Allegations Biden never signed anything

41,928 Views | 305 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by Ellis Wyatt
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I find it humorous that so many pardons were being signed that an autopen was even needed.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did Biden operate the autopen in the traditional sense or is it an electronic signature similar to that on a pdf? I think it's the latter.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

Did Biden operate the autopen in the traditional sense or is it an electronic signature similar to that on a pdf? I think it's the latter.


It's a machine that signs one's name.

I'm Gipper
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Here's a good video demo.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PER Truth Social:

Congressional GOP is opening investigation into the AutoPen.

While I am okay with that, we all know that nothing will ever come from that other than blustering from Congress Critters.

We need Department of Justice to be on this, not just Congress. Ed Martin is on this. That is the one to watch!


(There is little to know chance these pardons get undone, but we still need to know who had the autopen and what authority did he have)

I'm Gipper
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

bobbranco said:

Did Biden operate the autopen in the traditional sense or is it an electronic signature similar to that on a pdf? I think it's the latter.


It's a machine that signs one's name.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TA-OP said:

Im Gipper said:

What if Biden didn't authorize or instruct the auto pen be used? Then what?
I concede that the validity of the pardons is reliant on Presidential intent, but stand by saying using an autopen is perfectly fine. In fact, there was a bill originating from a House Republican earlier this year that would require a physical signature on pardons, suggesting they know autopen usage does not violate the Constitution.

However, there are checks on using an autopen to ensure intent. The DOJ is a big check and I highly doubt AG Bondi would keep quiet about any wrong doing. So, all we have now is President Trump and other MAGAs bloviating without having any evidence or basis.

Why did he hand sign Hunter's pardon, but none of the rest? How do you determine intent when someone is demented?
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll concede on the autopen issue if they go after those involved in the cover up regarding his health. They definitely knew better.
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

PER Truth Social:

Congressional GOP is opening investigation into the AutoPen.

While I am okay with that, we all know that nothing will ever come from that other than blustering from Congress Critters.

We need Department of Justice to be on this, not just Congress. Ed Martin is on this. That is the one to watch!


(There is little to know chance these pardons get undone, but we still need to know who had the autopen and what authority did he have)


Authority is they had access to the Oval Office.

It's hard to argue intent when Biden would go in and out of coherence. Even his higher coherent states were questionable.

I find it funny about all the talk because anyone with a brain could see he had dementia when he ran for president in 2020.
I wish a buck was still silver, it was back, when the country was strong.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

I'll concede on the autopen issue if they go after those involved in the cover up regarding his health. They definitely knew better.


What can you "go after" them for about laying about his health?


Forging a signature is a crime.

I'm Gipper
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

Did Biden operate the autopen in the traditional sense or is it an electronic signature similar to that on a pdf? I think it's the latter.
The constitution says "will sign." They understood that to be quill & ink. Technology changes (Trump uses a marker), but the intent is probably well described as "a unique action of personally legal approval."

So IF these were digital documents, I'd be fine with Docusign.

If the autopen operated to the individual command of a mentally competent president: I'd call it unpresidential but still accept it as legal so long as there were proof of the president giving the command for the specific signatures deposited.

The issue here is that there's no proof that Biden "signed" most of these documents. Without video evidence, there's no way to tell he actually approved for his signature to be applied to these documents.

On documents that Biden directed to receive his mark, it's lazy but not worth fighting over. But for any document that he didn't specifically direct to receive his mark; the signatures are forgeries that should be considered not-legally-binding.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If he could request an autopen he's capable of signing it officially.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The constitution says "will sign."
For bills, not pardons.


Quote:

any document that he didn't specifically direct to receive his mark; the signatures are forgeries that should be considered not-legally-binding.
Exactly!

I'm Gipper
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Propriety vs legitimacy. I don't see it as PROPER for a president to use autopen in their official capacity, but could imagine situations where prosthesis is warranted (ex a paraplegic who signs documents via nerolink + robotic arm). We'd still accept those as LEGAL signatures regardless of the layers of apparatus involved.

And there are plenty of delegated powers which could be signed "by direction" by various officials (they sign THEIR name, not the president's). I'm fine with those.

It's application of a a facsimile of president's signature WITHOUT his explicit direction that I see as an obvious legal problem. And IF you're running autopen in the whitehouse for a president who's in Air Force One: you owe it to the nation to have a process that's AT LEAST as verifiable as what comes standard on $19.99 adobe subscription.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll say again, show up to your next home closing with an auto pen and see how that flies.

It's not too much to ask that Presidential documents meet or exceed that standard.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funky Winkerbean said:

If he could request an autopen he's capable of signing it officially.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sam callahan said:

I'll say again, show up to your next home closing with an auto pen and see how that flies.

