Accident at trump vegas?

75,984 Views | 631 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by Im Gipper
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

It's not the frequency of the fires, it's the type/danger they represent. And since they are so 'infrequent' it sure seems odd this happened right in front of Trump Tower Vegas etc, just a few hours after an EV was used in a mass murder/terrorist attack in New Orleans.
IDK man. Those cybertrucks light up pretty often. Just yesterday one burned up in a Georgia parking lot.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/firefighters-extinguish-tesla-truck-fire-085324906.html
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

It's not the frequency of the fires, it's the type/danger they represent. And since they are so 'infrequent' it sure seems odd this happened right in front of Trump Tower Vegas etc, just a few hours after an EV was used in a mass murder/terrorist attack in New Orleans.
A barge knocked a section of the SPI causeway down within a few days of the twin towers being struck. Multiple people died, including someone I went to high school with.

The two events had nothing to do with each other. The human brain is hardwired to see patterns. It helps with processing new information. But it can also cause us to see things that aren't there.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just haven't seen any data as to cybertruck fire frequencies vs. other vehicles (EV or otherwise). I am curious who rented/operated that cybertruck though. Active crime scene?


From a purely political perspective, Trump, and Musk alike are enemies of the FBI/CIA, and Iran/Democrats etc. I don't think it's likely this vehicle just happened to catch fire there this am, personally.
Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I just haven't seen any data as to cybertruck fire frequencies vs. other vehicles (EV or otherwise). I am curious who rented/operated that cybertruck though. Active crime scene?


From a purely political perspective, Trump, and Musk alike are enemies of the FBI/CIA, and Iran/Democrats etc. I don't think it's likely this vehicle just happened to catch fire there this am, personally.
I know if I wanted someone dead, the first thing I'd do is start a fire to someone else's property somewhere they're not even at to show them I mean business.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I smell a rat.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jeeper79 said:

nortex97 said:

I just haven't seen any data as to cybertruck fire frequencies vs. other vehicles (EV or otherwise). I am curious who rented/operated that cybertruck though. Active crime scene?


From a purely political perspective, Trump, and Musk alike are enemies of the FBI/CIA, and Iran/Democrats etc. I don't think it's likely this vehicle just happened to catch fire there this am, personally.
I know if I wanted someone dead, the first thing I'd do is start a fire to someone else's property somewhere they're not even at to show them I mean business.


Being a smartass doesn't fool anyone at this point.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I know if I wanted someone dead, the first thing I'd do is start a fire to someone else's property somewhere they're not even at to show them I mean business.
If the intent is to terrorize the country for re-electing Trump, this would be evinced by such a pattern though. Not sure why you think I saw it as an assassination attempt. I'm more concerned about Hamza Bin Laden than angry American leftists vandalizing Trump properties, fwiw.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Question? When EV catches fire are there continuing explosions?
Dungeon Crawler Carl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:

90% chance this is simply another Tesla fire, not intentional.





Want to recalculate that percentage?
BlackLab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Krombopulos Michael said:

CanyonAg77 said:

90% chance this is simply another Tesla fire, not intentional.





Want to recalculate that percentage?


More like a car bomb.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like fireworks going off
Deputy Travis Junior
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Krombopulos Michael said:

CanyonAg77 said:

90% chance this is simply another Tesla fire, not intentional.





Want to recalculate that percentage?


Holy ***** This looks like a terrorist attack.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Krombopulos Michael said:


Want to recalculate that percentage?
no
Doctor51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's terrorism with explosion sending shrapnel everywhere to hurt people. Look at all the projectiles going everywhere
JobSecurity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jesus
Triple S
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
These are coordinated.

I BET that Cyber truck was rented via Turo.
"Eat more do-nuts and less lists" - Dennis Franchonie
Doctor51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Supposedly the New Orleans pickup used was a ford lightning.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Doctor51 said:

That's terrorism with explosion sending shrapnel everywhere to hurt people. Look at all the projectiles going everywhere
https://www.evfiresafe.com/post/electric-car-explosions

Quote:

While the terminology 'electric car explosion' is great for search engine clicks, the correct term we prefer to use is vapour cloud explosion (VCE).

