flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

---

Real ID does not meet the requirements because the ID only validate that you are in the country Legally or a US citizen. So Real ID do in fact remove illegal Immigrants from voting. However; registration is suppose to validate a person right to vote. So the ID prove you are who you say you are, and your registration prove you have the righ tot vote. 19 States don't follow Real ID with their driver license. The Law should require those 19 state to adopt a certification of citizenship in their ID.. that is common sense and this would be a good law especially if it update the 1993 voter act. Instead, they wrote a complete garbage of a law that forces people to bring there passport to vote, which is complete and utter BS.

This is my congressman! I wish you all had congressmen who would have the stones to roll this way.

Bulldog73 said:

---

🚨 BREAKING: It has just been announced that there are 40-50 House Republicans who will BLOCK ANY Senate legislation unless the SAVE America Act is passed, per Rep. Brandon Gill

Wow! We could be headed to a standoff!

"I would guess that right now there are probably 40 or 50… pic.twitter.com/HPS1bTMuwo

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 14, 2026

This is my congressman! I wish you all had congressmen who would have the stones to roll this way.

---

Quote:

---

EricLDaugh
BREAKING: It has just been announced that there are 40-50 House Republicans who will BLOCK ANY Senate legislation unless the SAVE America Act is passed, per Rep. Brandon Gill

Wow! We could be headed to a standoff!

"I would guess that right now there are probably 40 or 50 Republicans that are not going to vote for any piece of legislation from the Senate. That's a large chunk of the Republican conference!"

"I think it's because we realize, we recognize that this is the political issue of the day right now. This is what the American people want."

"And by the way, this is going to be key to House Republicans keeping a majority in November. It's going to be hard for us to go back to our voters in November and tell them, listen, you gave us control of the House, you gave us control of the Senate, and we couldn't get a common-sense voter ID bill passed that both parties, at least from a voter standpoint, support!"

"That's going to be really difficult. So I hope that the Senate sees that, sees that this is key to us maintaining control of the House. And if we don't do this, it's going to be a lot harder for us in a few months."

*Except for DHS funding, of course

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

---

.


As far as married women go, if they file for a name change that doesn't change their birth certificate. So providing a birth certificate plus their current ID (with their new married name) would not allow them to register to vote. They would need to provide additional documentation to show they changed their name.

You seem to be really mad about things I haven't said.
All I've done in this thread is provide factual information about what the SAVE Act would require of people in order to register to vote. And for some reason that is upsetting to you.

It's not the married women we want to not vote, although they're the ones who would put in the small additional effort to make sure they vote. It's the single white women who know nothing about the world who need to be encouraged to do something else on Election Day...

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

---

.


As far as married women go, if they file for a name change that doesn't change their birth certificate. So providing a birth certificate plus their current ID (with their new married name) would not allow them to register to vote. They would need to provide additional documentation to show they changed their name.

You seem to be really mad about things I haven't said.
All I've done in this thread is provide factual information about what the SAVE Act would require of people in order to register to vote. And for some reason that is upsetting to you.

---

So we must not pass this law because a married woman lost her record of name change and cannot access it from the sate it was filed? You realize that is a disparagement of a woman's intelligence, right? You see the issue with your hot take? That a married woman who elected to legally change her name cannot be hassled to provide such a document when registering or updating her registration to vote?

Is that your position? Cause that sauce is so weak it makes water seem like a ghost pepper sauce. Try harder and stay away from the strawman about the "lack of" factual information you have attempted to mislead with.

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

---

.


As far as married women go, if they file for a name change that doesn't change their birth certificate. So providing a birth certificate plus their current ID (with their new married name) would not allow them to register to vote. They would need to provide additional documentation to show they changed their name.

You seem to be really mad about things I haven't said.
All I've done in this thread is provide factual information about what the SAVE Act would require of people in order to register to vote. And for some reason that is upsetting to you.

---

So, you're saying that they hired a really bad attorney that would not have taken care of that?

If you are hiring an attorney to change your name then I can see where folks may think it's impossible for married women to vote.

As long as you are not doing for illegal / fraudulent intentions than you are good to go.

More than married women, I am more concerned about NBA and NFL guys who have changed their names and then all the converted Muslims now named Mohammed and not Fred. All the Chinese migrants named Hank Woo, and finally I have grave concern for Whoopi Goldberg and what her paperwork shows.

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

---

.


