Captain Pablo said:
HollywoodBQ said:
Iraq2xVeteran said:
This mass terror attack is the consequence of the Australian government allowing mass immigration. Unfortunately, liberals will never learn this lesson because they want to import future voters at all costs.
It's not quite that simple.
The reality is actually worse than that but I'm on a plane taking off from IAH so I'll try to get behind a keyboard tonight to explain.
It's complex and as Americans our situation is similar but different. And for different reasons. Australia's motivation is closer to Canada.
Well. We're waiting
I'm back home after my 14 hour trip to Jackson, MS for 2 hours of on-site work. But hey, I had to fix up a customer before the Christmas break. Plus, I do love "getting on the tools" whenever I can.
Trying to describe the Australian immigration situation in less than 5,000 words is going to be a challenge. Maybe I should try ChatGPT or something. Anyway, here goes the HollywoodBQ summary of Australian immigration for the past 75 years or so.
First, Australia is a country the size of the Lower 48 United States. Most of the habitable areas are near the coast so it's not a direct correlation to the USA.
This is part of why I say it's more closely aligned with Canada from an immigration perspective. I think we can all agree that most of the Canadian population lives close to the US Border, leaving massive expanses of Canada very unpopulated.
For a country to grow and prosper, it needs people to explore (or exploit, if you like) the land for natural resources, it needs farmers and ranchers to feed the population and in cities, you need banking, manufacturing and other services.
Australia began in Sydney, New South Wales with convicts from the United Kingdom in 1788 after they could no longer transport those convicts (some of whom were my ancestors) to the Colony of Georgia due to the American Revolution. Later, there were German free settlers in places like South Australia.
In Australia, there is a great sense of pride if you can trace your roots back to Convicts and especially The First Fleet in 1788. Although, during the past 15 years, "Australia Day" (January 26th) has increasingly become known as "Invasion Day" and Aussies have really gone overboard with the White Guilt about the "stolen land".
To grow the economy and essentially fulfill the Australian version of Manifest Destiny, Australia needed immigration.
This next part is going to sound hilarious but you can't find anyone in Australia today who is racist. Maybe Pauline Hanson. But seriously, nobody is racist. That's the worst thing you can call an Australian.
Now... if you rolled back the clock to say 1979, Australia was probably second only to South Africa in terms of being the most racist country on the planet. So much so that their immigration policy was called "The White Australia Policy" and they were still stealing half-caste babies from their Aboriginal mothers. If any of you are adopted, or know anybody who is adopted, you'd be disappointed to know that in Australia, there essentially is no adoption because of the negative connotation associated with baby stealing and "The Stolen Generation".
I was there in 2009 when Prime Minister Kevin Rudd (Labor) said "Sorry" and apologised to the Aboriginals for the decades of baby stealing. I was even lucky enough to see "SORRY" spelled out by skywriting airplanes over Sydney.
Now that we've established the contributing factors to the worst case of White Guilt ever, let's get back to the immigration situation.
The 10 Pound Pom scheme - I don't know when it started but in the 1950s through the 1960s, there was an immigration scheme by the Australian Government to try to get more White people to move from The UK to Australia. Most famously, you've got the members of AC/DC, the BeeGees, the Easybeats and narrowly missed Ozzy Osbourne's family. The basic idea was that for the low price of 10 British Pounds, the Australian Government would provide passage to Australia, papers and settle you in a place to live in Australia. Which apparently must have been better than Scotland, Ireland, Wales, England, etc.
I don't know how long it ran for or how many people were resettled in Australia but, it was a lot. Like maybe 10% of the country came to Australia this way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Pound_PomsEventually they ran out of "White" people to move to Australia and they started expanding to other areas of Europe that were deemed close enough to White. Primarily Italy and Greece.
So starting in the 1960s, loads of Italians and Greeks made their way to Australia. When large waves of immigrants have come in like this, Australia has controlled where they can go. So, all of the Greeks went to Melbourne and all of the Italians went to Sydney (specifically the Northern Beaches where I lived).
Much to my surprise, even in 2008, I still saw Italians being discriminated against by my neighbors because they "weren't White". Being fresh of the boat from Los Angeles, I thought this was both ridiculous and hilarious.
As we reach the 1970s, Australia starts to take in refugees for the first time. They come from 3 major groups. Vietnamese, Lebanese and Chileans.
As before with the Brits, Scots, Irish, etc. these newcomers are settled into specific areas. In Sydney, the Vietnamese are sent to an area called Cabramatta in Western Sydney. The Chileans are sent to Bossley Park in Western Sydney and the Lebanese are sent to Sydney's Inner West.
While I'm on the ethnic designations for settlement, the area in Western Sydney where all the Filipinos were settled is called Blacktown - you know, because it's full of Black people (Filipinos).
The refugees come in limited numbers and this coincides with the end of the White Australia Policy.
