American Hardwood said:

---

Pylon Cam said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

Tramp96 said:

---

Pylon would have advocated for the sling and rocks to be taken away from David.

---

Worse, people like her would have advocated not just confiscating his weapons, but also throwing him to the lions for being a terrorist.

---

You're describing the "shall not infringe" crowd.

I'm fighting against the status quo. I'm fighting against the laws that have made it so easy for people to harm their fellow man. I'm fighting for what Jesus actually taught.

---

Quote:

---

If you are a Christian, or even if you just have any morals, you should be all for getting guns off the street.

---

You invoked Jesus in these two quotes here and in such a way that demonstrates that you have no idea what you are talking about.

Jesus cared about one thing and one thing only, bringing each and every individual closer to God for the salvation of their soul. If he was confronted by one of these thugs, his concern would not be whether or not they had a sword or a gun but how the quality of their soul appeared and how they might be cleansed of their demons.

Jesus knows where sin originates, and it isn't in some material object. The only way you can stretch His teaching to fit your agenda is to take what He said about dispossessing yourself of material things that bind you to a sinful world. But even in this it recognizes that the material things of this world can only tempt a man to sin and not cause a man to sin. It still takes an act of will. That is what makes an action a sin or not.

---

come for the Kansas City Chiefs shootings...

stay for the Jesus dispensations. In the same thread.

only on F16!

Nanomachines son said:

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

japantiger said:

---

LMCane said:

---

Baseball Is Life said:

---

Pylon Cam said:

---

e=mc2 said:

---

Just another lawless, Democrat city. Democrats turn their cities into **** holes.

---

It's disingenuous (at best) to pin this on Democrats this is 100% the fault of Republican gun policy.

If we enacted common sense gun control, we'd see way less of this *****

---

Mexico is a shinning example of your gun free utopia.

---

how come in Israel and Switzerland where there are massive amounts of fully automatic rifles being carried by citizens,

there is a tiny fraction of the number of shootings in the USA?

---

73% of all murders happen in 5% of the counties in the US...Democrat controlled Urban centers. 52% of all counties have no murders. If we keep guns away from Democrats, crime will drop 90%. We all know the reason for this...Chicago, Detroit, Washington, DC, St Louis and Philadelphia drive the majority of it.

The below is from that bastion of hard-right wing press, NPR: "most gun violence is very tightly concentrated on a small number of very high risk young Black male adults that have a shared set of common risk factors," https://npr.org/local/305/2022/02/21/1082103272/a-majority-of-d-c-s-gun-violence-is-driven-by-a-small-number-of-people-study-says……

---

It is not and never will be a democrat issue. Stop obfuscating the actual data. The issue is exclusively a racial one. Democrat controlled Vermont has almost no violent crime, why? Because it's like 95% white.

You people are engaging in the same type of data denial the left does. Stop doing it.

---

I think they play a decent role here. Over the decades look at what their policies have done to the black communities. Almost every one is a wasteland...with a large % hooked on the govt teet. There are almost no fathers present. They own almost no businesses. Schools are a disaster and literacy rates are shockingly bad. Crime is through the roof. And degeneracy is lauded. It was not always this way...even post slavery on through segregation, the gap was much smaller between average whites and blacks. Thomas Sowell (and very few others) does a great job of backing this up with actual data and statistics.

On top of that...the left has taken a very pro-criminal, anti-law and order approach. Follow the crime thread on the Houston board. Almost ZERO of these murderers should have been out on the streets.

I don't disagree entirely with you, just saying, the left has not helped.

---

The Democrat issue comes into play with regards to the punishment of crime but not who actually commits the most crime. The former can be fixed but the latter cannot. The former is a cultural one while the latter is a racial one.

El Salvador policy fixes the first one. Of course this by default will fix the second one because it will guaranteed lock up far more blacks on a per capita basis.

---

I genuinely want to get your take on this...how were blacks so much better off (by every important metric...marriage rates, education, avg household income etc etc), relative to their non-black peers, during Jim Crow era and on through the 60's? It seems that you do not believe the government targeting and woo-ing them for votes has contributed to the devastation we see in their communities.

LBJ reportedly said "I'll have those n-ers voting democrat for 200 years"...did he fail?

