Democrats Release Video Calling for the US Military to Openly Defy Trump and Hegseth

29,878 Views | 455 Replies | Last: 16 days ago by El Gallo Blanco
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blackhorse83 said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

4stringAg said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

Scrolled through 6 pages and was shocked to find that no one actually provided links to what Trump 'truthed.'




What the Democratic VETS said was neither seditious or traitorous. All members of the military have the right, and in some cases have the duty, to refuse illegal orders. Their oath is to the Constitution, not to the Commander-In-Chief or to any other individual in the chain of command. Accusing these individuals of being TRAITORS and declaring their actions punishable by death is INSANE.

Trump is begging for someone to enact violence on these people. I feel like im taking crazy pills reading through TexAgs justify this.

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Informing someone of the possible consequences of their actions is not calling for the death of elected officials. It is important for Trump to counter the 6 democrats narrative so the uninformed have the opportunity to understand the gravity of what the 6 democrats are implying. Those of us who served are already well aware of what are legal and illegal orders. The general public is not.

So then what did he mean by retruthing a poster who said they should be hung?
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:


What the Democratic VETS said was neither seditious or traitorous.

Sure it was. But it was #RESISTANCE, so you love it. Same people said Trump called for violence on J6. You are completely detached from reality.

No one is giving unlawful orders. The suggestion of such is undermining the Commander in Chief.

And to this day some in Democratic Party leadership and their minions believe this despicable lie that President Trump called for violence on Jan 6th.
Regrettably the MSM still pushes this lie. Too many people are extremely ignorant.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.



Your political leaders prompted them to shoot and kill Trump and others.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.


Making up stories about Trump again
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.



Your side called for sedition. Trump posted the consequences.

Who are trying to convince with your gaslighting?! I hate you and your side and you hate me and my side. There is no reconciliation.
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.



Your side called for sedition. Trump posted the consequences.

Who are trying to convince with your gaslighting?! I hate you and your side and you hate me and my side. There is no reconciliation.

Speak for yourself please. I don't hate anyone. You and some people on here frustrate me to no end, but I don't hate anyone (other than George RR Martin for not finishing Game of Thrones).
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:


Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.
Trump is calling for the justice system to deal with seditionists. As you know.

And former military should be the last ones to blur the lines of the Constitution and chain of command.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Then condemn the violence and the rhetoric.
Blackhorse83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Then condemn the violence and the rhetoric.

No point in arguing with him. He is a true believer. This is a post of his back in September:

"I'm sorry you don't understand that "antifa" is a broad ideology, not a group. And besides that, the United States has no legal mechanism for labeling domestic organizations as terrorist groups."

"Experts also said it remains unclear how such a designation would work for a broad movement rather than a distinct group and expressed concern that it could be used to justify a crackdown on the political left more generally. Designating an ideology as a terrorist group is either useless or dangerous (as it's so vague that is anyone who accuses Trump of being a facist part of Antifa?)."
Scouts Out
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Then condemn the violence and the rhetoric.

Already did bucko and have no issue calling it out when I see it. I'm asking for you to do the same with Trump.

Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where in that screenshot did you condemn your side's rhetoric?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Then condemn the violence and the rhetoric.

Already did bucko and have no issue calling it out when I see it. I'm asking for you to do the same with Trump.


Good for you. I haven't heard Trump call for violence. I've heard his call for justice for seditionists. That's legal and constitutional. Hope they get dealt with by the legal system. Mark Milley should join them.
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blackhorse83 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Then condemn the violence and the rhetoric.

No point in arguing with him. He is a true believer. This is a post of his back in September:

"I'm sorry you don't understand that "antifa" is a broad ideology, not a group. And besides that, the United States has no legal mechanism for labeling domestic organizations as terrorist groups."

"Experts also said it remains unclear how such a designation would work for a broad movement rather than a distinct group and expressed concern that it could be used to justify a crackdown on the political left more generally. Designating an ideology as a terrorist group is either useless or dangerous (as it's so vague that is anyone who accuses Trump of being a facist part of Antifa?)."

