60 Minutes/The Catholic Church is a joke

36,962 Views | 430 Replies | Last: 17 days ago by Squadron7
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KentK93 said:

A good article:

Quote:

The Pope knows perfectly well that the deranged Iranian theocracy is violently hostile to Christianity and that the fiercely pursued ambition of that regime to arm militant Islam with atomic weapons capable of being fired at the principal European cities, including Rome, is a menace to all mankind, and certainly to everything traditional to Christianity. He had absolutely no business identifying the attitude of the Iranian government as a pacifistic one in relationship to the United States.


https://brusselssignal.eu/2026/04/us-and-catholic-church-must-maintain-a-united-front-against-the-antichrist-of-our-time/

The author, Conrad Black, is a convicted felon who was pardoned by Trump in 2019. His wife, Barbara Amiel, is a Jewish Zionist. There may be some bias in there. But maybe not.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PabloSerna said:

Dave Robicheaux said:

Maybe keep politics out of religion. Wouldn't that be nice


Something about salt losing its flavor. Ain't happening.


Well you have the left side covered
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jkag89 said:




How many years off from purgatory does playing e-goalie for the fundamental transformation of America from the freest, most tolerant, most economically potential to be successful society in history get you guys?

You guys have one song, circle the wagons, don't air our dirty laundry, and don't as questions.

So glad I'm done with all that forever.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PabloSerna said:

Dave Robicheaux said:

Maybe keep politics out of religion. Wouldn't that be nice


Something about salt losing its flavor. Ain't happening.
But it did lose its flavor for some and only miraculously returned in January 2025.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pope Leo

Honeymoon is over
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Great! Ending child trafficking (substantially) and public funding large and small of partner organizations as such:
Quote:

In response to a Miami Herald inquiry, the Department of Health and Human Services said the daily population of unaccompanied migrant children in the agency's care was "significantly lower," at 1,900, under the Trump administration compared to a peak of 22,000 under the Biden administration. "ORR is closing and consolidating unused facilities as the Trump Administration continues efforts to stop illegal entry and the smuggling and trafficking of unaccompanied alien children," said Emily G. Hillard, the Health and Human Services' press secretary, though she did not single out Catholic Charities as an affected organization.

Acknowledging the reality of declining migration, Wenski wrote that while "it is true that the number of unaccompanied minors" had declined and "some programs may be scaled back" or shuttered, "it is baffling that the U.S. government would shut down a program that it would be hard-pressed to replicate at the level of competence" shown by the church.

American Thinker: 'Lamentably political pontiff.'

More investigations are happening, public and private I believe:
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:


Great! Ending child trafficking (substantially) and public funding large and small of partner organizations as such:
Quote:

In response to a Miami Herald inquiry, the Department of Health and Human Services said the daily population of unaccompanied migrant children in the agency's care was "significantly lower," at 1,900, under the Trump administration compared to a peak of 22,000 under the Biden administration. "ORR is closing and consolidating unused facilities as the Trump Administration continues efforts to stop illegal entry and the smuggling and trafficking of unaccompanied alien children," said Emily G. Hillard, the Health and Human Services' press secretary, though she did not single out Catholic Charities as an affected organization.

Acknowledging the reality of declining migration, Wenski wrote that while "it is true that the number of unaccompanied minors" had declined and "some programs may be scaled back" or shuttered, "it is baffling that the U.S. government would shut down a program that it would be hard-pressed to replicate at the level of competence" shown by the church.

American Thinker: 'Lamentably political pontiff.'

More investigations are happening, public and private I believe:


Didn't bother looking up the context before posting this supposed "Gottcha", did you? A quick search on the first guy shows he heads an organization with $118 million budget, and 80 individual charities within Maryland. According to AI, the head of a similar private organization would bring in between $500k and $1.2 million. Seems like a bargain.