It's not too much to ask that Presidential documents meet or exceed that standard.

Exactly. If we can't do it, it's not legal for them to do it.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Hate to break it to Trump, but Biden very much was for open borders. Autopen issues aside, Biden profited greatly from all of this.

I'm Gipper
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No. Ron Klein, Tom Donilon, Jim Biden etc. were for open borders. They were doing their CCP-masters bidding. What pisses me off is that there are no known investigations into their finances. I'd bet dollars to pesos there are payments from foreign enemies to them, and a chain of communications that can be tracked down, if people at the lovely FBI etc. wanted to do so.

What pisses me off to be more precise is that Trump could order investigations into this, this afternoon, instead of complaining about it on truth social.
Quote:

Donald Trump Truth Social 05.20.25 03:55 PM EST

Joe Biden was not for Open Borders, he never talked about Open Borders, where criminals of all kinds, shapes, and sizes, can flow into our Country at will. It wasn't his idea to Open the Border, and almost destroy our Country, and cost us Hundreds of Billions of Dollars to get criminals out of our Country, and go through the process we are going through now. It was the people that knew he was cognitively impaired, and that took over the Autopen. They stole the Presidency of the United States, and put us in Great Danger. This is TREASON at the Highest Level! They did it to destroy our Country. The Joe Biden that everybody knew would never allow drug dealers, gang members, and the mentally insane to come into our Country totally unchecked and unvetted. All anyone has to do is look up his record. Something very severe should happen to these Treasonous Thugs that wanted to destroy our Country, but couldn't, because I came along. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Peepaw didn't come up with these plans/actions, he tried to stay upright/awake a few hours a day, generally unaware he even was nominally POTUS.
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:


Here's a good video demo.
Xiden needs to really be brought up on treason. As for the autopen. It needs the Office Space Printer treatment for its foul deeds against our great country!!!

StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LGB getting that 10%++ from everybody.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He was speculating on that, no evidence, but it's based on the Tenn. history with Gov. Blanton. Valid points though.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The more this Biden stuff comes out and the more it becomes obvious others were in control, then the light needs to be shown back on Butler, PA.

A turn of the head may indeed be what saves The Republic.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's all probably much worse than we thought.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it gets much much worse.

Someone was willing to kill Trump on a live broadcast rally, and when it goes bad have the body incinerated in hours and the investigation forgotten within 6 months.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

I think it gets much much worse.

Someone was willing to kill Trump on a live broadcast rally, and when it goes bad have the body incinerated in hours and the investigation forgotten within 6 months.


There is nothing to that. Just ask the current FBI. Move along. Nothing to see here.

I'm Gipper
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

bobbranco said:

Did Biden operate the autopen in the traditional sense or is it an electronic signature similar to that on a pdf? I think it's the latter.


It's a machine that signs one's other people's name.
With this White House I think this is more accurate. Since nobody operating this illegal cash machine was obviously signing their own name !!
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think they knew about his cancer before the 2020 election and knew if it got out Trump would win the election.

Once Biden "won" they knew if it was released they would have issues with Kamala taking over and risk a bloodbath in the midterms.

After a certain point they just kept it going until they finally installed Kamala. Who knows, maybe they threatened Biden with the medical release if he didn't step down.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Meh, I hope the first we hear of this from Trump is that the tactical nuke at Davos and the drone strike in Katonah, NY were a complete success.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's not start pretending that the only thing wrong with Biden's health the last few years was cancer and pants ****ting. And it's not a stutter.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Let's not start pretending that the only thing wrong with Biden's health the last few years was cancer and pants ****ting. And it's not a stutter.
I think the cancer treatment definitely exacerbated the dementia and brain fog.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

flown-the-coop said:

Let's not start pretending that the only thing wrong with Biden's health the last few years was cancer and pants ****ting. And it's not a stutter.
I think the cancer treatment definitely exacerbated the dementia and brain fog.
And muscle weakness in his legs? Felt the need to moderate his steps to smaller ones? Hard to climb stairs?
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

I'll concede on the autopen issue if they go after those involved in the cover up regarding his health. They definitely knew better.


What can you "go after" them for about laying about his health?


Forging a signature is a crime.
Not if the person is a democrat.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
one safe place said:

Im Gipper said:

Funky Winkerbean said:

I'll concede on the autopen issue if they go after those involved in the cover up regarding his health. They definitely knew better.


What can you "go after" them for about laying about his health?


Forging a signature is a crime.
Not if the person is a democrat.



So the Trump DoJ won't prosecute Democrats for crimes? Why not?

I'm Gipper
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.