....what about that is condoning violence? That whole response was about labeling 'ANTIFA' (a broad ideology rather than a coordinated organization) a terrorist group. It would be like calling 'Christian Nationalists' a terrorist org.
Hullabaloonatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Where in that screenshot did you condemn your side's rhetoric?

I very clearly condemned the violence (as can be interpreted by calling the individual who perpetuated the violence a 'criminal' who should meet justice).
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

Teslag said:

Where in that screenshot did you condemn your side's rhetoric?

I very clearly condemned the violence (as can be interpreted by calling the individual who perpetuated the violence a 'criminal' who should meet justice).


Can't help but notice you keep giving a pass to the Dem politicians calling for their sheep to do violence and sedition on their behalf
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

Blackhorse83 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Then condemn the violence and the rhetoric.

No point in arguing with him. He is a true believer. This is a post of his back in September:

"I'm sorry you don't understand that "antifa" is a broad ideology, not a group. And besides that, the United States has no legal mechanism for labeling domestic organizations as terrorist groups."

"Experts also said it remains unclear how such a designation would work for a broad movement rather than a distinct group and expressed concern that it could be used to justify a crackdown on the political left more generally. Designating an ideology as a terrorist group is either useless or dangerous (as it's so vague that is anyone who accuses Trump of being a facist part of Antifa?)."

....what about that is condoning violence? That whole response was about labeling 'ANTIFA' (a broad ideology rather than a coordinated organization) a terrorist group. It would be like calling 'Christian Nationalists' a terrorist org.


Except ANTIFA is real group and Christian Nationalism is a made up leftist boogie man
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

Logos Stick said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.



Your side called for sedition. Trump posted the consequences.

Who are trying to convince with your gaslighting?! I hate you and your side and you hate me and my side. There is no reconciliation.

Speak for yourself please. I don't hate anyone. You and some people on here frustrate me to no end, but I don't hate anyone (other than George RR Martin for not finishing Game of Thrones).



Well, the last season really did suck!

Also, if you don't have hate in your heart, then why spew lies?!


eta: and I don't hate you as a human being, I hate the degeneracy, deception, lies, immorality, etc... that you and your side champion and push. Your side is literally shooting and murdering our politicians and cultural leaders.
BBRex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WBBQ74 said:

UCMJ Article 92 should be required reading for these political idiots. You can't fix stupid.

The key word in Article 92 is "lawful." In the video, they are talking "unlawful" orders. At the same time, without any specifics, the video is akin to a public service announcement that says "don't drive your car into a tree." I mean, good advice, but I don't need a video with dim lawmakers for that.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

Then condemn the violence and the rhetoric.

The really great thing about his side is they actively rape, murder, and mutilate children, and most Dems have no idea due to the "rhetoric" of his party, their media, and a stunning communist mindset.

Now, the REALLY bad guys are the ones who are 100% aware of this, still push the same rhetoric, and want more.

Before anyone asks (not that conservatives would ask, as we know what examples of murder, rape, and child mutilation are), but thousands and thousands of women were raped on our border for four years by coyotes due to unrestrained, and against written law, immigration. By now, the numbers of Americans who were raped, murdered, and assaulted, by these same illegals, are likely in the thousands. Of course, Kirk, Trump, and 3 SOTUS justices either murdered, or attempted murder, don't count to the Dems, but would if they knew them personally.

Then we had a sitting Congresswoman (Crocket) calling out an innocent man (except for being conservative) named Jeffrey Epstein to be threatened and possibly harmed because she wanted to make a point for "her base".

Quote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/musk-calls-out-soros-radical-son-can-you-stop-trying-destroy-civilization

There sure seems to be some hatred in there someplace.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

WBBQ74 said:

Show of hands. How many of you have ever been in command of military members and either applied discipline UP UCMJ Article 15 OR conducted/participated in any level Courts Martial proceedings (Summary, Special, General) before? Anyone ever had to read the UCMJ? Any idea what Article 92 contains? If not, sit down and listen to folks who have before running your mouth about something you know zilch about.


