Trump Shutting Down USAID

129,599 Views | 1212 Replies | Last: 46 min ago by BMX Bandit
Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SwigAg11 said:

If NOVA gets cleared out that may turn VA red!
I don't understand?

NOVA the documentary series or something else?
The world needs mean tweets

My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA

Trump 2024
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Northern Virginia that's pretty much a D.C. suburb at this point.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Look at this:

https://datarepublican.com/nonprofit/assets/?other_expenses_show=0&assets_show=0&receipts_min=0&receipts_max=82040914822&govt_amt_min=19600000&govt_amt_max=11069708938&taxpayer_pct_min=0.6&taxpayer_pct_max=1&sort_field=travelExpensesPct&sort_dir=desc
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One thing I think is clear from all this: if Trump or Congressional Republicans do not agree to a budget bill in the future and the government shuts down, constant reminders to this and other fraud/waste will remind Americans where their money is going. CNN/MSDNC and other leftist outlets won't be able to gaslight the public anymore about the absolute need for government to remain open over constantly increased spending.
CatD11Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Worth the listen. Benz knew about USAID back to 2016.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/2rXdCTkipx2Iu5dX1Gh0s5?si=JGuB6WfdSXSaHbL2zCNJHA&context=spotify%3Ashow%3A4rOoJ6Egrf8K2IrywzwOMk


CatD11Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
60 Minutes - utter propaganda.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John F Kerry, who oh by the way served in Vietnam and Cambodia, clearly has found his latest war grift on taxpayers:

Lashing out at cuts (longer in the thread):

But she is right, they see themselves as guarding somehow against Chinese dominance. They're just wrong, if not stupid.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm very skeptical of Tom Cotton and Eldridge Colby alike.
BlackLab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, everything about that episode I guess last night seems to have been a pathetic lie.



There's no reason to ever watch that crap, imho, and the only 'good' thing about it is hearing about the lies being mocked via X in the morning.
Ag In Ok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting. So the 60 minutes staff who did the piece could go to jail in Germany for lying?
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
D, R, or I…I want them ALL to go down…

Whoever is caught with their hand in the cookie jar needs to be held accountable with the most extreme punishments imaginable…

Stop stealing our tax dollars!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
100 percent. They have a website and everything that spreads lies that are 'forever' on the internet.

I wish Rubio had pointed out that the National Socialists who perpetrated the holocaust had plenty of censorship power, which as leftists they used righteously, including before the war. And they absolutely controlled the media in Germany, including closing down newspapers and operating the news radio/banning foreign radio etc. There are practically zero parallels to liberty/free speech/conservatives (such as AfD) attributable to them today. I suspect he was too struck by her vapid stupidity to rebut it further with simple factual references quickly.

Oh, by the way, that victim was on TV bragging about removing incriminating evidence, pride flags etc. earlier this year and has deleted her X account. Weird, right?


$1400+ per meal via USAID thru the Clintons, but the controversy is Samantha Powers' speechwriter being laid off?
Mostly Foggy Recollection
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buzz, your girlfriend…. WOOF!
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ProgN said:

Look at this:

https://datarepublican.com/nonprofit/assets/?other_expenses_show=0&assets_show=0&receipts_min=0&receipts_max=82040914822&govt_amt_min=19600000&govt_amt_max=11069708938&taxpayer_pct_min=0.6&taxpayer_pct_max=1&sort_field=travelExpensesPct&sort_dir=desc


Is data republican working or collaborating with DOGE?

Great work so far, would love to see a query & network map of the BODs & officers of every corrupt NGO/entity and how they are related to all of the politicians, bureaucrats, and judges to include campaign donations.
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Come on, Pam Bondi. Let's get after it.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Come on, Pam Bondi. Let's get after it.
Well… this takes strategy. Once you start coming after corrupt politicians and their children, congress will go ape **** and pass zero legislation. Go after (D)s and they'll rightfully call you partisan. Go after all swamp critters and they'll impeach + remove Trump. This is Pandora's box. Bondi needs to have a solid blitz lined up.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get Off My Lawn said:

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Come on, Pam Bondi. Let's get after it.
Well… this takes strategy. Once you start coming after corrupt politicians and their children, congress will go ape **** and pass zero legislation. Go after (D)s and they'll rightfully call you partisan. Go after all swamp critters and they'll impeach + remove Trump. This is Pandora's box. Bondi needs to have a solid blitz lined up.