The main points to takeaway at this stage, entering the 1980s is that - Everyone is Australian, there are no hyphenated Australians and there is no underclass. Everyone is in the country legally. That will change slightly in the future.
By the late 1990s and certainly into the 2000s (when I arrived), Education becomes big business and there is a massive influx of Chinese and Indian students. The running gag when I got there in 2007 was that every gas station was run by Indians on student visas (that was pretty much true).
Another factor for Australian immigration was the 1997 turnover of Hong Kong to China. Prior to the handover, a lot of wealthy "Hongkies" bailed out of Hong Kong and came to Australia.
And with the fall of apartheid in South Africa, a lot of White South Africans, especially Jews came to Australia. Just like before, the Jews from SA settled mostly into one particular community in Sydney called St. Ives. The running joke was that if you lived in St. Ives, you didn't need to tell anybody that you were Jewish because everyone there is Jewish.
Now, onto the refugees. Australia got involved with the USA in Afghanistan and Iraq and as a result, took in refugees from both countries in reasonable quantities. By no means was it "unfettered".
Also, Australia, suffering from major White Guilt started taking in refugees from war torn nations in Africa, most notably Somalia and Angola. From my perspective, the good news there is that those refugees were all settled in Melbourne. Melbourne is the woke s/hole part of Australia. Very much San Francisco.
Melbourne is also crawling with Indian students and others who have managed to come to Australia from India whether that be to work in a call centre or whatever.
But, back to the refugees. In the early-mid 2000s, there were tons of asylum seekers, real or fake, who were trying to reach Australia from Indonesia by boat. What I could never figure out is how did somebody make it from Somalia through 20 different countries before trying to sail to Australia in some rickety boat that would have to be rescued by the Australian Navy.
The obvious answer is that these so called refugees and asylum seekers were being human trafficked and were paying people smugglers to get them to Australia so they could get on the Aussie welfare scheme.
By 2013, the calls to "Stop the Boats" had reached fever pitch and the Labor party had proven to be powerless to stop the asylum seekers and Australia elected the Liberal party and Tony Abbott took over as PM (despite #metoo claims before that was a thing).
The Liberal government (the conservative party in Australia) was successful at stopping the boats and redirected them to Manus Island in Papau New Guinea. Of course there would be claims about how inhumane this was.
Basically, Australians have very big hearts and want to help out those people doing it tough, to a point. So they'll take 10,000 Somalis in, or 10,000 Afghans, or Angolans, Cambodians, etc. But it's not just wide open immigration.
There are some soft spots in the Australian Immigration system which is otherwise very strict. In Australia, deportations are common and 10 year bans for violating the laws are commonplace.
What I've seen first hand when I've been in the Immigration Office to process the paperwork for myself and my family is the softness around "Partners". And that is exactly what the father shooter exploited to stay in Australia after coming in on a Student Visa.
My experience went like this. A British girl is having an interview to decide whether she got to remain in Australia and she comes clean with the interviewing officer. She says that she did overstay her visa but now she is "In Love" and has brought in her Partner to sponsor her petition to stay in the country.
The immigration officer asks how long she has overstayed her visa. And she replies, "Aw, just about 3 1/2 years". That girls got to stay in Australia because she was "In Love" and had a Partner. Aussies are very non-committal about marriage but that's a whole different discussion. I've known guys who have had 3 kids with their Partner before deciding to get married. I don't get it.
So 1600ish words about Australian Immigration but there is no smoking gun (pardon the choice of words) about mass immigration leading directly to a mass shooting.
And in this case, the father shooter had been in country for more than 25 years. So recent Afghan, Somali, etc. refugees had nothing to do with it.
Australia does do a pretty good job overall of restricting the flow of immigrants other than the limited numbers of refugees they take in.
The problems are:
Assimilation - sticking Vietnamese, Chileans, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc. out in parts of Western Sydney where regular "White Australians" never go. That's kind of a problem.
Australians don't do that much work - they'd rather go surfing, or go on holiday to Bali. So somebody has to do the work. One of the funniest meetings I recall was being in a meeting with 8 people at the table to discuss a topic that was a piece of critical Australian infrastructure. Of the 8 people, not a one of us was a native born Australian. There was me, an Irish girl, a Russian guy, a Turkish girl, a Brit, a Kiwi, a South African, and a dude from Bulgaria. It cracked me up that none of us were Aussies but... somebody had to keep the country running. So, Australia needs the immigrants.
When I arrived in 2007, there were less than 21 Million Australians. In 2025, there are almost 27 Million Australians. Annual immigration has been running in the 300,000-400,000 range. So yeah, they've brought a lot of people in but... compare that to the USA.
Since 2007, we've gone from about 301 Million to an estimated 343 Million. Think about how many potential bad apples could be in there? Especially given our porous borders. We have much bigger problems than Australia does.