Entertainment
Sponsored by

What is Chris Pine Thinking? The Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves Thread

31,363 Views | 269 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by The Collective
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Move to rename this thread, "Chris Pine was Right."
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
movie was absolutely amazing

the extended wild shape scene got me pretty good

And I definitely liked using wild shape to defeat the strength check associated with getting out of the gelatinous cube
Sea Pony 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I finally saw it too. Definitely one I would see again.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great reviews and performed better than expected at the box office, but with a $150 million budget (plus marketing) it's likely going to be considered a flop.

https://boundingintocomics.com/2023/04/03/dungeons-dragons-honor-among-thieves-predicted-to-be-a-flop-despite-better-opening-weekend-box-office-haul-than-originally-predicted/

Hopefully it cleans up in VOD and has strong legs.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
edge of tomorrow vibes

going to be played on cable TV for ever
Aggie_Journalist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a competitive spot to drop a movie though

D&D
Tetris
Air
& Mario

All in the span of a week??

I'm surprised these weren't spaced out more. D&D would have raked in far more money if it were given more room to breath.
Thanks and gig'em
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What's the rule of thumb these days? Box office needs to be double the budget to be worthwhile?
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Freaking amazing.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:



Freaking amazing.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's so good
Post removed:
by user
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

AliasMan02 said:

What's the rule of thumb these days? Box office needs to be double the budget to be worthwhile?


2.5x-3x depending on many things.

this will fall $200MM short in the end.

even a roll of "20"can not save it at this point.
I haven't seen it yet so feel free to ignore my nerdy and ignorant opinion but I think this will get wheels on streaming with the reddit nerd crowd.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is more at stake for Hasbro here than box office, obviously. They're not out to lose money or anything but heightening brand awareness and bringing D&D more into the mainstream is super critical.

This is a weird time for Hasbro/Wizards of the Coast. D&D is bigger than it has ever been, but the company is also under crazy levels of scrutiny by a cabal of superfans and influencers. This group, with crazy vocal and unified online support, completely upended the company's plans for modernizing their licensing in January. So much so that big chunks of their property was put into Creative Commons (kinda symbolic more than impactful, but still...). They have really changed a lot of the basic language and tenets of the game, and the whole genre. The new edition of the books won't refer to "races" anymore, and there will be no half-elves or half-orcs because the term "half" is too problematic in relation to identity. They're very influential.

To help smoothe things over with that community, this week they hosted a Creators Summit and invited top freelancers, streamers, etc. to talk through some issues and get a peek at some new stuff. The whole thing got derailed with issues important to these creators, who were way more interested in talking about representation and social issues than seeing the new technology or products.

These creators and influencers really helped to mainstream D&D with things like Actual Play series, and many write a lot of the company's content. But they also oppose things like modernization and monetization of the game experience. It's easy to read between the lines and realize while the people making D&D are very much of the ilk of these influencers, the corporate types hate them and the influence they have.

From my pov, if Hasbro can pull D&D fully into the mainstream and hook a broader and younger audience, they won't have to care what the current gatekeepers think or say. I have to think that's a huge part of getting the movie made and having it be successful as a franchise.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was a little taken aback that the flick was green lit at that number. That's $50 million more than John Wick 4.


Still I love the genre, and this was as well reviewed and received by those that saw it as the studio could have hoped for, so hopefully it does well enough to encourage following projects.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AliasMan02 said:

There is more at stake for Hasbro here than box office, obviously. They're not out to lose money or anything but heightening brand awareness and bringing D&D more into the mainstream is super critical.

This is a weird time for Hasbro/Wizards of the Coast. D&D is bigger than it has ever been, but the company is also under crazy levels of scrutiny by a cabal of superfans and influencers. This group, with crazy vocal and unified online support, completely upended the company's plans for modernizing their licensing in January. So much so that big chunks of their property was put into Creative Commons (kinda symbolic more than impactful, but still...). They have really changed a lot of the basic language and tenets of the game, and the whole genre. The new edition of the books won't refer to "races" anymore, and there will be no half-elves or half-orcs because the term "half" is too problematic in relation to identity. They're very influential.

