***OFFICIAL WORLD SERIES THREAD***

30,955 Views | 318 Replies | Last: 8 yr ago by Pahdz
Lt. Joe Bookman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow. Springer dove for that? Gotta keep that in front.
Ecce Homo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We can't handle the situation
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tough spot right here.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where is the complaining of this ump's strike zone?
Old Army Metal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This guy's strike zone is puzzling.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wait for it...

<crickets>
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ammit
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He may have an early tee time in the morning.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stripling warmed up to sit back down.
moneyag7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not taking either side on the strike zone but wanted to drop this one in here
Vernada
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lt. Joe Bookman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Springer made up for it
Lt. Joe Bookman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Awesome game.
Awesome series.
Fun baseball.
AggieWonWon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow!
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lt. Joe Bookman said:

Awesome game.
Awesome series.
Fun baseball.


No doubt.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was that on purpose?
Post removed:
by user
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Probably should have tagged up there.
agwin12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
moneyag7 said:

Not taking either side on the strike zone but wanted to drop this one in here


How in the world does he make a WS crew?
"A life lived for others is a life worthwhile" - Albert Einstein
Lt. Joe Bookman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow
TitanAGGIE09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Works going to come early tomorrow...
Fur Missile Command
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't care who you are rooting for, this is some of the best baseball played. However, Astros have come out on top of both of the most ridiculously epic games ever played in a World Series. Just saying. GO STROS!!!!
diehard03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

this is some of the best baseball played

Can't follow you here in terms of gameplay but Correa's "coaching" during the walk off run is what baseball should always be. Baseball is better for that existing.
diehard03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agwin12 said:

moneyag7 said:

Not taking either side on the strike zone but wanted to drop this one in here


How in the world does he make a WS crew?


I actually thought it was an exceptionally called game. He was giving a bit off the plate but he was incredibly consistent. The corners were strikes all night for both teams and I was impressed to see it called so consistently.

What a game though. We're at Game 5 and have watched two instant classics. Best WS in years.
diehard03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I actually thought it was an exceptionally called game. He was giving a bit off the plate but he was incredibly consistent. The corners were strikes all night for both teams and I was impressed to see it called so consistently.

What a game though. We're at Game 5 and have watched two instant classics. Best WS in years.

Dude, you're just game drunk because your team won.

Batters from both sides complained. Your own manager was caught on TV saying "I don't know what a strike is" to the bench.

The horrible strikezone was "bailed out" by the pitching staffs ****ting the bed.
Ecce Homo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
diehard03 said:

Quote:

I actually thought it was an exceptionally called game. He was giving a bit off the plate but he was incredibly consistent. The corners were strikes all night for both teams and I was impressed to see it called so consistently.

What a game though. We're at Game 5 and have watched two instant classics. Best WS in years.

Dude, you're just game drunk because your team won.

Batters from both sides complained. Your own manager was caught on TV saying "I don't know what a strike is" to the bench.

The horrible strikezone was "bailed out" by the pitching staffs ****ting the bed.

it was a horrible strike zone, but it was a consistently horrible strike zone. I've never seen one that gave nothing on one end of the plate; gave half a foot on the other end of the plate; and was low in just one section of the plate. However, he kept that strike zone for both sides, it was really odd.
diehard03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

it was a horrible strike zone, but it was a consistently horrible strike zone.

http://www.fangraphs.com/wins.aspx?date=2017-10-29&team=Astros&dh=0&season=2017

on what planet is that strike zone consistent?

edit: I don't care where they put the strike zone at. Literally look at balls and strikes in relation to each other.
Ecce Homo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
diehard03 said:

Quote:

it was a horrible strike zone, but it was a consistently horrible strike zone.

http://www.fangraphs.com/wins.aspx?date=2017-10-29&team=Astros&dh=0&season=2017

on what planet is that strike zone consistent?

edit: I don't care where they put the strike zone at. Literally look at balls and strikes in relation to each other.
that doesn't seem terrible; a lot has to do with the Catcher or the pitcher missing a target big time. McCann had a few instances where he dropped a pitch that would have been definitely called a strike had he held on.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This dude's zone was consistently off on corner pitches for both teams. The bigger issue is an exhausted bullpen (Dodgers) versus a bad bullpen (Astros) with juiced baseballs.

Astros will have won this WS as the better slugging team. MLB got what they wanted a slugfest.
diehard03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

that doesn't seem terrible; a lot has to do with the Catcher or the pitcher missing a target big time. McCann had a few instances where he dropped a pitch that would have been definitely called a strike had he held on.

This doesn't begin to describe the issues at play. You had Kershaw hitting the same spot twice and getting different calls. You have Springer getting 2 different calls for balls at the same height.

It's one thing if you have a zone that's 10 feet wide. It's another if you start randomly calling balls strikes (and vice versa) in the middle of that.
diehard03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

This dude's zone was consistently off on corner pitches for both teams. The bigger issue is an exhausted bullpen (Dodgers) versus a bad bullpen (Astros) with juiced baseballs.

It's a separate issue...and it's effect whitewashes the bad strike zone to some extent. I wouldn't downplay the strike zone though because a bunch of tired guys threw batting practice in a world series game.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaroonStain said:

This dude's zone was consistently off on corner pitches for both teams.
I think the strike zone box Fox puts up is misleading and is causing the umps to look worse. Not that they have been great, but I have see several times where the ball initially shows in the strike zone on the Fox strike zone box, but when they replay it they move the ball to be outside (or vice versa).
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes I think the Foxzone is going off where catcher receives the pitch or close to that point. I do not know how they have marking the pitch programmed unless it is an actual person tracking each pitch.

At least that ump will not be behind the dish again.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.