Quote:

Catholic Charities of Baltimore is a major social service provider, with reporting indicating significant revenue around $118M for its extensive network, which includes over 80 programs across 58 locations in Maryland. The organization makes audited financial statements and Form 990s for FY2024 available on their website, highlighting their operational scale

Quote:

For a private U.S. company with a budget (or revenue) of around $118 million, the median CEO compensation generally falls between $500,000 and $1 million+, with base salaries frequently ranging from $300,000 to $600,000


By the way, Franklin Graham seems to be doing quite well for himself…..
Quote:

Franklin Graham's compensation as CEO of Samaritan's Purse was $945,493 in 2024, rising from $882,156 in 2023. He serves as chairman, president, and CEO of the international aid organization. Over the last decade (20152024), his total compensation from the organization has totaled approximately $8 million.

But "Reeeeeeeeeeee! CEOs of Catholic Charities are getting…………CEO compensation!"
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

The cigar was a nice touch, lol.

And to be clear, I have no problem with RCC members writing checks to pay their leadership 500K-1MM/year for their 'charitable' work, I just don't want to be forced to support these organizations via my taxes, at all.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?

No, I don't want the death cultists in my country Leo!

When this Marxist opens the Vatican to illegals/Muslims to come and go as they please, let us know...

eater of the list
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:


The cigar was a nice touch, lol.

And to be clear, I have no problem with RCC members writing checks to pay their leadership 500K-1MM/year for their 'charitable' work, I just don't want to be forced to support these organizations via my taxes, at all.

I agree, tax payer money should not go to a single religious charity.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlackGold said:

KentK93 said:

fightingfarmer09 said:

As a practicing Catholic my frustration with the church is the same with every organization.

Apply the rules and principles universally.

Pope Leo has an obligation to promote peace between nations. I support that. He also had a major obligation to call out the mass slaughter of protestors in Iran and call on the nations of the world to step in and stop it. But he was silent on this.

The church loves to turn its "snide comments" and rebukes to the US for anything we have ever done with the exception of giving away our treasures to the rest of the world. And when we do this it is always "you could do more".

As a Catholic this is spot on! I would also say the Pope needs to crack open a couple of history books.


I'm sure the pope is vastly more well read than you think you are. The Pope and Catholicism at its core are very socialist because Jesus was. It obviously runs afoul with capitalism, but they're not there to promote capitalism they're there to promote Jesus and his teachings.

This doesn't mean you have to be a socialist to be Catholic though you could argue Jesus would want it that way.



Well if Pope Leo XIV needs to read more about the Crusades & Pope Urban II.

From Raymond Ibrahim book Sword & Scimitar: 14 Centuries of War Between Islam and The West:
Quote:

It was in this context that, on November 27, 1095, Pope Urban II (r. 10881099) made his famous appeal to the knights of Christendom. According to Robert the Monk, who may have been present at the Council of Clermont in France, Urban held nothing back: They [Muslim Turks] have completely destroyed some of God's churches and they have converted others to the uses of their own cult [mosques]. They ruin the altars with filth and defilement. They circumcise Christians and smear the blood from the circumcision over the altars or throw it into the baptismal fonts. They are pleased to kill others by cutting open their bellies, extracting the end of their intestines, and tying it to a stake. Then, with flogging, they drive their victims around the stake until, when their viscera have spilled out, they fall dead on the ground. They tie others, again, to stakes and shoot arrows at them; they seize others, stretch out their necks, and try to see whether they can cut off their heads with a single blow of a naked sword. And what shall I say about the shocking rape of women?… Who is to revenge all this, who is to repair this damage, if you do not do it?… Rise up and remember the manly deeds of your ancestors, the prowess and greatness of Charlemagne, of his son Louis, and of your other kings, who destroyed pagan [and Muslim] kingdoms and planted the holy church in their territories.10 When Urban concluded by calling on Western Christians to undertake an armed pilgrimage to Jerusalemboth to help fellow Christians and to liberate the Sepulchre of Christall in assembly, lay and laity alike, shouted a resounding, "God wills it!"


