Of course they do. They wouldn't even open their books to Congress.Spoony Love said:
They are and I would be very interested if any of these NGOs get away without having an annual audit.
Of course they do. They wouldn't even open their books to Congress.Spoony Love said:
They are and I would be very interested if any of these NGOs get away without having an annual audit.
6,000 journalists and 700 newsrooms received USAID money?
— Clayton Morris (@ClaytonMorris) February 6, 2025
It's a wonder all of them parrot the same news. pic.twitter.com/QEOmcX18kX
Remember Democrats don't really have a problem with unelected officials. pic.twitter.com/xmj8yv2Gmv
— Caballero (@HughAkston0) February 6, 2025
This may be the greatest gem of them all.
— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) February 7, 2025
$1.3 million for "ADAPTING AN LGB+ INCLUSIVE TEEN PREGNANCY PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR TRANSGENDER BOYS" pic.twitter.com/lVXvZnYUGc
It’s… even worse than that… https://t.co/oEXmyoTnLO
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) February 7, 2025
At the start of an election year, @cccuorg encouraged its 185 member schools (and roughly 520,000 students), including @WheatonCollege @biolau and @Baylor, to use the After Party curriculum in their chapel services, discipleship groups, theology and pastoral classes, and in… pic.twitter.com/DmadNRRh3N
— Megan Basham (@megbasham) February 7, 2025
Kristol and a group of Never Trump allies founded Defending Democracy Together in 2019 for the express purpose of opposing Donald Trump. One of its first initiatives was "Republicans for the Rule of Law." DDT spent a million dollars in campaign ads to pressure Republican… pic.twitter.com/58tHgVJakR
— Megan Basham (@megbasham) February 7, 2025
As the 2024 election season approached, DDT continued their efforts to defeat Trump, pouring millions in dark money into the effort, according to Open Secrets.
— Megan Basham (@megbasham) February 7, 2025
And now we know that at least $200k of what the hyper-partisan Kristol and DDT spent for the 2024 election cycle went… pic.twitter.com/PQMTX9jeQb
Quote:
Because as their editor-in-chief, Russell Moore, was taking money from Kristol's anti-Trump political organization to develop and promote a Christian political curriculum that teaches that white conservatives lack empathy and that Christians must use their vote to end alleged systemic racism, he was overseeing Christianity Today's political coverage, which the outlet claims is non-partisan.
This means Moore was formally partnering with a hyper-partisan group and promoting the material he developed from that partnership to Christianity Today's readers and podcast listeners.
This is an even greater ethical breach than the CT staffers who donated to Democrats while covering politics. It is a greater breach that merely taking the money of the hard-left, secular Rockefellers. Moore was taking partisan money to create material for churches and ministries and using his magazine to promote that political material without disclosing that it had been financed by an anti-Trump political group.
Do we really believe that after all the spending DDT has done to defeat Donald Trump this wasn't its aim in funding The After Party?
Is it any wonder then that in the run up to the election CT was white-washing Kamala Harris' record and encouraging Christians not to vote?
Whatever the purpose was for the $1.8 million listed as government grants on CT's 2023 tax return, this alone is damning stuff.
Ellis Wyatt said:Of course they do. They wouldn't even open their books to Congress.Spoony Love said:
They are and I would be very interested if any of these NGOs get away without having an annual audit.
BusterAg said:Ellis Wyatt said:Of course they do. They wouldn't even open their books to Congress.Spoony Love said:
They are and I would be very interested if any of these NGOs get away without having an annual audit.
We may be one huge, blockbuster corruption story away from FBI raids of NGO corporate offices.
It was not by random chance this agency was picked. That has become obvious.FireAg said:taxpreparer said:
Where is the constitutional mandate for organizations like USAID, NOAA, etc.? Where is the constitutional mandate for the fed gov to give grants to any non-profit or give any block grants to ngo's, states, or cities?