And? What did these vets say that was wrong?
You think potus calling to hang people is the appropriate response? Come on.

"Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders."

A statement of fact, followed by:

"This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens,"

An accusation without substance or proof.

"Like us, you all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution. Right now, the threats coming to our constitution aren't just coming from abroad but from right here at home."

A statement that implies that the current administation and POTUS are a domestic threat.

"Right now, more than ever, the American People need you."

An open call to action to defy orders from this administraton.


And you ask what is wrong with what they said?!? This wasn't a "reminder" to the military of their options. This was a thinly veiled call to undermine and defy the duly elected President of the US... WITHOUT EVIDENCE!
13B
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hullabaloonatic said:

13B said:

Hullabaloonatic said:

Scrolled through 6 pages and was shocked to find that no one actually provided links to what Trump 'truthed.'




What the Democratic VETS said was neither seditious or traitorous. All members of the military have the right, and in some cases have the duty, to refuse illegal orders. Their oath is to the Constitution, not to the Commander-In-Chief or to any other individual in the chain of command. Accusing these individuals of being TRAITORS and declaring their actions punishable by death is INSANE.

Trump is begging for someone to enact violence on these people. I feel like im taking crazy pills reading through TexAgs justify this.

President Trump isn't begging for violence, he is merely reminding everyone of the oaths they took and that if there is seditious behavior then it is punishable by death and quotes an example from the past. See, I can spin it just like you are attempting to do.

Give me a ****ing break. He called them seditious traitors that should be punished by death and then re-truthed a guy who said they should be hung.

Don't try to gaslight me or anyone else on this non sense. The POTUS is explicitly calling for the execution of elected leaders.

WOW! Irony escapes you.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.

This is an untrue statement. Trump has called for no one's death. He is stating his opinion that the video constitues a seditious act by these individuals, and could be prosecuted as seditious conspiracy.

He has a point. (See my post above)

He also re-tweeted a post that said that seditious conspiracy in Washington's time would result in a penalty of death. As far as I'm aware, that is a true statement as well.

So please, unless you have a link showing that Trump specifically is calling for the death of these individuals, give it a rest with the hyperbole.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

bobbranco said:

Did Trump call them out by name?

All I see is seditious behavior...

....He quote 'truthed' (i still can't believe the dumb reality we live in where the President is 'truthing' online) the Washington Examiner article linking the video explicitly calling them traitors:


And then the very next 'truth':


It's extremely clear that he thinks they should be put to death.

Sedition can be punishable by death, if a jury so decides.

He's not calling for on the spot summary judgment or encouraging anyone to hunt them down.

Settle down.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

Teslag said:

Where in that screenshot did you condemn your side's rhetoric?

I very clearly condemned the violence (as can be interpreted by calling the individual who perpetuated the violence a 'criminal' who should meet justice).


He didn't ask you to only condemn the violence
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.

Swallwell wants to shoot unruly Americans.

Cities burned during the summer(s) of love all stoked by leftist fools.

Leftist elected officials want to send Americans to re-education camps. What are those exactly?

We could go on for days regurgitating every violent incident the left propagates.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BBRex said:

WBBQ74 said:

UCMJ Article 92 should be required reading for these political idiots. You can't fix stupid.

The key word in Article 92 is "lawful." In the video, they are talking "unlawful" orders. At the same time, without any specifics, the video is akin to a public service announcement that says "don't drive your car into a tree." I mean, good advice, but I don't need a video with dim lawmakers for that.

If we needed this reminder, the left probably should have been noble and made the PSA daily during the term of the incognitive Biden.
zag213004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

zag213004 said:

flown-the-coop said:

Haitians. Very common in their culture to consume animals as such to take over their spirits. Vodou.

If you fell for the "it was made up" nonsense, then sorry your gal Kamala lost.


Again show me evidence that there are Haitians illegally here (or even legally here) and eating pets. You made the accusation.

Asking for this proof has nothing to do with who I didn't vote for so stop deflecting.



I usually do not oblige such lazy demands of "proof", but here you are.