To help smoothe things over with that community, this week they hosted a Creators Summit and invited top freelancers, streamers, etc. to talk through some issues and get a peek at some new stuff. The whole thing got derailed with issues important to these creators, who were way more interested in talking about representation and social issues than seeing the new technology or products.

These creators and influencers really helped to mainstream D&D with things like Actual Play series, and many write a lot of the company's content. But they also oppose things like modernization and monetization of the game experience. It's easy to read between the lines and realize while the people making D&D are very much of the ilk of these influencers, the corporate types hate them and the influence they have.

From my pov, if Hasbro can pull D&D fully into the mainstream and hook a broader and younger audience, they won't have to care what the current gatekeepers think or say. I have to think that's a huge part of getting the movie made and having it be successful as a franchise.
I had no idea thanks for the summary. No half-orc or half-elf geez leave your wokeness out of my silly fantasy games! (not you specifically just in general)
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To be fair, they'll be available but just not in the PHB.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AliasMan02 said:

To be fair, they'll be available but just not in the PHB.
So, what is in the handbook? Human, dwarf, elf, orc, gnome, furries, etc?
91_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KidDoc said:

AliasMan02 said:

There is more at stake for Hasbro here than box office, obviously. They're not out to lose money or anything but heightening brand awareness and bringing D&D more into the mainstream is super critical.

This is a weird time for Hasbro/Wizards of the Coast. D&D is bigger than it has ever been, but the company is also under crazy levels of scrutiny by a cabal of superfans and influencers. This group, with crazy vocal and unified online support, completely upended the company's plans for modernizing their licensing in January. So much so that big chunks of their property was put into Creative Commons (kinda symbolic more than impactful, but still...). They have really changed a lot of the basic language and tenets of the game, and the whole genre. The new edition of the books won't refer to "races" anymore, and there will be no half-elves or half-orcs because the term "half" is too problematic in relation to identity. They're very influential.

To help smoothe things over with that community, this week they hosted a Creators Summit and invited top freelancers, streamers, etc. to talk through some issues and get a peek at some new stuff. The whole thing got derailed with issues important to these creators, who were way more interested in talking about representation and social issues than seeing the new technology or products.

These creators and influencers really helped to mainstream D&D with things like Actual Play series, and many write a lot of the company's content. But they also oppose things like modernization and monetization of the game experience. It's easy to read between the lines and realize while the people making D&D are very much of the ilk of these influencers, the corporate types hate them and the influence they have.

From my pov, if Hasbro can pull D&D fully into the mainstream and hook a broader and younger audience, they won't have to care what the current gatekeepers think or say. I have to think that's a huge part of getting the movie made and having it be successful as a franchise.
I had no idea thanks for the summary. No half-orc or half-elf geez leave your wokeness out of my silly fantasy games! (not you specifically just in general)


Other recent woke changes include retconning gypsy references, culture, accents out of the Ravenloft setting
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

AliasMan02 said:

To be fair, they'll be available but just not in the PHB.
So, what is in the handbook? Human, dwarf, elf, orc, gnome, furries, etc?


Ha. Shocking furry-free.

Human
Dwarf
Dragonborn
Halfling
Elf
Gnome
Goliath* new
Orc
Tiefling
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
you can pry my half-elf bard from my cold dead hands
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Races/species also don't give you inherent stat bonuses anymore. You just get a +2 and +1 to put wherever you want.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this game sucks

Next thing you'll tell me is that anyone can have dark vision or fey ancestry
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No reason to ever play a non human character, again
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cone said:

this game sucks

Next thing you'll tell me is that anyone can have dark vision or fey ancestry

I'd have to look it up but now if you have ancestry you can select such things as Fey Ancestry... so like if you're a human but your grandfather was an Elf you can select it in lieu of some Human trait.

