Trump Shutting Down USAID

129,621 Views | 1212 Replies | Last: 49 min ago by BMX Bandit
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow. We've reached the point where we have to celebrate a court determining who the president actually is correctly.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stressboy said:

nortex97 said:

USAID must be held accountable to the executive if it is allowed to exist.



That looks like a call for violence.
Looks like a call for DOJ investigation
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thread. Currently live tweeting court hearing.

Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
akm91 said:

Stressboy said:

nortex97 said:

USAID must be held accountable to the executive if it is allowed to exist.



That looks like a call for violence.
Looks like a call for DOJ investigation
Soooo.... They're ordered to stop spending money and shut down.
They spend money on Metro advertising posters, WITH THEIR NAME ON IT

Bold strategy there.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:

akm91 said:

Stressboy said:

nortex97 said:

USAID must be held accountable to the executive if it is allowed to exist.



That looks like a call for violence.
Looks like a call for DOJ investigation
Soooo.... They're ordered to stop spending money and shut down.
They spend money on Metro advertising posters, WITH THEIR NAME ON IT

Bold strategy there.
That's so pathetic it almost makes me wonder if it's a false flag. Almost.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tailgate88 said:

Kenneth_2003 said:

akm91 said:

Stressboy said:

nortex97 said:

USAID must be held accountable to the executive if it is allowed to exist.



That looks like a call for violence.
Looks like a call for DOJ investigation
Soooo.... They're ordered to stop spending money and shut down.
They spend money on Metro advertising posters, WITH THEIR NAME ON IT

Bold strategy there.
That's so pathetic it almost makes me wonder if it's a false flag. Almost.


I think its fake, but **** usaid anyway.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well worth the watch

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah I have that on my list. He has been on all the big podcasts now I think in the past week, blowing up now with the USAID infamy.

More subterfuge to hide money going invariably to Hamas from USAID:
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Thread. Currently live tweeting court hearing.


They better appeal this if it goes against them
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It will get overturned, Trumps team better fight
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2rXdCTkipx2Iu5dX1Gh0s5?si=mcXchIVVSHyB5y6vx3m4Aw&context=spotify%3Ashow%3A4rOoJ6Egrf8K2IrywzwOMk

Benz and Rogan just dropped. Haven't listened yet but it's about what trump has been doing and what it means.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judges, judge shopping themselves?



The Global Health case assigned number 25-cv-00402, and the AIDS Vaccine case was assigned number 25-cv-00400. The implication of the case numbers is that the two cases were likely filed at the same time on Monday, 2/11/25.
The Global Health case was assigned to new Biden appointee Judge Loren AliKahn, and the Aids Vaccine case was assigned to Biden appointee Amir Ali.

When new cases are filed and the parties know the cases are "related" by their subject matter to a case already filed in the District, a "Related Case Notice" is supposed to be filed along with the new case. All three cases here challenge the POTUS' authority as alleged in the the same EO targeting spending by USAID.

Global Health did not file a Related Case Notice with regard to the case before Judge Nichols. For obvious reasons based on his earlier comments, they didn't want the case moved away from Judge AliKahn.

But the DOJ did file such a notice. When DOJ did so, Global Health then filed a "Response," noting that the AIDS Vaccine case was also "related" in that it challenged the same EO as the American Foreign case before Judge Nichols.

When there is a Related Case Notice filed, the Local Rule provides as follows:

"Where the existence of related cases in this Court is revealed after the cases are assigned, the judge having the later-numbered case may transfer that case to the Calendar and Case Management Committee for reassignment to the judge having the earlier case."
Note the case numbers:

American Foreign Service Assn -- 22-cv-00352
Aids Vaccine -- 22-cv-00400
Global Health -- 22-cv-00402.

Curiously, the AIDS Vaccine case was also originally assigned to Judge AliKahn, and she issued a "Show Cause Order" directing the parties to take a position on the "Related Case Issue."
The DOJ did so, noting the overlap of the three cases with regard to the same EO and a challenge to the authority of POTUS to cancel USAID funding. The DOJ also noted that the same Plaintiffs' counsel was involved in both Judge Nichols case and the new AIDS Vaccine case. DOJ asked that both new cases be transferred to Judge Nichols.