When an EV battery pack goes into thermal runaway, toxic & flammable gases are vented from the lithium ion battery cells. In some cases, primarily in enclosed spaces, the gases form a large vapour cloud.

Around 700L of gases are released for every 1kWh of battery capacity*; to put that in perspective, a Tesla Model 3 can have up to a 75kWh battery, & some newer EV models coming to market may have around 100kWh.

When there is a point of ignition, such as an overheating battery cell, the vapour cloud does one of two things;

  • around 90% of the time, the gases ignite quickly but not explosively, sucking back the vapours as they burn;
  • or the gases explode, instantly propagating combustion at subsonic speeds, driven by heat transfer.

Both pose significant risks to emergency responders, as they may happen rapidly &, if you don't know the signs of thermal runaway, without much warning.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GrapevineAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry, that looks nothing like the truck explosion.
TexasAGGIEinAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg has been bodybagged. He was very wrong and struggling to come to terms with it.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOYAL AG said:

CanyonAg77 said:

90% chance this is simply another Tesla fire, not intentional.


Don't mean to rain on your parade but EV in general and Tesla in particular are actually less likely than ICE cars to have non-crash related fires.

https://normantaylor.com/blog/which-cars-catch-fire-the-most/

Quote:

Tesla has also faced scrutiny over vehicle fires. However, electric vehicles (EVs) are generally less likely to catch fire than traditional gasoline-powered cars. Since 2014, there have allegedly been 83 fatalities linked to Tesla fires, and reports indicate 218 fire incidents involving Tesla vehicles between 2013 and early 2024.

Despite these incidents, Tesla vehicles still have a lower fire risk than cars with internal combustion engines.



This is, actually, all BUT irrelevant.

You can extinguish a ICE car fire in any number of ways, including with regular water. You almost can't extinguish an EV fire, at least not effectively, with much of anything.

Your statement is a LITTLE bit like saying nuclear weapons aren't harmful because they haven't been used much.
Deputy Travis Junior
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:




I'm out of my element, but I can note that in this video the car is seen on fire, but more or less intact. In that tweet video, though, the solid steel panels are shredded by the explosion.

The two aren't at all comparable IMO.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Could just as easily been any Ram or Jeep product…
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexasAGGIEinAR said:

CanyonAg has been bodybagged. He was very wrong and struggling to come to terms with it.
Nope.

You have a vehicle that can explode.

It explodes.

Film at 11.

If it were a terrorist event, ask yourself why it did so little damage. Was anyone hurt? Is there structural damage to the hotel?

It is not impossible that it was a terrorist attack.

If so, it was a pretty lousy one.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah that's a terrorist attack imho. For publicity, not deaths, which is nice. I would theorize this is less likely though as such to be an islamic army type attack, more likely domestic leftists/antifa/communists/democrats.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


You can see the flash detonation inside the truck cab. Sure looks like a bomb. A weak one admittedly.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77 said:

TexasAGGIEinAR said:

CanyonAg has been bodybagged. He was very wrong and struggling to come to terms with it.
Nope.

You have a vehicle that can explode.

It explodes.

Film at 11.

If it were a terrorist event, ask yourself why it did so little damage. Was anyone hurt? Is there structural damage to the hotel?

It is not impossible that it was a terrorist attack.

If so, it was a pretty lousy one.

Gotta side with Canyon here. Yes, this could have been deliberate. But, Teslas do ignite. More often than pro EV people are willing to admit. And of all their models, they've had the most difficulties with the Cybertruck.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Dungeon Crawler Carl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAGGIEinAR said:

CanyonAg has been bodybagged. He was very wrong and struggling to come to terms with it.


While we are at it.

I hate to point out obvious but if that truck was recorded pulling up to the valet.....unless the driver blew himself up in the truck. He's on camera (multiple cameras) fleeing the hotel.


Anyone want to calculate the odds of a cyber truck blowing up right at the front door of a Trump Hotel.

If these things were blowing up like this on a regular basis, we would have a couple of *****Official EV Fire Threads***** almost as often as we have a civil war threads on F16.


Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can also see smoke coming from all four wheel wells prior. And the entire explosion comes from the floor of the vehicle.