Nanomachines son said:

---

japantiger said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

japantiger said:

---

LMCane said:

---

Baseball Is Life said:

---

Pylon Cam said:

---

e=mc2 said:

---

Just another lawless, Democrat city. Democrats turn their cities into **** holes.

---

It's disingenuous (at best) to pin this on Democrats this is 100% the fault of Republican gun policy.

If we enacted common sense gun control, we'd see way less of this *****

---

Mexico is a shinning example of your gun free utopia.

---

how come in Israel and Switzerland where there are massive amounts of fully automatic rifles being carried by citizens,

there is a tiny fraction of the number of shootings in the USA?

---

73% of all murders happen in 5% of the counties in the US...Democrat controlled Urban centers. 52% of all counties have no murders. If we keep guns away from Democrats, crime will drop 90%. We all know the reason for this...Chicago, Detroit, Washington, DC, St Louis and Philadelphia drive the majority of it.

The below is from that bastion of hard-right wing press, NPR: "most gun violence is very tightly concentrated on a small number of very high risk young Black male adults that have a shared set of common risk factors," https://npr.org/local/305/2022/02/21/1082103272/a-majority-of-d-c-s-gun-violence-is-driven-by-a-small-number-of-people-study-says……

---

It is not and never will be a democrat issue. Stop obfuscating the actual data. The issue is exclusively a racial one. Democrat controlled Vermont has almost no violent crime, why? Because it's like 95% white.

You people are engaging in the same type of data denial the left does. Stop doing it.

---

Blacks vote 90% Democrat. Blacks live predominantly in Democrat controlled urban centers. The top 20 cities in America have not had a Republican administration in 3 generations. The Venn Diagram is an almost perfect overlap.

---

So? It's a black issue and will forever be a black issue. That won't change if they somehow began voting for the GOP.

---

Jesus is the answer. This is both facetious, and absolutely true.

aTm2004 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

Agree. It is a culture issue and the leaders within the black communities who call this out are ignored. As a society, we need to have the uncomfortable conversation if we really want to solve anything.

---

Culture does not explain why the UK, Canada, Israel, Japan, and France have the same racial breakdowns in violent crime. Why is it so hard for some of you to admit it literally is a racial issue?

---

I don't give a chit about the UK, Canada, Israel, Japan, or France. I care about the US. It's not just a race issue. It's a culture issue within a specific race. Did we have this issue 50-60 years ago? Or is this something relatively recent with the rise of fatherless homes? Single moms with multiple kids by multiple deadbeats? Music that glorifies guns, violence, sex, and abuse of women? Kids who choose education over ignorance being told they're acting white?

I'm seriously asking, because I don't think black people who grew up in stable 2 parent homes with discipline and a push for education are causing these issues. I mean, Asians are always the lowest no matter where you look. Why is that? Because of strong family values and education being the foundation of their culture.

I know there are going to be black Ags reading this who are no different than you and I that are judged because of chit like this from of nothing more than their skin color, and it ****ing sucks and is wrong. They are not the same as the ****tards that commit violent crimes.

---

Yes, we did have this issue 60 years ago. The difference is that whites still had balls and didn't care if some jackass called them racist because they were in fact racist. Crime was punished harshly and private citizens could deal with crime easily on their own without worrying about some leftist prosecuting them for vigilantism.

We removed every major safeguard in our criminal system and everyone knows it. So the violent criminals who may not have acted previously now know they can get away with it and do so with impunity.

This is why they do everything in NYC and then drive to Florida to sell it. They get arrested and punished in Florida while they get free reign in NYC.

With regards to culture, that is always downstream of behavioral genetics. Your behavior is governed by genetics. For example, blacks have a much higher percentage of the population with the 2-repeat allele of the MAOA gene than any other race. That gene is directly responsible for a significantly increased risk of violent crime in that person.

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

japantiger said:

---

LMCane said:

---

Baseball Is Life said:

---

Pylon Cam said:

---

e=mc2 said:

---

Just another lawless, Democrat city. Democrats turn their cities into **** holes.

---

It's disingenuous (at best) to pin this on Democrats this is 100% the fault of Republican gun policy.

If we enacted common sense gun control, we'd see way less of this *****

---

Mexico is a shinning example of your gun free utopia.