Rather than do that, Judge AliKahn requested that the AIDS Vaccine case be randomly reassigned by the Clerk's Office. That is how it ended up with Judge Ali. Then she transferred the Global Health case to Judge Ali as well since the AIDS Vaccine case had the earlier-issued case number between the two -- likely filed at the same time.

Basically, she avoided either case going to Judge Nichols who had already indicated an unwillingness to block the EO issued by President Trump.

In other districts where I have practiced the issue of related cases is left to the Judge who was assigned the first case to decide, not the Judge who was assigned the later case. So, in this circumstance, it would have been Judge Nichols who decided whether he should
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Judges, judge shopping themselves?



The Global Health case assigned number 25-cv-00402, and the AIDS Vaccine case was assigned number 25-cv-00400. The implication of the case numbers is that the two cases were likely filed at the same time on Monday, 2/11/25.
The Global Health case was assigned to new Biden appointee Judge Loren AliKahn, and the Aids Vaccine case was assigned to Biden appointee Amir Ali.

When new cases are filed and the parties know the cases are "related" by their subject matter to a case already filed in the District, a "Related Case Notice" is supposed to be filed along with the new case. All three cases here challenge the POTUS' authority as alleged in the the same EO targeting spending by USAID.

Global Health did not file a Related Case Notice with regard to the case before Judge Nichols. For obvious reasons based on his earlier comments, they didn't want the case moved away from Judge AliKahn.

But the DOJ did file such a notice. When DOJ did so, Global Health then filed a "Response," noting that the AIDS Vaccine case was also "related" in that it challenged the same EO as the American Foreign case before Judge Nichols.

When there is a Related Case Notice filed, the Local Rule provides as follows:

"Where the existence of related cases in this Court is revealed after the cases are assigned, the judge having the later-numbered case may transfer that case to the Calendar and Case Management Committee for reassignment to the judge having the earlier case."
Note the case numbers:

American Foreign Service Assn -- 22-cv-00352
Aids Vaccine -- 22-cv-00400
Global Health -- 22-cv-00402.

Curiously, the AIDS Vaccine case was also originally assigned to Judge AliKahn, and she issued a "Show Cause Order" directing the parties to take a position on the "Related Case Issue."
The DOJ did so, noting the overlap of the three cases with regard to the same EO and a challenge to the authority of POTUS to cancel USAID funding. The DOJ also noted that the same Plaintiffs' counsel was involved in both Judge Nichols case and the new AIDS Vaccine case. DOJ asked that both new cases be transferred to Judge Nichols.

Rather than do that, Judge AliKahn requested that the AIDS Vaccine case be randomly reassigned by the Clerk's Office. That is how it ended up with Judge Ali. Then she transferred the Global Health case to Judge Ali as well since the AIDS Vaccine case had the earlier-issued case number between the two -- likely filed at the same time.

Basically, she avoided either case going to Judge Nichols who had already indicated an unwillingness to block the EO issued by President Trump.

In other districts where I have practiced the issue of related cases is left to the Judge who was assigned the first case to decide, not the Judge who was assigned the later case. So, in this circumstance, it would have been Judge Nichols who decided whether he should


Yep. More lawfare from the bench.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep, just appeal
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like the judge will go with the plaintiffs. Not real surprised.



Hopefully Trump's team can convince the circuit/SCOTUS to treat it like an injunction and seek mandamus relief. Seems like the communists are once again over-stepping, just a matter of how far out of bounds the contact is made.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's time for SCOTUS to put the kibosh on all these district court injunctions.
Trump will fix it.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How fast can SCOTUS act?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SCOTUS won't look at anything until May, likely.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know if this is USAID related or not.

Touchless
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


quick off topic side note. It's crazy to me Trump's hair is all of a sudden grey and not the orangish color. It's like he just all of a sudden stopped coloring it after the election or something.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

Glad he's got Elon's back and talking about how they are chattering about him. One thing though -- why announce such an intention a day in advance? Seems like the kind of thing you should just spring out as a revelation so there is no counter-measures (or even flights from the country)
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Touchless said:

will25u said:


quick off topic side note. It's crazy to me Trump's hair is all of a sudden grey and not the orangish color. It's like he just all of a sudden stopped coloring it after the election or something.
Changing the narrative, maybe?

