Cliff.Booth said:
To some extent, obviously. But from the beginning did George Lucas frame the Jedi as practicing some religion that is just one school of thought not necessarily any better or worse than other religions of thought, or was the original trilogy pretty much straight up good guys vs bad guys, love vs hate, light vs dark?
Once again, I don't disagree that Star Wars can be constructed this way, my point is that it will always be very limiting from a narrative stand point.
I would argue the OT is much more silent on these issues that is why we have almost 50 years of arguing about this and ginormous amounts of media trying to explore it.
In looking at the OT, most of our knowledge about the Jedi's are as follows:
Ben Kenobi, who makes statements that are both true or untrue from a certain point of view aka a liar.
Yoda, who is dying, doesn't want to train Luke and throws him into a Dark Side Cave without any preparations.
Han, who claims the Jedi is just a hokey religion.
Leia, who refers to Kenobi not as a Jedi, but as a General.
The on the Dark Side:
Darth Vader who claims the Dark Side has power. Who wants to convert Luke to the Dark Side. He is not labeled as a Sith.
The Emperor who tries to convert Luke to the Dark Side not labeled as a Sith.
So really, in just the three movies the Jedi are poorly defined at best and the Sith are nonexistent.
As to Good guys vs Bad Guys. Sure, I will generally concede that the Rebellion is made up of Good Guys and the Empire is Made up of bad guys. But then you have characters like Lando and Boba Fett who have some ambiguity to them. I include Boba Fett, because arguably he is just a man doing a job. But we can make him solidly a bad guy.
It is the prequels that really flesh out the Jedi/Sith and honestly that leads to a lot more ambiguity, like how many children can you murder before redemption is impossible. Episode 6 equates Anakin to be in the same standing as Obi-Wan and Yoda. And Episode 3 shows him murdering small children.
Ultimately, I submit if Star Wars just a story about good beating evil then nothing after 4-6 should have been made and there should not be an EU.
But I think we all want there to be more to the story than that. We want some gray, some ambiguity, some more complicated story telling.
I think reasonable people can disagree where that line should be drawn.
Real life is fully of challenging moral issues and the best fiction reflects that.