Democrats Release Video Calling for the US Military to Openly Defy Trump and Hegseth

29,206 Views | 455 Replies | Last: 9 days ago by El Gallo Blanco
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?

When was the last time the US declared war?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?



Reagan illegally provided weapons and funds to the Contras to overthrow a government. Is Trump just walking the Reagan walk here?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?



Reagan illegally provided weapons and funds to the Contras to overthrow a government. Is Trump just walking the Reagan walk here?

No, because Trump, being superior to Reagan, is doing it legally and letting everyone know about it.

Ronnie would be mad jealous.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?

But it is legal to drone or bomb them on the other side of the world? Both targets have been declared terrorists.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?


Tell that to Malaysia and other Pacific located countries that will execute you for drug possession.
superaggie73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?


That's funny…I don't ever see you say it's illegal to kill babies.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To put it in proper context, those drug smugglers were reduced to just "clumps of cells" floating in a salty brine.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?

Did you say the same thing when Obama or Biden was droning terrorists in the sandbox?

There's absolutely nothing illegal about taking out enemy combatants.

If he was droning American citizen smugglers in the valley, then you might have a point.

The idea that this is illegal is not only stupid, it's just another liberal anti Trump talking point designed to sow division.

There's not a single liberal in the United States that would complain about a Democrat president doing the same (unless they were one of the many criminal Democrat voters/sympathizers that benefit from the drug trade).
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

…,,,
Talk about an insurrection, this is what one actually looks like far more than J6 ever did.
,,,…,,,…
And yes, the video is real and not AI.

Agreed. At minimum these senators & congressmen should be censored in congress and removed from any committees they are on. (re: I understand this also won't happen.)

Anyone considering voting for any Democratic candidate at any level of government should immediately reconsider their voting preferences.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I saw this video on TMZ, and Senator Elissa Slotkin claims that President Trump and Secretary Hegseth is weaponizing the US military against its own citizens, such as shooting unarmed protesters. Senator Elissa Slotkin are Marxists trying to protect illegal aliens at all costs.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?

They did have drugs and were observed loading the drugs on the boats. These drug cartels have been declared international terrorists and are being legally taken care of properly.
in 25 years more people have died from drugs than in any wars the United States has been involved in.
that doesn't include the executions carried out by the cartels in this country, nor the people traded in sexual slavery.
You may want to reconsider your position in this situation.

Oh, and guess who was President in 2020-2024 as the deaths accelerated.
Or who was President in 2018/ 2019 when deaths dropped.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maduro said they were fishermen. So Trump broke international law and should be afraid to step foot in NYC where international law dawg Mamdani will arrest Trump and ship him to The Hague.

Or... libs could quit being absolutely brain dead about the cartel boats running drugs. But anything Trump rots them to nonsense.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So Slotkin was behind this…?!

Former CIA is behind putting together a psyop (kudos to Gutfeld for calling this out) and deployed it on the American people and our troops?

It's time to make an example of her. As in cut all her clearances, any CIA retirement she has, seize all her devices and communication services and arrest her.

People need to quit demanding folks wake up on pedo who's been dead for 6 years and realize an intelligence asset is at work to incite a military coup.

She's dangerous. And to be honest, she deserves to be stopped and treated as the clear and present danger to the US.

Someone is behind this and orchestrating this.
shiftyandquick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shiftyandquick said:

This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed


If you really thought this was happening, would you come to a public web forum and accuse the reincarnation of Hitler of doing such?

If I held such views the first thing I would be doing is applying for political asylum in North Korea or Venezuela. Let me know you are are interested.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed

Dude, you are deteriorating before our eyes. Your absolute hated of Trump, Republicans, and conservatives is rotting away your brain faster then smoking 50lbs of meth per day.

Trump, as commander in chief, cannot be prosecuted for killing the terrorist drug runners.

Per the Supreme Court:
Quote:

The court holds that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers.

Former presidents are also entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for their official acts.

There is no immunity, the court holds, for unofficial acts.

Commander in chief is a "core constitutional power."
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

shiftyandquick said:

This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed

Dude, you are deteriorating before our eyes. Your absolute hated of Trump, Republicans, and conservatives is rotting away your brain faster then smoking 50lbs of meth per day.

Trump, as commander in chief, cannot be prosecuted for killing the terrorist drug runners.

Per the Supreme Court:
Quote:

The court holds that a former president has absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers.

Former presidents are also entitled to at least a presumption of immunity for their official acts.

There is no immunity, the court holds, for unofficial acts.

Commander in chief is a "core constitutional power."

9-1-1

I'd like to report a murder!!!
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's gotten so bad he can't think for himself and just repeats Reddit talking points. He is still crying that Kirk's killer wasn't alt right like Reddit promised him.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enjoy the brig you gaslit useful idiots.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?