Or read about Pope Sergius IV:
Quote:

Similarly, after Egyptian Fatimid caliph Hakim bi-Amr Allah (r. 9961021) ordered the destruction of some thirty thousand churches in Egypt and Greater Syria13including Jerusalem's Church of the Holy Sepulchre, which was torn to its foundations and Christ's tomb vandalized in 1009Pope Sergius IV (d. 1012) issued an encyclical mourning its "destruction," which "plunged the entire church and the city of Rome into deep grief and distress." Accordingly, "with the Lord's help we intend to kill all these enemies and restore the Redeemer's Holy Sepulchre." Christians from everywhere were called to come to the fight and fear nothing, "for God has promised that whoever loses the present life for the sake of Christ will gain another life which he will never lose. For this is not a battle for an earthly kingdom, but for the eternal Lord."14

Or Pope Gregory VII:
Quote:

Even Pope Urban's immediate predecessor, Pope Gregory VII (d. 1085), had issued an encyclical three years after Manzikert, "to all who are willing to defend the Christian faith." In it, he descried "a race of pagans"elsewhere he refers to them as "Saracens"who, "with pitiable cruelty has already almost up to the walls of Constantinople laid waste and with tyrannical violence has seized everything; it has slaughtered like cattle many thousands of Christians."15 Grieving was not enough: "The example of our Redeemer and the duty of brotherly love demand that we set our hearts on delivering our siblings. Just as He offered His life for us, so we should offer our lives for our siblings."16


I will leave you with what I read this morning:
Quote:

Finally, on June 7, 1099, the crusadersnow a fraction of their original numbersstood before the walls of Jerusalem. They wept with joy and wasted no time in besieging the city. It held out; great thirst set inthe Muslims had earlier poisoned or blocked the local wellsand tempers flared. The Westerners eventually agreed to launch an all-out assault on July 14. Before that day came, and on the advice of a "certain man of God," they "embrace[d] a painful regime of fasting and of continual prayers of devotion."65 The Muslim defenders atop the walls watched in astonishment as the army that had only recently besieged them became a large, barefoot, and unarmed procession. With crosses held high, the knights marched around the walls of Jerusalemin conscious emulation of the ancient Hebrews' procession around Jericho before God delivered it to thembefore congregating at the Mount of Olives, where they heard impassioned sermons. Safe behind their walls, the Muslims jeered; they shot arrows at and killed several Europeans during the procession. And "to further provoke Christians to rage, Saracens [atop the walls] subjected crucifixes to ridicule and shame," wrote a contemporary. "They spat on them and did not even refrain from urinating on them in the sight of all."

Others took care of your misunderstanding on your comment on socialism & Jesus.

Thank you for your attention in this matter!
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eater of the list said:

nortex97 said:


The cigar was a nice touch, lol.

And to be clear, I have no problem with RCC members writing checks to pay their leadership 500K-1MM/year for their 'charitable' work, I just don't want to be forced to support these organizations via my taxes, at all.

I agree, tax payer money should not go to a single religious charity.


Nor should any of them, including the churches (I'm looking at you too mega churches) that run them, get tax exemption.

Who's with me.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Street Fighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:

jkag89 said:




How many years off from purgatory does playing e-goalie for the fundamental transformation of America from the freest, most tolerant, most economically potential to be successful society in history get you guys?

You guys have one song, circle the wagons, don't air our dirty laundry, and don't as questions.

So glad I'm done with all that forever.


Ask the democrats and republicans. Neither give a rats ass about you, children, or any moral value.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

Dave Robicheaux said:

Maybe keep politics out of religion. Wouldn't that be nice


Something about salt losing its flavor. Ain't happening.

Destroying a sovereign nation that is the most benevolent in world history is not advancing the cause of Christ, no matter how much someone tries to contort scripture.

That is not being salt and light. It's the opposite.

