*****The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power*****

147,194 Views | 1847 Replies | Last: 21 days ago by maroon man
Madmarttigan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That seems like a really ugly stat but it might be a stat that is much lower than you think for other shows. Wonder what it is for some successful shows.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's funny how much I simultaneously enjoyed and was underwhelmed by this show. I had kind of forgotten about it, too.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madmarttigan said:

That seems like a really ugly stat but it might be a stat that is much lower than you think for other shows. Wonder what it is for some successful shows.
(A 50 percent completion rate would be a solid but not spectacular result, according to insiders).
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An L of an Ag said:

The Porkchop Express said:

I've never read anything outside of LOTR and The Hobbit, so I don't have a dog in that fight.


You really should read The Silmarllion. Great stories and characters in their own right, besides being the setup for the Third Age winding down with LOTR.
Just dont make the mistake most people do, and treat it like an actual finished product by Tolkien.
The core of each story is great though.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Honestly the lack of talent and vision behind this lost opportunity is just utterly mind boggling. Its no surprise not many finished it. I had to force myself to sit through it and i grew up on tolkien and love it.

So thankful for peter jackson and cast.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

Honestly the lack of talent and vision behind this lost opportunity is just utterly mind boggling. Its no surprise not many finished it. I had to force myself to sit through it and i grew up on tolkien and love it.

So thankful for peter jackson and cast.
For the LotR version of Jackson, atleast.
I can forgive him of anything for delivering tha trilogy to us.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

Madmarttigan said:

That seems like a really ugly stat but it might be a stat that is much lower than you think for other shows. Wonder what it is for some successful shows.
(A 50 percent completion rate would be a solid but not spectacular result, according to insiders).
What's the source on that 50% stat, just curious.
Life is better with a beagle
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

Honestly the lack of talent and vision behind this lost opportunity is just utterly mind boggling. Its no surprise not many finished it. I had to force myself to sit through it and i grew up on tolkien and love it.

So thankful for peter jackson and cast.
CBR struggling on that last Friday.

Life is better with a beagle
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madmarttigan said:

That seems like a really ugly stat but it might be a stat that is much lower than you think for other shows. Wonder what it is for some successful shows.


https://www.whats-on-netflix.com/news/are-completion-rates-key-to-netflix-cancelations/

The crux of that analysis is basically that anything below 50% is a death sentence at Netflix. 37% is... Very bad.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Porkchop Express said:

C@LAg said:

Madmarttigan said:

That seems like a really ugly stat but it might be a stat that is much lower than you think for other shows. Wonder what it is for some successful shows.
(A 50 percent completion rate would be a solid but not spectacular result, according to insiders).
What's the source on that 50% stat, just curious.
the posted article where the 37% number came from
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm just one of those happy to have more LOTR content.

Yeah there was some spectacularly dumb moments like attempting to swim across the planet, pretty much the entire hobbit storyline, etc. But all in all I thought the story was decent, scenery and background was amazing to look at. The Dwarf cities, Numenor, Sauron's ice castles, etc.

Galadriel was also super hot, cbr complaining 500 times she was ugly and should have been the hottest female in a trillion years notwithstanding.



TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From the latest Puck newsletter...

Quote:

It's hard to talk about completion rates without good comparisons or a benchmark for success. Netflix's Resident Evil had a 45 percent completion rate and was canceled after one season, for example, while the animated series Arcane, with a completion rate of 60 percent, was renewed. Of course, those are Netflix series, not a billion-dollar franchise play.

Other contextual factors are missing, too. How much did Rings of Powerdrive audiences to Prime Video versus other series? How much did it increase customer acquisition overseas, especially in emerging territories where the Prime e-commerce business isn't as established? Are the new subscribers highly engaged with the service, or more likely to churn? Did people who watched Rings of Power go on to buy something on Prime?

Completion rates are important markers of engagement, of course, and especially valuable for advertisers. If you purchase a pre-roll ad on the sixth episode of a series and 63 percent of the initial audience doesn't get that far, the impact is far lower. Not great! But as someone who spends every day in the data mines, I can say with authority that we don't have enough information to declare Rings a flop. (The streamers have no reason to release better data, so why should they?) Yes, the headline number doesn't look good for Amazon, but it's actually a perfect example of why the economics of streaming are so complicated.

