Camp Mystic and Guadalupe updates

217,499 Views | 848 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by BadMoonRisin
chilimuybueno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you old friend!
nhamp07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jopatura said:

aginlakeway said:

Heads should roll in Kerrville? Like people should be fired? Really?

In your opinion, what should happen, and who should it happen to?

This was a horrible event that occurred at 5 am. Maybe everyone gets out if it happens at 5 pm. Blaming Kerrville officials for this seems harsh to me.


Kerrville didn't become underwater until closer to 6:30am depending on where you were on the river. The whole thing started west of Camp Mystic where it was even more rural - not sure there was much that could be done there. Hunt had no warning and likely not much opportunity for warning even with monitors.

The emergency manager in Kerrville said he didn't think things were that bad because it wasn't raining at 3:30-4am while he was running along the river. Kerrville didn't start doing anything until 5:34 am when the NWS alert included them. If they had started to get people to high ground at 4:20am, I think a lot of people in Kerrville would have been saved. It's the middle of the night but they had to have known that water was coming downstream. Another hour would have been priceless, especially for the RV parks in the city.

I'm not sure why the NWS didn't include Kerrville in the 4:20am warning - they had to know the water was heading that way. Questions that should be asked - why didn't the NWS include Kerrville, whose decision was that? Did Kerrville OEM/City Manager play any role in that?


All the rain fell west of kerrville initially which is probably the main reason. They did issue a flood warning for the Guadalupe River at kerrville initially at 333am.

https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/vtec/f/2025-O-NEW-KEWX-FL-W-0013_2025-07-04T11:28Z
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

Reading that is hard. The cabins with the missing girls were the highest ones there, and over 35' above the normal river level, with no precedent of water ever getting that high. They were the last to be evacuated because it was assumed they were above any danger.

Is it possible to post some of that here for those of us without access?


Outdoor Board

https://texags.com/forums/34/topics/3548389/replies/70489102
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Yeah it's real tough to blame city officials when the forecast had been for 4-8 inches and they got 14 in deluge downpours over a brief period of time. I'm not sure some of those camps are even within city limits, anyway. Sure, one or two meteorologists called it correctly but not too many from what I saw, and we can't evacuate everyone every single time a weatherman says something is scary. Ultimately, if there is a 'substantial' risk of an overnight flood people need to get kids away from the rivers. Full stop.

Now, camp owners/operators I struggle to rationalize how/why they wouldn't have someone awake all night on alert but some of those people also perished.



Where does the Llano River end up? In the Colorado River system?

Theirs is no blaming any city state or government officials, this is why the lake system was developed years ago, to try and control these floods, it's been happening for literally hundreds of years. The lake system is the best we can do at this time, let's not blame any person for any of this … that's ridiculous
tamc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Feeds into Lake LBJ / Colorado River
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

nortex97 said:

Yeah it's real tough to blame city officials when the forecast had been for 4-8 inches and they got 14 in deluge downpours over a brief period of time. I'm not sure some of those camps are even within city limits, anyway. Sure, one or two meteorologists called it correctly but not too many from what I saw, and we can't evacuate everyone every single time a weatherman says something is scary. Ultimately, if there is a 'substantial' risk of an overnight flood people need to get kids away from the rivers. Full stop.

Now, camp owners/operators I struggle to rationalize how/why they wouldn't have someone awake all night on alert but some of those people also perished.



Where does the Llano River end up? In the Colorado River system?

Theirs is no blaming any city state or government officials, this is why the lake system was developed years ago, to try and control these floods, it's been happening for literally hundreds of years. The lake system is the best we can do at this time, let's not blame any person for any of this … that's ridiculous
Blame game is human nature, but something we should try to keep in check.

