Entertainment
Sponsored by

Why doesn't Disney just cancel the new Snow White movie?

94,183 Views | 927 Replies | Last: 7 mo ago by EclipseAg
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

fig96 said:

AGC said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

fig96 said:

aTmAg said:

This board untrustworthy on identifying political stuff. They've gotten this wrong countless times.
Hi pot this is kettle.
How so? I've never screwed this up. That's like calling Snow White black. (not in this movie.. but historically)
If we take just the present topic, you're literally arguing with someone who's seen the movie about what's in the movie (that you haven't seen).
And my point is that I don't trust this board on their assessment of this movie because of their failure in the PAST.

Reading comprehension is important.
Reading comprehension is important.

My point is that you on the flip side see something you believe is political everything you see. And in this case, even in something you haven't seen (which is pretty impressive).
No I don't. And I've made clear of that on this board. For example, the producer of Chernobyl is a flaming lib, but he kept his leftist agenda out of that series and I have said so. Same for other shows that I also love like BB and the Wire. Decades ago, most good movies had no political agenda at all. It is easier to name the few movies back then that did have a political agenda than those that didn't. Now it's the other way around. Most of what Hollywood spews has some sort of agenda tossed in.
I have no idea about your comments on those specific things, but I do know I've been involved in multiple threads with you making things political that weren't very political, hence the comment.
Could it be that you under appreciate how political these shows actually are? I'm not the only guy saying these things. And it's not just F16. It's commonly acknowledged across society. Hell, Disney itself admitted that they have been too political and have claimed that they will try to do better. And yet F13 will gaslight people all day long on how they really aren't political.

We need more Back to the Futures and less of this woke BS.
Could it be that there's a very slim chance that you're never wrong, a similarly slim chance that I'm never wrong, and a much better than average chance that the truth lies somewhere in the middle?

Hence pot, kettle.


If they hadn't revised the cast, script, etc. I think it'd be much easier to claim it's not political. It's too muddled now to say the end product isn't the result of CYA precisely because it was, and is now a milquetoast product hoping to scrape by, despite still not having a prince. You simply can't unring the bell.
That's fair but I think also gets into a really gray area.

Similar to The Acolyte, did the creators' intent negatively affect the show? Quite possibly, but at the same time the discussion around those viewpoints was far more prominent than any content that appeared in the actual end product (which kind of sounds like the case here as well from those who have seen it).


In the end we'll never truly know exactly what resulted in what, it's all conjecture on the viewers side. Sometimes creators just make bad decisions.
Didn't the creator of that show brag about how gay she was making Star Wars or something to that effect? Maybe one day these directors and lead actresses of the shows will learn to just keep their mouths shut and quit talking about their activism instead of the content of the movie? That mainstream America exists outside of their weird little self-reinforcing hyper-woke echo chamber bubbles? Nah, probably not.

Honestly, many Americans have reached their limit when it comes to the activism and preachiness. It's a huge turnoff. Whether it's actually in the movie, or just talked about by the creators/actors before the movie even comes out.

We get it, it offends or upsets some of you that people take more than just the actual movie itself into consideration. Unless it's a movie like "Sound of Freedom" of course lol.
It's amazing to me how you respond to posts like you're responding to the post then randomly insert these things that no one has said and act like they're facts.

I'm not offended or upset about anything about this in any way nor do I particularly care what you do, if you choose not to see it because of things the lead said knock yourself out. I don't think it looks especially good and the reviews seem to back that up. I'll probably catch it on D+ at some point.

I'm simply making the point that in many cases the dialogue around the film/show contains far more activism than the film/show itself, and that seems to be the case here. It was probably the case for Sound of Freedom as well, another film I'll get around to watching eventually.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

It's so obvious that so much of y'alls nonsense comes from having no idea how this **** works in the first place.

Disney didn't actively cast a "super woke lead who won't shut up about how woke they are."

They didn't set out to cast the most woke person they could.

That's ridiculous.

Steven Spielberg cast Zegler out of obscurity - literally, while she was still in high school - as the lead in his remake of West Side Story, which she shot when she was 18 years old.