And all creatures of the Goblin type have Fey Ancestry now.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
you're really selling me on 6th edition

lol nope
maverick2076
How long do you want to ignore this user?
5e has evolved into this generic, everyone is the same, no one is evil, everyone can be anything mess. The gaming license business was the last straw. We left and went to Pathfinder 2e. Better character creation, more meaningful choices, better combat. It's a better game in pretty much every way.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
5e is fine

the DM runs the game not Jeremy Crawford
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
maverick2076 said:

5e has evolved into this generic, everyone is the same, no one is evil, everyone can be anything mess. The gaming license business was the last straw. We left and went to Pathfinder 2e. Better character creation, more meaningful choices, better combat. It's a better game in pretty much every way.


We'll see if Wizards invests like they should in VTT they'll maintain, but I'm not sure they will. All this noise and distraction is keeping them from advancing where they should. Or so it seems. Maybe they're working it behind the scenes. But it's something I don't see Paizo ever leaning into.

Wizards should be fully digitalizing everything and training its AI. A fully realized 3D VTT that creates context-driven tokens, intelligent random maps, and designs encounters should be just a few years away.

I swear I'm close to just hiring devs and doing it myself.
maverick2076
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At that point, it's just another video game. I really don't think that's what the community wants.

Paizo is pretty well integrated with Foundry on the VTT front. And I don't think a company that happily gives away all of its ruleset through places like Archives of Nethys is concerned with monetization and micro transactions like WotC is.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does wizards still try to do video games? They had the mmo, is it still up?

Paizo has 2 pretty successful games in Kingmaker and Wrath of the Righteous.
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I grew up on AD&,D 3rd edition with pool of radiance and icewind Dale and such but switched to GURPS way back in 1989 or so which was a much better ruleset overall. Not sure where GURPS by Steve Jackson is these days.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AliasMan02 said:

cone said:

this game sucks

Next thing you'll tell me is that anyone can have dark vision or fey ancestry

I'd have to look it up but now if you have ancestry you can select such things as Fey Ancestry... so like if you're a human but your grandfather was an Elf you can select it in lieu of some Human trait. . .
It seems like you should be able to select Fay Fey Ancestry in that instance.
AGinHI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KidDoc said:

I grew up on AD&,D 3rd edition with pool of radiance and icewind Dale and such but switched to GURPS way back in 1989 or so which was a much better ruleset overall. Not sure where GURPS by Steve Jackson is these days.
AD&D 1st edition for me.

I was young when I learned to play at an after school club my parents sent me to with my older brother to get us out of the house. I was hooked the first day listening to these older kids imagining the most absurd and funny situations.

The resurgence and popularity amazes me and makes me somewhat jealous, because back in the day you'd get made fun of if other kids knew you played.

At least in my case since I spent most of my time in sports and around the "jock" crowd.
“We don't have a government of the people, by the people, for the people. We have government of the people, by the bureaucrats, for the bureaucrats.”

-Milton Friedman
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I never even heard of Dungeons & Dragons until the summer after my fish year at A&M. My roommate started playing Baldur's Gate on his pc.
91_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGinHI said:

KidDoc said:

I grew up on AD&,D 3rd edition with pool of radiance and icewind Dale and such but switched to GURPS way back in 1989 or so which was a much better ruleset overall. Not sure where GURPS by Steve Jackson is these days.
AD&D 1st edition for me.

I was young when I learned to play at an after school club my parents sent me to with my older brother to get us out of the house. I was hooked the first day listening to these older kids imagining the most absurd and funny situations.

The resurgence and popularity amazes me and makes me somewhat jealous, because back in the day you'd get made fun of if other kids knew you played.

At least in my case since I spent most of my time in sports and around the "jock" crowd.


I got the Red Box back in about 1980. Then moved up to Advanced. Then 2nd edition.

Someone told my southern Baptist mom about how evil it was and made me throw everything away...spoiler I hid it in the attic.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.