So far I've seen it blamed on

Climate change
Trump (budget cuts)
Abbott
Republicans
County officials
City officials
Camp owners/operator
RV park owners/operators
"Weather people"
God

I'm sure there will be 50 more people/groups to blame before this is all over.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
itsyourboypookie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Find Glenn

2wealfth Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stay safe out there, threatening flooding still a major risk

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Amen.
itsyourboypookie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

fullback44 said:

nortex97 said:

Yeah it's real tough to blame city officials when the forecast had been for 4-8 inches and they got 14 in deluge downpours over a brief period of time. I'm not sure some of those camps are even within city limits, anyway. Sure, one or two meteorologists called it correctly but not too many from what I saw, and we can't evacuate everyone every single time a weatherman says something is scary. Ultimately, if there is a 'substantial' risk of an overnight flood people need to get kids away from the rivers. Full stop.

Now, camp owners/operators I struggle to rationalize how/why they wouldn't have someone awake all night on alert but some of those people also perished.



Where does the Llano River end up? In the Colorado River system?

Theirs is no blaming any city state or government officials, this is why the lake system was developed years ago, to try and control these floods, it's been happening for literally hundreds of years. The lake system is the best we can do at this time, let's not blame any person for any of this … that's ridiculous
Blame game is human nature, but something we should try to keep in check.

So far I've seen it blamed on

Climate change
Trump (budget cuts)
Abbott
Republicans
County officials
City officials
Camp owners/operator
RV park owners/operators
"Weather people"
God

I'm sure there will be 50 more people/groups to blame before this is all over.


County judge can't come out and say this is the most dangerous valley in America but they did nothing knowing 8 inches of rain was predicted.

Yes it was worse. But something should of been done.
Bryanisbest
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The devil is the cause of all negative things. God co-opts them and uses them for a beneficial purpose.
2008and1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
itsyourboypookie said:

Find Glenn





This man is a hero. But before we go looking to praise him and find him let's keep in mind that this man probably feels an extreme amount of survivor guilt thinking he maybe could have done more. Honor the man by leaving him alone to process all of this.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gunny456 said:

We have no meteorologist anymore. No one studies the systems. They just depend on all the computer models.
Thing is the was just about like 1987 in so many ways but worse due the holiday.
I grew up on the Guadalupe. Lived on it for close to 40 years myself. My family lived on it for over a century and a half. Sadly…. It will do this again someday.

I know this is a tough situation. But be assured the weather is still studied but this is/was a very rare system. This looks like whats called an extra tropical warm core low. All Hurricanes, T.S. Depressions etc are all examples of tropical warm core lows.

This nightmare critter may have been a land based moisture rich warm core low. These are very rare. The meteorology with this system was/is insane- 72+ degree dew points west of the Pecos. Days of rain in the normally parched Permian basin and points south. A mid level moisture fetch from Barry all left the near entirety of the atmospheric column primed for a disaster.

It all started north west of San Angelo around 2:00 to 3:00 AM on the 4th. You could see a spin in the slow moving but rapidly developing system as it dumped 15 inches of rain NW of SJT. And it later it drifted east weakening a bit as these thing seem to do as the heating of the day cranked up after 11:00 am. By 7:00pm it was a shadow of its former power.

Then around 3:00ish in the AM it fired to life again, as warm core systems often do. This time In Burnet and Williamson counties again dumping 7 to 10 to 12 inch rains. These things love the early morning hours in July, Aug, and Sept. But this one was very weird- most warm core lows with similar structure form in the left overs of depressions and T.S. but rarely hurricanes and they typically move N or NW . But this one- was no such thing as it slowly drifted east..

I think what we saw here was a very rare event with little case history and tragic consequences . Though the NWS had flash flood watches out in the hard hit areas no one saw this coming. And for good reason- It was extremely rare.

If I was a grad or doctoral student, I'd try to make a career on this thing with the memories of these kids in my heart and as a motivator.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
People like this really piss me off. Former Texas State Bar President (and an Aggie) already politicizing things. She may be running for other office, not sure.


aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

People like this really piss me off. Former Texas State Bar President (and an Aggie) already politicizing things. She may be running for other office, not sure.





Wow. Horrible.
One day at a time.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgPrognosticator said:

Squadron7 said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


Using what tools?


Using a satellite app on your phone would have been sufficient enough to predict a storm surge on the Guadalupe.

I have no stake in the level of the Guadalupe, but when I saw the tropical storm swirling over Hunt at midnight, I knew the Guadalupe would be flooding.