As far as married women go, if they file for a name change that doesn't change their birth certificate. So providing a birth certificate plus their current ID (with their new married name) would not allow them to register to vote. They would need to provide additional documentation to show they changed their name.

You seem to be really mad about things I haven't said.
All I've done in this thread is provide factual information about what the SAVE Act would require of people in order to register to vote. And for some reason that is upsetting to you.

---

bring a copy of the marriage license with you to register and you should be good to go.

Do you think it's important to prove you're a citizen of America to vote in American elections?

What do you think is the best way to achieve this?

Why do you think democrats fight so hard to prevent this?

Kaiser von Wilhelm said:

---

It's not the married women we want to not vote, although they're the ones who would put in the small additional effort to make sure they vote. It's the single white women who know nothing about the world who need to be encouraged to do something else on Election Day...

---

Like vote on Wednesday?

A state license is plenty enuff

Burpelson said:

---

A state license is plenty enuff

---

Nah. Too many illegals have state drivers licenses like in Kalifornia.

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

A passport isn't a requirement by the law. It just happens to be one of the few IDs that satisfy all the requirements of the law.

These will satisfy the id/citizenship requirements of the law:

-Unexpired U.S. Passport (book or card)
-Unexpired Enhanced Tribal Card (ETC)

These IDs COULD satisfy the requirements provided you are a U.S. citizen. They are available to non citizens but will also indicate citizenship status:

-Unexpired Free and Secure Trade (FAST) Card
-Unexpired NEXUS Card
-Unexpired SENTRI Card
-Unexpired Global Entry Card
-Unexpired U.S. Enhanced Driver's License or Enhanced Identification Card(only available in MI, MN, NY, VT, and WA)

Outside of those IDs you would need to present a document that proves your citizenship and a document that proves your identity. For most people that means a birth certificate and a driver's license.

---

Those are requirements to register to vote, not to actually vote. Get registered, then present REAL ID or similar on voting day.

Making people prove they are citizens to register to vote has always been the assumed requirement, just poorly enforced in lib controlled areas because they want non-registered and ineligible votes to vote illegally in elections.

Why are you so against legal voters voting?

---

If you don't have those documents, you aren't going to be register to vote so flashing a Real ID at the polls os a bit of a moot point.

---

If you aren't registered, the showing up with real ID is irrelevant.

Good

JamesE4 said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

---

.


As far as married women go, if they file for a name change that doesn't change their birth certificate. So providing a birth certificate plus their current ID (with their new married name) would not allow them to register to vote. They would need to provide additional documentation to show they changed their name.

You seem to be really mad about things I haven't said.
All I've done in this thread is provide factual information about what the SAVE Act would require of people in order to register to vote. And for some reason that is upsetting to you.

---

bring a copy of the marriage license with you to register and you should be good to go.

---

This ACT is terrible legislation, Senate doesn't want anything to do with it.

Bulldog73 said:

---

🚨 BREAKING: It has just been announced that there are 40-50 House Republicans who will BLOCK ANY Senate legislation unless the SAVE America Act is passed, per Rep. Brandon Gill

Wow! We could be headed to a standoff!

"I would guess that right now there are probably 40 or 50… pic.twitter.com/HPS1bTMuwo

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 14, 2026

This is my congressman! I wish you all had congressmen who would have the stones to roll this way.

---

Brandon is my congressman too. I love reading Facebook posts about him on Flower Mound related sites and how the libs just hate him so much.

Dude will keep winning this district until he hopefully runs for Senator.

It is absolutely insane and ridiculous that a simple proof of voter eligibility isn't required to vote. The democrats know that they cheat,l and stuff ballot boxes, and have been doing it for eons. Mail in ballots, absentee ballots, provisional ballots, multiple registrations, not removing the dead from voter rolls, etc. this has been their MO for eons. And shame on Republicans for letting them do it!

Three examples:

1) In 2008 there were more votes cast in the Democratic primary in Jim Wells County than there were registered voters. Nothing was done.
2) Mrs. TCR first voted as a young adult in Cameron Country. A few years after her marriage, name change, and registration in another county, her parents still received voter registration cards in the mail in Cameron Country. We called the Registrar in Cameron Country. Nada. We called the Secretary of State. Nada. Her parents still get that illegal card. All she has to do it present it and vote a second time. This is how they steal elections! Nothing has been done!
3) Mrs. TCR's deceased aunt voted in Cameron County by mail-in ballot in 2020 after she died. That's a fact!

