Good Luck today Virginia!

40,507 Views | 446 Replies | Last: 28 min ago by techno-ag
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Turns out governments are supposed to serve its people whether they are white or not.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2040huck said:

Jack Boyette said:

2040huck said:

Jack Boyette said:

2040huck said:

fafo The Republicans started and approved this kind of stuff


No they didn't, and those who keep saying this prove they're just as uninformed as we already knew they were, which is why they vote for a party that celebrates mental illness and not enforcing our laws at the expense of Americans.

The best part is that it proves that for Dems, the ends ALWAYS justify the means. They were calling out Republicans for this, calling it a "blight on democracy." And yet, their response is to DO EXACTLY THE SAME THING BUT WORSE.

Exactly the same thing. yep



No…WORSE. You're totally fine with disenfranchising almost half the voters in a state. A 52-46 state shouldn't have an 88% majority.

You guys are beyond pathetic.

So you believe that each state should have representation consistent with its popular vote? I happen to agree.


Then you love what Texas did, right?
Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Like letting populations in big cities rule the states and they all have their hands out for freebies!
Sorry, but some folks wouldn't mind feeding the really down and out, but those on perpetual free ride because of their voting ? Nope.


Rural Red State populations are pretty large takers of government bennies on a household level. They also get sweet handouts like ag subsidies.

No part of the urban or rural or political divide has a high horse when it comes to sucking on the government teat.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
huskerag2011 said:

Logos Stick said:

Malibu said:

When we do it it's for good reasons.


New England has a total of 21 U.S. House seats, distributed as follows: Massachusetts has 9, Connecticut has 5, Maine has 2, New Hampshire has 2, Rhode Island has 2, and Vermont has 1.

State Trump %
-----------------------------
Connecticut ................~41%
Maine..........................~46%
Massachusetts............~37%
New Hampshire......... ~48%
Rhode Island..............~41%
Vermont......................~33%


Now a single House seat is R in those states!

GTFO with the liberal high horse and "'Texas did it first!" BS.


For comparison's sake, let's take a look at the states in the 8th Circuit, Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. 29 U.S. House seats: Missouri 8, Minnesota 8, Arkansas 4, Iowa 4, Nebraska 3, North Dakota 1, South Dakota 1.

State Harris%
Arkansas 33%
Iowa 42%
Minnesota 50%
Missouri 40%
Nebraska 38%
North Dakota 30%
South Dakota 34%

Of those 29 seats, there are 6 Dem seats, 4 in Minnesota, and 2 in Missouri.

Both sides suck with gerrymandering.


Fine, we'll take 20% in New England instead of 0 and call it even. That gives us 4 more seats. You good with that?

The bottom line is that if Rs got the seats based on ratios AND the seats that Rs were screwed out of in the last census, you Dems would never have the House again. Add to that the VRA stuff and its over!

Regardless, we need to stop debating and start grinding liberals into dust.
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Windy City Ag said:

Quote:

Like letting populations in big cities rule the states and they all have their hands out for freebies!
Sorry, but some folks wouldn't mind feeding the really down and out, but those on perpetual free ride because of their voting ? Nope.


Rural Red State populations are pretty large takers of government bennies on a household level. They also get sweet handouts like ag subsidies.

No part of the urban or rural or political divide has a high horse when it comes to sucking on the government teat.


But I would imagine those in rural areas aren't for burning cities down and ignoring what is going on in the demise of our society.
But liberals are always working. They've caved Virginia. Now NC has imported Congolese colony on full USRAP Benefits and who will be nucleus of destroying NC too.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Never negotiate with Democrats about 'fairness.' Play their game by their rules, as Sean Spicer said today.

Zero reason not to, now.
Colonel Kurtz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twelve12twelve said:

Turns out governments are supposed to serve its people whether they are white or not.

Yeah, no surprise that 3rd worlders want to turn VA into the 3rd world hellhole they came from.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hmmm. If true, very sus.
I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here we go again.
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
5Amp said:

And all Republicans can do is whine, all over the radio as I drive in my car. In control of all three branches with a majority on SC bench and can't do nothing but whine about how mean and corrupt the Democrats are.



The Republicans are the Washington Generals. I'm as far right as they come but I respect the Democrats alot more then Republicans. They do what they say they will do. Look at how they fight for illegals and don't want them deported. When they are in power bring them in by the 10's of millions. Republicans say they will deport them but won't. Repulicans are just playing the game Democrats are out to win.
dvldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good first step.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

Hmmm. If true, very sus.