You can make a donation to a charity of your choice for being wrong.

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/haiti-voodoo-culture-eating-animals-humans-jack-brewer

https://lifesadventure.club/2024/09/14/the-role-of-animal-sacrifice-in-haitian-vodou-religion/

https://floridianpress.com/2024/09/florida-lawmaker-confirms-pet-eating-is-happening-in-u-s/




Did you actually go into the links and read them and investigate the claims within these links? Because your second link, definitely argues against the claim that Haitian immigrants are eating people's pets and local park birds

For your reading pleasure.

1.0 first link
first link: the text of the article recaps the assertion made by Trump during the debate of Haitian immigrants in springfield ohio eating pets. According to this Evie article, this "news was first made by an ohio resident who claimed on facebook that their neighbor's cat had been stolen by immigrants, only to be discovered hanging from a branch and being prepared for consumption."

Through my research I found an article from cincy local news station (Source 1)that determined the primary source of this claim: Erika Lee (35). Lee states in an NBC News interview (source 2) that she made the following post:

"My neighbor informed me that her daughters friend had lost her cat. She checked pages, kennels, asked around, etc. One day she came home from work, as soon as she stepped out of her car, looked towards a neighbors house, where Haitians live, & saw her cat hanging from a branch, like you'd do a deer for butchering, & they were carving it up to eat. I've been told they are doing this to dogs, they have been doing it at snyder park with the ducks & geese, as I was told that last bit by Rangers & police. Please keep a close eye on these animals"

Her Neighbor, Newton, in an interview with newsguard, stated that Lee's facebook post mistated her (Newton). According to Newton, the owner of the missing cat was "an acquaintance of a friend"

So to summarize this part, this initial claim from Lee was a fourth-hand account based on a rumor. (Lee>Newton>Friend>Acquaintance of a friend). Nothing has been shown to substantiate this 4th-hand account rumor and Lee regret's posting it.


On another story,
(Source 3) There is a separate police report filed by a different springfield resident, Anna Kilgore (Trump Supporter), who believed her Haitian neighbors were responsible for her cat, Miss Sassy, going missing. The wallstreet Journal visited Kilgore who had filed the police report. According to Kilgore (via the WSJ), Miss Sassy "actually returned a few days later - found safe in her own basement". Kilgore apologised to her Haitian neighbors via translation app.

To summarize this story, Cat owner filed report accusing Haitian neighbors of taking her cat. Cat was found in owners basement unharmed a couple of days later.

1.1 First X post imbedded
Within the evie link there is an imbedded X post from riverrat328 stating: "Actual resident of Springfield, Ohio is afraid for her life and her pets post and police report to follow". and within this post includes 3 attachments:
1. the first attachment is a video of a person crying saying that it is not a joke, she doesn't feel safe and to imagine being homeless for a year for no F'in reason. She makes claims that "they" are out there decapitating animals and follows up with telling the audience to imagine walking outside and seeing you dog's head decapitated on the ground. She doesnt feel safe, everything is scary, everybody is homeless and there is hate everywhere.

Her testimony alone of "them" decapitating animals is hearsay and her credibility is called into question when within the same speech she claims that everybody is homeless in her town. We know this is not true. The amount of homeless make up .69% of the springfield ohio population (source 4). I found it odd in her testimony that she was able to zoom in and zoom out on words of emphasis during her speech while this is an artistic choice I don't understand why this was needed. If she's homeless, maybe she can showcase her video editing skills in a job application and hopefully get out of the homeless situation that she is in.

2. a facebook post from Annie Schlicher makes a 3rd-hand anecdote that her partner at work's, brother in-law saw "this haitian man run up to these geese and cut its head of to take it home" and that the man "did it in front of a bunch of kids" (age not known). Annie Schlicher then calls out a mayor Anthony Harris.