This is all ridiculous. The democrats know they've used these mechanisms to commit fraud everywhere. Acorn, Covid, etc. But yet you need an ID to get health care, open a bank account, get a cell phone, get welfare services, the list goes on. But "those" people can't get one to vote? Please. It's a lie.

Shame on Republicans for not shoving this down the Democrats throats. (It'll end up in the courts anyway)

Want to win the Mid-Terms? Pass the Save Act.

Before we get into any other details, did Mrs. TCRs deceased aunt (condolences) vote R or D in 2020 and then will she be voting R potentially in 2026. We need the votes so I do not want to disenfranchise the poor lady, since she is no longer with us and all.

But yes, your points are valid.

For the libs and their insane takes on the SAVE Act, it just shows their hate for America and their disrespect of women, poor people and people of color. You know, typical democrat.

Call me a conspiracy theorist, but i have a feeling that it isn't just the Democrats cheating with the known exploits. I wouldn't be surprised if both parties do it, and it wouldn't surprise me if our election system is all one big fraud by two entrenched parties that game the system to keep out reformers who could threaten their own interests. Someone too uppity coming along that can't likely be bought or be useful to the party once they get in? No problem, just defeat them with phony ballots.

Funny how nothing gets done with urgency even when it should be a no-brainer. Funny how there's always one or a few hold-outs that decide not to vote lockstep with their party at juuuuust the right moment to keep the status quo.

This is a big club, and we're not in it.

flown-the-coop said:

---

Before we get into any other details, did Mrs. TCRs deceased aunt (condolences) vote R or D in 2020 and then will she be voting R potentially in 2026. We need the votes so I do not want to disenfranchise the poor lady, since she is no longer with us and all.

But yes, your points are valid.

For the libs and their insane takes on the SAVE Act, it just shows their hate for America and their disrespect of women, poor people and people of color. You know, typical democrat.

---

She's deceased.

By definition she votes D now...

It's Cameron Country. I think you can figure out how she voted after she passed.

The Chicken Ranch said:

---

Three examples:

1) In 2008 there were more votes cast in the Democratic primary in Jim Wells County than there were registered voters. Nothing was done.

---

I've got to call BS on this one, unless you can show any evidence.

From the best data I can find
County Kelly McM Noriega Smi Tot Vot Tot Reg Turnout
JIM WELLS 2,145 521 5,522 331 8,519 26,255 32.45%

That's 8519 total Dem votes for Senator with 26,255 Registered voters.

I have to assume the rest of your examples are as bogus as your first one.

You know, lying to make your point isn't as successful as you may think.

my wife changed her name back to her maiden after divorcing her 2nd husband(she may have done the same after the first divorce for all I know).
changed her name to mine after we married. She's voted every year for the 32 yrs we've been married.

must be white privilege.

Bless your heart.

You aren't worth responding to. Thankfully we have the ignore feature.

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

nai06 said:

---

MagnumLoad said:

---

If you just have a drivers license with the gold star you are good. It's not hard. Ugh!

---

No you aren't. Real ID does not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The fact that so many people still believe this is a real problem.

---

Real ID does not satisfy the requirement to register. To vote, it is perfectly acceptable. Quit parroting Reddit talking points to fear monger. Disgusting.

---

Who is fear mongering? I'm only laying out exactly what the law requires?

Why do you hate people knowing what the law requires?

---

I hate people who coddle to illegals and want them to vote and make up bizarre concepts about how difficult it is for someone to register to vote. You have 8 months to get a copy of a required document and then bring your ID to cast your vote.

How is that hard? And how many married women took their husbands name, didn't file a name change, but somehow have an ID that has their married name? I mean, is there even a single example of this?

Substantially ALL people who are eligible and registered to vote have already accomplished the above. What you oppose is a review and cleanup of voter rolls and for those who have an issue come up to correct over… the next 8 flippin months.

You libs give the real world a break from your American hatin nonsense and apply some logic. If you need an ID and proof of citizenship to vote in Chile, you probably should need the same in the United States, where the state of the free world is on the line vs the protection of pumas and guanacos.

---

.


As far as married women go, if they file for a name change that doesn't change their birth certificate. So providing a birth certificate plus their current ID (with their new married name) would not allow them to register to vote. They would need to provide additional documentation to show they changed their name.

---

Like a marriage license?