There isn't one…nothing was ever defined when the Foreign Assistance Act was signed in 1961…
We have a lawfully-formed organization with literally no congressionally approved rules as to how it will appropriate its funds…
Quite literally, it is a slush fund that has clearly been used to launder money and pay off certain folks to help drive certain agendas and ideologies…with literally zero oversight…
Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:BusterAg said:Ellis Wyatt said:Of course they do. They wouldn't even open their books to Congress.Spoony Love said:
They are and I would be very interested if any of these NGOs get away without having an annual audit.
We may be one huge, blockbuster corruption story away from FBI raids of NGO corporate offices.
Makes you wonder if that's why Patel is the nominee they're delaying as long as possible
And, no one would care except all of the people that are on the dole from the U.S. government and their NPC acolytes.Ag In Ok said:
And yet the left would complain about the search warrants and never, ever what would be found. It's as if they were super upset Epstein island was raided and silent on what was found….
You know...same stuff Biden stood for.nortex97 said:
An old X account where he advocated against marrying outside his race, abolishing civil rights act, silly/stupid stuff like that.
USAID sent $4.2 billion in total grants to “Miscellaneous foreign awardees” under Biden alone.
— Parker Thayer (@ParkerThayer) February 6, 2025
Most of them at least have descriptions (unlike those above), and sometimes they even have countries named, but no names or addresses. https://t.co/dS8h1XBhSx
Big_Time_Timmy_Jim said:BusterAg said:Ellis Wyatt said:Of course they do. They wouldn't even open their books to Congress.Spoony Love said:
They are and I would be very interested if any of these NGOs get away without having an annual audit.
We may be one huge, blockbuster corruption story away from FBI raids of NGO corporate offices.
Makes you wonder if that's why Patel is the nominee they're delaying as long as possible
That's just data that USAID discloses publicly, but with access to the internal systems one can decipher where the money went.Fenrir said:
So between those last 2 tweets the US government has literally just handed out almost $5 billion to undisclosed entities.
Makes you wonder how sinister the recipients must be that they were made anonymous when others were not.
Don't worry. Biden didn't know what continent the money was sent to either.Quote:
We don't even get to know what continent the money was sent to.
Agree. And what really sends my BP through roof is that all these mofos paid agitators and race hustlers to keep us occupied putting out fires at home , so they could steal from us.f1ghtintexasaggie said:
Of all the ish that's come out, this make my blood boil the most. How the **** could this be allowed to happen? No money trail? No way to audit? This could have been sent directly to our own politicians with no way of knowing? Of course, they SAY it went to foreign entities, but how can we trust that?
f1ghtintexasaggie said:
Of all the ish that's come out, this make my blood boil the most. How the **** could this be allowed to happen? No money trail? No way to audit? This could have been sent directly to our own politicians with no way of knowing? Of course, they SAY it went to foreign entities, but how can we trust that?
Well we do have photo evidence pallets of cash was delivered to Iran...Sims said:f1ghtintexasaggie said:
Of all the ish that's come out, this make my blood boil the most. How the **** could this be allowed to happen? No money trail? No way to audit? This could have been sent directly to our own politicians with no way of knowing? Of course, they SAY it went to foreign entities, but how can we trust that?
Unless it was pallets of cash (never been done before, i know...) there is payment information on those lines. Only a couple more cross references and they know exactly where the money went.
akm91 said:That's just data that USAID discloses publicly, but with access to the internal systems one can decipher where the money went.Fenrir said:
So between those last 2 tweets the US government has literally just handed out almost $5 billion to undisclosed entities.
Makes you wonder how sinister the recipients must be that they were made anonymous when others were not.
And Congress to fix it for realKrombopulos Michael said:akm91 said:That's just data that USAID discloses publicly, but with access to the internal systems one can decipher where the money went.Fenrir said:
So between those last 2 tweets the US government has literally just handed out almost $5 billion to undisclosed entities.
Makes you wonder how sinister the recipients must be that they were made anonymous when others were not.
The "electronic money" went into a bank account somewhere on this planet.......It's not like there are pallet loads of billions upon billions dollars of cash being moving around place to place. Grand Cayman and US Virgin Islands would be tipping over with all that cash in their bank vaults.
The transactions from one account to another are traceable.
Correcting the abuse just takes the willingness to disclose what is going on.