First of all The only mayor I have found within the united states named Anthony Harris is in Frost, Texas. there is no mayor by the name of Anthony Harris in Springfield, Ohio. The current mayor of Springfield Ohio is Rob Rue. secondly the mayor Police Department and the Ohio Department of natural resources have found zero evidence to support the claims of geese being taken and/or decapitated.

regarding the name, Anthony Harris, this name belongs to a resident of Ohio which claimed at a Springfield city commission meeting that the migrants were eating ducks in the park. The video of the claim from Harris can be found at 1:10:09 of source 5. Harris is a self described social media influencer on tiktok and youtube. He claims that Haitians are in the parks and grabbing ducks by their neck and cutting their head off and walking off with them and eating them.

In a later video (source 6) Anthony Harris recounts his day he went to the city council meeting. in his recounting he states that someone tagged him in a facebook status saying "Anthony, me and my kid were just in the park and then they just went up and grabbed a goose and cut his head off and then ran off and was eating it". Harris admits he never saw this happen at the 2 minute mark. it is safe to assume he is referencing the post by Schlicher which tagged Harris as the Mayor. The story matches exactly but at this point Harris is making a 4th-hand account of an event that has zero evidence to back up the claim.

3. The 3rd attachment shows a grainy transcript of a legitimate call detail report from the clark county communications center in Springfield, Ohio. the report documents a non-emergency call received August 26, 2024 at 10:36 AM where the caller, Toby, Claimed to have seen four individuals, two male two female and believed them to be of Haitian descent based on the language spoken, carrying a goose near the intersection of Walter Street and Water Street. The caller provided a partial license plate for a gray Toyota Tacoma. Officer.Perlman arrived on the scene at 11 AM and completed the call at 11:11 AM with no further action noted. at the time there was no evidence to verify the callers claims.. further investigations by local and state authorities such as the Department of natural resources found no supporting evidence, dead geese, or violations had been committed. (see source 7). Although there have been posts of other police reports, the original complaint made by Toby is the only one of record for springfield. (Source 8)

1.2 second X post
Man from Wall street apes post says he is not haitian but he is from carribean and he says that Haitian immigrants are indeed eating animals. He claims they are harvesting cats for food and for voodoo purposes. he says haitians eat the animals and use the blood and bones for voodoo purposes for good luck or "good juju" as he puts it. In voodoo practices it is only typical for sacrifices of edible animals such as chickens and goats. Cats are not one of the animals that are sacrificed. such instances are extremely rare (source 9). He says it is their culture to do this. however his claims are secondhand accounts of practices within Haiti. he personally has not been to Haiti and witnessed this nor does that mean these practices are happening in the united states. Eating dog meat in Korea is not illegal but I dont see widespread evidence of dog meat being consumed by korean immigrants. is it possible there may be an instance or two maybe but it's not a widespread issue. My point is just because something in a country occurs at regularity does not mean that it transfers to a different country due to rules and regulations immigrants for the most part follow. this person's claim is speculation and so far the evidence to support such practices of animal, slaughter in parks, and the kidnapping of pets by Haitian immigrants are unfounded.

the evie article continues saying that there are not any specific police reports about cats or dogs being taken. The article then references the already unfounded claim of geese being stolen at parks, and of course, the reasons behind such an action.

1.3 3rd X post
this post features a interview with a former NFL player who has been in Haiti for humanitarian work. Brewer makes reference to the voodoo culture within Haiti of animal sacrifice and the desperate situation many Haitians face within their country. He also makes the claim that the Haitians as a culture practice cannibalism. according to the US state department, there is no evidence that supports the practice of cannibalism within Haiti (Source 10). If Jack Brewer has the videos that he claims to have of people eating people, they should be turned over to the state department as evidence because this would change the state departments relations with the country of Haiti for sure. there is also no evidence that Haitians coming over to the United States are cannibals either. again, this is speculation based off of unfounded claims about people residing in a country over 1000 miles away from the mainland.

continuing on with the EVIE article, the article references a video uploaded by at highway_30 showing a man in a Third World country drinking a cat's blood while it's still alive. The user cannot confirm the validity and context of the footage (like what country it is coming from). The video has been removed from X so there is no way to further investigate this claim.

