Who you root for means I dont really care what you have to say on a US game thread.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Uh, who I root for has nothing to do with what I said?
The 2nd statement is a fact.
Who you root for means I dont really care what you have to say on a US game thread.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Uh, who I root for has nothing to do with what I said?
Start a thread about Mexican soccer, and go talk to yourself over there…Brian Earl Spilner said:
Uh, who I root for has nothing to do with what I said?
aggiephoenix02 said:Start a thread about Mexican soccer, and go talk to yourself over there…Brian Earl Spilner said:
Uh, who I root for has nothing to do with what I said?
PatAg said:Its not just today, it's every game we play. We've covered it ad-nauseum on this forum, and there are countless articles about it. Feel free to read uptysker said:PatAg said:
Ultimately its a road game and its not a big deal to lose
Realistic takeaway is there can be no real confidence in Gregg to make the right tactical decisions before the game, or to make the right lineup decisions, or deploy the players correctly.
I think he fundamentally approaches the international game incorrectly
What would you have done differently today?
Juan Solo said:
Deux a zero
DeangeloVickers said:
Anyone want to kick my dog?
Aggie basketball and US Soccer weekend
This very post here is antagonizing…Brian Earl Spilner said:aggiephoenix02 said:Start a thread about Mexican soccer, and go talk to yourself over there…Brian Earl Spilner said:
Uh, who I root for has nothing to do with what I said?
You have stars, you can block me if my posting bothers you. I've done zero antagonizing.
PatAg said:
https://twitter.com/johnspacemuller/status/1487898099821514753?s=20&t=7LGrWlNDPrhLrBkdsVBhAg
I wonder if this is what GGG is intending for Pulisic to do, or if he just does what he wants.
I'd be ok with benching a player to get a point across if he is just ignoring strategy
It may be the generic answer, but I feel like its a little of all that. I think we are attempt to play and learn a system, that in theory woudl work, but in practice clearly doesnt with this group of players.fig96 said:
That's kind of my question, what pieces are we missing and are they elsewhere in the pool? Having Reyna out doesn't help either.
I can't tell if we're trying to shoehorn players into a system that doesn't play to their strengths or if the overall quality isn't there.
PatAg said:It may be the generic answer, but I feel like its a little of all that. I think we are attempt to play and learn a system, that in theory woudl work, but in practice clearly doesnt with this group of players.fig96 said:
That's kind of my question, what pieces are we missing and are they elsewhere in the pool? Having Reyna out doesn't help either.
I can't tell if we're trying to shoehorn players into a system that doesn't play to their strengths or if the overall quality isn't there.
Having Reyna would definitely help this team be more dangerous in combination play and through the middle of the field.
Well, we'll have much more favorable officiating, NOT questionable Concacaf refs. That will help tremendously. For example, think about how many ticky tack fouls on Pulasic will be called in the World Cup that aren't called in Concacaf play…Pahdz said:
This is kinda where I've landed, and I think it's pretty accurate.
Personally, I would either insert Reyna centrally for one of the MMA, or you play him as a winger and let him drift centrally whenever he feels it in the game.tysker said:PatAg said:It may be the generic answer, but I feel like its a little of all that. I think we are attempt to play and learn a system, that in theory woudl work, but in practice clearly doesnt with this group of players.fig96 said:
That's kind of my question, what pieces are we missing and are they elsewhere in the pool? Having Reyna out doesn't help either.
I can't tell if we're trying to shoehorn players into a system that doesn't play to their strengths or if the overall quality isn't there.
Having Reyna would definitely help this team be more dangerous in combination play and through the middle of the field.
But where does Reyna play to make an impact? Is he a winger coming inside or do we replace one of the MMA midfield?
Dre_00 said:
It's the system. The talent in the pool has never been greater and that's in both absolute terms and relative to the rest of CONCACAF.
I'm not sure if this is right but I feel that the system isn't great for CONCACF qualifying but can be more useful/better against better teams. Which means that this could reap dividends IF we qualify. I don't know...I could be full of it.
I don't think it's Gregg as much as the officiating…JW said:
Gregg isn't some hidden genius that only reveals itself against better teams. it is what it is.
I agree with this. I feel like there's space to be had there and if I am going to the WC, I want Pulisic, Weah, and Reyna all on the field together.PatAg said:Personally, I would either insert Reyna centrally for one of the MMA, or you play him as a winger and let him drift centrally whenever he feels it in the game.tysker said:PatAg said:It may be the generic answer, but I feel like its a little of all that. I think we are attempt to play and learn a system, that in theory woudl work, but in practice clearly doesnt with this group of players.fig96 said:
That's kind of my question, what pieces are we missing and are they elsewhere in the pool? Having Reyna out doesn't help either.
I can't tell if we're trying to shoehorn players into a system that doesn't play to their strengths or if the overall quality isn't there.
Having Reyna would definitely help this team be more dangerous in combination play and through the middle of the field.
But where does Reyna play to make an impact? Is he a winger coming inside or do we replace one of the MMA midfield?
In theory you could even have him pushed up playing withdrawn under Pepi and let him float around, but that doesnt jive with our current tactics.