Entertainment
Sponsored by

Why doesn't Disney just cancel the new Snow White movie?

94,333 Views | 927 Replies | Last: 7 mo ago by EclipseAg
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.


Well see the movie for yourself then
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nai06 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.


Well see the movie for yourself then
Why would I want to pay movie to see a crappy movie?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
double aught said:

Some people see the woke boogeyman everywhere they look. Just like others see racism at every turn.

Two sides of the same coin.
I'm over the politics both ways so that irrelevant.

The reality is it was a horrible casting job and that matters. At least it used to before everything was blamed on politics.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
The lead actress vocally supports murdering rapists and told everyone that doesn't agree with her to avoid the movie.

So he's avoiding it.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
The lead actress vocally supports murdering rapists and told everyone that doesn't agree with her to avoid the movie.

So he's avoiding it.
That's fine, no one has claimed she hasn't made those comments and if someone chooses to avoid the movie because of that, go for it.

We are talking about, however, about the assessment of the movie, not the discussion around it. And dude literally hasn't seen it.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fig96 said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
The lead actress vocally supports murdering rapists and told everyone that doesn't agree with her to avoid the movie.

So he's avoiding it.
That's fine, no one has claimed she hasn't made those comments and if someone chooses to avoid the movie because of that, go for it.

We are talking about, however, about the assessment of the movie, not the discussion around it. And dude literally hasn't seen it.
Brah...READ THE THREAD TITLE. Then come back to me and tell me this thread was intended to only foster discussion of the movie itself. You can start your own thread about the actual movie if you feel so inclined. This thread was NEVER going to be about that lol.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

fig96 said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
The lead actress vocally supports murdering rapists and told everyone that doesn't agree with her to avoid the movie.

So he's avoiding it.
That's fine, no one has claimed she hasn't made those comments and if someone chooses to avoid the movie because of that, go for it.

We are talking about, however, about the assessment of the movie, not the discussion around it. And dude literally hasn't seen it.
Brah...READ THE THREAD TITLE. Then come back to me and tell me this thread was intended to only foster discussion of the movie itself. You can start your own thread about the actual movie if you feel so inclined. This thread was NEVER going to be about that lol.
That's fine…the thing I am literally replying to was discussing the content of the movie and comments regarding that.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.

We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
20ag07 said:

Quote:

Disney knew this thing wouldn't have legs. That's why it got dumped in March, and didn't clog their roll out of Thunderbolts, Lilo & Stich, Fantastic 4, Zootopia 2, and Avatar 3 coming up soon.
Porkchop, for as much words as you've blathered about box office, I'd expect you to know better.

Beauty and the Beast, Alice in Wonderland, and Cinderella live actions were all released in March, and certainly weren't dumps. It's the Disney playbook to put these things on Spring Break.


Why did you call him Porkchop?

Porkchop quit TexAgs. Never to return.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.

We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
Can you provide some examples from the movie that make it "woke" in your opinion?
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
maroon barchetta said:

20ag07 said:

Quote:

Disney knew this thing wouldn't have legs. That's why it got dumped in March, and didn't clog their roll out of Thunderbolts, Lilo & Stich, Fantastic 4, Zootopia 2, and Avatar 3 coming up soon.
Porkchop, for as much words as you've blathered about box office, I'd expect you to know better.

Beauty and the Beast, Alice in Wonderland, and Cinderella live actions were all released in March, and certainly weren't dumps. It's the Disney playbook to put these things on Spring Break.


Why did you call him Porkchop?

Porkchop quit TexAgs. Never to return.


Lol, good one. Now THAT'S the best post on this thread in the last 10 pages.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.

We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
Could it be that there's a very slim chance that you're never wrong, a similarly slim chance that I'm never wrong, and a much better than average chance that the truth lies somewhere in the middle?

Hence pot, kettle.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

nai06 said:

I do find it a little amusing that of all the complaints on this thread about politics, beliefs, DEI, etc. none of those things are actually relevant to the movie itself.

It's just an average movie. I also don't think most of the country is aware of the drama surrounding the movie either
Word on the streets is that this is being VERY polite.

I am honestly kind of surprised at how many men on here are up in arms over people not seeing this because the lead actress has basically bashed the original story and the constructs within it. Why does it have to be exclusively about the actual movie itself, which I heard sucks and looks putrid from the clips I have seen? An awful lot of people are simply turned off by hyper-woke ignorant feminists like the lead actress.

Why can't people refuse to see it or criticize it because the ignorant outspoken doofus they cast as lead role keeps openly bashing the original story (which is what most people love and the reason they would ever want a remake to begin with)?
I must have missed all these posters here up in arms about this because like one person has mentioned her being cancelled and no one else has spent any time focusing on it.


Yea but that dude got REALLY mad that I thought the dance number looks ******ed.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure it will end up on our TV at some point once it hits D+, as do most flicks that end up there. I don't anticipate my kids watching it more than once though because they have not mentioned it a single time, and when they are in to a movie coming out they ask about a billion times. Three daughters ages 4-8 are the target demo for this thing and honestly couldn't give a damn that it exists.
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.

We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
Could it be that there's a very slim chance that you're never wrong, a similarly slim chance that I'm never wrong, and a much better than average chance that the truth lies somewhere in the middle?

Hence pot, kettle.


