Hopefully on their butts in the street.Quote:
Where do these folks land?
Hopefully on their butts in the street.Quote:
Where do these folks land?
It's sad when a poor soul flaunts his ignorance for all to see. It shows they know nothing about Christian charity and what its purpose is. If they did, they would understand that governmental agency can never be charity regardless of the appearance of goodwill or benefit to the recipient. Never mind that the supposed "charity" usually comes with strings attached or an ulterior motive that certainly isn't "charitable".Mattressburn said:
Nothing is more Christian than shuttering the government agency that helps struggling countries with food, medicine, and clean water.
I think it would take a $2 trillion cut to balance the budget - that would require cutting into SS, Medicare and/or defense. Probably not going to happen.Dirt 05 said:
They have to cut a trillion before the budget is balanced. Until that point the only thing Americans will receive is loosening of chains of debt on themselves, their children, and future unborn progeny.
Quote:
I enjoy coming to F16 in the morning, reading something new that helps make America get better because of Trump's policy action, and thinking wow I can't believe i had to argue with conservatives for over a year this would be a different Trump. Feels selfishly satisfying.
jacketman03 said:
Thread title says "Trump shuts down USAID", but the story is all about Musk saying he's going to do it. So I guess now we're cool with unelected bureaucrats taking control of government?
Nice principles you got there.
nortex97 said:
Pretty hilarious, really.
jacketman03 said:ts5641 said:You understand Trump's the one in charge right? All these things are being done at his direction.jacketman03 said:
Thread title says "Trump shuts down USAID", but the story is all about Musk saying he's going to do it. So I guess now we're cool with unelected bureaucrats taking control of government?
Nice principles you got there.
And yes, I'm totally fine with Musk doing as much as possible as long as it begins to eliminate government spending and waste.
So it's okay for unelected bureaucrats to run things so long as they align with your interests?
Like I said, nice principles you've got there.
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:Kashchei said:
He needs to go after the UN next
Looks like the Department of Education may be next up on the list.BREAKING: Elon Musk is planning to gut the Department of Education next, per MSNBC.
— Patrick Webb (@RealPatrickWebb) February 2, 2025
Farmer_J said:
I can't overstate how strategically smart it was to take on USAID first. They are the ones who fund hit piece journalists and rent-a-riots to shut down any reforms.
It'll be interesting how the deet state fights back with their credit card cutoff.
To paraphrase the late Senator from Illinois, Everett Dirksen:Kenneth_2003 said:Wiki...Swan Song said:
If the department was created by a President, a President should be able to shut it down, no?
I like how that NBC article call a $40B budget just a "fraction" of the overall budget. 40 Billion Dollars!
US 2023 budge was $6,100,000,000,000 in total outlays, but $3.8 was mandatory spending and $0.7 Net interest (I'm assuming some other interest is buried in the mandatory...)
$1,700,000,000,000 Discretionary
$40,000,000,000 is 2.35% of discretionary
$40,000,000,000 is 0.656% of total
Yeah, it's a fraction. Everything is a "fraction" when you express the math correctly.
Swan Song said:
If the department was created by a President, a President should be able to shut it down, no?
I like how that NBC article call a $40B budget just a "fraction" of the overall budget. 40 Billion Dollars!
TexasAggie_02 said:
Damn, TAMUs Borlaug Institute is going to have a bad day today.
USAID also funded videogames to highlight gender issues. pic.twitter.com/2klCWeDGZa
— Grummz (@Grummz) February 3, 2025
titan said:
True. Also, like other outlays, it makes sense to stop it outright first, then renew as find are valid or can flush out just where it was going.
Case in point: AOC, promoting USAID all over X today, actually came from a USAID program in college to jumpstart her miracle political career. https://t.co/imxyVTt3H3 pic.twitter.com/EnzReCYHM8
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) February 3, 2025
El Gallo Blanco said:
The ONLY downside to this, is I worry that someone will PAY. No doubt, many powerful people would love to see Trump and/or Elon dead, now more than ever.
This is the biggest government shakeup we have evee seen in our lifetimes. Whether it works or not, it's a genuine aggressive attempt at a reversal of the existing power structures and status quo. It's f-ing happening.
This makes Watergate look like stealing a pen and some paperclips from the office supply closet. Lifelong Dems aren't going to like that either. Watergate was sooooo terrible.El Gallo Blanco said:
The ONLY downside to this, is I worry that someone will PAY. No doubt, many powerful people would love to see Trump and/or Elon dead, now more than ever.
This is the biggest government shakeup we have evee seen in our lifetimes. Whether it works or not, it's a genuine aggressive attempt at a reversal of the existing power structures and status quo. It's f-ing happening.
Tom Fox said:In an ideal and just world, hopefully tax cuts to those already paying for almost everything.No Spin Ag said:Dirt 05 said:
They have to cut a trillion before the budget is balanced. Until that point the only thing Americans will receive is loosening of chains of debt on themselves, their children, and future unborn progeny.
Any of that loosening of chains of debt turn into real money going into those people's wallets, and if so, how will we get that money in our wallets?
FireAg said:Farmer_J said:
I can't overstate how strategically smart it was to take on USAID first. They are the ones who fund hit piece journalists and rent-a-riots to shut down any reforms.
It'll be interesting how the deet state fights back with their credit card cutoff.
I think Trump and Musk probably need to have their security quadrupled…
RFK Jr. revealed that USAID was actually a CIA front, secretly funneling $5 billion in 2014 to ignite riots in Ukraine.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) February 2, 2025
According to him, these CIA-backed riots triggered a coup d'état that toppled Ukraine's neutral, democratically elected government.
Just one month before the… pic.twitter.com/alcyCYdwaf
Do you mean "arousing" a la Chuck Schumer? What a dork.texagbeliever said:
I enjoy coming to F16 in the morning, reading something new that helps make America get better because of Trump's policy action, and thinking wow I can't believe i had to argue with conservatives for over a year this would be a different Trump. Feels selfishly satisfying.
The level of corruption in these agencies is directly proportional to the Establishment's weeping and gnashing of teeth over the corruption being exposed.
— Ultra Maga Corgi King (@Corgi_King0421) February 3, 2025
Mind-blowing 🤯 https://t.co/Vv7PnkaFYz
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 3, 2025
Gotta elect JD Vance in 2028Gilligan said:
Ecstatic that this is all being exposed. It's sickening and I believe only the surface is being scratched.
It's 2025. What happens in the future?
How do we stop this from happening again?
What safeguards will be put in place?
Who will go to jail and made examples of and deterrence for others?