They're not going to be able to impeach Trump over this.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I really think they are keeping their powder dry until Kash is confirmed.
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tailgate88 said:

I really think they are keeping their powder dry until Kash is confirmed.


Wait until after midterms. We need congress to pass Trump's key legislation first. Then burn it down.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Come on, Pam Bondi. Let's get after it.
Well… this takes strategy. Once you start coming after corrupt politicians and their children, congress will go ape **** and pass zero legislation. Go after (D)s and they'll rightfully call you partisan. Go after all swamp critters and they'll impeach + remove Trump. This is Pandora's box. Bondi needs to have a solid blitz lined up.

They're not going to be able to impeach Trump over this.
If Kash and Bondi went after criminal politicians first (which is arguably the most important target for a just Justice system) you'd see active indictments for over 2/3 of congress. Insider trading, rico, misuse of funds, security violations, bribery, etc. Congress wouldn't take that sitting down, and most of the uncharged critters would side with their pals because it's only a matter of time before they get caught as well. It'd be half the freedom caucus and a handful of freshmen against the entire swamp - and they'd be getting pressure from all angles (including donors) to side with their peers.

It's one thing to go after bureaucrats - another entirely to go after those who created them.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91AggieLawyer said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Come on, Pam Bondi. Let's get after it.
Well… this takes strategy. Once you start coming after corrupt politicians and their children, congress will go ape **** and pass zero legislation. Go after (D)s and they'll rightfully call you partisan. Go after all swamp critters and they'll impeach + remove Trump. This is Pandora's box. Bondi needs to have a solid blitz lined up.

They're not going to be able to impeach Trump over this.
Agree. Besides being in the right and doing what he was elected to do, you can bet Trump, with help from Elon and his geniuses, now knows with certainty where all the skeletons are buried with proof to back it up.

Nobody that has even a hint of impropriety in their background is going to risk his wrath, especially elected officials that have something to hide.
Cibalo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You will know things are getting real when Trump starts building a new federal prison to house the swamp.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get Off My Lawn said:

91AggieLawyer said:

Get Off My Lawn said:

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Come on, Pam Bondi. Let's get after it.
Well… this takes strategy. Once you start coming after corrupt politicians and their children, congress will go ape **** and pass zero legislation. Go after (D)s and they'll rightfully call you partisan. Go after all swamp critters and they'll impeach + remove Trump. This is Pandora's box. Bondi needs to have a solid blitz lined up.

They're not going to be able to impeach Trump over this.
If Kash and Bondi went after criminal politicians first (which is arguably the most important target for a just Justice system) you'd see active indictments for over 2/3 of congress. Insider trading, rico, misuse of funds, security violations, bribery, etc. Congress wouldn't take that sitting down, and most of the uncharged critters would side with their pals because it's only a matter of time before they get caught as well. It'd be half the freedom caucus and a handful of freshmen against the entire swamp - and they'd be getting pressure from all angles (including donors) to side with their peers.

It's one thing to go after bureaucrats - another entirely to go after those who created them.

If this is their strategy, a simple resignation from Congress will likely suffice. Even if it doesn't, those that potentially face criminal charges WILL be forced to resign and there won't be enough of them left to mount any kind of impeachment effort.

Besides, if, as you say, "its only a matter of time before they get caught..." then the last thing they want to do is poke the impeachment stick. That will all but guarantee they get charged. What would the administration have to lose?