"Grey man bad"
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Ribeye-Rare
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

quick off topic side note. It's crazy to me Trump's hair is all of a sudden grey and not the orangish color. It's like he just all of a sudden stopped coloring it after the election or something
IIRC, Levin mentioned on his show either yesterday or Monday that he thought the President was looking tired and that he hoped he was feeling OK.

Hell, I wouldn't blame Trump if he were tired. That guy works like crazy, and he's 78 years old. He's damn sure not falling asleep in his easy chair every day at 4:30 PM watching Gunsmoke reruns, that's for sure.

My side note -- it looks like he's found his JFF in Elon. I hope it lasts.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone notice that with all USAid funding cut off, there's not mass protests despite all the Congressmen yelling about a constitutional crisis?

Weird right?
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

That seems like a podcast he was on. I wonder where the complete episode is?

Purely partisan family/politics.

You can almost hear him gag on what's going down his throat.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FTAG 2000 said:

Anyone notice that with all USAid funding cut off, there's not mass protests despite all the Congressmen yelling about a constitutional crisis?

Weird right?


Nobody to pay the bus charters AND the passengers.
Some redass hard working President Trump results.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FTAG 2000 said:

Anyone notice that with all USAid funding cut off, there's not mass protests despite all the Congressmen yelling about a constitutional crisis?

Weird right?

I have noticed that the actual attendance at these hissy-fit rallies has been quite paltry…

I've been wondering if I was the only one who noticed…
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funding has been turned off …for now

…the spigot will be on soon. Waiting for the planned inciting incident.

A George Floyd 2.0 on steroids is assuredly coming soon.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

Funding has been turned off …for now

…the spigot will be on soon. Waiting for the planned inciting incident.

A George Floyd 2.0 on steroids is assuredly coming soon.

Not if it isn't funded…I'm not so sure the spigot will be turned on, and even if it were to be, something tells me DOGE could forensically pinpoint where the funding came from and who was responsible for cutting the check…

They rooted out the FEMA payment for illegals in hotels pretty damn quick and identified the perpetrators, outed them, and then fired them…

I think DOGE has set some traps in the system to identify any misuse of funds moving forward…
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

oh no said:

Funding has been turned off …for now

…the spigot will be on soon. Waiting for the planned inciting incident.

A George Floyd 2.0 on steroids is assuredly coming soon.

Not if it isn't funded…I'm not so sure the spigot will be turned on, and even if it were to be, something tells me DOGE could forensically pinpoint where the funding came from and who was responsible for cutting the check…

They rooted out the FEMA payment for illegals in hotels pretty damn quick and identified the perpetrators, outed them, and then fired them…

I think DOGE has set some traps in the system to identify any misuse of funds moving forward…
Let's hope so.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Doge is using AI on government databases to look for wasteful spending- looking at budgets, contracts, outgoing cash, etc.

A well-timed outrageous incident (ie - white supremacy + guns) could fire up the masses that these dem politicians are trying unsuccessfully to fire up now. That happens, and outside of gov funding can pour in to really make it "fiery but mostly peaceful". DOGE has no role if that happens. DOGE is computer science nerds on government databases.

- politicians, bureaucrats, and their Pravda media arm want people to be up in arms about DOGE now. But they're not. Deep state can't pay for enough outrage right now because their expenditures are being watched. But they could still create an incident and find a way to really make people care. Just need a martyr like St Floyd.

Remember that a divided population is easier to control. Marxism 101. The state will make sure the division continues and worsens.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lovely people:


EXCELLENT! (NED is/was part of the war machine at USAID):


You have to laugh at some of the cover purposes:

Using 'feminist messaging' in Europe (aka propaganda) to increase Afghan war funding (keep in mind we then handed Afghan to the Taliban Biden allies):

I'll stop, that's about all I can take this am with my coffee.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.