Newark mayor who stormed ICE facility arrested

32,245 Views | 306 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by 13B
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wonder if the mayor cut a deal to implicate the congress woman. That would be fun.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Love to see it. Charged.

Quote:

As RedState reported, McIver was seen on video throwing punches at and shoving ICE agents after they tried to prevent her from entering a checkpoint. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested on site for trespassing after a Homeland Security official showed up to deal with the situation. McIver was allowed to leave, though, leaving open the question of whether she'd face consequences.
…
Quote:

If a normal American did what McIver did, they'd have been slammed to the ground and handcuffed. It wouldn't even be a question that they'd be charged with a crime, and they'd almost certainly lose their employment as well. Congressional members are supposed to have some sense of decorum and respect. Cussing out rank-and-file ICE agents and throwing punches at them is not those things, to say the least.

House Majority Leader Mike Johnson should quickly bring a resolution to expel McIver from Congress to the floor. Even if it doesn't pass, and it just might, it will at least make the entire Democrat caucus own her ridiculous behavior. Further, the DOJ should file charges. McIver cannot be allowed to get away with what she did simply because of her status. If that happens, it'll be open sense for this kind of dangerous, grandstanding garbage. The time to nip this in the bud is now. Make an example of her, and do it harshly.
I'm glad to see that happened. You can not have congressional members existing above the law. As I said above, any normal person would have been on the ground in handcuffs had they done what McIver did, and had she been allowed to get away with her behavior, it would have signaled open season on immigration authorities.
She should now be expelled from the House per above.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bulldog73 said:

I wonder if the mayor cut a deal to implicate the congress woman. That would be fun.
It was mentioned this morning on Fox & Friends that Mayor Barakas agreed to cooperate when his charges were dropped.

Should Trump offer to put in a good word with Bondi on her behalf if she votes for the BBB?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pilgrimshadow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's convenient that she's already comfortable wearing orange.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, it is the new black
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She won't get jail time. The maximum penalty for what she is charged with is one year in prison. Assuming her criminal record is clean, she's looking at probation.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HTownAg98 said:

She won't get jail time. The maximum penalty for what she is charged with is one year in prison. Assuming her criminal record is clean, she's looking at probation.
Man, I wish you were on the Jan 6 legal team.

They are still considering additional charges and word on the Newark mayor is he is facing more serious charges if he balks at cooperation.

Whilst I can normally agree someone with a clean record would be considered for probation, the libs tossed all that out the window. Goose and gander and all that jazz for this cat.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I sure hope they keep going and not wimp out...let the swine like Swallowwell cry alligator tears. Nobody cares because this is an 80-20 issue and the Dems just haven't realized it yet or think this the only way to show how brave they are in their "resistance."
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

HTownAg98 said:

She won't get jail time. The maximum penalty for what she is charged with is one year in prison. Assuming her criminal record is clean, she's looking at probation.
Man, I wish you were on the Jan 6 legal team.

They are still considering additional charges and word on the Newark mayor is he is facing more serious charges if he balks at cooperation.

Whilst I can normally agree someone with a clean record would be considered for probation, the libs tossed all that out the window. Goose and gander and all that jazz for this cat.
She's only been charged with one crime as of now. Sure, if they stack on additional charges, the penalties could rise. But that's all we have to go on at the present time.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one is above the law. If they can charge a President with something, they can charge a representative with something. It's not Animal House where some are more equal than others.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

No one is above the law. If they can charge a President with something, they can charge a representative with something. It's not Animal House where some are more equal than others.
I know what you meant but obligatory



Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Animal House : Animal Farm :: Tomato : Tomahto
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Urban Ag said:

techno-ag said:

No one is above the law. If they can charge a President with something, they can charge a representative with something. It's not Animal House where some are more equal than others.
I know what you meant but obligatory





I shoulda paid more attention in English at A&M.

In apologies, here's one of the great cinematic burps of all time.