Basically the same sentiment...

wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm in the same camp. Absolutely enjoyed having more LOTR content and it was nowhere as bad as people made it out to be
ja86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I do not consider the show LOTR content. It is names and places taken from Tolkien's legendarium and used in a generic fantasy story. In that context I found entertaining. If I view it in context of Tolkien's works, I would pull what is left of my hair out.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Frumpy women need love too…. god bless you!
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wangus12 said:

I'm in the same camp. Absolutely enjoyed having more LOTR content and it was nowhere as bad as people made it out to be


Agreed. I'm not a hard core Tolkien guy but I enjoy the story. Thought the show was good, and entertaining. I see this first season as setting all the pieces for everything to come.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CondensedFogAggie said:


I'm just one of those happy to have more LOTR content.

Yeah there was some spectacularly dumb moments like attempting to swim across the planet, pretty much the entire hobbit storyline, etc. But all in all I thought the story was decent, scenery and background was amazing to look at. The Dwarf cities, Numenor, Sauron's ice castles, etc.

Galadriel was also super hot, cbr complaining 500 times she was ugly and should have been the hottest female in a trillion years notwithstanding.






Honestly, it wasn't that great. I didn't think there was anything particularly visually spectacular throughout the season. The costumes aside from some of the main characters looked like bed sheets on LARPers. Numenor's sets looked cheap and lacked texture, for lack of a better word. Everything looked like painted foam or wood. Watching it, I could not understand where $60 million an episode went.

ETA And that's Amazon's problem: They're spending vast sums of money on RoP, so it can't just be decent. It has to be INCREDIBLE. As a streaming show, its purpose is to attract and retain viewers, and there's no way it's doing that if only 37% of viewers finish it. By contrast, Squid game had an 87% completion rate and Stranger Things season 4 was at 70% 28 days after its release. Amazon needs to be adding insane subscriber numbers and retail engagement to justify the budget, but I'm just not sold on that because they actually LOST US subscribers last year.

https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-shopping-prime-membership-us-stopped-growing-first-time-ever-2023-1
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was bad.

Didn't we exhaust all these arguments, already? Is TexAgs just that obsessed with insulting fellow posters for their opinions?

It really is funny to see all the same posters on this board who ALWAYS make posts directed at other posters to try and belittle or personally attack them for their opinions, instead of just focusing on the material and arguments made. The posters attacked then respond in kind and we get several pages of personal fights and attacks.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At some point you would think the thread would just be people who enjoyed it, like talking about it, and are looking forward to the next season. But, sometimes I forget, this is the Internet.
Life is better with a beagle
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

At some point you would think the thread would just be people who enjoyed it, like talking about it, and are looking forward to the next season. But, sometimes I forget, this is the Internet.
Yeah, don't you dare go around having fun and liking things. You need to be miserable
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Yeah it wasn't amazing, but it was their first season, I'm willing to cut them some slack. Maybe not create a dumb trailer everyone hates, for starters.

At least Amazon didn't completely butcher the entire thing beyond all recognition like Wheel of Time. ROP was damn Shakespearean compared to that mess.

Hope ROP gets better, which will lead to more LOTR content down the line.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasTeleAg said:

It was bad.

Didn't we exhaust all these arguments, already? Is TexAgs just that obsessed with insulting fellow posters for their opinions?

It really is funny to see all the same posters on this board who ALWAYS make posts directed at other posters to try and belittle or personally attack them for their opinions, instead of just focusing on the material and arguments made. The posters attacked then respond in kind and we get several pages of personal fights and attacks.


Are you for real with this? I can't count the number of times you've personally attacked me on this board or mocked people for liking this show. Just the other day, in fact, in a completely separate thread, I saw you give a laugh-cry face to someone for admitting they liked this show. Your never-ending cynicism, and your calling out of the exact things you yourself constantly engage in, never ceases to amaze me.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

At some point you would think the thread would just be people who enjoyed it, like talking about it, and are looking forward to the next season. But, sometimes I forget, this is the Internet.