The Pope needs to stick to things that are in his wheelhouse, like fancy clothing and lavish treatment.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

By the way, Franklin Graham seems to be doing quite well for himself…..
Quote:

Franklin Graham's compensation as CEO of Samaritan's Purse was $945,493 in 2024, rising from $882,156 in 2023. He serves as chairman, president, and CEO of the international aid organization. Over the last decade (20152024), his total compensation from the organization has totaled approximately $8 million.

But "Reeeeeeeeeeee! CEOs of Catholic Charities are getting…………CEO compensation!"


Franklin Graham is not the head of any church.

I also know first hand that he is very, very closely involved with the on-ground operations of Samaritan's Purse. He is not just a guy who sits in an office and tells other people where to go and what to do, nor does he go to the field for photo ops.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I agree, tax payer money should not go to a single religious charity.

Get the government out of the Church's job and I will totally agree. "Charity" is not the job of government, and it ruins every one it involves itself in. Welfare, healthcare for the sick who can't afford it, social nets... that is the Church's domain. Keep the lying, cheating, incompetent bureaucrats and politicians known as "government" out of it.
Monkeypoxfighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow. This thread went from "The Pope thinks killing each other (even Iranians) is wrong" to "The largest charitable organization in the world is evil and shouldn't be able to distribute taxpayer money where it's needed, and we prefer the government do it." Lots of odd thinking g here.
It only took me a year to figure out this place is nuts!
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Catholic Charities is not "distributing taxpayer money where it's needed." Catholic Charities has been taking a central role in facilitating an invasion of this country and a degradation of our rule of law and the welfare of American citizens. What they have been engaged in is much more harmful than good. If it weren't driven by greed and a hunger for political power, maybe I would consider agreeing with you.

Democrats hate God and if they are "helping" a religious organization, it is not out of benevolence and virtue.
Monkeypoxfighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Catholic Charities is not "distributing taxpayer money where it's needed." Catholic Charities has been taking a central role in facilitating an invasion of this country and a degradation of our rule of law and the welfare of American citizens. What they have been engaged in is much more harmful than good. If it weren't driven by greed and a hunger for political power, maybe I would consider agreeing with you.

Democrats hate God and if they are "helping" a religious organization, it is not out of benevolence and virtue.

I really don't care who they feed and clothe, but I do have issues with them facilitating entering the US. And no, their overall mission is not more harmful than good. Our own damn government put out phone numbers and information on how to cross.
It only took me a year to figure out this place is nuts!
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:



I just find it amusing that in our country we love to mock wealthy evangelical ministers who live in expensive mansions for telling others how they need to live...but at the same time some of those same people think we're supposed to fawn at the words of a man who lives in his own city that's surrounded by walls/security that doesn't welcome in "any" migrant...as he tells everyone else they aren't doing enough and need to welcome everyone into their communities.

There is nothing wrong with encouraging others and remembering what we're called to do as Christians. It is a different tone, however, when the encouraging turns into political lecturing and echoing talking points with a very purist attitude that has no regard for what's actually happening in other parts of the world.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These NGO's can't make it without tax dollars is a huge problem. Charity isn't taking money from force of the Federal government to give to a a NGO with "charity" in it's name is just wrong.
Quote:

Wenski added that due to the funding cuts from the American taxpayer, "Catholic Charities' services for unaccompanied minors has been stripped of funding and will be forced to shut down within three months."
In other words, without federal money, a Catholic Charities program cannot survive. That tells you just how dependent on your federal tax money this specific church program is.
The Trump administration made a very interesting point in its defense. Since Trump took office in 2025, the flow of unaccompanied illegal alien children has dropped dramatically. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) told the Herald that "the daily population of unaccompanied migrant children in the agency's care was 'significantly lower,' at 1,900, under the Trump administration compared to a peak of 22,000 under the Biden administration."


https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/04/16/trump-ends-11-million-grant-to-catholic-charities-for-its-illegal-immigration-support-n4951843
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Monkeypoxfighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem314 said:

Logos Stick said:



I just find it amusing that in our country we love to mock wealthy evangelical ministers who live in expensive mansions for telling others how they need to live...but at the same time some of those same people think we're supposed to fawn at the words of a man who lives in his own city that's surrounded by walls/security that doesn't welcome in any migrant...as he tells everyone else they aren't doing enough and need to welcome everyone into their communities.

