Really, don't mean to be rude but they are easy to find so I thought you were messing.
You can find estimated top 10 lists everywhere with basic searches. Now the values might be slightly different because the criteria being used might be slightly different and the articles will detail the criteria used but they are all consistent on one thing. Texas is at number 1 the last two years at well over 40 mil for their football roster. And that number is actually low for them bc not every dollar going to Arch is known.
I will not post on this one anymore but I am not apologizing when a poster states "That's BS" and then I back it up. Also find it interesting that Ags are arguing with me when my primary point is Texas is paying plenty in all their sports, especially ones that they are winning. I added football to the softball discussion bc there are more detailed estimates. But softball estimates has Texas top 4.
You can find estimated top 10 lists everywhere with basic searches. Now the values might be slightly different because the criteria being used might be slightly different and the articles will detail the criteria used but they are all consistent on one thing. Texas is at number 1 the last two years at well over 40 mil for their football roster. And that number is actually low for them bc not every dollar going to Arch is known.
I will not post on this one anymore but I am not apologizing when a poster states "That's BS" and then I back it up. Also find it interesting that Ags are arguing with me when my primary point is Texas is paying plenty in all their sports, especially ones that they are winning. I added football to the softball discussion bc there are more detailed estimates. But softball estimates has Texas top 4.
Gig ‘Em Baby!