quote:
The Spurs play an efficient, merciless game but it doesn't have a ton of highlights and they don't show much emotion.
Note: This is NOT a personal attack--please just bear with me while I rant.
The highlighted portion of your post is pure drivel. This whole national perception of the Spurs being a boring, highlight-lacking team stems directly from the reputation they gained in the '98 and '99 seasons. Because of Tim Duncan and David Robinsons' low-key personalities, the media slapped the boring label on the Spurs and it's stuck with them throughout their run of more than a decade of success. Was the '99 team boring? They made other teams look boring through putting the defensive clamps on them. But would you call Avery Johnson's personality boring? What about the firebrand that was Mario Elie? How about Malik Rose's undying heart and hustle off the bench? Yet because Tim and David were the faces of the franchise, the boring label stuck fast (and it's not like those two were going to do a bunch to change that).
But even giving the '99-'02 teams a pass for being called "boring," I absolutely defy anyone to objectively call the Spurs' game boring since the arrivals of Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. They may say all the right things in the media and not rock the boat, but it's impossible to miss the fire those two players alone have in their eyes every time they set foot on the hardwood. And that attitude has filtered down to San Antonio's youth. DeJuan Blair reminds me of Malik Rose's spunk. And did anyone miss George Hill getting right back into Kobe Bryant's face in their last game at the AT&T Center?
The "boring" label will probably dog this franchise at least until Tim Duncan retires (and probably for a few years after), but let's not kid ourselves about the entertainment value of San Antonio's game.