No matter how many times this gets put in an anti-Pope thread, it doesn't make it true. Security? If yiu think the Pope doesn't need security, you have no business breathing, much less posting, and only a small part of Vatican City has walls……1000+ year old walls….meant to keep literal armies bent on death and enslavement out.

Even with its tiny size (.17 sq miles) the Vatican has allowed a few refugees in. I'll let you look up and correct your own mistake.
It only took me a year to figure out this place is nuts!
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Monkeypoxfighter said:

Wow. This thread went from "The Pope thinks killing each other (even Iranians) is wrong" to "The largest charitable organization in the world is evil and shouldn't be able to distribute taxpayer money where it's needed, and we prefer the government do it." Lots of odd thinking g here.


How exactly is it charity when it's not your own money you're distributing?

So if the government sends me a million bucks to donate and I just turn around and donate that money to the needy do I get to crow about how altruistic I am for distributing out someine woes hard earned money?

And there's no odd thinking here. No one is saying we want the government to distribute the money. We're saying we don't want any government money or involvement. If a religious group wants to be charitable, they should be doing it with the monies donated from their members (you know actual charity).
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

By the way, Franklin Graham seems to be doing quite well for himself…..
Quote:

Franklin Graham's compensation as CEO of Samaritan's Purse was $945,493 in 2024, rising from $882,156 in 2023. He serves as chairman, president, and CEO of the international aid organization. Over the last decade (20152024), his total compensation from the organization has totaled approximately $8 million.

But "Reeeeeeeeeeee! CEOs of Catholic Charities are getting…………CEO compensation!"


Franklin Graham is not the head of any church.

I also know first hand that he is very, very closely involved with the on-ground operations of Samaritan's Purse. He is not just a guy who sits in an office and tells other people where to go and what to do, nor does he go to the field for photo ops.

That's nice. Neither is the head of the Maryland Catholic Family Charities. What's your point? Seems like that preacher is getting a good salary paid for by taxpayers.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Monkeypoxfighter said:

Gigem314 said:

Logos Stick said:



I just find it amusing that in our country we love to mock wealthy evangelical ministers who live in expensive mansions for telling others how they need to live...but at the same time some of those same people think we're supposed to fawn at the words of a man who lives in his own city that's surrounded by walls/security that doesn't welcome in any migrant...as he tells everyone else they aren't doing enough and need to welcome everyone into their communities.

No matter how many times this gets put in an anti-Pope thread, it doesn't make it true. Security? If yiu think the Pope doesn't need security, you have no business breathing, much less posting, and only a small part of Vatican City has walls……1000+ year old walls….meant to keep literal armies bent on death and enslavement out.

Even with its tiny size (.17 sq miles) the Vatican has allowed a few refugees in. I'll let you look up and correct your own mistake.

Thank you for making my point. The Pope, in context, does need security. The Vatican, while not a literal solid wall, is surrounded by a great deal of security relative to most places of its size and doesn't just let anyone in. Context and details matter. I don't necessarily think they are anti-immigrant for not letting anyone in. I don't think they're disobeying God's calling by having security and order for their community/leadership. But they on the other hand seem to be more pushy on other countries having policies that require certain levels of law/security for reasons they probably know very little about on the other side of the world - or chose not to acknowledge.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Monkeypoxfighter said:

Quote:



Democrats hate God and if they are "helping" a religious organization, it is not out of benevolence and virtue.

I really don't care who they feed and clothe, but I do have issues with them facilitating entering the US. And no, their overall mission is not more harmful than good. Our own damn government put out phone numbers and information on how to cross.