This isn't 2019 where Trump doesn't have leverage over specific politicians. Or the popularity for that matter.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
USAID - a non-American department. Pro marxists.
Marvin J. Schiller
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Exactly right. She is after Eisen too:

Quote:

Your organization boasts an impressive roster:

Janet Napolitano (Director): Former Governor of Arizona
Tom Ridge (Director): First Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Christine Todd Whitman (Co-Chair): Former Republican Governor of New Jersey and Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency under President George W. Bush.
Michael Steele (Director): Former RNC chair
Michael Chertoff (Director): Former United States Secretary of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush
Joanna Lydgate (President): Former Chief Deputy Attorney General of Massachusetts under a Democratic administration.
Tom Coleman (Director): Former House Representative from Missouri
Donald Ayer (Director): Former Deputy Attorney General under President George H.W. Bush

However, its website states absolutely nothing of what they do except a bunch of vaguities about defending democracy and a few papers.

The paid officers are getting handsomely paid:

Joanna Lydgate (President) ($382,382)
Jenn Fogel-Bublick (Chief Operating Officer) ($282,532)
Christine Sun (Legal Director) ($246,932)
Thania Sanchez (Research Director) ($215,227)
Gillian Feiner (Senior Counsel) ($211,443)
Elizabeth Ulmer (Svp, Communications) ($224,448)
Dax Goldstein (Senior Counsel) ($213,245)

Almost all of the expenses go to salary, with the "Other" expenses going out to contractors.

However, its website states absolutely nothing of what they do except a bunch of vaguities about defending democracy.

So, I was wondering... what do you guys actually do?

Turns out ... you have a YouTube channel and last year, you produced a very expensive-looking Muppet show.

That's what you spend your 17 million dollars on. Muppets that have less than 200 views. That's your idea of election security. Creating animated puppet shows that nobody watches to lecture nonexistent viewers on election safety.

Oh, and they're definitely produced by you, because I went to one of the websites linked in the video and it says "State United Democracy Center" at the bottom.

Tell me, who the hell is donating you to do this? And why should we trust any of you neoconservatives with the responsibility of safeguarding "Democracy" and elections if your idea of doing so is producing puppet shows?
LOL @ smearing datarepublican as 'muh, she must be Russian.'

More at her X channel.
Swan Song
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The coup de gras…

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teaching Afghani peasants about degenerative modern art on our dime. Turquoise Mountain Foundation.

Just when you think you've heard it all.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Teaching Afghani peasants about degenerative modern art on our dime. Turquoise Mountain Foundation.

Just when you think you've heard it all.

And it's starting to appear that this little pet projects were just half-assed attempts to show "we did something semi-related to our mission"…

But then it appears in many cases that they only spent a fraction of the funds allocated to them, and the rest went toward "overhead"…

Nancy needs to explain to us how $202M of "overhead" wound up in her bank account…
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Side note: anyone else notice how quiet Nancy has been lately?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But wait, it gets better. That Rory chap who is a Brit politician was doing a weekly podcast.
Quote:

Oh no, how will the women of Afghanistan cope without lectures about Marcel Duchamp's urinal? They'll have to find a way. For it's been revealed that Turquoise Mountain, a batty British charity that has lectured Afghan women about the wonders of conceptual art, has had its USAID funding slashed. I hope you're happy now, Donald Trump and Elon Musk no more will the tyrannised women of Afghanistan enjoy the sweet relief of a plummy Brit telling them about the time Duchamp put a porcelain piss station in an art gallery.

This is the heartbreaking news that the NGO founded by King Charles and run by Rory Stewart's wife, Shoshana, has had its USAID handout of a million dollars slashed. It was Rory who broke the story. Looking even soppier than normal in his weekly conflab with Alastair Campbell on their surreally successful podcast, The Rest Is Politics, he said USAID funding for Turquoise Mountain 'just stopped'. It had a contract with USAID, and it 'had another million dollars to go', and yet mad, bad Trump pulled the plug, Rory almost sobbed.