If they hadn't revised the cast, script, etc. I think it'd be much easier to claim it's not political. It's too muddled now to say the end product isn't the result of CYA precisely because it was, and is now a milquetoast product hoping to scrape by, despite still not having a prince. You simply can't unring the bell.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGC said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.

We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
Could it be that there's a very slim chance that you're never wrong, a similarly slim chance that I'm never wrong, and a much better than average chance that the truth lies somewhere in the middle?

Hence pot, kettle.


If they hadn't revised the cast, script, etc. I think it'd be much easier to claim it's not political. It's too muddled now to say the end product isn't the result of CYA precisely because it was, and is now a milquetoast product hoping to scrape by, despite still not having a prince. You simply can't unring the bell.
That's fair but I think also gets into a really gray area.

Similar to The Acolyte, did the creators' intent negatively affect the show? Quite possibly, but at the same time the discussion around those viewpoints was far more prominent than any content that appeared in the actual end product (which kind of sounds like the case here as well from those who have seen it).

In the end we'll never truly know exactly what resulted in what, it's all conjecture on the viewers side. Sometimes creators just make bad decisions.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zegler basically came out and said they have removed the prince in this film, and watching the critical drinker review I'll link below, he says it is clearly obvious on the reshoots where they went back to add in the replacement for the prince, I assume due to the backlash zegler received for her comments.

I generally agree with critical drinker on his takes, so it is interesting to hear his thoughts, which actually includes praise for zeglers performance.

Also ultra lol if it's true that the group of hipsters in the field are the bandits in the film.

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG










AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

AGC said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.

We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
Could it be that there's a very slim chance that you're never wrong, a similarly slim chance that I'm never wrong, and a much better than average chance that the truth lies somewhere in the middle?

Hence pot, kettle.


If they hadn't revised the cast, script, etc. I think it'd be much easier to claim it's not political. It's too muddled now to say the end product isn't the result of CYA precisely because it was, and is now a milquetoast product hoping to scrape by, despite still not having a prince. You simply can't unring the bell.
That's fair but I think also gets into a really gray area.

Similar to The Acolyte, did the creators' intent negatively affect the show? Quite possibly, but at the same time the discussion around those viewpoints was far more prominent than any content that appeared in the actual end product (which kind of sounds like the case here as well from those who have seen it).

In the end we'll never truly know exactly what resulted in what, it's all conjecture on the viewers side. Sometimes creators just make bad decisions.


I mean I'm not so sure it's that grey. This is a remake rather than new original tale, so changes are magnified because we all know the original. The mere idea of retelling a tale and updating or changing it for modern audiences contradicts the idea of transcendent truth and shared human experience, because there's something that no longer applies.
The Sun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Talking points unite!



AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dumb takes. Disney didn't make the film for every moron that tweeted that crap or posts it here; it wouldn't make enough money because they're no one's target audience. Every child has a father, regardless of what some believe…
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just can't believe you guys are still going with this crap.

I woke up to 60 new responses in this thread!

Of grown men talking about Snow White!

It's objectively hilarious.
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the hipsters in the field from the pre release stills are in fact bandits. They frequently steal from the Evil Queen and castle because the townspeople are starving. They share their spoils with the rest of the villagers and those in need since the Evil Queen hoards all of the kingdoms resources. It's very much in the vein of Robin Hood and his merry band of thieves.

Plot wise Snow White catches the leader stealing and does nothing to stop him. She tries and fails to convince the Evil Queen to share more food and go easy on him. She instead decides to chain him to the front gate to freeze to death as a lesson.

Snow White frees him and they later meet up to join forces in the forest.

I don't actually recall the scene from the still being in the film
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I just can't believe you guys are still going with this crap.

I woke up to 60 new responses in this thread!

Of grown men talking about Snow White!

It's objectively hilarious.


I have two daughters in the target demographic which means I, as the parent, am the gatekeeper.

The only people that don't get it are the ones whining about middle aged men and our opinions.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gatekeeping for your daughters and endlessly whining on the internet are two completely different things.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is going on in here?
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I just can't believe you guys are still going with this crap.

I woke up to 60 new responses in this thread!

Of grown men talking about Snow White!

It's objectively hilarious.
Shouldn't you just take your L on this one? The movie did worse than the Dumbo remake which was an absolute bomb. And Dumbo cost $100M less to make.

Hollywood Reporter Story:
Quote:

Box Office: How 'Snow White' Landed in Potential Bomb Territory

The mood was grim Sunday on the Disney lot as Snow White opened behind expectations to just $43 million domestically. Globally, the live-action remake of the iconic 1937 film was expected to clear $100 million, but instead came in at $87.3 million. (Final weekend numbers will arrive later Monday.)

While those hauls wouldn't normally spell disaster for a female-targeted pic, Snow White has found itself in potential bomb territory because of its hefty production budget of $270 million before another $100 million or so in marketing costs.

Based on initial ticket sales and mixed word-of-mouth, Snow White may have trouble getting to $300 million or $400 million globally, well short of a box-office safety net of $500 million or more, several rival studios execs and box office pundits tell THR. (Consider that 2019's Dumbo, which debuted to $45 million domestically, topped out at $353 million against a $170 million budget).
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/box-office-snow-white-landed-193037932.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Gatekeeping for your daughters and endlessly whining on the internet are two completely different things.


Feel free to stop responding if it bothers you that much. No need to insult other posters.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.