---

how come in Israel and Switzerland where there are massive amounts of fully automatic rifles being carried by citizens,

there is a tiny fraction of the number of shootings in the USA?

---

73% of all murders happen in 5% of the counties in the US...Democrat controlled Urban centers. 52% of all counties have no murders. If we keep guns away from Democrats, crime will drop 90%. We all know the reason for this...Chicago, Detroit, Washington, DC, St Louis and Philadelphia drive the majority of it.

The below is from that bastion of hard-right wing press, NPR: "most gun violence is very tightly concentrated on a small number of very high risk young Black male adults that have a shared set of common risk factors," https://npr.org/local/305/2022/02/21/1082103272/a-majority-of-d-c-s-gun-violence-is-driven-by-a-small-number-of-people-study-says……

---

It is not and never will be a democrat issue. Stop obfuscating the actual data. The issue is exclusively a racial one. Democrat controlled Vermont has almost no violent crime, why? Because it's like 95% white.

You people are engaging in the same type of data denial the left does. Stop doing it.

---

I think they play a decent role here. Over the decades look at what their policies have done to the black communities. Almost every one is a wasteland...with a large % hooked on the govt teet. There are almost no fathers present. They own almost no businesses. Schools are a disaster and literacy rates are shockingly bad. Crime is through the roof. And degeneracy is lauded. It was not always this way...even post slavery on through segregation, the gap was much smaller between average whites and blacks. Thomas Sowell (and very few others) does a great job of backing this up with actual data and statistics.

On top of that...the left has taken a very pro-criminal, anti-law and order approach. Follow the crime thread on the Houston board. Almost ZERO of these murderers should have been out on the streets.

I don't disagree entirely with you, just saying, the left has not helped.

---

The Democrat issue comes into play with regards to the punishment of crime but not who actually commits the most crime. The former can be fixed but the latter cannot. The former is a cultural one while the latter is a racial one.

El Salvador policy fixes the first one. Of course this by default will fix the second one because it will guaranteed lock up far more blacks on a per capita basis.

---

I genuinely want to get your take on this...how were blacks so much better off (by every important metric...marriage rates, education, avg household income etc etc), relative to their non-black peers, during Jim Crow era and on through the 60's? It seems that you do not believe the government targeting and woo-ing them for votes has contributed to the devastation we see in their communities.

LBJ reportedly said "I'll have those n-ers voting democrat for 200 years"...did he fail?

---

Cultural Marxism destroyed a lot of positive aspects of American culture in the 1960s. I am not saying these did not have an affect on the black population, rather I am saying it's less significant than you think because if culture was the problem then we would see different violent crime rates in other nations where these cultural issues never existed. The problem with that worldview is that violent crime rates across every nation are roughly identical on a per capita basis when broken down by race. That means the issue never was a cultural one and the argument falls apart completely.

So now do MS vs DC. Both have high percentage black populations, one is mostly rural and and run by republicans and one is almost entirely urban and controlled by democrats. The urban one run by democrats is nearly 4x as violent as the rural one run by republicans. You can't eliminate culture and politics from the equation as easily as you think.

LMCane said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

Pylon Cam said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

Tramp96 said:

---

Pylon would have advocated for the sling and rocks to be taken away from David.

---

Worse, people like her would have advocated not just confiscating his weapons, but also throwing him to the lions for being a terrorist.

---

You're describing the "shall not infringe" crowd.

I'm fighting against the status quo. I'm fighting against the laws that have made it so easy for people to harm their fellow man. I'm fighting for what Jesus actually taught.

---

Quote:

---

If you are a Christian, or even if you just have any morals, you should be all for getting guns off the street.

---

You invoked Jesus in these two quotes here and in such a way that demonstrates that you have no idea what you are talking about.

Jesus cared about one thing and one thing only, bringing each and every individual closer to God for the salvation of their soul. If he was confronted by one of these thugs, his concern would not be whether or not they had a sword or a gun but how the quality of their soul appeared and how they might be cleansed of their demons.

Jesus knows where sin originates, and it isn't in some material object. The only way you can stretch His teaching to fit your agenda is to take what He said about dispossessing yourself of material things that bind you to a sinful world. But even in this it recognizes that the material things of this world can only tempt a man to sin and not cause a man to sin. It still takes an act of will. That is what makes an action a sin or not.

