of Chief Justice Roberts.

---

Well, if so, that's just more proof that he's a peacocking clown that needs to be replaced. He cares more about image than the constitution.

---

There is no leverage on CJ Roberts. There is no super majority for impeaching him even if anyone was serious about it.

---

I'm just expressing my desires.

---

I hear you. Roberts through his inaction has allowed the USSC to be political, just to the betterment of the minority position.

We have been sued on the new congressional map by groups represented by lawyers from…

…the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Glad to see the SPLC is *not* on our side! pic.twitter.com/UTheVWN30Y

— Ron DeSantis (@GovRonDeSantis) May 6, 2026

Well looks like all the southern states are redrawing, minus Georgia (Thanks Kemp you POS)

Florida 4, Louisiana 2, Bama 2, Tennessee 1, South Carolina 1, Mississippi 1 are all redrawing. That is 11 pick ups.

So it will be 212R to 205D with 18 toss ups. One of the Florida seats created is considered a toss up. Rs only need 6 of the toss ups to win the house. I like their odds

That of course would mean Louisiana and Bama get rid of both of the blue districts in their states, which idk 100% they are doing, think Louisiana might keep one of them

I am guessing Virginia gets to hold on to the new map as well

Quote:

---

I am guessing Virginia gets to hold on to the new map as well

---

Very doubtful.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

I am guessing Virginia gets to hold on to the new map as well

---

Very doubtful.

---

That would mean 216 to 201

18 toss ups

Man what a bummer for Dems lmao

This was the year they truly had a shot at it. Maybe they'll get it in 2028 but highly doubt it as India, Utah, Nebraska all likely redraw, maybe Kansas as well. If Georgia has a R governor they will redraw as well

If Georgia doesn't redraw by 2028, won't they be sued?

JDUB08AG said:

---

If Georgia doesn't redraw by 2028, won't they be sued?

---

They might have a Dem governor.

Why would they get sued?

2026NCAggies said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

If Georgia doesn't redraw by 2028, won't they be sued?

---

They might have a Dem governor.

Why would they get sued?

---

Isn't the current map inclusive of a racially gerrymandered district and would be in violation of the SCOTUS ruling?

JDUB08AG said:

---

2026NCAggies said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

If Georgia doesn't redraw by 2028, won't they be sued?

---

They might have a Dem governor.

Why would they get sued?

---

Isn't the current map inclusive of a racially gerrymandered district and would be in violation of the SCOTUS ruling?

---

I'm curious to see what happens in CA, TX, and the swing States.

The South Carolina House Rules Committee has voted to amend the sine die agreement to allow for Redistricting next week.

Final Vote:
🟢 Yes: 12
🔴 No: 2

Potential New Map:
🔴 Republicans: 7 (+1)
🔵 Democrats: 0 (-1)

(+/- vs current map) pic.twitter.com/ZY93xVc8t7

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) May 6, 2026

YEE-HAW!!!

Move 'em on, head 'em up
Head 'em up, move 'em on
Move 'em on, head 'em up
Rawhide!
Cut 'em out, ride 'em in
Ride 'em in, let 'em out
Cut 'em out, ride 'em in
Rawhide!

Rawhide!

source: https://www.lyricsondemand.com/tvthemes/rawhidelyrics.html

GenericAggie said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

2026NCAggies said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

If Georgia doesn't redraw by 2028, won't they be sued?

---

They might have a Dem governor.

Why would they get sued?

---

Isn't the current map inclusive of a racially gerrymandered district and would be in violation of the SCOTUS ruling?

---

I'm curious to see what happens in CA, TX, and the swing States.

---

I bet CA, adds a couple more Dems unless Hilton pulls a giant upset

Texas is basically maxed out for Rs, do not think we can add anymore until after the 2030 census

Swing states can only Gerrymander if they are completely controlled by Dems or Rs.

Michigan for ex. cannot, their house is controlled by Rs, Senate barely controlled by Dems. John James has a good chance at Governor. May be getting ahead of myself but Michigan may be turning in to a lean Red state

Georgia may not be able to after 2026 because they could lose the Governors race.

Pennsylvania cannot because Rs control the upper chamber and Dems control lower chamber.

Virginia one of the bluest swing states barely got it through, they would have lost the election had it not been for cheating and the money that poured in for Dems.