The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

No one is above the law. If they can charge a President with something, they can charge a representative with something. It's not Animal House where some are more equal than others.
And for this fat *****, they didn't have to make up charges. She is on video assaulting Federal LEOs in the commission of their official duties. She was demanding something she has no right to. She should absolutely be expelled from Congress.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
PCC_80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So nice of her to wear bright orange so that we can easily pick her out of the crowd. I am sure that she meant to do this to show her constituants how hard she fights for them. But, I guess she forgot that orange works both ways.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She struck LEOs. ***** deserves prison!
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

She struck LEOs. ***** deserves prison!


8 years is ludicrous. I despise these petty tyrants more than most but 8 is a ridiculously long sentence considering we let child rapists out after a couple of years.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Child rape can get you life so there's that.

She should get the 8 years and maybe the Dems will be more electable then.

For now, dis ho goin to da clink.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What did the Jan 6 defendants get?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Queso1 said:

Logos Stick said:

She struck LEOs. ***** deserves prison!


8 years is ludicrous. I despise these petty tyrants more than most but 8 is a ridiculously long sentence considering we let child rapists out after a couple of years.
She won a prize. She can enjoy it for 8 years.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Faces 8 years" does not mean she is going to get that punishment.

That is the maximum punishment. Unless she is a multitime offender, that's not going to happen.

I'm Gipper
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Who let Keenan Thompson in the courtroom!?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Legit.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:




The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:



CrackerJackAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Don't forget Federal inmate 'gold bar Bob' Menendez' son was also there (and I think arrested).



I actually agree that a sitting US Senator should have the right to oversight (without hindrance) of any United States facility world wide at any time unannounced.

Or we should elect a group of tribunes that all hell breaks loose if they don't get whatever they ask for or are blocked from any type of over sight.

I think it keeps everyone honest because they would always be willing to burn the opposition.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Everything in the government is about procedures. Sorry but it's a fact.
CrackerJackAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Everything in the government is about procedures. Sorry but it's a fact.


That's not a justification for why it's ok.

I don't trust government and the more widely it can be cracked open for any reason the better

I would think a group of Tribunes elected directly by the people would still be pretty cool.

One year. Unpaid. Can never run for political office again. Cannot have ever held a federal political office. Same goes for lobbying industry.

It really adds a fourth level of oversight & check/balance to the Washington cabal.



techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CrackerJackAg said:

nortex97 said:

Everything in the government is about procedures. Sorry but it's a fact.


That's not a justification for why it's ok.

I don't trust government and the more widely it can be cracked open for any reason the better

I would think a group of Tribunes elected directly by the people would still be pretty cool.

It really adds a fourth level of oversight & check/balance to the Washington cabal.




The problem is Dems would abuse it. If they won't go through the proper channels and procedures now, and only showboat for the cameras, think how much worse they'd be without policies in place.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CrackerJackAg said:

nortex97 said:

Don't forget Federal inmate 'gold bar Bob' Menendez' son was also there (and I think arrested).



I actually agree that a sitting US Senator should have the right to oversight (without hindrance) of any United States facility world wide at any time unannounced.

Or we should elect a group of tribunes that all hell breaks loose if they don't get whatever they ask for or are blocked from any type of over sight.

I think it keeps everyone honest because they would always be willing to burn the opposition.
So a US Senator or Representative should be allowed to walk into any area, anytime no matter the security requirements?

Walk into Los Alamos an enter the vault where all of the nuclear weapons designs are stored?

Walk into an ICBM control bunker?

Walk into ADX Florence?

Walk into Area 51?

There are places that few people should be allowed to go, and many others that should only be accessed because of the security arrangements that need to be made before a tour can be conducted.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
CrackerJackAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

CrackerJackAg said:

nortex97 said:

Everything in the government is about procedures. Sorry but it's a fact.


That's not a justification for why it's ok.

I don't trust government and the more widely it can be cracked open for any reason the better

I would think a group of Tribunes elected directly by the people would still be pretty cool.

It really adds a fourth level of oversight & check/balance to the Washington cabal.




The problem is Dems would abuse it. If they won't go through the proper channels and procedures now, and only showboat for the cameras, think how much worse they'd be without policies in place.


I would want republicans to do the same. Keep both sides honest for fear of being outed by a tribune.

Senators can't do it so it's less political within the senate.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.