---

come for the Kansas City Chiefs shootings...

stay for the Jesus dispensations. In the same thread.

only on F16!

---

If you dont like it change the channel. BTW he aint wrong. Maybe if more listened back in the day, 70 AD could have been avoided.

txags92 said:

---

So now do MS vs DC. Both have high percentage black populations, one is mostly rural and and run by republicans and one is almost entirely urban and controlled by democrats. The urban one run by democrats is nearly 4x as violent as the rural one run by republicans. You can't eliminate culture and politics from the equation as easily as you think.

---

Well, Black citizens in Mississippi obviously don't carry the violence gene like those in DC…..

Are they gonna tell us who the shooters are or does this not fit the narrative?

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

rgag12 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

Always remember the Steve Sailer law of mass shootings:

Sailer's Law of Mass Shootings appears to be vindicated at the Kansas City Super Bowl parade:

"If there are more wounded than killed, then the shooter is likely black.

"If there are more killed than wounded, then the shooter is likely not black."

— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) February 14, 2024

It is 100% always true. In fact I have never seen it not be true. It doesn't matter if the shooter is a man or a woman, asian, Hispanic, white, Indian, Jewish, etc. all that matters is if the suspect is black or not black. If the shooter is black then there will always be far more wounded than dead and if the shooter is not black then there will be more dead than wounded.

---

What's the reasoning behind it? They only use cheap target rounds?

---

Dad left to get milk and never came back to show their kids how to properly and safely use a firearm.

EskimoJoe said:

---

rgag12 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

Always remember the Steve Sailer law of mass shootings:

Sailer's Law of Mass Shootings appears to be vindicated at the Kansas City Super Bowl parade:

"If there are more wounded than killed, then the shooter is likely black.

"If there are more killed than wounded, then the shooter is likely not black."

— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) February 14, 2024

It is 100% always true. In fact I have never seen it not be true. It doesn't matter if the shooter is a man or a woman, asian, Hispanic, white, Indian, Jewish, etc. all that matters is if the suspect is black or not black. If the shooter is black then there will always be far more wounded than dead and if the shooter is not black then there will be more dead than wounded.

---

What's the reasoning behind it? They only use cheap target rounds?

---

Dad left to get milk and never came back to show their kids how to properly and safely use a firearm.

---

That and holding the damn thing sideways, because swag is more important than accuracy.

rgag12 said:

---

What's the reasoning behind it? They only use cheap target rounds?

---

For one thing, garden variety gangbangers don't spend any time at the range and have never received any firearm training. Since their firearms are likely stolen, they have no familiarity with them as someone might if he had researched and then bought a gun.

rgag12 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

Always remember the Steve Sailer law of mass shootings:

Sailer's Law of Mass Shootings appears to be vindicated at the Kansas City Super Bowl parade:

"If there are more wounded than killed, then the shooter is likely black.

"If there are more killed than wounded, then the shooter is likely not black."

— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) February 14, 2024

It is 100% always true. In fact I have never seen it not be true. It doesn't matter if the shooter is a man or a woman, asian, Hispanic, white, Indian, Jewish, etc. all that matters is if the suspect is black or not black. If the shooter is black then there will always be far more wounded than dead and if the shooter is not black then there will be more dead than wounded.

---

What's the reasoning behind it? They only use cheap target rounds?

---

They don't give a ****, never train, and often shoot blindly.

I was talking with a Dallas police officer at church this week and he worked a shooting where 2 gang members were shooting at each other with ARs, fired over 100 rounds, and only hit homeless people sleeping on the ground.

They identified the deceased victim last night but yes, surprising we don't have new information.

Nanomachines son said:

---

Definitely Not A Cop said:

---

Pylon Cam said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Pylon Cam said:

---

How many more shootings will it take for Republicans to wake up? All of this suffering, carnage, and death is not worth it.

If you are a Christian, or even if you just have any morals, you should be all for getting guns off the street.

---

If you're a practical person, you look at the 13% causing more than 50% of these types of incidents.

Don't go blaming republicans for perpetuating a victim mentality.