Nevada has a R governor

Arizona is partially controlled by Rs

IDK if North Carolina can gerrymander they have a Dem Governor

The reason Kansas didn't redraw is they have Dem Gov

sorry for all the examples, kind of typed away there

Quote:

---

Arizona is partially controlled by Rs

---

No, it is not. It is controlled by the McCain Machine and Runbeck.

2026NCAggies said:

---

GenericAggie said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

2026NCAggies said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

If Georgia doesn't redraw by 2028, won't they be sued?

---

They might have a Dem governor.

Why would they get sued?

---

Isn't the current map inclusive of a racially gerrymandered district and would be in violation of the SCOTUS ruling?

---

I'm curious to see what happens in CA, TX, and the swing States.

---

I bet CA, adds a couple more Dems unless Hilton pulls a giant upset

Texas is basically maxed out for Rs, do not think we can add anymore until after the 2030 census

Swing states can only Gerrymander if they are completely controlled by Dems or Rs.

Michigan for ex. cannot, their house is controlled by Rs, Senate barely controlled by Dems. John James has a good chance at Governor. May be getting ahead of myself but Michigan may be turning in to a lean Red state

Georgia may not be able to after 2026 because they could lose the Governors race.

Pennsylvania cannot because Rs control the upper chamber and Dems control lower chamber.

Virginia one of the bluest swing states barely got it through, they would have lost the election had it not been for cheating and the money that poured in for Dems.

Nevada has a R governor

Arizona is partially controlled by Rs

IDK if North Carolina can gerrymander they have a Dem Governor

The reason Kansas didn't redraw is they have Dem Gov

sorry for all the examples, kind of typed away there

---

I appreciate the details. WI?

GenericAggie said:

---

2026NCAggies said:

---

GenericAggie said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

2026NCAggies said:

---

JDUB08AG said:

---

If Georgia doesn't redraw by 2028, won't they be sued?

---

They might have a Dem governor.

Why would they get sued?

---

Isn't the current map inclusive of a racially gerrymandered district and would be in violation of the SCOTUS ruling?

---

I'm curious to see what happens in CA, TX, and the swing States.

---

I bet CA, adds a couple more Dems unless Hilton pulls a giant upset

Texas is basically maxed out for Rs, do not think we can add anymore until after the 2030 census

Swing states can only Gerrymander if they are completely controlled by Dems or Rs.

Michigan for ex. cannot, their house is controlled by Rs, Senate barely controlled by Dems. John James has a good chance at Governor. May be getting ahead of myself but Michigan may be turning in to a lean Red state

Georgia may not be able to after 2026 because they could lose the Governors race.

Pennsylvania cannot because Rs control the upper chamber and Dems control lower chamber.

Virginia one of the bluest swing states barely got it through, they would have lost the election had it not been for cheating and the money that poured in for Dems.

Nevada has a R governor

Arizona is partially controlled by Rs

IDK if North Carolina can gerrymander they have a Dem Governor

The reason Kansas didn't redraw is they have Dem Gov

sorry for all the examples, kind of typed away there

---

I appreciate the details. WI?

---

Both of their chambers are controlled by republicans with a Dem governor. But his term is up this year and the R candidate for governor will likely win, up in all the polls I've seen

🚨 THIS IS INSANE: If the liberal wins in Wisconsin next Tuesday, she will REMOVE 2 GOP Congressional districts.

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CANDIDATE BRAD SCHIMEL: "Little did I know when I got into this race 16 months ago that we were going to be called the most important race in… pic.twitter.com/ppDEIl5pj7

— Pascal Najadi (USSF)🇺🇸 (@JfkPascalNajadX) May 7, 2026

So the Wisconsin court can just change districts without involvement from the state legislature?

will25u said:

---

🚨 THIS IS INSANE: If the liberal wins in Wisconsin next Tuesday, she will REMOVE 2 GOP Congressional districts.

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CANDIDATE BRAD SCHIMEL: "Little did I know when I got into this race 16 months ago that we were going to be called the most important race in… pic.twitter.com/ppDEIl5pj7

— Pascal Najadi (USSF)🇺🇸 (@JfkPascalNajadX) May 7, 2026

---

100% chance the liberal wins.

Anytime there is a Wisconsin SC election the lib wins because it seems they always occur at odd times, and right now the left will turn out in mass to vote because to them, they're voting against Trump.

JDUB08AG said:

---

So the Wisconsin court can just change districts without involvement from the state legislature?

---

Probably will declare the current map "unconstitutional" using some KBJ level reasoning, and then draw a new map themselves.