And what urgent work does Turquoise Mountain do? It promotes craft-making in Afghanistan. You can buy its 'hand-knotted rugs' made by 'talented weavers' a must-have for every virtuous home in the West's turbo-smug boroughs. It does some good stuff, like restoring historic buildings, and it does some insane stuff, like the aforementioned Duchamp discourse. In a remarkable scene in Adam Curtis's 2015 documentary, Bitter Lake, a woman from Turquoise Mountain was shown extolling the virtues of Duchamp's inverted urinal to a roomful of incredulous Afghan women. It was super rad when Duchamp 'put this toilet in an art gallery', she said, as the women shook their veiled heads in disbelief.
Quote:

The optics are awful. Stewart reportedly makes 70,000 a month from his podcast wanging on about Brexit and Trump and other things that give his class of wets and bores sleepless nights. We don't know how much his wife makes with Turquoise Mountain, but it won't be peanuts. And yet the taxed earnings of the workers of America part funded his wife's NGO antics. Make it make sense! No doubt, Stewart, Campbell and their listeners will fret that Trump is leaving poor Afghans in the lurch. So let's remind them that Campbell was Tony Blair's right-hand man when he laid waste to Afghanistan and then Iraq something Trump and Musk have never done. I bet there are Afghan women who'd far rather have back the sons killed in that infernal war than another ****ing powerpoint on Duchamp.
End woke colonialism. About right.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
$70-large a month for running what is tantamount to a leftwing psyop podcast?

Damn…I really got into the wrong line of work…
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shoshana Stewart, about as pretentious a couple as Meghan and her boy toy.

And stage-5 TDS sufferer Rory has a book on the top 10 list in the UK.


These guys look like crooks who appear to just hate America in general and have been basically stealing money via USAID, among other places. Typical.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How USAID flew bags of hundred dollar bills to the Taliban:
Quote:

  • [T]he ultimate responsibility lay with USAID. The $40 million on the tarmac was part of a much larger scheme under which USAID and the State Department provided over $1.7 billion in funding to the UN, which then shipped $2.9 billion in cash to Afghanistan.
  • Under the guise of humanitarian needs, $1.7 billion was provided to the UN, which used some of the money to buy dollars to fly into Afghanistan, to trade for Afghan currency, which the U.S. had also arranged to have printed on behalf of the Taliban.
  • The cash is not provided to the Taliban or DAB by the UN, but by the groups funded by the UN.
  • During the intermediate step, DAB held "auctions" of the dollars which elements linked to the Taliban, including the Haqqani network allied with Al Qaeda, reportedly "win." The auctions prop up the Afghan currency and keep the Taliban in power.
  • Putting the money into UN pooled accounts allowed USAID to claim that they "do not provide assistance to or through the Taliban", they just put money into "pooled UN accounts..."
  • The State Department responded to these revelations by falsely claiming that there are no sanctions on Afghanistan, that banks refuse to carry out wire transfers because of "the lack of profitability" and that "to the best of our knowledge, no electronic financial delivery systems are currently scalable to meet the liquidity needs of the UN" requiring it to instead convert billions of dollars into paper notes and ship them by plane. None of this is true or even a plausible lie.
  • The Taliban money laundering scheme was not an exception. It was how USAID, the State Department and the UN have operated for too long, not only in Afghanistan, but in Syria, Yemen, Gaza and many other terrorist areas around the world, using plausible deniability and chains of organizations to avoid accountability and direct responsibility for aiding terrorists.
  • Americans have become the financiers of their worst enemies. It's time for that to stop.
In 2022, the DAB Afghanistan Bank showed off photos of $40 million in stacks of hundred dollar bills sitting on the tarmac at Kabul International Airport. The Taliban-controlled central bank described this as one of three shipments of "humanitarian aid" amounting to over $100 million.
DAB, Afghanistan's central bank, was headed by Noor Ahmad Agha, a "specially designated terrorist" who had been named as the "financier of bomb-making", including the IEDs which had killed over 1,000 American soldiers, and sending money to a sanctioned figure was illegal.
Despite that, someone had sent a massive fortune in U.S. cash to the Taliban's terror bank.


The Democrat party, and USAID are enemies of the republic. Much more about Haqqani Network at Sarah Adams channel.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there a more perfect exemplar of British snobbery/aristocracy than Rory Stewart?




More at this hotair link.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.