Camp directors absolutely MUST know this…


Yeah what kid or councilor is on their phone at 4:00 AM. I'm a weather nut and was already following this system. Nobody saw an event of this magnitude coming. The NWS did good, given the circumstances, just to have a FF watch in effect.

Arm chair QB's are the worst.
Cyprian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Political degenerate
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Noem doing much better than Abbott. Offering actual actions they are taking vs generalities and performative signing papers he could have just said he did while giving actual info
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

Noem doing much better than Abbott. Offering actual actions they are taking vs generalities and performative signing papers he could have just said he did while giving actual info

And Cornyn doing far worse. There is almost zero a US Senator can do to help.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

nortex97 said:

Yeah it's real tough to blame city officials when the forecast had been for 4-8 inches and they got 14 in deluge downpours over a brief period of time. I'm not sure some of those camps are even within city limits, anyway. Sure, one or two meteorologists called it correctly but not too many from what I saw, and we can't evacuate everyone every single time a weatherman says something is scary. Ultimately, if there is a 'substantial' risk of an overnight flood people need to get kids away from the rivers. Full stop.

Now, camp owners/operators I struggle to rationalize how/why they wouldn't have someone awake all night on alert but some of those people also perished.



Where does the Llano River end up? In the Colorado River system?

Theirs is no blaming any city state or government officials, this is why the lake system was developed years ago, to try and control these floods, it's been happening for literally hundreds of years. The lake system is the best we can do at this time, let's not blame any person for any of this … that's ridiculous


Lbj, perdenales, Travis, it's all Lower Colorado. Honestly, Travis at this point could take all this rainfall and not bat and eye.

Lately if you cross the LLano bridge, south of the break it's been pretty bad. Road tripped it that way 2 weeks ago to hit up coopers and it was rock bottom.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DannyDuberstein said:

Noem doing much better than Abbott. Offering actual actions they are taking vs generalities and performative signing papers he could have just said he did while giving actual info


That's her job, she's head of DHS.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That woman is a piece of garbage.
WestHoustonAg79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ttu_85 said:

AgPrognosticator said:

Squadron7 said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


Using what tools?


Using a satellite app on your phone would have been sufficient enough to predict a storm surge on the Guadalupe.

I have no stake in the level of the Guadalupe, but when I saw the tropical storm swirling over Hunt at midnight, I knew the Guadalupe would be flooding.

Camp directors absolutely MUST know this…


Yeah what kid or councilor is on their phone at 4:00 AM. I'm a weather nut and was already following this system. Nobody saw an event of this magnitude this coming. The NWS did good, given the circumstances, just to have a FF watch in effect.

Arm chair QB's are the worst.


Thank you for posting. Times like this is when the internet and social media are just the worst. Unimaginable time of crisis and some jack wagon with no skin in the game is already jumping to conclusions while many are still missing and true aftermath data is even out there. Obvious lack of empathy and seems that he can't put himself in someone else's shoes during horrific situations.

And frankly he couldnt get, bc of so many unknowns. But yet, already on the keyboard offense for zero reason.

Ugh. Makes me sick. And this will be one of many like this not just on TA but world at large.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jesus. 14 children confirmed dead.
Buford T. Justice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a very dark day in Texas history.
"Gimme a diablo sandwhich and a dr. pepper...to go"
redseven94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WestHoustonAg79 said:

ttu_85 said:

AgPrognosticator said:

Squadron7 said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


Using what tools?


Using a satellite app on your phone would have been sufficient enough to predict a storm surge on the Guadalupe.

I have no stake in the level of the Guadalupe, but when I saw the tropical storm swirling over Hunt at midnight, I knew the Guadalupe would be flooding.

Camp directors absolutely MUST know this…


Yeah what kid or councilor is on their phone at 4:00 AM. I'm a weather nut and was already following this system. Nobody saw an event of this magnitude this coming. The NWS did good, given the circumstances, just to have a FF watch in effect.

Arm chair QB's are the worst.