I am in no way defending what the democrats did. But CC was an accessory. It is an evil organization.
NE PA Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you have a link that tells us how much taxpayer money goes to Samaritan's Purse handy to share? If the government is giving money to it, then I'll agree with you. If not, then it's apples and oranges, up to those that donate to the charity to worry about how much Franklin Graham gets paid, as exorbitant as it is.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind." - J.S. Mill
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

Monkeypoxfighter said:

Gigem314 said:

Logos Stick said:



I just find it amusing that in our country we love to mock wealthy evangelical ministers who live in expensive mansions for telling others how they need to live...but at the same time some of those same people think we're supposed to fawn at the words of a man who lives in his own city that's surrounded by walls/security that doesn't welcome in any migrant...as he tells everyone else they aren't doing enough and need to welcome everyone into their communities.

No matter how many times this gets put in an anti-Pope thread, it doesn't make it true. Security? If yiu think the Pope doesn't need security, you have no business breathing, much less posting, and only a small part of Vatican City has walls……1000+ year old walls….meant to keep literal armies bent on death and enslavement out.

Even with its tiny size (.17 sq miles) the Vatican has allowed a few refugees in. I'll let you look up and correct your own mistake.

Thank you for making my point. The Pope, in context, does need security. The Vatican, while not a literal solid wall, is surrounded by a great deal of security relative to most places of its size and doesn't just let anyone in. Context and details matter. I don't necessarily think they are anti-immigrant for not letting anyone in. I don't think they're disobeying God's calling by having security and order for their community/leadership. But they on the other hand seem to be more pushy on other countries having policies that require certain levels of law/security for reasons they probably know very little about on the other side of the world.


Security with dare I say it, "guns"?

Following the Aug 27, 2025, Minneapolis school shooting, Pope Leo pleaded for an end to the "pandemic of arms" that he said "infects our world".
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:

Franklin Graham is not the head of any church.

I also know first hand that he is very, very closely involved with the on-ground operations of Samaritan's Purse. He is not just a guy who sits in an office and tells other people where to go and what to do, nor does he go to the field for photo ops.

That's nice. Neither is the head of the Maryland Catholic Family Charities. What's your point? Seems like that preacher is getting a good salary paid for by taxpayers.

Samaritan's Purse is a huge organization that does many things that have no relation whatsoever with the government.

I have relatives who have worked with them in Africa doing very "insignificant" things such as providing air transportation to remote villages for people who are not even affiliated with the organization. They just do it because they're filling needs.

I have also been present in remote Alaska while Graham was there funding and overseeing a church being built. The only people who knew he was there were the people on-site. He didn't have an entourage, and he wasn't doing it for attention...because he didn't get any.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:

Gigem314 said:

Monkeypoxfighter said:

Gigem314 said:

Logos Stick said:



I just find it amusing that in our country we love to mock wealthy evangelical ministers who live in expensive mansions for telling others how they need to live...but at the same time some of those same people think we're supposed to fawn at the words of a man who lives in his own city that's surrounded by walls/security that doesn't welcome in any migrant...as he tells everyone else they aren't doing enough and need to welcome everyone into their communities.

No matter how many times this gets put in an anti-Pope thread, it doesn't make it true. Security? If yiu think the Pope doesn't need security, you have no business breathing, much less posting, and only a small part of Vatican City has walls……1000+ year old walls….meant to keep literal armies bent on death and enslavement out.

Even with its tiny size (.17 sq miles) the Vatican has allowed a few refugees in. I'll let you look up and correct your own mistake.

Thank you for making my point. The Pope, in context, does need security. The Vatican, while not a literal solid wall, is surrounded by a great deal of security relative to most places of its size and doesn't just let anyone in. Context and details matter. I don't necessarily think they are anti-immigrant for not letting anyone in. I don't think they're disobeying God's calling by having security and order for their community/leadership. But they on the other hand seem to be more pushy on other countries having policies that require certain levels of law/security for reasons they probably know very little about on the other side of the world.


Security with dare I say it, "guns"?

Following the Aug 27, 2025, Minneapolis school shooting, Pope Leo pleaded for an end to the "pandemic of arms" that he said "infects our world".