Ha, even I enjoyed this show and think the criticism is over-the-top.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

At some point you would think the thread would just be people who enjoyed it, like talking about it, and are looking forward to the next season. But, sometimes I forget, this is the Internet.


So the only acceptable discussion is nut fluffing?

Amazon spent north of $750+ million on RoP ($1.5 million/minute of content) and intended it to be a flagship, brand defining series. Sorry that news that it had a terrible completion rate hurts, but it is what it is and is worthy of discussion considering the cost and implications. That kind of audience retention is typical of shows about to be cancelled because they're losing 10%-15% of their audience every week, especially when they cost as much as RoP.

To put it into perspective, Netflix has multiple shows that have broken the 1 billion hour streaming mark. That's 60 billion minutes. RoP only racked up a reported 24 billion minutes. That's normally really good, but it's not even close to $750 million good. To put it into perspective, season 2 of Bridgerton had over 37.5 billion minutes viewed on a roughly $100 million budget.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not upset by statistics. Nothing said in that story or any other story diminishes the enjoyment level I took watching the show, which was substantial.

Life is better with a beagle
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:




Amazon spent north of $750+ million on RoP ($1.5 million/minute of content) and intended it to be a flagship, brand defining series. Sorry that news that it had a terrible completion rate hurts, but it is what it is and is worthy of discussion considering the cost and implications. That kind of audience retention is typical of shows about to be cancelled because they're losing 10%-15% of their audience every week, especially when they cost as much as RoP.


I mean, it's their money, not mine. They still made a fun, enjoyable show to me personally.

And I thought all the sets, costumes, backgrounds, computer visuals were pretty spectacular. Had tons of fun watching LOTR come back to life again. Again minus the hobbits. I'm sure the first season is particularly expensive as the build the sets.

Granted, I was just hoping it wouldn't be a disaster after watching the trailer.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CondensedFogAggie said:

ABATTBQ11 said:




Amazon spent north of $750+ million on RoP ($1.5 million/minute of content) and intended it to be a flagship, brand defining series. Sorry that news that it had a terrible completion rate hurts, but it is what it is and is worthy of discussion considering the cost and implications. That kind of audience retention is typical of shows about to be cancelled because they're losing 10%-15% of their audience every week, especially when they cost as much as RoP.


I mean, it's their money, not mine. They still made a fun, enjoyable show to me personally.

And I thought all the sets, costumes, backgrounds, computer visuals were pretty spectacular. Had tons of fun watching LOTR come back to life again. Again minus the hobbits. I'm sure the first season is particularly expensive as the build the sets.

Granted, I was just hoping it wouldn't be a disaster after watching the trailer.

This is basically exactly where I'm at. I thought the trailers were terrible, and I came in almost wanting to dislike the show, so maybe I was pleasantly surprised because of that. I also usually can't stand prequels, but ended up really enjoying the way they laid the groundwork here. The show wasn't perfect by any means, and there were definitely a number of issues, but overall the hate feels way overblown.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CondensedFogAggie said:

ABATTBQ11 said:




Amazon spent north of $750+ million on RoP ($1.5 million/minute of content) and intended it to be a flagship, brand defining series. Sorry that news that it had a terrible completion rate hurts, but it is what it is and is worthy of discussion considering the cost and implications. That kind of audience retention is typical of shows about to be cancelled because they're losing 10%-15% of their audience every week, especially when they cost as much as RoP.


I mean, it's their money, not mine. They still made a fun, enjoyable show to me personally.

And I thought all the sets, costumes, backgrounds, computer visuals were pretty spectacular. Had tons of fun watching LOTR come back to life again. Again minus the hobbits. I'm sure the first season is particularly expensive as the build the sets.

Granted, I was just hoping it wouldn't be a disaster after watching the trailer.


