It's amazing to me how you respond to posts like you're responding to the post then randomly insert these things that no one has said and act like they're facts.El Gallo Blanco said:Didn't the creator of that show brag about how gay she was making Star Wars or something to that effect? Maybe one day these directors and lead actresses of the shows will learn to just keep their mouths shut and quit talking about their activism instead of the content of the movie? That mainstream America exists outside of their weird little self-reinforcing hyper-woke echo chamber bubbles? Nah, probably not.fig96 said:That's fair but I think also gets into a really gray area.AGC said:fig96 said:Could it be that there's a very slim chance that you're never wrong, a similarly slim chance that I'm never wrong, and a much better than average chance that the truth lies somewhere in the middle?aTmAg said:Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.fig96 said:I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.aTmAg said:No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.fig96 said:Reading comprehension is important.aTmAg said:And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.fig96 said:If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).aTmAg said:How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)fig96 said:Hi pot this is kettle.aTmAg said:
This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Reading comprehension is important.
My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
Hence pot, kettle.
If they hadn't revised the cast, script, etc. I think it'd be much easier to claim it's not political. It's too muddled now to say the end product isn't the result of CYA precisely because it was, and is now a milquetoast product hoping to scrape by, despite still not having a prince. You simply can't unring the bell.
Similar to The Acolyte, did the creators' intent negatively affect the show? Quite possibly, but at the same time the discussion around those viewpoints was far more prominent than any content that appeared in the actual end product (which kind of sounds like the case here as well from those who have seen it).
In the end we'll never truly know exactly what resulted in what, it's all conjecture on the viewers side. Sometimes creators just make bad decisions.
Honestly, many Americans have reached their limit when it comes to the activism and preachiness. It's a huge turnoff. Whether it's actually in the movie, or just talked about by the creators/actors before the movie even comes out.
We get it, it offends or upsets some of you that people take more than just the actual movie itself into consideration. Unless it's a movie like "Sound of Freedom" of course lol.
I'm not offended or upset about anything about this in any way nor do I particularly care what you do, if you choose not to see it because of things the lead said knock yourself out. I don't think it looks especially good and the reviews seem to back that up. I'll probably catch it on D+ at some point.
I'm simply making the point that in many cases the dialogue around the film/show contains far more activism than the film/show itself, and that seems to be the case here. It was probably the case for Sound of Freedom as well, another film I'll get around to watching eventually.