Wisconsin is still a member of ERIC, last I checked. Meaning their voter rolls are full of phantom voters.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Arizona is partially controlled by Rs

---

No, it is not. It is controlled by the McCain Machine and Runbeck.

---

I have a dream where Runbeck gets raided by the FBI. That might actually give me hope in this countries government again

BusterAg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Arizona is partially controlled by Rs

---

No, it is not. It is controlled by the McCain Machine and Runbeck.

---

I have a dream where Runbeck gets raided by the FBI. That might actually give me hope in this countries government again

---

I just want to see a police blockade around their warehouses where everything in or out is inspected and photos taken. Before and after an election.

I do think the new GJ subpoena(that was inadvertantly not filed under seal)encompasses a lot of people/entities. They could be on the list, it is over 3000 Fulton county employees/temps, etc.

Good ole Abbe Lowell is fighting the subpoena(s).

will25u said:

---

I do think the new GJ subpoena(that was inadvertantly not filed under seal)encompasses a lot of people/entities. They could be on the list, it is over 3000 Fulton county employees/temps, etc.

Good ole Abbe Lowell is fighting the subpoena(s).

---

Runbeck contracted with Fulton County to create and mail out all of their mail in ballots for 2020. They worked very closely with Dominion on the ballot definition files so those ballots could be tabulated by Dominion machines.

When Dominion took over the entire state's voting apparatus there was one thing that they didn't...the voter rolls. The same voter rolls that had been stolen during a municipal election in August of 2019. Obviously, no one frm Fulton County was in Maricopa County overseeing what Runbeck was doing.

I understand that. But I do think outside entities are also in the GJ subpoena as well. I might be mistaken though.

aggiehawg said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Arizona is partially controlled by Rs

---

No, it is not. It is controlled by the McCain Machine and Runbeck.

---

I have a dream where Runbeck gets raided by the FBI. That might actually give me hope in this countries government again

---

I just want to see a police blockade around their warehouses where everything in or out is inspected and photos taken. Before and after an election.

---

I would rather that the FBI just let themselves into their HQ at 9pm on a Friday night and empty the place out.

🚨 The 5th Circuit has vacated a ruling that struck down Louisiana’s state House and Senate maps under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. pic.twitter.com/E99o03zJvb

— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) May 7, 2026

For those confused -- a federal judge struck down Louisiana's state House and Senate maps a few years ago under the VRA and ordered new ones with additional majority-black districts. Louisiana appealed. The 5th Circuit now vacates the federal judge's ruling because of Callais.

— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) May 7, 2026

And the same will continue to play out in other states. Until Callais the federal courts were in the redistricting business under VRA in general, most often Section 2 after Section 5 was struck down.

Callais put the courts out of that business for now.

Gaeilge said:

---

🚨 BREAKING: TENNESSEE HOUSE PASSES 2026 REDISTRICTING — and liberals have thrown the chamber into complete and utter CHAOS

Democrats are going berserk in a frenzy, WALKING OUT and some even being REMOVED by officers! 🤣

9R-0D Congressional map! 🔥

What a glorious sight to… pic.twitter.com/MMMJwnacmq

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 7, 2026

---

I'd love for any lib to show similar behavior from Republicans in all the NE states when they were gerrymandering to ensure ZERO representation for R's despite 30-40% of the constituency.

Typical reaction of Dems/Libs any time they don't get their way.
They act like petulant children pitching fits.

Decorum/rules/laws go out the window.
We see examples of this culture that they have created in different areas of life every day.

Quote:

---

Tennessee State Representative Antonio Parkinson (D-Memphis) is calling on Memphis to secede from the state of Tennessee following a redistricted map that will likely ensure no Democratic representation in the state.
The House and Senate expeditiously passed the bill Thursday that will split Memphis into three separate districts.
"This is no longer simply about maps," said Rep. Parkinson. "This is about whether Memphis a majority-Black economic engine for this state is expected to continue contributing billions in tax revenue, culture, labor, and commerce while being systematically stripped of political power," Parkinson said.

---

Quote:

---

"If this legislature no longer believes the people of Memphis deserve the ability to choose a representative who reflects their community, then at least have the courage to say it plainly," Parkinson said. "Do not hide behind maps and procedure. Let Memphis secede from the State of Tennessee. And I'm dead serious. Let my people go."
Parkinson also called for the City of Memphis to secede from the State of Tennessee back in 2018.

---

LINK