What's your point? First find me a minister of any faith that calls for more gun violence. Second, explain on what intellectual level guarding someone against gun violence is the same as calling for less of it.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NE PA Ag said:

Do you have a link that tells us how much taxpayer money goes to Samaritan's Purse handy to share? If the government is giving money to it, then I'll agree with you. If not, then it's apples and oranges, up to those that donate to the charity to worry about how much Franklin Graham gets paid, as exorbitant as it is.

Pretty easy find…
https://pres-outlook.org/2025/03/white-house-unfreezes-19-million-in-usaid-funding-for-samaritans-purse/
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
NE PA Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

NE PA Ag said:

Do you have a link that tells us how much taxpayer money goes to Samaritan's Purse handy to share? If the government is giving money to it, then I'll agree with you. If not, then it's apples and oranges, up to those that donate to the charity to worry about how much Franklin Graham gets paid, as exorbitant as it is.

Pretty easy find…
https://pres-outlook.org/2025/03/white-house-unfreezes-19-million-in-usaid-funding-for-samaritans-purse/



Then I agree with you that it's hypocritical to bash Catholic Charities executives for high pay and not do the same for Samaritan's Purse.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind." - J.S. Mill
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
B-1 83 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Gigem314 said:

Monkeypoxfighter said:

Gigem314 said:

Logos Stick said:



I just find it amusing that in our country we love to mock wealthy evangelical ministers who live in expensive mansions for telling others how they need to live...but at the same time some of those same people think we're supposed to fawn at the words of a man who lives in his own city that's surrounded by walls/security that doesn't welcome in any migrant...as he tells everyone else they aren't doing enough and need to welcome everyone into their communities.

No matter how many times this gets put in an anti-Pope thread, it doesn't make it true. Security? If yiu think the Pope doesn't need security, you have no business breathing, much less posting, and only a small part of Vatican City has walls……1000+ year old walls….meant to keep literal armies bent on death and enslavement out.

Even with its tiny size (.17 sq miles) the Vatican has allowed a few refugees in. I'll let you look up and correct your own mistake.

Thank you for making my point. The Pope, in context, does need security. The Vatican, while not a literal solid wall, is surrounded by a great deal of security relative to most places of its size and doesn't just let anyone in. Context and details matter. I don't necessarily think they are anti-immigrant for not letting anyone in. I don't think they're disobeying God's calling by having security and order for their community/leadership. But they on the other hand seem to be more pushy on other countries having policies that require certain levels of law/security for reasons they probably know very little about on the other side of the world.


Security with dare I say it, "guns"?

Following the Aug 27, 2025, Minneapolis school shooting, Pope Leo pleaded for an end to the "pandemic of arms" that he said "infects our world".

What's your point? First find me a minister of any faith that calls for more gun violence. Second, explain on what intellectual level guarding someone against gun violence is the same as calling for less of it.


Dude come on. He wasn't commenting on "gun violence" directly. He was calling for the end of a "pandemic of arms". I obviously have no problem with the Pope having armed security. It would be crazy for him not to.

But the Pope here is not the first politician to call for more gun control, while having personal armed details. It's okay to have an opinion that is unencumbered and recognize the irony in his statement.

B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh. The world needs more arms. Got it.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NE PA Ag said:

B-1 83 said:

NE PA Ag said:

Do you have a link that tells us how much taxpayer money goes to Samaritan's Purse handy to share? If the government is giving money to it, then I'll agree with you. If not, then it's apples and oranges, up to those that donate to the charity to worry about how much Franklin Graham gets paid, as exorbitant as it is.

Pretty easy find…
https://pres-outlook.org/2025/03/white-house-unfreezes-19-million-in-usaid-funding-for-samaritans-purse/



Then I agree with you that it's hypocritical to bash Catholic Charities executives for high pay and not do the same for Samaritan's Purse.

As I showed, it's not really high pay. Looks rather standard.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.