Thank you for posting. Times like this is when the internet and social media are just the worst. Unimaginable time of crisis and some jack wagon with no skin in the game is already jumping to conclusions while many are still missing and true aftermath data is even out there. Obvious lack of empathy and seems that he can't put himself in someone else's shoes during horrific situations.

And frankly he couldnt get, bc of so many unknowns. But yet, already on the keyboard offense for zero reason.

Ugh. Makes me sick. And this will be one of many like this not just on TA but world at large.


Thanks for posting this WHA79. I said the exact same thing on this board during the California fires and got trashed. Did you also chime in on that one?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WestHoustonAg79 said:

ttu_85 said:

AgPrognosticator said:

Squadron7 said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


Using what tools?


Using a satellite app on your phone would have been sufficient enough to predict a storm surge on the Guadalupe.

I have no stake in the level of the Guadalupe, but when I saw the tropical storm swirling over Hunt at midnight, I knew the Guadalupe would be flooding.

Camp directors absolutely MUST know this…


Yeah what kid or councilor is on their phone at 4:00 AM. I'm a weather nut and was already following this system. Nobody saw an event of this magnitude this coming. The NWS did good, given the circumstances, just to have a FF watch in effect.

Arm chair QB's are the worst.


Thank you for posting. Times like this is when the internet and social media are just the worst. Unimaginable time of crisis and some jack wagon with no skin in the game is already jumping to conclusions while many are still missing and true aftermath data is even out there. Obvious lack of empathy and seems that he can't put himself in someone else's shoes during horrific situations.

And frankly he couldnt get, bc of so many unknowns. But yet, already on the keyboard offense for zero reason.

Ugh. Makes me sick. And this will be one of many like this not just on TA but world at large.
I assume you are referencing me. I'll bide my time but stand by my assertions above. Kids sleeping in a canyon where flooding is a likely/anticipated risk, and being woken to water reaching their bunks is not ok. And I've read multiple accounts of that happening. Some I am sure did heroic acts, in fact many if not almost all. Empirically, the overall risk management however, was not acceptable, and if you find that to be 'jumping to conclusions' or a 'jack wagon' response I don't give a rat's ass.

Attempting to paint all skepticism as to the preparedness of all sites, or actions of management with a monolithic brush I think is absurd, but this isn't my first day on the internet either. I haven't pointed to any individuals to have 'heads roll' or anything like that. I do think a thorough after action review will prove out that much of the planning for recent developments (camping and homes etc) along these rivers is naive and dangerous, and I am not posting for any reason other than to point that out.
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im sure there will be new tech that emerges to prevent this scale of tragedy from ever happening again. Some type of sensor and siren that can wake everyone up in flood plains.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There will be plenty of time for this later.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

WestHoustonAg79 said:

ttu_85 said:

AgPrognosticator said:

Squadron7 said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


Using what tools?


Using a satellite app on your phone would have been sufficient enough to predict a storm surge on the Guadalupe.

I have no stake in the level of the Guadalupe, but when I saw the tropical storm swirling over Hunt at midnight, I knew the Guadalupe would be flooding.

Camp directors absolutely MUST know this…


Yeah what kid or councilor is on their phone at 4:00 AM. I'm a weather nut and was already following this system. Nobody saw an event of this magnitude this coming. The NWS did good, given the circumstances, just to have a FF watch in effect.

Arm chair QB's are the worst.


Thank you for posting. Times like this is when the internet and social media are just the worst. Unimaginable time of crisis and some jack wagon with no skin in the game is already jumping to conclusions while many are still missing and true aftermath data is even out there. Obvious lack of empathy and seems that he can't put himself in someone else's shoes during horrific situations.

And frankly he couldnt get, bc of so many unknowns. But yet, already on the keyboard offense for zero reason.

Ugh. Makes me sick. And this will be one of many like this not just on TA but world at large.
I assume you are referencing me. I'll bide my time but stand by my assertions above. Kids sleeping in a canyon where flooding is a likely/anticipated risk, and being woken to water reaching their bunks is not ok. And I've read multiple accounts of that happening. Some I am sure did heroic acts, in fact many if not almost all. Empirically, the overall risk management however, was not acceptable, and if you find that to be 'jumping to conclusions' or a 'jack wagon' response I don't give a rat's ass.

