Aggrad08 said:The Banned said:
Premise 1: God created humans to live eternally with Him
Premise 2: Some humans will choose not to live eternally with Him
Premise 3: Humans do not lose the eternal quality He created.
Conclusion: Humans will live eternally, but some % will live apart from Him. That existence is called Hell
"Punishment" or "torment" in this scenario can just mean loss of the good that they were supposed to receive had they chosen to receive it. I don't think people in Hell will necessarily believe they made a mistake or have "emotional regret". They will just keep rejecting the God they rejected here on earth, which is it's own, self-inflicted torment. Satan knows full well what he did, but he doesn't seem to have any regrets of any kind, despite his condition.
There are typically two rebuttals here:
Rebuttal 1: If I'm making an eternal choice in a temporal timeline, shouldn't the opportunity to accept or reject this gift be done with full and perfect knowledge? Shouldn't God give us more evidence?
My response: I have yet to meet an atheist who would submit to all the moral teachings of the Catholic or EO church if God was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. I use those two because they are the most ancient and hold the highest bar when it comes to morals (especially the Catholic Church). So what good would God showing up do if you wouldn't be willing to listen any way? This leads to rebuttal 2...
Rebuttal 2: I didn't consent to being born, so why do I have to live for eternity?
My response: This is why some Christians prefer annihilationism. My personal belief that God is Father. He loves all His children, even if they refuse to love Him back. He's not gonna off you just because you hate Him, because killing people that hate you is not love. He would have the non-believer if they'd just relent, but they don't.
We can get into "what about people that never hear about Jesus", but the ancient Churches do not teach those who never hear are auto-banned from Heaven, so it doesn't really move the needle for any but modern evangelical/baptist types.
Edit for clarity
This all fall apart upon even modest rational scrutiny. First and foremost. Missing out on a reward is not torment. Period. We are *******izing by the word beyond recognition if we make it merely mean this. And if it does the rest of your argument can be shown to fall apart. Because a lack of reward simple does not rationally require suffering. And if hell doesn't have suffering or regret that's fine, but you basically abandoned the premise and there really isn't anything in scripture you can lean on here. In fact hell itself is almost totally absent in scripture. Paul never mentions it. It doesn't exist in the OT. You might find Sheol mistranslated as hell in some versions.
Your first rebuttal is a weird attempt at denying the obvious. It is boldly irrational to think people's behavior wouldn't be affected by knowing with certainty god exists and what he wants. Period end of story. I know mine would be.
The issue with eternity fails in multiple ways. Not only is eternity not chosen, but god leave no room for people to choose him later. With no reason provided and none you can offer.
Is your god so incapable of gaining a relationship with a person he's incapable of achieving that with an eternity to work with?
And offing you is only preferable if hell is a real torture. You've already backed off that premise so completely as one could say in your version there is no such thing as hell. Just somewhere else besides heaven. Because once hell really is eternal torture, god becomes a monster and there is simply no way around it.
The bolded isn't simply "my version". The early church fathers were not unanimous on what hell is going to be like, and to this day neither the Catholic or EO has ever defined it. You will find "my version" in the writings of multiple fathers. "Torment" was only used in Revelations. Jesus described a punishment, separation, etc. And separation from God, the source of all good, can certainly be a self-inflicted "torment" The fact that you don't make room for this possibility is your own problem, likely stemming from the type of hell you were taught as a child. Just because Pastor Bob over at (insert name) Baptist Church said his version of hell is true doesn't make it so. There is a reason so many men that learned directly from the apostles and their successors never took a firm stance outside of it's eternal existence
My first rebuttal isn't irrational. It is anecdotal. It can definitely be proven wrong. I've just yet to hear anyone give me to opposite response. So I'll ask you: If God proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Catholic Church was 100% right, would you follow all of the moral prescriptions of the Church? Teachings on LGBT, contraception, abortion, confession, etc. You'd do a 180 on all those and more?
And I specifically said God would love for all people to choose Him. I also said those people simply won't want to. It's not what He's incapable of. It's the hardness of heart and pride that humans are capable of that screws things up. If your answer to my question above is "no", why should you expect it to change after death?