Women's Tennis 2025-2026

84,372 Views | 1041 Replies | Last: 55 min ago by bigfoot10s
Ag9701
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Went today. Don't get a chance to go to many. Really liked it.

Are the players who play on courts 1, 2 and 3 considered the best on the team? Do the opposing teams also put their best on 1, 2 and 3?
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Glad you got out! Yes lines 1-3 are the strongest usually. Same with the other teams.
JPN06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The forecast looks like Baylor will likely be hosting our ITA matches next weekend.

Again.
aggietennisfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many more trips to Baylor do our teams have to make in order for someone to care enough to get an indoor tennis facility?
JPN06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We will win at Baylor and still qualify and Trev will think "I guess we don't need to spend money on that because we are doing great without it".
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's turn our women's basketball practice gym into an indoor tennis court
RodgerDodger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a brilliant idea!
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If the ice storm comes that is a possibility, everything would likely need to head south to Houston to avoid it.

I do have a question, how much would it cost to build the most basic indoor barn that Baylor has? Basically no room for any fans, only players, coaches, and family allowed in. We always propose some kind of grand performance indoor facility that would host fans, but that's not what Baylor has and we seem to envy here. How much for just the most basic barn that isn't really for fans to attend matches in? It has to be significantly cheaper than what we usually discuss.
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our women's tennis team would beat our WBB in a pickup game tomorrow.
JPN06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Something like the Baylor bare bones box under $10M. Something high end like SMU $35-40M.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Baylor isn't a barn. City of Bryan is a barn

Baylor is 6 courts, climate controlled, plus I believe a small pro shop/lobby. That's gonna be like $15mil now.

The plans I once saw that were for the space between Mitchell and the new PE building were similar to Baylor.

We need to face it, we could win 2 more nattys and the athletic dept still won't do anything. They don't care about tennis at all.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Describe it however you'd like. Some bricks on the entrance, but the point being a facility not meant for fans to stream in and watch in any significant numbers. Basically, when we are playing there, it is coaches, players, and families.



JPN06,
I appreciate the answer. I think that smaller number is likely doable if one lead donor steps forward. We just need someone who wants their name on that building. There are likely a good number of Ags that like tennis enough to be that next level of material donor to get it over the top, but aren't going to be the lead donor. Not everyone is as comfortable with NIL payments are they are the old school donation toward scholarships and facilities. We will see. I don't think settling for the bare bones facility would be bad. I think it is the only thing that would ever have any chance in the non-revenue space.
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They don't care about much of anything besides football. However, I do think there are coaches that have the full support of the admin. Most of these schools have indoor facilities because of big donors footing the bill. The reality is, we have not had anyone step up to the plate yet. If someone wrote a $10,000,000 check, it would get done.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiedrjdub said:

They don't care about much of anything besides football. However, I do think there are coaches that have the full support of the admin. Most of these schools have indoor facilities because of big donors footing the bill. The reality is, we have not had anyone step up to the plate yet. If someone wrote a $10,000,000 check, it would get done.


Someone committed $1mil a few years ago, and they re-routed it to football…
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If the donation was restricted to what we are talking about, they couldn't just "re-route it to football".
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No, I mean, someone will have to come in and say they will finance the building of a new tennis facility...not just give a donation.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
According to the people I know within the program, it was given to tennis for indoors. And it was never put towards indoors. Take that for what you will. These people wouldn't make it up.
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those people need to ask for their money back then.

But, I think if someone came to Trev and said, hey, I have $15m to donate to build the tennis facility what they need - it would happen.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiedrjdub said:

Those people need to ask for their money back then.

But, I think if someone came to Trev and said, hey, I have $15m to donate to build the tennis facility what they need - it would happen.


Agreed. 15m is way different than 1!
Aggie Tennis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiedrjdub said:

Pepperdine takes down tu 5-2. Some consolation for what they did to us in WBB today.


Texas did not look good but the freshman we were supposed to get looked fantastic, unfortunately.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bigfoot10s said:

According to the people I know within the program, it was given to tennis for indoors. And it was never put towards indoors. Take that for what you will. These people wouldn't make it up.

Did they write it on the memo line of the check or something and no one saw it or it was illegible?

The 12th Man Foundation would do that type of restricted donation with a contract.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

bigfoot10s said:

According to the people I know within the program, it was given to tennis for indoors. And it was never put towards indoors. Take that for what you will. These people wouldn't make it up.

Did they write it on the memo line of the check or something and no one saw it or it was illegible?

The 12th Man Foundation would do that type of restricted donation with a contract.


That I don't know. I wasn't there for the transaction…

Bottom line, I believe (from what I know) that we have had people come forward to donate for indoors, and it has still not happened. The ADs in the past have always found a way to fund every other project other than tennis.

When the indoor football/track project was presented a few years ago, it was for $200mil I believe. They could have EASILY tacked on $20 for tennis and it would have been funded. For whatever reason, they chose not to. The athletic dept does not care to get indoors funded even though it is a major stumbling block for recruiting and bringing quality opponents to College Station.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can think of a few possibilities, but the 12th Man Foundation could not just re-route something restricted for indoor tennis to football.

The possibilities are that it didn't occur fully like you were told and there are some key points missing OR the funds are still sitting there to be used and additional million are needed to get it funded and off the ground OR the people making the donation decided they wanted to use it for something else that was going to be built sooner and they personally re-routed it to football.

Can you follow up and get more details? Seems like something we don't actually have to speculate on.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

I can think of a few possibilities, but the 12th Man Foundation could not just re-route something restricted for indoor tennis to football.