Attempting to paint all skepticism as to the preparedness of all sites, or actions of management with a monolithic brush I think is absurd, but this isn't my first day on the internet either. I haven't pointed to any individuals to have 'heads roll' or anything like that. I do think a thorough after action review will prove out that much of the planning for recent developments (camping and homes etc) along these rivers is naive and dangerous, and I am not posting for any reason other than to point that out.
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FobTies said:

Im sure there will be new tech that emerges to prevent this scale of tragedy from ever happening again. Some type of sensor and siren that can wake everyone up in flood plains.
Hopefully, this is the case and their lives will not be lost in vain. Hopefully, new technology and procedures will be deployed so lives will be directly saved in the future from this tragedy. The worst thing is to learn nothing from their deaths and have the same mistakes repeated again!!!
WestHoustonAg79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

WestHoustonAg79 said:

ttu_85 said:

AgPrognosticator said:

Squadron7 said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


Using what tools?


Using a satellite app on your phone would have been sufficient enough to predict a storm surge on the Guadalupe.

I have no stake in the level of the Guadalupe, but when I saw the tropical storm swirling over Hunt at midnight, I knew the Guadalupe would be flooding.

Camp directors absolutely MUST know this…


Yeah what kid or councilor is on their phone at 4:00 AM. I'm a weather nut and was already following this system. Nobody saw an event of this magnitude this coming. The NWS did good, given the circumstances, just to have a FF watch in effect.

Arm chair QB's are the worst.


Thank you for posting. Times like this is when the internet and social media are just the worst. Unimaginable time of crisis and some jack wagon with no skin in the game is already jumping to conclusions while many are still missing and true aftermath data is even out there. Obvious lack of empathy and seems that he can't put himself in someone else's shoes during horrific situations.

And frankly he couldnt get, bc of so many unknowns. But yet, already on the keyboard offense for zero reason.

Ugh. Makes me sick. And this will be one of many like this not just on TA but world at large.
I assume you are referencing me. I'll bide my time but stand by my assertions above. Kids sleeping in a canyon where flooding is a likely/anticipated risk, and being woken to water reaching their bunks is not ok. And I've read multiple accounts of that happening. Some I am sure did heroic acts, in fact many if not almost all. Empirically, the overall risk management however, was not acceptable, and if you find that to be 'jumping to conclusions' or a 'jack wagon' response I don't give a rat's ass.

Attempting to paint all skepticism as to the preparedness of all sites, or actions of management with a monolithic brush I think is absurd, but this isn't my first day on the internet either. I haven't pointed to any individuals to have 'heads roll' or anything like that. I do think a thorough after action review will prove out that much of the planning for recent developments (camping and homes etc) along these rivers is naive and dangerous, and I am not posting for any reason other than to point that out.


Wasn't directed towards you. But knee jerk reactions and this type of rhetoric does nothing at this point. Will be plenty of time to have these discussions and I'm certain several of your points will show true but god bless we aren't 24 hours into the aftermath man.
WestHoustonAg79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

aginlakeway said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


It unexpectedly rose 25 feet in 45 minutes. At 5 am. When less than 8 inches was the forecast.

I'm not blaming anyone for this. And i have family of friends still missing. Some long-time TexAgs posters have family missing. And they don't seem to be blaming anyone. See awesome thread on Outdoors board. Very informative.

Still wondering whose heads should roll in Kerrville. That comment is what started this portion of the discussion.
First, I consider this an example of an invalid appeal to authority. You may, as I do, find that thread informative yet it is also full of people with loved ones missing/deceased, and I am not going to assign any figment of blame or suggest remedial policy actions there. Second, your friends and family being missing adds absolutely zero to your credibility/status as a subject expert on any of these topics, any more than your having once apparently resided in Lakeway does. It's akin to nurses etc. claiming people should wear a mask around in public during Fauci's reign of terror, and people considering them experts because they work in a medical field/facility, and their viewpoint deserves more sympathy/authority as a result.

