Canvasback said:
Arresting people curious about the problems as being the cause of the problems is just wrong.
Hey, when you need a scapegoat you need a scapegoat.
Canvasback said:
Arresting people curious about the problems as being the cause of the problems is just wrong.
oh no said:
the vandals are just curious. that's all.
torrid said:Canvasback said:
Arresting people curious about the problems as being the cause of the problems is just wrong.
Hey, when you need a scapegoat you need a scapegoat.
J. Walter Weatherman said:BadMoonRisin said:
If you have a 6.7M gallon pool with zero circulation, I have no idea how you are supposed to keep it from growing algae. Even with high chlorination it will still grow when the temperature gets warm.
Agreed. And even if they kill the existing algae the dead algae will have no place to go without circulation and they water will be grey and cloudy instead of green. The only permanent answer to me is some kind of pump system, no clue how expensive that would be though.
Send the bill to the DNC. They foment this kind of irrational hate.flown-the-coop said:
5 or 6 people arrested another 6 under investigation for damaging the lining and poisoning the newly installed grass.
Per Trump on the tarmac and PA. No, he did not show a video so it's certain I'm never happened and it's just made up cover him grifting with his cronies.
He did say he just folks out there and it's already looking beautiful again. But it will need to be drained to repair the vandalism.
Thanks for wasting a few million gallons of water to Hate America cause Orange Man Bad.
AxelFoley85 said:
You can tell how tough the coating is from that picture?
TXCityAggie said:FTAG 2000 said:
lol there is literally video of them catching vandals attacking the pool but you Biden Bros can't even accept that.
Told my wife what kind of a fool vandalizes a pool because of the president and yet here some of you are on this thread with late stage TDS.
It's actually fascinating to watch the cult members buy into every lie that comes out of Trump's mouth. Do you know its bs deep down or do you actually believe you've seen a video of Antifa destroying the pool?
They always accuse others of what they are doing. Pro-Americans are cultists now. So, in reality anti-American TDSers are displaying cult-like behavior.jt2hunt said:
TDS is a cult like no other!
Strange hills people pick to die on!
AustinAg2K said:Equinox said:91_Aggie said:Slwdsm said:
A few quick points...
If they are doing an investigation/arrests they may not display the evidence they have at this time. Any hidden cameras they may have of the crimes would be exposed.
The people demanding evidence and placing the proof of evidence on Trump need to realize... this is not a court room. He doesn't need to prove crap to you. Showing you the evidence wouldn't matter anyways... this is the same tds infected morons that denied the Trump assassination attempt(s) and also think the perps are Republicans.
Final point... the tds posts on this thread are ridiculous. You people are really taking victory laps on a beautification project failing. No matter the cause of the failure, the fact that your big win for the week/month/term is that the reflection pool will still be a **** pile for July 4th is ridiculous. Why do you need everything to be ugly?
Someone said there was a literal video of people being arrested while vandalizing it. Trump has never shied away from showing when he is right. Why not now? If there was video he would be showing it to show how crazy the left is.
Weak.
Is it though?
AtlAg05 said:AxelFoley85 said:
Just go back to river water and dye it blue. Whole thing is a dumb money pit.
For comparison(per Grok):
$16 million / $7 trillion 0.00023% (about 2.3 millionths of the budget).
Quote:
what can you tell about the political leanings from the Texags thread?
Claude responded: Based on reading across the 15+ pages, the political leanings are pretty easy to characterize:
Based on reading across the 15+ pages, the political leanings are pretty easy to characterize:
The thread is overwhelmingly conservative/pro-Trump, which is unsurprising for a Texas A&M sports forum's politics board. The indicators:
Numerically lopsided. There appear to be perhaps 23 posters raising skeptical or critical points against a field of 20+ defenders. The upvote counts (likes) on posts reflect this pro-Trump posts routinely get 2095 likes while the critical posts get 1027.
The vocabulary is telling. Routine use of "TDS" (Trump Derangement Syndrome), "dims," "leftists," "the Great Husseini," "0bummer" these are standard-issue MAGA-adjacent rhetorical markers. The thread reflexively frames every criticism of Trump as partisan bad faith rather than engaging the substance.
