coastsrs said:
Why did bateman fly between his town and the teacher conference when it was 70 miles away?
That part makes no sense. No one would fly that distance.
Maybe i confused it with the Dayton fam vacation but pretty sure he said he hopped on a flight with 2 other people to go to the teacher conference on censoring books as his alibi.
I actually prefer they not try to do too much explaining of the supernatural. The less we know about the boogeyman the better. He is the embodiment of grief. He is what happens when you let grief consume you. I think the son appearing to Ralph and telling him that he needs to let him go is a bit of foreshadowing on how they will defeat the boogeyman, something to do with letting go of their grief.BenFiasco14 said:
I'm absolutely engrossed in this show. Can't believe people didn't get interest. I'm a huge horror fan tho especially of stuff like this. This is good stuff. Haven't read the book. Can't wait to see where this goes. Heavy foreshadowing about the structures and whatnot, like that's where this thing lives or teleports between somehow.
Really interested to see how they can tie the supernatural part into real life, I.e., explaining what really happened without saying oh it was the boogeyman
Dr. Not Yet Dr. Ag said:I actually prefer they not try to do too much explaining of the supernatural. The less we know about the boogeyman the better. He is the embodiment of grief. He is what happens when you let grief consume you. I think the son appearing to Ralph and telling him that he needs to let him go is a bit of foreshadowing on how they will defeat the boogeyman, something to do with letting go of their grief.BenFiasco14 said:
I'm absolutely engrossed in this show. Can't believe people didn't get interest. I'm a huge horror fan tho especially of stuff like this. This is good stuff. Haven't read the book. Can't wait to see where this goes. Heavy foreshadowing about the structures and whatnot, like that's where this thing lives or teleports between somehow.
Really interested to see how they can tie the supernatural part into real life, I.e., explaining what really happened without saying oh it was the boogeyman
BenFiasco14 said:
They were very similar pictures yes.
Proposition Joe said:BenFiasco14 said:
They were very similar pictures yes.
So he knows there's still something out there that killed the boy (and the others), knows its weird, knows his wife had something weird happen at work, knows it supposedly told the little girl to warn him, and then his wife draws the same exact unique looking weird figure as the boy.... and he's still telling her she dreamed it?
Not really a crackerjack detective there.
BenFiasco14 said:Proposition Joe said:BenFiasco14 said:
They were very similar pictures yes.
So he knows there's still something out there that killed the boy (and the others), knows its weird, knows his wife had something weird happen at work, knows it supposedly told the little girl to warn him, and then his wife draws the same exact unique looking weird figure as the boy.... and he's still telling her she dreamed it?
Not really a crackerjack detective there.
Not defending the shows logic, but before she drew the picture and handed it to him and then leaving the car, they had the conversation about her "dream" on their back patio and his rationalization for it was that the little girl put it into her head and it scared her, hence why she had a nightmare about it so similar to the girls story.
I thought they did a good job in this scene of showing how engrossed he was in the investigation. He was reading something the PI sent him and didn't even look up to see his wife. You could tell he was a million miles away, deep in thought.Proposition Joe said:BenFiasco14 said:
They were very similar pictures yes.
So he knows there's still something out there that killed the boy (and the others), knows its weird, knows his wife had something weird happen at work, knows it supposedly told the little girl to warn him, and then his wife draws the same exact unique looking weird figure as the boy.... and he's still telling her she dreamed it?
Not really a crackerjack detective there.
WES2006AG said:I thought they did a good job in this scene of showing how engrossed he was in the investigation. He was reading something the PI sent him and didn't even look up to see his wife. You could tell he was a million miles away, deep in thought.Proposition Joe said:BenFiasco14 said:
They were very similar pictures yes.
So he knows there's still something out there that killed the boy (and the others), knows its weird, knows his wife had something weird happen at work, knows it supposedly told the little girl to warn him, and then his wife draws the same exact unique looking weird figure as the boy.... and he's still telling her she dreamed it?
Not really a crackerjack detective there.
TexasAggie008 said:
some people prefer the Ozark / Stranger Things method (non-stop can't turn it off-action)
both ok shows, don't get me wrong....but this isn't meant to be the same mass-appeal product imo
liking it a lot so far
I don't mean "action" like explosions or gunfights or anything like that, but rather more "things" happening.TexasAggie008 said:
some people prefer the Ozark / Stranger Things method (non-stop can't turn it off-action)
both ok shows, don't get me wrong....but this isn't meant to be the same mass-appeal product imo
liking it a lot so far
TCTTS said:
Man, I'm the complete opposite on some of these points. It seems totally believable to me that Ralph (or anyone, really) still wouldn't have jumped to a "Welp, I guess the Boogieman is real" conclusion yet.
TCTTS said:
You've been complaining about this show every week since like episode two. Clearly, it's not your thing. At this point, why are you still watching?
This is kind of a weak move. You can also ignore him if he's annoying to you, but at least his points are rational and reasoned.TCTTS said:
No one said critical commentary isn't allowed. There's been plenty of that in this thread from myself and just about everyone else. All I'm saying is you've consistently complained about this show every single week. So I was curious as to why someone who clearly doesn't like something A) continues to watch it, and B) continues to complain about it. I've just never understood that kind of behavior on this board. After a couple episodes, sure, I get it. But after five episodes it's a little odd, that's all.