I'm saying now this was just a battery fire/explosion
LOYAL AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91AggieLawyer said:

LOYAL AG said:

CanyonAg77 said:

90% chance this is simply another Tesla fire, not intentional.


Don't mean to rain on your parade but EV in general and Tesla in particular are actually less likely than ICE cars to have non-crash related fires.

https://normantaylor.com/blog/which-cars-catch-fire-the-most/

Quote:

Tesla has also faced scrutiny over vehicle fires. However, electric vehicles (EVs) are generally less likely to catch fire than traditional gasoline-powered cars. Since 2014, there have allegedly been 83 fatalities linked to Tesla fires, and reports indicate 218 fire incidents involving Tesla vehicles between 2013 and early 2024.

Despite these incidents, Tesla vehicles still have a lower fire risk than cars with internal combustion engines.



This is, actually, all BUT irrelevant.

You can extinguish a ICE car fire in any number of ways, including with regular water. You almost can't extinguish an EV fire, at least not effectively, with much of anything.

Your statement is a LITTLE bit like saying nuclear weapons aren't harmful because they haven't been used much.


Yeah, no. You're moving the goalposts from "cars prone to catch fire" to "what happens when a given car does catch fire". A car fires is catastrophic probably close to 100% of the time. Given that I think I'll take the car that is less prone to catch fire.
The federal government was never meant to be this powerful.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

You can also see smoke coming from all four wheel wells prior. And the entire explosion comes from the floor of the vehicle.

I'm saying now this was just a battery fire/explosion


Why do you hate EVs so muuuuuuuch!?




Looks like a typical EV fire, and with all the hypervigilance right now, everything seems "coordinated".

I very well could be wrong, but I operate off logic and not emotions. I'm a dude.
Deputy Travis Junior
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

CanyonAg77 said:

TexasAGGIEinAR said:

CanyonAg has been bodybagged. He was very wrong and struggling to come to terms with it.
Nope.

You have a vehicle that can explode.

It explodes.

Film at 11.

If it were a terrorist event, ask yourself why it did so little damage. Was anyone hurt? Is there structural damage to the hotel?

It is not impossible that it was a terrorist attack.

If so, it was a pretty lousy one.

Gotta side with Canyon here. Yes, this could have been deliberate. But, Teslas do ignite. More often than pro EV people are willing to admit. And of all their models, they've had the most difficulties with the Cybertruck.


That car didn't "ignite," it went up in an explosion that shredded its ultra hard stainless steel paneling like tissue paper.

Maybe it's just a coincidence that a symbol of a major Trump supporter happened to suffer an edge of the bell curve explosion right in front a Trump building, but that's a lot to swallow. I think it's more likely that somebody was trying to send a message. I'm happy to be convinced otherwise if people have videos showing EVs catching fire and blowing up like that one did (canyon's sad video doesn't count).
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Krombopulos Michael said:

TexasAGGIEinAR said:

CanyonAg has been bodybagged. He was very wrong and struggling to come to terms with it.


While we are at it.

I hate to point out obvious but if that truck was recorded pulling up to the valet.....unless the driver blew himself up in the truck. He's on camera (multiple cameras) fleeing the hotel.


Anyone want to calculate the odds of a cyber truck blowing up right at the front door of a Trump Hotel.

If these things were blowing up like this on a regular basis, we would have a couple of *****Official EV Fire Threads***** almost as often as we have a civil war threads on F16.



We did. But staff locked it.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Old Army Ghost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Krombopulos Michael said:

TexasAGGIEinAR said:

CanyonAg has been bodybagged. He was very wrong and struggling to come to terms with it.


While we are at it.

I hate to point out obvious but if that truck was recorded pulling up to the valet.....unless the driver blew himself up in the truck. He's on camera (multiple cameras) fleeing the hotel.


Anyone want to calculate the odds of a cyber truck blowing up right at the front door of a Trump Hotel.

If these things were blowing up like this on a regular basis, we would have a couple of *****Official EV Fire Threads***** almost as often as we have a civil war threads on F16.



looks like every other ev fire
Old Army has gone to hell.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.