They don't even care anymore. They are cheating, and we know they are cheating, and they know that we know they are cheating. They simply don't care.

And why should they? The Republicans won't do anything about it....
Texas A&M University
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

annie88 said:

Hmmm. If true, very sus.


They don't even care anymore. They are cheating, and we know they are cheating, and they know that we know they are cheating. They simply don't care.

And why should they? The Republicans won't do anything about it....

If people buy into the cheating conspiracy, how are they so dull to think only one side cheats?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.
Texas A&M University
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.

You really believe that?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

If people buy into the cheating conspiracy, how are they so dull to think only one side cheats?

Hmm, just hear me out here...maybe...just maybe...it always benefits one side?
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texas A&M University said:

Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.

You really believe that?


That's what the evidence shows. Open your eyes..
Malibu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why is that suspect? Yes went up by 65762 votes and no went up by 29898. If a large urban precinct reported, Seems like that would be expected and lopsided the other way if it was from a rural area. Unless I'm dumb and missing something obvious
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Texas A&M University said:

Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.

You really believe that?


That's what the evidence shows. Open your eyes..

Won't happen. Look at his posting history.

16 year old account, 103 posts, almost none on F16, and suddenly activated to carry the Democrat's talking points.
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Colonel Kurtz said:

twelve12twelve said:

Turns out governments are supposed to serve its people whether they are white or not.

Yeah, no surprise that 3rd worlders want to turn VA into the 3rd world hellhole they came from.

So non-white people are automatically third worlders? Bold claim cotton.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Logos Stick said:

Texas A&M University said:

Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.

You really believe that?


That's what the evidence shows. Open your eyes..

Won't happen. Look at his posting history.

16 year old account, 103 posts, almost none on F16, and suddenly activated to carry the Democrat's talking points.

FIFY.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twelve12twelve said:

Colonel Kurtz said:

twelve12twelve said:

Turns out governments are supposed to serve its people whether they are white or not.

Yeah, no surprise that 3rd worlders want to turn VA into the 3rd world hellhole they came from.

So non-white people are automatically third worlders? Bold claim cotton.


Most non-white countries are **** holes. Hell, large portions of Mexico is like stepping back 200 years into the past. I couldn't believe it when I visited.

They have literally lived next door to the greatest, most advanced country to ever grace the planet for centuries and they are still a corrupt, **** hole. We've even outsourced our manufacturing to them and it didn't help. We gave them the keys to the kingdom.

dvldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Additional clarification on the court case:
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texas A&M University said:

Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.

You really believe that?

It is proven daily.
Old Gorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twelve12twelve said:

Turns out governments are supposed to serve its people whether they are white or not.


I see the SPLC has made an appearance.

Disagreement with the globalist left is always couched as racism., especially from those who pay hayseeds to engage in the grift.
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Close, I work for Soros, Inc. I was able to turn down SPLC for better offers.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dvldog said:


From my understanding, the VSC stated the referendum election was allowed to proceed but they would not make a decision on the constitutionality until after the election was completed. Sounded like they were going to make their decision based on the results rather than the actual Virginia Constitution. Since the referendum didnt win by a landslide they may rule its unconstitutional.
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.

Most naive thing ever written.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

From my understanding, the VSC stated the referendum election was allowed to proceed but they would not make a decision on the constitutionality until after the election was completed. Sounded like they were going to make their decision based on the results rather than the actual Virginia Constitution. Since the referendum didnt win by a landslide they may rule its unconstitutional.

There was no damage or harm until it was passed. That is what caused voters to be disenfranchised, hence the harm. Pretty common for a court to wait for the harm to manifest, in fact.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

From my understanding, the VSC stated the referendum election was allowed to proceed but they would not make a decision on the constitutionality until after the election was completed. Sounded like they were going to make their decision based on the results rather than the actual Virginia Constitution. Since the referendum didnt win by a landslide they may rule its unconstitutional.

There was no damage or harm until it was passed. That is what caused voters to be disenfranchised, hence the harm. Pretty common for a court to wait for the harm to manifest, in fact.
Makes sense. Thank you.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're welcome.
swc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.


Guardians of Pedophiles nickname wasn't just pulled out of a box of names.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ervin Burrell said:

Logos Stick said:

Because one side is void of all morals and ethics and decency.

HTH.

Most naive thing ever written.

Sure Jan.

Here's exhibit 10,384:
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florida about the do a remap to counter D's in Virginia.


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.