***Official 2021-2022 San Antonio Spurs Season Thread***

102,627 Views | 1335 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by MookieBlaylock
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a dumbass. Tim Duncan would have won finals MVP at 37 of it wasn't for a Ray Allen 3.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also. That post makes absolutely no sense.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It also fails to acknowledge the impact of rule changes, health and safety education, and medical advancements.

Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Timmy was also 1st team all NBA as a 37 year old. That guy is just a hater.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guy went on to say he hated the Spurs because of the Nash flop.

LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is Gordon Hayward not.a Spur?
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I find myself conflicted these days. I want these young guys to win enough that they keep their confidence but lose enough to get a top 5 draft pick or hopefully top 3. I'm definitely going to be rooting for Houston, New Orleans and OKC to win every time they don't play us.
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They can only beat teams when the opponent puts out its C effort or below

Need to lose more and play Wlaker 35 minutes a game
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteagle said:

I find myself conflicted these days. I want these young guys to win enough that they keep their confidence but lose enough to get a top 5 draft pick or hopefully top 3. I'm definitely going to be rooting for Houston, New Orleans and OKC to win every time they don't play us.


At some point, Houston, NOLA and OKC will shut it down. Spurs won't. So I think the Spurs definitely won't have a bottom 3 record which have equal odds of a top 4 pick at over 50%. Right now they are sitting at 6th with 39% odds of a top 4 pick (but also 50%+ odds of dropping below 6th) . I think that's best case scenario. I bet we draft somewhere between 7-9th.
Pendragon12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fantastic win against the Jazz. Just fantastic.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pendragon12 said:

Fantastic win against the Jazz. Just fantastic.
Yes! Lots of positives.

1) The Jazz got ahead and they could have thrown in the towel but they turned up the defense and played clutch basketball.
2) Landale got some quality minutes and played pretty well. Would liike to see him get more playing time.
3) Lonnie drove and scored the game-winning bucket over Gobert. He has been more consistent lately and that should really boost his confidence.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Landale led the spurs in +/- with +14 in just 6 mins. He did a lot of small things and was always in the right position. Eubanks, who played like ass last night, should not see the floor anymore. Its really a no-brainer.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enzo The Baker said:

Landale led the spurs in +/- with +14 in just 6 mins. He did a lot of small things and was always in the right position. Eubanks, who played like ass last night, should not see the floor anymore. Its really a no-brainer.
Again I agree with you. I like Drew but he is such a liability against anyone with a pulse. I would love to see Landale take his minutes and get more experience.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This Tweet pretty much sums up the Spurs team right now.

LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteagle said:

This Tweet pretty much sums up the Spurs team right now.


Pendragon12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteagle said:

Enzo The Baker said:

Landale led the spurs in +/- with +14 in just 6 mins. He did a lot of small things and was always in the right position. Eubanks, who played like ass last night, should not see the floor anymore. Its really a no-brainer.
Again I agree with you. I like Drew but he is such a liability against anyone with a pulse. I would love to see Landale take his minutes and get more experience.


Agree. Drew played terribly. He hustles and at times can be some great energy off the bench, but he has been pretty bad the last few games.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Since it looks like we won't be drafting in the top 5 I have been looking at some early draft prospects.

What do yall think about Nikola Jovic? He looks like somebody that fits what the Spurs need with some of the skills that Pop likes. Good passer, good defender and looks like a decent shooter.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know anything about him. But I say draft him based on his name alone.
West Texan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteagle said:

Since it looks like we won't be drafting in the top 5 I have been looking at some early draft prospects.

What do yall think about Nikola Jovic? He looks like somebody that fits what the Spurs need with some of the skills that Pop likes. Good passer, good defender and looks like a decent shooter.


He was really good in the U19 World Cup this last summer. I think his biggest question is his athleticism, but he possesses a ton of skill.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enzo The Baker said:

I don't know anything about him. But I say draft him based on his name alone.
I know! That's what I was thinking.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
God I hate these West coast games. Game doesn't start until 9:30 Central Time. At least I don't have to go to work tomorrow!
Sports-Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spurs up by 27 after three quarters
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sports-Ag said:

Spurs up by 27 after three quarters

Lots of energy tonight. Good defense and lots of offensive rebounds.
Sports-Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spurs win. 116-92

Murray with his 6 triple double this season and the most by a spur in a season.

Pop is 11 wins away to be second in wins and 14 to take the number one spot.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sports-Ag said:

Spurs win. 116-92

Murray with his 6 triple double this season and the most by a spur in a season.

Pop is 11 wins away to be second in wins and 14 to take the number one spot.
He should be able to get the record. They have a lot of games left with Houston, New Orleans and OKC.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What record/seed do the Spurs have to have for DJ to be voted an all star this year? I'd say it's possible if they get to 10th.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enzo The Baker said:

What record/seed do the Spurs have to have for DJ to be voted an all star this year? I'd say it's possible if they get to 10th.
Not sure, but stats like these make a pretty good case. Of course, he is not a prolific scorer so the average fan doesn't notice.

Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yea. Murray would only get in on the Coach's reserve votes. He's admittedly surprised me a lot this year. Didn't expect this kind of consistency from him.
Ag Natural
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's definitely getting noticed by the smart NBA pundits. Of course, this just causes them to fantasize about Ben Simmons trades.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag Natural said:

He's definitely getting noticed by the smart NBA pundits. Of course, this just causes them to fantasize about Ben Simmons trades.
Speaking of trades, before the season started I thought that if they could swing a trade for Simmons it might work out. But now, with the way this team is playing, I would rather they went after somebody like Sabonis, if Indiana would make the trade. The Spurs have enough young talent and draft picks that you would think that someone would try to make a deal with them but you never know.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jteagle said:

Ag Natural said:

He's definitely getting noticed by the smart NBA pundits. Of course, this just causes them to fantasize about Ben Simmons trades.
Speaking of trades, before the season started I thought that if they could swing a trade for Simmons it might work out. But now, with the way this team is playing, I would rather they went after somebody like Sabonis, if Indiana would make the trade. The Spurs have enough young talent and draft picks that you would think that someone would try to make a deal with them but you never know.


Sabonis would be incredible. I think it would be a trade similar to the Vucevic trade, with a little more to give up. Maybe we could get it done with one of our firsts, Chicago first, a swap and one of our guards/wings + Thad for salary. Doubt they would take Derrick as they already have Brogdon (and his age). They'd probably ask for KJ or Vassell. Not sure which I would give up. Vassell has the higher ceiling.

Edit: Getting Sabonis would extend Pop's career by at least 5 more years too.
Pendragon12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To me, DV, Primo, and maaaaybe KJ are the untouchables on this roster. Devin is so disruptive already on defense and has a very polished offensive game. And KJ? If his shooting is real, he's incredibly valuable. Until this recent stretch of improvement, I actually don't think KJ is untouchable. But he's 22 and seems to be trending up as a 3 point shooter.

If we went for Sabonis, we either need to move Jakob to the bench or move him, and I like neither of those options with what we are currently getting out of him with his contract.

Ugh. I know Sabonis is great, and I'm a biased Spurs homer…but I want to give this crew a chance. I'd rather keep our picks and see what we can do with the kids this year. That could be a horrible take, I know that, but I don't like the idea of moving either of DV or KJ. At all. Like I said, I know I'm a homer, but I don't think Sabonis gives us what we are lacking.

Edit - because he doesn't really space the floor for us and I don't think he's a great defender? Honestly right now, the issue with the starting lineup and the team overall is White's lack of 3 point shooting this season and overall inconsistency. Yes we need a star, but I don't think Sabonis is that star, I guess is my feeling not wanting to move DV/KJ.
Enzo The Baker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pendragon12 said:

To me, DV, Primo, and maaaaybe KJ are the untouchables on this roster. Devin is so disruptive already on defense and has a very polished offensive game. And KJ? If his shooting is real, he's incredibly valuable. Until this recent stretch of improvement, I actually don't think KJ is untouchable. But he's 22 and seems to be trending up as a 3 point shooter.

If we went for Sabonis, we either need to move Jakob to the bench or move him, and I like neither of those options with what we are currently getting out of him with his contract.

Ugh. I know Sabonis is great, and I'm a biased Spurs homer…but I want to give this crew a chance. I'd rather keep our picks and see what we can do with the kids this year. That could be a horrible take, I know that, but I don't like the idea of moving either of DV or KJ. At all. Like I said, I know I'm a homer, but I don't think Sabonis gives us what we are lacking.

Edit - because he doesn't really space the floor for us and I don't think he's a great defender? Honestly right now, the issue with the starting lineup and the team overall is White's lack of 3 point shooting this season and overall inconsistency. Yes we need a star, but I don't think Sabonis is that star, I guess is my feeling not wanting to move DV/KJ.
What Sabonis gives up defensively, he would make for in rebounding and playmaking. Spurs would be able to run some beautiful offense with him. I think he and Jock would work well together. But I do see what you're saying.

The thing that would give me trepidation about making a move for him is that his contract only has two years after this year, so it would be risky.

Also, I think it is highly unlikely that the Pacers make a big move like this with us. I think it's team policy now not to make blockbuster trades with the San Antonio Spurs.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pendragon12 said:

To me, DV, Primo, and maaaaybe KJ are the untouchables on this roster. Devin is so disruptive already on defense and has a very polished offensive game. And KJ? If his shooting is real, he's incredibly valuable. Until this recent stretch of improvement, I actually don't think KJ is untouchable. But he's 22 and seems to be trending up as a 3 point shooter.

If we went for Sabonis, we either need to move Jakob to the bench or move him, and I like neither of those options with what we are currently getting out of him with his contract.

Ugh. I know Sabonis is great, and I'm a biased Spurs homer…but I want to give this crew a chance. I'd rather keep our picks and see what we can do with the kids this year. That could be a horrible take, I know that, but I don't like the idea of moving either of DV or KJ. At all. Like I said, I know I'm a homer, but I don't think Sabonis gives us what we are lacking.

Edit - because he doesn't really space the floor for us and I don't think he's a great defender? Honestly right now, the issue with the starting lineup and the team overall is White's lack of 3 point shooting this season and overall inconsistency. Yes we need a star, but I don't think Sabonis is that star, I guess is my feeling not wanting to move DV/KJ.
I know what you mean about trying to give this crew a chance. I would love to see Primo become a huge playmaker that puts them over the top with another player that they can pick up in this draft.

If they could get Sabonis, I think a starting lineup of Jakob, Sabonis, Keldon, McDermott and DJ would be awesome. That way Derrick could come off of the bench which I think he would be better for the team.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.