WaltonAg18 said:
Tom Fox said:
WaltonAg18 said:
Step 1: Designate the NRA as a terrorist group
Step 2: Arrest all NRA-supporters for funding and furthering the cause of a terrorist group
Step 3: Rinse and repeat until you have no opposition
Step 4: Never lose an election again
Unfortunately not shocking at all that some of you don't see how this can be further abused and misused by the democrats if they ever manage to stumble their way back into power. "But but but they did it to me first" is not the correct answer in these situations.
Apples to oranges. They revoked her privilege to be here. She is a non citizen and removed her.
You cannot remove citizens from the US.
And you actually think Hamas is not a terrorist organization? And that the NRA is one? One of these is demonstrably not like the other.
Try harder.
According to the OP she was arrested for her op-ed, which had nothing to do with Hamas and everything to do with a useless student senate at a diploma mill university doing things that student senates do.
You don't get to spend four years whining and crying about the lack of due process for January 6 victims and then turn around and encourage the same behavior against people you disagree with.
The OP cites the WaPo, which has been known to exaggerate, propagandize, editorialize and be highly selective in the "facts" that they report. And yet you are willing to accept these "facts" as gospel.
There is a reason many appeal to the 48 hour rule, especially when discussing articles from biased sources with a clear agenda.
If the facts remain after a suitable period that this grad student did nothing more than post opinions supporting a terrorist organization, then revoking her visa remains entirely correct but hauling her off in handcuffs may have been excessive though lawful. If facts yet to be disclosed reveal that she might have been a danger to anyone, or that her actions were more than just exercising her free speech, then the "masked agents" and handcuffs were justified. But I'll bet the WaPo is not going to be the one to expose those aggravating factors, will it?