***Official 2024 - 2025 Dallas Mavericks Season Thread***

83,077 Views | 1236 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by thegoodolag15
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
zgolfz85 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

It's also relevant to point out that Dallas now has, easily, the best defensive frontcourt in basketball

Davis
Lively
Gafford
PJ

Scoring late in games with PJ/Davis/Lively all out there is gonna be a *****


You really think they're keeping all 3 btw gaff, lively and AD


Gafford seems to be an obvious trade casualty just because of salary. He also wasn't great in the playoffs last year.

However, they are saying they want AD to play the 4, so you need Gafford. Gafford has also dominated OKC this year, so that may be a reason to keep him.
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can you guys get Jimmy Butler without sacrificing too many of those pieces?
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was a no on Sexton until this trade. A week ago, he made no sense. Now he actually makes perfect sense.

He's probably the most realistic of that group.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Woods Ag said:

Can you guys get Jimmy Butler without sacrificing too many of those pieces?


Probably not. If I'm Miami, I have to have PJ.

The AAC may burn if Nico sends away PJ now. He's probably everybody's favorite player now lol.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

I was a no on Sexton until this trade. A week ago, he made no sense. Now he actually makes perfect sense.

He's probably the most realistic of that group.

Financially, you could do Gafford for Sexton straight up, but you are in the tax.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Woods Ag said:

Can you guys get Jimmy Butler without sacrificing too many of those pieces?
No realistic way to get Jimmy. Would havet to give up Gafford, Klay, and PJ to make the salaries work.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

shack009 said:

I was a no on Sexton until this trade. A week ago, he made no sense. Now he actually makes perfect sense.

He's probably the most realistic of that group.

Financially, you could do Gafford for Sexton straight up, but you are in the tax.


If I'm giving them Gafford then maybe I would throw in Grimes or Christie and see if I can get Kesler back. Obviously we'd be throwing in that Lakers 2029 and maybe something else.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Guitarsoup said:

shack009 said:

I was a no on Sexton until this trade. A week ago, he made no sense. Now he actually makes perfect sense.

He's probably the most realistic of that group.

Financially, you could do Gafford for Sexton straight up, but you are in the tax.


If I'm giving them Gafford then maybe I would throw in Grimes or Christie and see if I can get Kesler back. Obviously we'd be throwing in that Lakers 2029 and maybe something else.
They want two firsts for Kessler. I doubt he is on the table. Ainge is a pain to deal with.

It also might be a 3-team deal bc they might not want Gafford when they have Kessler.

Could send Gafford for Chris Paul and that would cut 3M in salary for the new owners.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
most fans do not have a favorite player anymore
AggieSportsGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Everything new coming out about this trade makes me more and more disgusted.
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
thegoodolag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WOMP WOMP
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.