She ended up killing it in that role, in which she showcased a hell of a singing voice, and was then cast in Snow White on the hells of West Side Story at age 20. THAT'S why Disney cast her as Snow White - because she was anointed by our greatest living director, was a big, up-and-coming talent, and has a hell of a singing voice.

She didn't "go woke" until AFTER she was cast in Snow White. At least not publicly in any way that matters. In other words, Disney had no idea who they were dealing with in that regard or what she was going to end up saying in interviews.

Either way, there's ZERO chance they're not banging their heads against the wall due to her shenanigans. Turns out she's also a bratty, entitled, ill-formed political activists who's never known rejection in this business, and I guarantee you Disney wants her to shut up as much as you do.

That said... she's also ONLY 23.

She's a kid.

One who was handed an insane amount of celebrity at an early, formative age.

I'm not a fan either - her personality is rather grating - but I'm also choosing to extend a little grace, knowing how horrified I'd be if the whole world (especially rage-filled keyboard warriors) judged me based on some of the things I said and did in my early twenties.
Good insight.

Is the Disney woke culture creating activists? If not, what is? I mean.. she openly supported Hamas. This isn't just someone supporting typical one side of the aisle stuff. Where does support of terrorists come from that they couldn't have learned about with a typical background check of her and her family? And if there was nothing there before, where are the internal controls from Disney prevent cash cow leading actors/actresses from being extremists politically.. publicly before their movie is released? I think that question is likely the one Disney needs to figure out the most. Because they keep getting caught in this same situation where they are having to pick up the pieces after their show pony exposes their backside.
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:


Look at them destroying and vandalizing Teslas at the moment.
In the 1940s and 50s, my 16-year-old colored grandfather once bench pressed a Tesla.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The problem Disney had with the casting is that this followed up TLM (and came at the height of Disney wokism), which a lot of people saw as woke black washing, and any objection was deemed racist because, "Mermaids aren't real, so she can be any color," despite being a Danish fairy tale.

Fine. Whatever. Mermaids aren't real and the character is not defined as being white, so this isn't some attempt to black wash. Sure. We'll move on.

Snow White, yet another European fairytale, where the character is quite literally defined by being white as snow, is cast as a POC. Totally not woke. Defs not brown washing. But any objections are based on ignorance and racism because Snow White doesn't actually need to be white. If you disagree, you're an ignorant racist. Again. Hell, you've got nai in here moving the goal posts to midfield and saying they could have cast a black woman and would have been justified.

In context, it is really difficult to believe there was no woke component to the casting and really difficult to argue otherwise without completely ignoring it. Sure, Zegler can sing and wasn't exactly a nobody, but that's true for a multitude of white actresses. Hell, singing isn't even that much of a requirement considering they cast Emma Watson as Belle.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

TCTTS said:

It's so obvious that so much of y'alls nonsense comes from having no idea how this **** works in the first place.

Disney didn't actively cast a "super woke lead who won't shut up about how woke they are."

They didn't set out to cast the most woke person they could.

That's ridiculous.

Steven Spielberg cast Zegler out of obscurity - literally, while she was still in high school - as the lead in his remake of West Side Story, which she shot when she was 18 years old.

She ended up killing it in that role, in which she showcased a hell of a singing voice, and was then cast in Snow White on the hells of West Side Story at age 20. THAT'S why Disney cast her as Snow White - because she was anointed by our greatest living director, was a big, up-and-coming talent, and has a hell of a singing voice.

She didn't "go woke" until AFTER she was cast in Snow White. At least not publicly in any way that matters. In other words, Disney had no idea who they were dealing with in that regard or what she was going to end up saying in interviews.

Either way, there's ZERO chance they're not banging their heads against the wall due to her shenanigans. Turns out she's also a bratty, entitled, ill-formed political activists who's never known rejection in this business, and I guarantee you Disney wants her to shut up as much as you do.

That said... she's also ONLY 23.

She's a kid.

One who was handed an insane amount of celebrity at an early, formative age.

I'm not a fan either - her personality is rather grating - but I'm also choosing to extend a little grace, knowing how horrified I'd be if the whole world (especially rage-filled keyboard warriors) judged me based on some of the things I said and did in my early twenties.
Good insight.