---

Dog whistle aside, those 13% would not have the same level of access to guns that they do now if not for Republican gun policy.

Gun control works, but only if it's applied everywhere. Guns are trafficked into states with stricter gun control from states with weaker gun control that's why we have this issue.

---

Saying 13% of the population cause 50% of crime is not a dog whistle. Those are facts. Implying that 13% can't handle their god given rights to bear arms like you are doing is absolutely a dog whistle though. What about black people having legal gun ownership is such an issue for you?

---

To be fair it's not 13% cause 50% of violent crime, it's actually 13% cause 61% of violent crime. The old numbers are outdated.

---

To be even more accurate, it's closer to 2% of the total population responsible for 61% of violent crime.
~13% is all blacks.
~6% is black males.
~4% is black males 15-40.
50% of that 4% is black males 15-40 without a father in the home.
2% of the population responsible for 60+% of the violent crime.

DeProfundis said:

---

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

---

Seems like there's a name for a group of "several people". Is the media going out of their way to avoid saying this shooting has gang ties by calling it a dispute between several people?

W said:

---

approaching the Noon hour...

still can't names or photos of the shooters?

---

Two in custody are juveniles, one is an adult.

"KANSAS CITY, Mo. Kansas City police say a dispute between several people led to the deadly shooting Wednesday at the Chiefs' Super Bowl rally.

At the conclusion of the rally, there were shots fired west of Union Station near the parking garage, and several people were hit."

https://fox4kc.com/news/dispute-led-to-shooting-at-chiefs-super-bowl-rally-police/

Why do cops even take questions in situations like this. Just make a statement and leave. We don't need 30min of "can't answer that due to ongoing investigation".

txags92 said:

---

So now do MS vs DC. Both have high percentage black populations, one is mostly rural and and run by republicans and one is almost entirely urban and controlled by democrats. The urban one run by democrats is nearly 4x as violent as the rural one run by republicans. You can't eliminate culture and politics from the equation as easily as you think.

---

Compare Vermont to West Virginia. Both are heavy white states with more than 90% white populations. Both have low violent crime rates as compared to the national average. One is a democrat state and the other is a republican state. Turns out culture doesn't matter all that much.

Jackson, Mississippi is the highest murder rate city in the US.

You're comparing individual cities to an entire state. I would bet if you compare the areas with similar demographics to DC that you would get similar violent crime breakdowns.

You're not comparing Apples to Apples at all.

EskimoJoe said:

---

rgag12 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

Always remember the Steve Sailer law of mass shootings:

Sailer's Law of Mass Shootings appears to be vindicated at the Kansas City Super Bowl parade:

"If there are more wounded than killed, then the shooter is likely black.

"If there are more killed than wounded, then the shooter is likely not black."

— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) February 14, 2024

It is 100% always true. In fact I have never seen it not be true. It doesn't matter if the shooter is a man or a woman, asian, Hispanic, white, Indian, Jewish, etc. all that matters is if the suspect is black or not black. If the shooter is black then there will always be far more wounded than dead and if the shooter is not black then there will be more dead than wounded.

---

What's the reasoning behind it? They only use cheap target rounds?

---

Dad left to get milk and never came back to show their kids how to properly and safely use a firearm.

---

My dad never showed me how to use a gun, I learned on my own and was able to aim a gun just fine the first time I used one. The difference is and always will be an IQ one.

I don't think you guys realize how low IQ people live their lives. Their entire thought process is different. "Press button more harder gun shoot harder" is the extent to which many people can process at the level we're talking about here.

Nano said:

---

With regards to culture, that is always downstream of behavioral genetics. Your behavior is governed by genetics. For example, blacks have a much higher percentage of the population with the 2-repeat allele of the MAOA gene than any other race. That gene is directly responsible for a significantly increased risk of violent crime in that person.

---

It wasn't too long ago, european whites were hanging "witches" in salem. That wasn't long after europeans were having issues with this black plague thing, from being filthy.

Just over a hundred years ago europeans were sitting in trenches and dying by the hundreds of thousands. Mustard gas, artillery, trenchfoot. The ruling class far away from the frontlines.

It seems we've managed to evolve while maintaining much of the same genetics.

DeProfundis said:

---

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

---

What's that short word for "several people"?