And that's all fine, but there's apparently a lot of butthurt that other people thought differently and dared mention it. The only reason it's getting mentioned again is the horrible metrics which would have precluded a renewal anywhere else. Considering the budget (which is supposed to be the same or more for season 2 and represents 5% of Amazon's video AND music expenses) and the viewership, I would be a little shocked at this point of there was a season 3. Yes, season 2 has not come out yet, but if less than 40% of viewers bothered to finish season 1, I can't imagine season 2 will outperform it and justify the astronomical price tag.
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

CondensedFogAggie said:

ABATTBQ11 said:




Amazon spent north of $750+ million on RoP ($1.5 million/minute of content) and intended it to be a flagship, brand defining series. Sorry that news that it had a terrible completion rate hurts, but it is what it is and is worthy of discussion considering the cost and implications. That kind of audience retention is typical of shows about to be cancelled because they're losing 10%-15% of their audience every week, especially when they cost as much as RoP.


I mean, it's their money, not mine. They still made a fun, enjoyable show to me personally.

And I thought all the sets, costumes, backgrounds, computer visuals were pretty spectacular. Had tons of fun watching LOTR come back to life again. Again minus the hobbits. I'm sure the first season is particularly expensive as the build the sets.

Granted, I was just hoping it wouldn't be a disaster after watching the trailer.


And that's all fine, but there's apparently a lot of butthurt that other people thought differently and dared mention it. The only reason it's getting mentioned again is the horrible metrics which would have precluded a renewal anywhere else. Considering the budget (which is supposed to be the same or more for season 2 and represents 5% of Amazon's video AND music expenses) and the viewership, I would be a little shocked at this point of there was a season 3. Yes, season 2 has not come out yet, but if less than 40% of viewers bothered to finish season 1, I can't imagine season 2 will outperform it and justify the astronomical price tag.


Which is yes a valid point, I wouldn't want the results of the first season discourage execs and stop new lotr content for another 15 years

But then again this is Amazon, lotr is the one only card they have in the stream wars
AgE2theBONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just recently finished a rewatch.

I enjoyed watching as it originally aired. I thoroughly enjoyed it the second time through. Halbrand comes across totally differently once you already know who he is.

And there was lots of cool little stuff I missed the first time. For example, I'd only recently read/heard that Annatar meant Lord of Gifts. When Celebrimbor thanked him for suggesting an alloy to amplify the mithril, Halbrand said, "Call it.... a gift."

I wonder how many little references like that I missed simply for lack of familiarity with all the history/lore that the hardcore Tolkien fans know inside/out. I'm doing my best to educate myself with Nerd of the Rings on YouTube.

I had no problem at all with the Harfoots, who many seemed to loathe. I really enjoyed Nori's interaction with Gandalf/Blue Wizard/who knows? A million people have guaranteed he's Gandalf, especially after the follow your nose comment, but I'm prepared to eat crow if my Blue Wizard prediction proves incorrect.

Some of the actors were just fantastic. The guy playing Elendil, Adar, Elrond, The dwarf king and his son, both, and Halbrand. All great portrayals. I understand why Tolkien fans might not have cared for Galadriel the Warrior but I loved her, as well. And hot DAMN was she a smoke show.

Blowing the dam to channel the water into Mount Doom to ignite an explosion: frikkin awesome.

"I told you I took it off a dead man." (Translation: I just acknowledged I'm at least 1000 years old)

followed by

"I've been awake since before the breaking of the first silence." Outstanding reveal, genuinely unnerving.

So yeah, I liked it. A lot. Wish it weren't so polarizing.
AgE2theBONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only complaint that I've really agreed with concerned the inconsistency with the Harfoots and their tight-knit, "nobody walks alone," we're one big loving family vibe, contrasted with, "Oh, you broke your foot? We're leaving you to die" or "Nori brought The Stranger around, let's take the wheels off their cart and banish them to death."

Poor writing, there.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CondensedFogAggie said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

CondensedFogAggie said:

ABATTBQ11 said:




Amazon spent north of $750+ million on RoP ($1.5 million/minute of content) and intended it to be a flagship, brand defining series. Sorry that news that it had a terrible completion rate hurts, but it is what it is and is worthy of discussion considering the cost and implications. That kind of audience retention is typical of shows about to be cancelled because they're losing 10%-15% of their audience every week, especially when they cost as much as RoP.


I mean, it's their money, not mine. They still made a fun, enjoyable show to me personally.