The forecast accurately predicted a deluge upstream of those camps (on already soaked ground/rocks), and while the amount the river would rise by was not clear (no one anticipated the 5 am 45 minute 25 foot rise), it was predicted to be a dangerous situation. This was not a surprise storm. An accurate meteorological prediction was noted on this thread early on, or the OB one.

The camp adult staff apparently chose not to monitor the situation via eye site/checks or via radio/communications otherwise overnight. I don't think it's fair to say 'poor cell coverage' and 'they needed some sleep' are acceptable answers when dozens are missing and many more barely awoke to cling to rafters until the wall of their structures blew out etc. I don't consider that acceptable risk management, and radio/cellular communications are issues that can actually be managed today, this isn't some 1876 movie/TV set. You can again disagree with me freely, and I don't claim to be a camp management/safety expert, I just am not willing to cede to your point that their overnight 6-8 hours of sleep was appropriately managed given the situation(s) and responsibilities they bore.


Apparently is why you should hop off for a bit and come at this objectively when aftermath data and intel is available. "Apparently" implies speculation. Which I think is gross to push (and defend) at this moment in time. Disagree with me all you want I just think it's not constructive to have this conversation yet. But you do you and defend your right to dive in here bud. Just yuck.
jopatura
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WestHoustonAg79 said:

nortex97 said:

aginlakeway said:

nortex97 said:

Yes. If you are in charge of a bunch of kids by a river, someone should be awake/on CQ duty to monitor for flooding if this is a risk to the site that evening especially. To me this seems self-evident.


It unexpectedly rose 25 feet in 45 minutes. At 5 am. When less than 8 inches was the forecast.

I'm not blaming anyone for this. And i have family of friends still missing. Some long-time TexAgs posters have family missing. And they don't seem to be blaming anyone. See awesome thread on Outdoors board. Very informative.

Still wondering whose heads should roll in Kerrville. That comment is what started this portion of the discussion.
First, I consider this an example of an invalid appeal to authority. You may, as I do, find that thread informative yet it is also full of people with loved ones missing/deceased, and I am not going to assign any figment of blame or suggest remedial policy actions there. Second, your friends and family being missing adds absolutely zero to your credibility/status as a subject expert on any of these topics, any more than your having once apparently resided in Lakeway does. It's akin to nurses etc. claiming people should wear a mask around in public during Fauci's reign of terror, and people considering them experts because they work in a medical field/facility, and their viewpoint deserves more sympathy/authority as a result.

The forecast accurately predicted a deluge upstream of those camps (on already soaked ground/rocks), and while the amount the river would rise by was not clear (no one anticipated the 5 am 45 minute 25 foot rise), it was predicted to be a dangerous situation. This was not a surprise storm. An accurate meteorological prediction was noted on this thread early on, or the OB one.

The camp adult staff apparently chose not to monitor the situation via eye site/checks or via radio/communications otherwise overnight. I don't think it's fair to say 'poor cell coverage' and 'they needed some sleep' are acceptable answers when dozens are missing and many more barely awoke to cling to rafters until the wall of their structures blew out etc. I don't consider that acceptable risk management, and radio/cellular communications are issues that can actually be managed today, this isn't some 1876 movie/TV set. You can again disagree with me freely, and I don't claim to be a camp management/safety expert, I just am not willing to cede to your point that their overnight 6-8 hours of sleep was appropriately managed given the situation(s) and responsibilities they bore.


Apparently is why you should hop off for a bit and come at this objectively when aftermath data and intel is available. "Apparently" implies speculation. Which I think is gross to push (and defend) at this moment in time. Disagree with me all you want I just think it's not constructive to have this conversation yet. But you do you and defend your right to dive in here bud. Just yuck.


Firsthand accounts say there was someone at Camp Mystic monitoring the river and was a big reason why Camp LaJunta had no casualties. Unfortunately the biggest problem Camp Mystic had was assuming they were on high enough ground.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which was a fair, if not ultimately wrong, assumption. The water had not reached that level in recorded history. Not close really.

Someone earlier said that they didn't have a chance and I think that's correct.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.