2.0 lifesadventure club link
this link begins with discussions on Haitian voodoo practices. The initial claims about the animals that are typically sacrificed such as chickens goats are true within the country.

The article then goes into the misconceptions and disinformation some of the bullet points include:
- cats and dogs are not typically used for sacrifice
- expert state that Afro Caribbean religions like Haitian voodoo only sacrifice animals considered edible claims of Haitians,
- eating cats and dogs, as part of voodoo to rituals are considered false by scholars
- there has been a long history of stigmatization and misinformation about voodoo practices.

The article then goes into the context of the recent claims. The site states that recent disinformation campaigns have made unsubstantiated claims about Haitian immigrants and animal sacrifice. The article then goes onto list The unsubstantiated claims that have been made about immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, and that they have been debunked by local authorities and fact checkers.

So this article contradicts your claim of Haitians in the United States taking and eating pets. So thank you for supporting my stance with this article.


3.0 floridian press
The title of this article is Florida law maker confirms pet eating is happening in US. Florida Rep Mario Diaz-Balart recounts hearing people eating animals like cats, horses, ducks, and iguanas in South Florida, and that "it does happen". Miami news site an instance where three horses were stolen from southwest Miami Dade farm and slaughtered for their meat. The article does not provide claims as to who the perpetrators were. there was another instance of a cuban-american man in Miami arrested for illegally selling 40 pounds of slaughtered horse meat: Alain Arencibia Diaz.

The article goes on to talk about invasive iguanas being eaten for dinner in South Florida. I don't see why this is relevant to Haitians in usa supposedly stealing and eating peoples pets. it is legal in USA to eat iguanas, snakes, frogs, alligators. it is illegal to eat cats, dogs and horses in USA.

Continuing the article begins talking about sacrifices being protected by the us constitution in a 9-0 decision in 1993 which overturned local ordinances banning the practices of the Santeria religion. The ruling held that the restrictions were targetting a specific religion and were not religiously neutral. Again, this does not provide evidence of Haitian immigrants practicing sacrifices on cats and dogs, legally or illegally obtained. The article then references the Jack Brewer comments about dogs, cats, and humans being sacrificed and eaten in Haiti, to which I already pointed out. No evidence supports this as per the state department.

The article then finally concludes with the question "are immigrants eating domestic pets?" They answer "maybe". only because a law was passed in 2018 outlawing the slaughter of dogs and cats for human consumption and their logic is why would they make this law if it wasn't happening .

The basis of this law goes back to 2017 as an effort to encourage the end of dog and cat meat trade within countries such as China, South Korea, Vietnam, and India. Prior to this law, the only states where it was illegal to consume, cat and dog meat was California, Hawaii, Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey, and New york. That means blood-red states like Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, Louisiana, and even Florida allowed the consumption of cat and dog meat. Does that mean people in Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana? We're all taking each other's cats and dogs and eating them. No, it doesn't. There have still been animal cruelty laws put in place at these states, including Ohio, where the supposed pet cat animal sacrificing was taking place.



To summarize the links that you sent me: the first link references, rumors that have been disproven or are from 3rd to 4th hand accounts with unsubstantiated claims. The second link actually contradicts your argument and the first link arguments. The third and final link basically rehashes the same unsubstantiated claims made from the first link and does not add any evidence to support your assertion that Haitian immigrants are taking pet cats and dogs (as well as local park birds) and consuming them.

Source 1: https://www.wlwt.com/article/post-at-origin-of-lie-about-haitian-migrants-eating-pets/62201811#:~:text=SPRINGFIELD%2C%20Ohio%20%E2%80%94,kennels%2C%20asked%20around%2C%20etc.