Is the Disney woke culture creating activists? If not, what is? I mean.. she openly supported Hamas. This isn't just someone supporting typical one side of the aisle stuff. Where does support of terrorists come from that they couldn't have learned about with a typical background check of her and her family? And if there was nothing there before, where are the internal controls from Disney prevent cash cow leading actors/actresses from being extremists politically.. publicly before their movie is released? I think that question is likely the one Disney needs to figure out the most. Because they keep getting caught in this same situation where they are having to pick up the pieces after their show pony exposes their backside.


I don't doubt that she was cast with all the right intentions and from the bits of this that have leaked online, she does have a great voice. But, I have a hard time believing, based on who she has proven to be, that Disney execs didn't know she was a vocal walking PR-nightmare. This is the personality of some theatre kids who simply don't understand that a)they're not nearly as intelligent as they think they are b) they're not as informed on the issues they're sounding off on as they think they are and c) they have some responsibility to not let their personal views detract from a production which involves the money and livelihood of a lot of others. That being the case, why didn't executives pull her aside early on and tell her to shut the **** up? Problematic actors leave productions regularly once directors realize they're a pain in the ass, so why wasn't she warned to curb the bull**** or leave the production? Was she really seen as irreplaceable? Or were those in charge (who almost all agreed with her views) secretly enjoying their starlet spouting off?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I see the Hamas support as, more than anything, the current "trendy" cause among the far left in her age group. Personally, I don't view it as anything real or lasting. Rather, it's the perfect encapsulation of the world we currently live in, where certain terminally online morons can only view damn near every interaction in terms of the "oppressed" vs the "oppressor." They see innocent people being bombed, can't compute any geo-political situation more complex than that, and react in childish, uninformed fashion. To me, in that regard, it feels more like stupidity and a fad rather than any kind of legit "terrorist support" (which it definitely still is, don't get me wrong).

That said, I *do* see a lot of the left increasingly speaking out against people like her. In other words, I don't see the Hamas support ballooning. I could always be wrong, though.

As for the Disney question, I don't know what the answer is. I guess they could dock pay in some form or fashion contractually, for speaking out politically during Disney-paid press tours? Otherwise, I don't see how Disney could control their stars' social media or whatever else they say out outside of the Disney ecosystem.
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These last couple of posts have actually gotten me wondering if there's any way studios could exert the type of control these days they used to have back in the beginning days of Hollywood. Maybe not quite to that extent, but some tyoe of control of what an actor says while under contract for filming and press tours.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i have a 6 year old daughter. If she asks to go, ill probably take her. Havent heard anything about it from her, though, yet.

and i successfully dragged my feet for weeks to avoid going to see Mufasa until my wife broke down and took her.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think, in this particular instance, Disney was caught between a rock and a hard place.

If they tell Zegler to shut up, word gets out, and suddenly they have hundreds of thousands of idiots on social media calling them "Zionists" or whatever, then they're dealing with the fallout from that. On the other hand, they tell Gadot to keep quiet, and they suddenly have hundreds of thousands of Jewish people (who make up a huge chunk of the industry, obviously) yelling at them just the same, and they're dealing with the fallout from that.

Mainly, it sounds like Disney just wants this nightmare of a production/press tour/release to be over.

As has been noted many times in this thread, this movie was from a past Disney era, under the old leadership, and probably would have been developed/handled completely differently under Iger's returning, less-woke stewardship.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Considering she was cast in the Chapek era, I don't doubt they knew exactly who and what they were getting. I can't imagine giving a movie this high profile a budget of $240 million (before reshoots) and hiring a 20 year old kid to be the face of it without knowing whether she can handle the PR aspect.

That said, she was definitely told to STFU at some point and do damage control because she started walking a lot of things back. Then she eventually just went for broke and they had to scale back any kind of appearances to keep her in check.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cliff.Booth said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

TCTTS said:

It's so obvious that so much of y'alls nonsense comes from having no idea how this **** works in the first place.

Disney didn't actively cast a "super woke lead who won't shut up about how woke they are."

They didn't set out to cast the most woke person they could.

That's ridiculous.

Steven Spielberg cast Zegler out of obscurity - literally, while she was still in high school - as the lead in his remake of West Side Story, which she shot when she was 18 years old.