I would like to see a valid judicial citation or legal analysis backing up this claim, not some nobody's opinion.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this not literal insurrection or treason? Why is this allowed?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

There are none. They're lying because they're democrats.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

This is the beginnings of a Duterte operation. Use the executive to kill people selling drugs. Have your own masked police force that only responds to you. And kills for you. It's not quite happened yet within our borders like Duterte. But the seeds are being planted.

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippines-president-duterte-war-on-drugs-thousands-killed
Good. Kill all the narco-terrorists.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Is this not literal insurrection or treason? Why is this allowed?

Sedition

Treason is defined in the Constitution and this isn't it.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HumpitPuryear said:

shiftyandquick said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Exactly what alleged illegal orders are these nimrods babbling about?

It's illegal to just kill people because they might have drugs. How about that for a start?

I'm sure you felt the same about Obama the Droner and were here railing about that too.

Obama the Droner

that was good.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Video reminding military their oath are to the constitution and not dear leader, to not obey illegal orders. Soldier, sailer, Marine, etc 101. Basic *****


Texags "SEDITION!!!"

Maybe step back and consider why they felt this basic reminder was necessary instead of jumping in to your feels.
Burpelson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Per UCMJ one does not follow illegal orders, that was made clear to us in boot camp.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did the UCMJ say allow one to make up what they think is "illegal"?
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

Video reminding military their oath are to the constitution and not dear leader, to not obey illegal orders. Soldier, sailer, Marine, etc 101. Basic *****


Texags "SEDITION!!!"

Maybe step back and consider why they felt this basic reminder was necessary instead of jumping in to your feels.


They felt the need to score political points by grandstanding not because there's some existential threat from illegal orders.
Hth
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

Video reminding military their oath are to the constitution and not dear leader, to not obey illegal orders. Soldier, sailer, Marine, etc 101. Basic *****


Texags "SEDITION!!!"

Maybe step back and consider why they felt this basic reminder was necessary instead of jumping in to your feels.

That is not at all what they're doing, but that is the legal cover they're dancing around. What they say is not inaccurate, but they intentionally omit what these "illegal orders" are. They want our service members to refuse to enforce immigration laws and protect our cities from criminals when ordered to do so, while taking all of the risk. Their omission gives them plausible deniability, because they are cowards that don't care at all about our military service members.

There's not a single POS Democrat that will stand up for them when they're brought in front UCMJ tribunal for refusing orders. They are self serving unAmerican scum bags that belong nowhere near the levers of power, especially with regards to the life and limb of our service members and you know it.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is retruthing posts calling for congress members to be hung.


The violent left everyone.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

Did the UCMJ say allow one to make up what they think is "illegal"?

Yeah, I wasn't aware that law school was part of boot camp. I don't think "it's illegal because my favorite Democrat says so" is going to go over very well when they're court marshaled. Democrats are willing to throw these people's lives away in order to score cheap political points. You can't hate those scum bags enough.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggieforester05 said:

ETFan said:

Video reminding military their oath are to the constitution and not dear leader, to not obey illegal orders. Soldier, sailer, Marine, etc 101. Basic *****


Texags "SEDITION!!!"

Maybe step back and consider why they felt this basic reminder was necessary instead of jumping in to your feels.

That is not at all what they're doing, but that is the legal cover they're dancing around. What they say is not inaccurate, but they intentionally omit what these "illegal orders" are. They want our service members to refuse to enforce immigration laws and protect our cities from criminals when ordered to do so, while taking all of the risk. Their omission gives them plausible deniability, because they are cowards that don't care at all about our military service members.

There's not a single POS Democrat that will stand up for them when they're brought in front UCMJ tribunal for refusing orders. They are self serving unAmerican scum bags that belong nowhere near the levers of power, especially with regards to the life and limb of our service members and you know it.


Kelly is scum? Hint, they all served and none of them are scum.

The potus is scum, you know it, America knows it.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:

There's not a single POS Democrat that will stand up for them when they're brought in front UCMJ tribunal for refusing orders. They are self serving unAmerican scum bags that belong nowhere near the levers of power, especially with regards to the life and limb of our service members and you know it.


Kelly is scum?

Yes, Kelly is a seditionist scum bag.
AtomicActuator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nothing they said was incorrect. It is in fact their duty to not follow illegal orders. This isn't new or even broadly controversial.

The only controversy is whether or not any given order is actually illegal. And from the perspective of the person receiving a questionable order, it's a terrible position where you are potentially going to be tried for a crime regardless of what you do, and a judge or jury will decide if you made the right choice maybe years later.

Ideally we need our commander in chief and the military leadership to only issue orders that are unquestionably legal except in the most rare and grave circumstances.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.