Source 2: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/-just-exploded-springfield-woman-says-never-meant-spark-rumors-haitian-rcna171099

Source 3 (the primary source is paywalled): https://gizmodo.com/cat-stolen-by-haitian-migrants-in-ohio-was-actually-just-in-cat-owners-basement-2000500328#:~:text=The%20Wall%20Street%20Journal%20earnestly,kicked%20it%20into%20high%20gear.

source 4: https://dam.assets.ohio.gov/image/upload/epa.ohio.gov/Portals/35/cso/Springfield-Integrated_LTCP_Update.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Source 5: https://www.youtube.com/live/VL4JXoFcJQI?si=2qApdingdoNUztxL

source 6: https://www.youtube.com/live/WiBB_XAKDec?si=5mtx_PDFrQ_XYiE_

source 7: https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/county-no-evidence-of-august-claim-that-haitians-took-geese-at-springfield-park/NFRGJNURHREGHB32HBC6UKZJWQ/

source 8: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/police-audio-haitian-geese/

source 9: https://www.themonastery.org/blog/is-voodoo-coming-to-a-town-near-you#:~:text=%22Afro-Caribbean%20religions%2C%20including%20Haitian%20Vodou%2C%20only%20involve%20the%20sacrifice%20of%20animals%20considered%20edible%2C%20such%20as%20chickens%20and%20goats.%20Cats%20and%20dogs%20are%20not%20part%20of%20these%20practices%2C%22%20Kummels%20explained.%20Such%20sacrifices%20are%20also%20rare.

source 10: https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2024/03/20/politifact-cannibalism-in-haiti-fact-checking-the-unfounded-claims/73028427007/


flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's simple. Just tell the Haitians to quit eating the cats and dogs. Simple.
agAngeldad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Why not? Judges in Tennessee are telling both the governor and POTUS they have no right to determine when to deploy forces under their control.

I checked the 1776 org chart and the revised one from 1786 and did not see judges at the top, particularly regarding troops. Didn't see Congress listed above POTUS either. But maybe I missed something.


This country is close to a recheck. Low level politicians and judges tell the POTUS what he can do is total BS.
Forum Troll
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is an insane amount of mental gymnastics going on in this thread.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hullabaloonatic said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you have a little taste of how Republicans and Trump supporters have felt for the last 10 years with the way your party's ongoing violent rhetoric and actual violence has flowed. Until you show a concern for that, spare us your pearl clutching over this.


Which other President has called for the death of elected officials?

Which party has already shot multiple people on the other side, to include THIS President?

Trump is an elected official who is calling for the death of other elected officials.

The people who have perpetuated violence on victims such as Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman were private citizens who behaved in self motivated interests that do not represent anyone but themselves.

You keep saying this, but no matter how many times you parrot it from whatever platform you are on, it still doesn't make it true.

Think critically and independently. At least try anyway.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would also LOVE to see how all of the TDS folks that are bending like pretzels over trying to somehow say Trump is giving out illegal orders left and right and defending what the 6 idiots on the video did would react if say....

Ted Cruz
Tom Cotton
Cash Patel
Kristy Noem
Tom Homan
and throw in somebody like MTG or the current joint chief of staff command or something

did the same thing whenever the next democrat is elected POTUS. Because I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that they would be screaming from every rooftop they could that it was a traitorous and seditious act meant to undermine the very foundations of democracy and that we are in a constitutional crisis and that they are fomenting and actively trying to stir up an insurrection and whatever other talking point term is en vogue at the time.

100% certainty that they would be frothing at the mouth to see these folks hanged publicly. Because it's OK when D's do it in their mind, because in their mind everything is right because it's justified to their TDS mind. Same mentality that the SS soldiers had back in WWII at the various internment camps.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forum Troll said:

There is an insane amount of mental gymnastics going on in this thread.

True. One side has been responsible for all the lawbreaking and violence, yet people in congress are telling service members to defy the other side. So really, just more lawbreaking from the left.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

I would also LOVE to see how all of the TDS folks that are bending like pretzels over trying to somehow say Trump is giving out illegal orders left and right and defending what the 6 idiots on the video did would react if say....

Ted Cruz
Tom Cotton
Cash Patel
Kristy Noem
Tom Homan
and throw in somebody like MTG or the current joint chief of staff command or something

did the same thing whenever the next democrat is elected POTUS.

We know that the left illegally used the surveillance state against some of those people for legally asking for the 2020 election to be reviewed.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.