The possibilities are that it didn't occur fully like you were told and there are some key points missing OR the funds are still sitting there to be used and additional million are needed to get it funded and off the ground OR the people making the donation decided they wanted to use it for something else that was going to be built sooner and they personally re-routed it to football.

Can you follow up and get more details? Seems like something we don't actually have to speculate on.


You really think they wouldn't re-route money from a non rev sport to one of the biggest money makers in the nation?!? Do you know how football works??

I know you know what I mean. No, I won't follow up with my source on this. It's a bit of a sore subject with them.

I do think if someone wanted to donate a mil to tennis, and the AD and 12th man foundation felt they could use it elsewhere and it benefit football, they would ABSOLUTELY convince the donor to move it. You're probably right, the 12th man foundation didn't do it on their own. But I can guarantee you they could do some persuading to make it happen.

Our coaches have been lied to for 10+ years about indoors. It's really sad. Everyone thought the women winning a natty would help. Didn't even move the needle. Hell, Denton can't touch Weaver's accomplishments and yet he gets a 10 year deal for mediocrity and makes significantly more than Mark. The way the athletic dept treats tennis as a whole is a joke.
JPN06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylor built theirs for $7M 10 or 12 years ago. Construction costs have gone up but not doubled. It could be built for 10 or less. That's not really the way A&M does things though and I can see them not wanting to build unless they can build something nice which even if it's not equal to SMU would still be 25 or more.

What I heard about that donation was that when the donor was told building the facility was not imminent they moved the money over to football. I was told that by a friend who worked in the 12th man foundation. That doesn't make the result any better but it's not like they just took the money by force.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JPN06 said:

Baylor built theirs for $7M 10 or 12 years ago. Construction costs have gone up but not diubled. It could be built for 10 or less.

What I heard about that donation was that when the donor was told building the facility was not imminent they moved the money over to football. I was told that by a friend who worked in the 12th man foundation. That doesn't make the result any better but it's not like they just took the money by force.


So the 12MF convinced them to move it. The coaches have been told for years that the 12MF was working on it, but obviously it isn't even on the drawing board right now. It's really sad
JPN06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good post. Could not agree more.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You say that's not how A&M does things, yet we were in an agreement with the City of Bryan to get partial use of a half-a$$ indoor multi purpose public facility for a measly price of $675k a year for facility NOT ON CAMPUS that wasn't even ours.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

You really think they wouldn't re-route money from a non rev sport to one of the biggest money makers in the nation?!? Do you know how football works??

They can't re-route restricted funds. It is really as simply as that. So, something is missing from what you are sharing.
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
outside of our annual debate about the indoor facilities that we all keep losing lol - it seems like the doubles pairings are more than likely set. for now, we will see:

1) Lulu / Mia
2) Anna / Violeta
3) Daria / Lexington

Lines 2 and 3 flip flopped in the second match of each day (Friday and Sunday). Tilde played line 1 with Lulu on Sunday afternoon. Hoping Mia is ok and we are just giving her a bit of a rest.

Singles at this point:

1) Mia
2) Lulu
3) Lexington
4-5) Violeta / Daria
6) Anna
7) Tilde

**Daria played Line 4 for 2 matches and Violeta played Line 4 for 2 matches.

It seems Nicole is a no go this year. I hope we see her back for NCAAs, but I'm not sure what will happen with that. Only those inside the coaching circle know. We need to stay healthy from this point on.
bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:


Quote:

You really think they wouldn't re-route money from a non rev sport to one of the biggest money makers in the nation?!? Do you know how football works??

They can't re-route restricted funds. It is really as simply as that. So, something is missing from what you are sharing.


Okay so maybe it wasn't restricted

But as JPN said, the 12MF will help convince someone to move money from one project to football. That's not right, in my opinion. They aren't working for all sports the same.

I get the revenue part and without football tennis wouldn't happen. The coaches get that too, we've talked about it. Still doesn't make it right.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, it falls into one of my options above:

Quote:

OR the people making the donation decided they wanted to use it for something else that was going to be built sooner and they personally re-routed it to football.

bigfoot10s
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

So, it falls into one of my options above:

Quote:

OR the people making the donation decided they wanted to use it for something else that was going to be built sooner and they personally re-routed it to football.




Yes they made the decision, possibly. Do you not think some smooth talker inside the 12MF isn't trying to convince people to do it though? Honestly?
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UP NEXT:

Michigan State on Friday
Winner of Arizona State/ TCU on Saturday
JPN06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bigfoot10s said:

You say that's not how A&M does things, yet we were in an agreement with the City of Bryan to get partial use of a half-a$$ indoor multi purpose public facility for a measly price of $675k a year for facility NOT ON CAMPUS that wasn't even ours.

1. A&M does not build trash on campus. Let's not get into an argument about aesthetics, but at least we can agree that all of the new buildings lately have been high-quality. I don't want to call Baylor's indoor trash because it's very decent and useable and hey at least they have one, but if we built on campus I think we would build something nicer. So I'm with you that it would probably be more like $20M.

2. Aggie Athletics job is to make money. $675K per year and Trev will be long gone before you get to anywhere near 20M. From a business point of view, he looks a lot better to the masses that don't give a f about tennis if he spends 675 (nothing to A&M) per year as opposed to 20M, which is a game-changing amount to most sports.

So don't get it twisted, I'm not sticking up for the "Aggie way". But I think what I said above is accurate, don't you?

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.