shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
When was the last time the US declared war?
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
Logos Stick said:shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
Reagan illegally provided weapons and funds to the Contras to overthrow a government. Is Trump just walking the Reagan walk here?
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
Rapier108 said:
…,,,
Talk about an insurrection, this is what one actually looks like far more than J6 ever did.
,,,…,,,…
And yes, the video is real and not AI.
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?

shiftyandquick said:
This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed
shiftyandquick said:
This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed
Quote:
The court holds that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers.
Former presidents are also entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for their official acts.
There is no immunity, the court holds, for unofficial acts.
Rapier108 said:shiftyandquick said:
This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed
Dude, you are deteriorating before our eyes. Your absolute hated of Trump, Republicans, and conservatives is rotting away your brain faster then smoking 50lbs of meth per day.
Trump, as commander in chief, cannot be prosecuted for killing the terrorist drug runners.
Per the Supreme Court:Quote:
The court holds that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers.
Former presidents are also entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for their official acts.
There is no immunity, the court holds, for unofficial acts.
Commander in chief is a "core constitutional power."
shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
Good. Kill all the narco-terrorists.shiftyandquick said:
This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed
ts5641 said:
Is this not literal insurrection or treason? Why is this allowed?
HumpitPuryear said:shiftyandquick said:CanyonAg77 said:
Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?
It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?
I'm sure you felt the same about Obama the Droner and were here railing about that too.
ETFan said:
Video reminding military their oath are to the constitution and not dear leader, to not obey illegal orders. Soldier, sailer, Marine, etc 101. Basic *****
Texags "SEDITION!!!"
Maybe step back and consider why they felt this basic reminder was necessary instead of jumping in to your feels.
ETFan said:
Video reminding military their oath are to the constitution and not dear leader, to not obey illegal orders. Soldier, sailer, Marine, etc 101. Basic *****
Texags "SEDITION!!!"
Maybe step back and consider why they felt this basic reminder was necessary instead of jumping in to your feels.
aTmAg said:
Did the UCMJ say allow one to make up what they think is "illegal"?
aggieforester05 said:ETFan said:
Video reminding military their oath are to the constitution and not dear leader, to not obey illegal orders. Soldier, sailer, Marine, etc 101. Basic *****
Texags "SEDITION!!!"
Maybe step back and consider why they felt this basic reminder was necessary instead of jumping in to your feels.
That is not at all what they're doing, but that is the legal cover they're dancing around. What they say is not inaccurate, but they intentionally omit what these "illegal orders" are. They want our service members to refuse to enforce immigration laws and protect our cities from criminals when ordered to do so, while taking all of the risk. Their omission gives them plausible deniability, because they are cowards that don't care at all about our military service members.
There's not a single POS Democrat that will stand up for them when they're brought in front UCMJ tribunal for refusing orders. They are self serving unAmerican scum bags that belong nowhere near the levers of power, especially with regards to the life and limb of our service members and you know it.
Quote:Quote:
There's not a single POS Democrat that will stand up for them when they're brought in front UCMJ tribunal for refusing orders. They are self serving unAmerican scum bags that belong nowhere near the levers of power, especially with regards to the life and limb of our service members and you know it.
Kelly is scum?