The whataboutism pattern. Nearly every response to a procedural concern pivots immediately to Obama's $34M, USAID, Solyndra, Hunter Biden's drug use, or Stacey Abrams. This is a classic defensive rhetorical move of partisans who feel their team is under attack.
The skeptics are outnumbered but not irrational. "Pagerman @ work," "nai06," "HTownAg98," and a handful of others raise genuinely substantive points and notably, those points held up better under scrutiny than the majority position. They're probably center-right or libertarian-leaning rather than left-wing they don't defend Democrats, they just refuse to excuse Trump on procedural grounds.
The one honest moderate. User "BQ78" stands out he explicitly said the no-bid process was wrong AND acknowledged it was a small problem compared to larger Democratic failures. That kind of "a pox on both houses" position is rare in the thread and suggests genuine independent thinking.
The thread is essentially a microcosm of how partisan forums process uncomfortable facts: the majority moves through denial, whataboutism, and mockery before grudgingly acknowledging problems only when they become undeniable at which point the blame shifts entirely to vandals.
AxelFoley85 said:
You can tell how tough the coating is from that picture?
GeorgiAg said:
I love AI for threads like these:Quote:
what can you tell about the political leanings from the Texags thread?
Claude responded: Based on reading across the 15+ pages, the political leanings are pretty easy to characterize:
Based on reading across the 15+ pages, the political leanings are pretty easy to characterize:
The thread is overwhelmingly conservative/pro-Trump, which is unsurprising for a Texas A&M sports forum's politics board. The indicators:
Numerically lopsided. There appear to be perhaps 23 posters raising skeptical or critical points against a field of 20+ defenders. The upvote counts (likes) on posts reflect this pro-Trump posts routinely get 2095 likes while the critical posts get 1027.
The vocabulary is telling. Routine use of "TDS" (Trump Derangement Syndrome), "dims," "leftists," "the Great Husseini," "0bummer" these are standard-issue MAGA-adjacent rhetorical markers. The thread reflexively frames every criticism of Trump as partisan bad faith rather than engaging the substance.
The whataboutism pattern. Nearly every response to a procedural concern pivots immediately to Obama's $34M, USAID, Solyndra, Hunter Biden's drug use, or Stacey Abrams. This is a classic defensive rhetorical move of partisans who feel their team is under attack.
The skeptics are outnumbered but not irrational. "Pagerman @ work," "nai06," "HTownAg98," and a handful of others raise genuinely substantive points and notably, those points held up better under scrutiny than the majority position. They're probably center-right or libertarian-leaning rather than left-wing they don't defend Democrats, they just refuse to excuse Trump on procedural grounds.
The one honest moderate. User "BQ78" stands out he explicitly said the no-bid process was wrong AND acknowledged it was a small problem compared to larger Democratic failures. That kind of "a pox on both houses" position is rare in the thread and suggests genuine independent thinking.
The thread is essentially a microcosm of how partisan forums process uncomfortable facts: the majority moves through denial, whataboutism, and mockery before grudgingly acknowledging problems only when they become undeniable at which point the blame shifts entirely to vandals.
flown-the-coop said:HTownAg98 said:
You can see pictures of torn pieces of the liner posted everywhere. They're not hard to find. And yes, it's speculation as to why the liner is separating. But while there's no proof of vandalism, there is some proof that the liner didn't adhere properly. We don't know why, and I'm sure the people that installed it thought it would work as outlined in the scope of work. But it didn't. So fix it.
what proof?
And sorry, I don't trust random pics from the internet. In 10 minutes I could have Looch dancing in a Hookem leotard with tassles seducing a gay bear from baylol, but Dems are unable to manufacture pics? And that is somehow proof that you understand what is going on? And that is somehow now absolutely to blame on experienced contractor who does this for a living?
Please…
AxelFoley85 said:
LOL. My family has been in concrete and foundation work for the better part of 75 years. I literally grew up working on slabs and spent the first half of my career working them. My wife is an architect. Neither of us could tell you a single thing about the coating from a photo. What a ridiculous assumption on your part but TDS, hate America party!!!
AxelFoley85 said:
I agree with you 98%. What I don't agree with is making an assertion based off a photo. I wouldn't place such an assumption without having inspected the work myself.