***** USMNT vs Canada WCQ Game Thread (1/30) *****

24,754 Views | 481 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by ChipFTAC01
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wangus12 said:

What'd they say. I've got telemundo
We're lacking urgency, too much farting around with the ball when we should be looking for one touch passes towards the goal. The same thing they've been saying the entire qualifying…
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wangus12 said:

What'd they say. I've got telemundo


USA isn't anywhere close to aggressive enough.
You know Canada is going to foul and aggressive and we are going too slow. Then showed highlights of that.
Their goal was really bad defense. We lost 3 balls on goal....Robinson lost on a basic 1-2 and didn't have feet....remember he's not in midseason.
Get Zardes out. Need goal threat
Should be end to end 2nd half
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds spot on to me. Ball needs to be moving faster. Downside is I'm sure its speeding on the turf so tough to control.
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get. AARONSON. off.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeangeloVickers said:

Love the honesty of studio crew

Depressing
They're so much better than Lalas and his crew…
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zardes isn't in the top 5 problems for this game. He's just a lightning rod for critics.

Everybody on the team needs to play more direct towards goal. ATTACK. Force Canada to foul. Canada doesn't want a track meet with us. RUN.

You have to pull Pulisic from set pieces. He had one or two good ones and five absolute stinkers. You can't throw away possession in dangerous spots.

wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is that not a second yellow
Kampfers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeangeloVickers said:

Get. AARONSON. off.


He'll get until 70'. Zardes will go the 90.

Gerg big brain. You small brain.
Pahdz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can we get VAR on 5 for Canada?!
duck79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This buffering is really annoying
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He faked his injury to not get it.
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zardes has been fine, I've actually been pleased with his play so far, sure he's had a couple of bad touches, but it hasn't been bad enough to pull him…
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's some bull**** right there Mr. Ref.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This ref is dog****
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Um you can't shoulder check a guy in soccer ref.

Clear foul and should've been a second yellow.
Pahdz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We've got to attack 5 we can get him sent off
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think anyone this Zardes is the primary issue, but I also think a different type of striker would be more effective the way this match is playing out.

This is where he hopefully now scores and proves me wrong, and I'd be fine with that
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiephoenix02 said:

Zardes has been fine, I've actually been pleased with his play so far, sure he's had a couple of bad touches, but it hasn't been bad enough to pull him…
He's pretty much dead weight for what his position is supposed to do.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need some big switches.

Canada is flooding to ball side. Switch it. Make them run. Get some mismatches.
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On the plus side, all you can ask for out of a ref is consistency and this ref has been consistently *****
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aaronson with a great outlet to David for that counter attack
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How the **** is that a foul on Dest!!!?!
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How did we get whistled for a foul there?

I didn't think Canada did enough for PK, but let's play on.
Pahdz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
birdman said:

We need some big switches.

Canada is flooding to ball side. Switch it. Make them run. Get some mismatches.


We've made a few recently maybe they're realizing that
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some handbags after the shield I guess?
Pahdz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This might be one Dest's best games for us
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I love the work Aaronson is putting in on that far touchline.
Milwaukees Best Light
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gregg is gonna put in Nipple. I just freaking know it.
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That play was summary of our dumb play.

I think it was Robinson carrying the ball in the middle. He had space and no Canadian was near him. He passes to Pulisic on the wing. Pass is unnecessary and terrible also. Pulisic slings an impotent cross in there, easily defended.
Kampfers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
God I love McKennie. Best player right now by far. Really hope Pulisic can find some form before the next set of qualifiers
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He and Aaronson are starting to get into some interesting combination play.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is it we get shafted every game by refs.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Milwaukees Best Light said:

Gregg is gonna put in Nipple. I just freaking know it.

Honestly, bring him on for Pulisic would probably be good in this game
aggiebird02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dang it!
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great attack.

Excellent settle from Aaronson. Shot wasn't ideal, but it was pretty good.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.