TexasRebel said:

---

DeProfundis said:

---

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

---

What's that short word for "several people"?

---

Trans.

No. You're thinking paranoid schizophrenia.

I think both work. Think about it.

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

TexasRebel said:

---

DeProfundis said:

---

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

---

What's that short word for "several people"?

---

Trans.

---

Misgendered and triggered. "It's Mam"!

Nanomachines son said:

---

txags92 said:

---

So now do MS vs DC. Both have high percentage black populations, one is mostly rural and and run by republicans and one is almost entirely urban and controlled by democrats. The urban one run by democrats is nearly 4x as violent as the rural one run by republicans. You can't eliminate culture and politics from the equation as easily as you think.

---

Compare Vermont to West Virginia. Both are heavy white states with more than 90% white populations. Both have low violent crime rates as compared to the national average. One is a democrat state and the other is a republican state. Turns out culture doesn't matter all that much.

Jackson, Mississippi is the highest murder rate city in the US.

You're comparing individual cities to an entire state. I would bet if you compare the areas with similar demographics to DC that you would get similar violent crime breakdowns.

You're not comparing Apples to Apples at all.

---

Jackson is the largest city in MS, has been controlled by democrats since 1989 and had a large surge in murders in 2020. Their overall violent crime rate is well above the rest of MS, but not remarkable relative to many other democrat controlled cities. The rest of Mississippi still has plenty of black population, but they have elected republicans statewide for over a decade, and the crime rate is much lower than Jackson's.

TexasRebel said:

---

DeProfundis said:

---

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

---

What's that short word for "several people"?

---

Non-binary.

Nanomachines son said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

Agree. It is a culture issue and the leaders within the black communities who call this out are ignored. As a society, we need to have the uncomfortable conversation if we really want to solve anything.

---

Culture does not explain why the UK, Canada, Israel, Japan, and France have the same racial breakdowns in violent crime. Why is it so hard for some of you to admit it literally is a racial issue?

---

I don't give a chit about the UK, Canada, Israel, Japan, or France. I care about the US. It's not just a race issue. It's a culture issue within a specific race. Did we have this issue 50-60 years ago? Or is this something relatively recent with the rise of fatherless homes? Single moms with multiple kids by multiple deadbeats? Music that glorifies guns, violence, sex, and abuse of women? Kids who choose education over ignorance being told they're acting white?

I'm seriously asking, because I don't think black people who grew up in stable 2 parent homes with discipline and a push for education are causing these issues. I mean, Asians are always the lowest no matter where you look. Why is that? Because of strong family values and education being the foundation of their culture.

I know there are going to be black Ags reading this who are no different than you and I that are judged because of chit like this from of nothing more than their skin color, and it ****ing sucks and is wrong. They are not the same as the ****tards that commit violent crimes.

---

Yes, we did have this issue 60 years ago. The difference is that whites still had balls and didn't care if some jackass called them racist because they were in fact racist. Crime was punished harshly and private citizens could deal with crime easily on their own without worrying about some leftist prosecuting them for vigilantism.

We removed every major safeguard in our criminal system and everyone knows it. So the violent criminals who may not have acted previously now know they can get away with it and do so with impunity.

This is why they do everything in NYC and then drive to Florida to sell it. They get arrested and punished in Florida while they get free reign in NYC.

With regards to culture, that is always downstream of behavioral genetics. Your behavior is governed by genetics. For example, blacks have a much higher percentage of the population with the 2-repeat allele of the MAOA gene than any other race. That gene is directly responsible for a significantly increased risk of violent crime in that person.

---

So, you're saying black people are genetically predisposed to being violent, and in so being, liberal whites have made it almost impossible to hold those accountable for said crimes? I agree with the latter but question the former.

TexasRebel said:

---

DeProfundis said:

---

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

---

What's that short word for "several people"?

---

Fang? R...ran...rang? Sang? Something like that.

And just like that the gun grab cheerleaders on this thread have disappeared like a fart in the wind. Why is it that the only time you people care guns is when gun crime is carried out by white right wing extremists?

DeProfundis said:

---

So I am going to guess that some black people got upset at each other and started shooting indiscriminately into a crowd.

---

It's tough to hit your target when you hold your pistol sideways like a gangsta