And I thought all the sets, costumes, backgrounds, computer visuals were pretty spectacular. Had tons of fun watching LOTR come back to life again. Again minus the hobbits. I'm sure the first season is particularly expensive as the build the sets.

Granted, I was just hoping it wouldn't be a disaster after watching the trailer.


And that's all fine, but there's apparently a lot of butthurt that other people thought differently and dared mention it. The only reason it's getting mentioned again is the horrible metrics which would have precluded a renewal anywhere else. Considering the budget (which is supposed to be the same or more for season 2 and represents 5% of Amazon's video AND music expenses) and the viewership, I would be a little shocked at this point of there was a season 3. Yes, season 2 has not come out yet, but if less than 40% of viewers bothered to finish season 1, I can't imagine season 2 will outperform it and justify the astronomical price tag.


Which is yes a valid point, I wouldn't want the results of the first season discourage execs and stop new lotr content for another 15 years

But then again this is Amazon, lotr is the one only card they have in the stream wars


It's kind of a half card. They don't own the rights to a lot of Tolkien's works.

It's not exactly a question of discouraging execs, it's a question of how long can they sink this budget into it based on the audience and ROI. IMO, this whole thing was a terrible idea and shows that Amazon's media arm is kind of out of touch.

For one, anything in streaming with a massive budget is probably a bad idea. It puts a lot of eggs into one basket with negligible potential upside. RoP has, AFAIK, the largest budget of any streaming show or movie ever. In terms of cost per minute of content, it's kind of staggering. In terms of its percentage of Amazon's overall budget, it's immense. That's a huge risk that requires a huge increase in subscriptions to pay off, which is a big gamble for any streamer because the entire industry is kind of out of its growth phase and leveling off. I've laid out the reasoning before, but suffice it here to say I don't believe big budget films have the impact on catalogue and subscribers to justify production by streamers unless they have a wide theatrical release to help pay for themselves through ticket sales.

For two, they made a big deal about essentially refreshing Tolkien's work with a more diverse casting and making it more modern. Whether you agree with that or not, it's obviously a polarizing decision that is going to split your potential audience. If your ultimate goal is adding subscriptions, you need mass appeal to capture new audiences. Making the show polarizing before it's even aired is the exact opposite of that. There's no way that kind of announcement and artistic direction is going to draw more viewers than it alienates, especially when it comes to new subscribers.

For three, the sci-fi/fantasy genre is currently saturated between streamers. I'm sure Amazon thought this would be different because LotR and Tolkien effectively created the mass marketability of the genre, but that also means there is going to be a much higher bar and more purists to appease. Again, this goes against points 1 & 2 based on the direction they took. It would have been better to not **** up WoT, find an IP in a different genre, or create something original.


If it were me making the decision, I'd have scaled things back considerably and played it more conservatively. Apple, Disney, Netflix, and HBO have all hit home runs with much lower budget, original series. If it works, scale up. If it doesn't, losses are minimized. The way the metrics look, RoP is like a movie with a blockbuster budget that will barely recoup its production cost, and they're already making the sequel.


ETA TLDR this is a business decision eventually. A lot of people may like the series, but it has to be enough to justify the budget. A lot of people like Shadow and Bone on Netflix and it was the #1 show for a bit, but even it's facing the axe because it isn't popular enough to justify it's production budget.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I liked the show way more than I liked the Hobbit trilogy. New people, new places, a multi-sided conflict with lots of interesting characters to root for / against. The real problem is the longer in the tooth stuff that you're creating new versions of, the more hate you're going to get from it - Tolkien, Star Wars, etc. They've got 45-80 years of fandom, and people get set in their ways about how things "should be" even though most of our entertainment overall is just reimaginings of classic stories.

Life is better with a beagle
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One thing I wondered in regards to the streaming numbers and people finishing...

Are people more likely to finish a series of it's all dumped at once to binge? I bet this show would have been more successful as a binge.
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CondensedFogAggie said:




But then again this is Amazon, lotr is the one only card they have in the stream wars
I think you're forgetting a little something called "Wheel of Time".


Which is fair, because so did the audience.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.