She ended up killing it in that role, in which she showcased a hell of a singing voice, and was then cast in Snow White on the hells of West Side Story at age 20. THAT'S why Disney cast her as Snow White - because she was anointed by our greatest living director, was a big, up-and-coming talent, and has a hell of a singing voice.

She didn't "go woke" until AFTER she was cast in Snow White. At least not publicly in any way that matters. In other words, Disney had no idea who they were dealing with in that regard or what she was going to end up saying in interviews.

Either way, there's ZERO chance they're not banging their heads against the wall due to her shenanigans. Turns out she's also a bratty, entitled, ill-formed political activists who's never known rejection in this business, and I guarantee you Disney wants her to shut up as much as you do.

That said... she's also ONLY 23.

She's a kid.

One who was handed an insane amount of celebrity at an early, formative age.

I'm not a fan either - her personality is rather grating - but I'm also choosing to extend a little grace, knowing how horrified I'd be if the whole world (especially rage-filled keyboard warriors) judged me based on some of the things I said and did in my early twenties.
Good insight.

Is the Disney woke culture creating activists? If not, what is? I mean.. she openly supported Hamas. This isn't just someone supporting typical one side of the aisle stuff. Where does support of terrorists come from that they couldn't have learned about with a typical background check of her and her family? And if there was nothing there before, where are the internal controls from Disney prevent cash cow leading actors/actresses from being extremists politically.. publicly before their movie is released? I think that question is likely the one Disney needs to figure out the most. Because they keep getting caught in this same situation where they are having to pick up the pieces after their show pony exposes their backside.


I don't doubt that she was cast with all the right intentions and from the bits of this that have leaked online, she does have a great voice. But, I have a hard time believing, based on who she has proven to be, that Disney execs didn't know she was a vocal walking PR-nightmare. This is the personality of some theatre kids who simply don't understand that a)they're not nearly as intelligent as they think they are b) they're not as informed on the issues they're sounding off on as they think they are and c) they have some responsibility to not let their personal views detract from a production which involves the money and livelihood of a lot of others. That being the case, why didn't executives pull her aside early on and tell her to shut the **** up? Problematic actors leave productions regularly once directors realize they're a pain in the ass, so why wasn't she warned to curb the bull**** or leave the production? Was she really seen as irreplaceable? Or were those in charge (who almost all agreed with her views) secretly enjoying their starlet spouting off?

This would be a lot easier to do if they had cast a white girl. I guess it could still possibly be perceived as "mansplaining" or "the tyrannical controlling patriarchy"...but the worst sin you can commit is to try to tell a woman of color what to do or what she should or shouldn't say. "Sit down and shut up" is what they are supposed to do I believe.
The D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.
Roughly half of the signers of the Declaration of independence ranged from like 18-25. That being said, people are much less mature these days. I personally think the age of voting should be raised to 25, because most 23 yr olds are basically lost kids nowadays.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.
Roughly half of the signers of the Declaration of independence ranged from like 18-25. That being said, people are much less mature these days. I personally think the age of voting should be raised to 25, because most 23 yr olds are basically lost kids nowadays.


lol exactly. Kids (and young adults) nowadays are made dumber by our education system. And they are made to think they are smarter than they actually are because of social media and group think feedback loops. It's literally the worst combo.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just never stop laughing at the stupid response to those posting on an Entertainment board, within an Aggie athletics forum, to "stop obsessing".

I'm assuming no one posting on this thread is a 4-12 year old girl. This is a forum to discuss Entertainment. Simply critiquing something, and then responding to those who respond to you, is not "obsessing". I will always comment on the woke Disney garbage because it's just ludicrous, and I take great joy in seeing it come crashing down.

Honestly, I really wish Disney would stop and just get back to making the great movies I grew up with in the 90's and most of Pixar's existence. I think entertainment is better when Disney is making great films. But by no means am I getting that worked up about any of this. It takes hardly any effort at all to log onto TexAgs and make a post mocking the woke DEI bull***** If they were to make a movie completely devoid of woke/DEI, I would be the first to applaud them.

Now... with this whole Netflix rebooting the Chronicles of Narnia series... I will definitely be raging if they **** that up.
chap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.


His board, his rules.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lathspell said:

Now... with this whole Netflix rebooting the Chronicles of Narnia series... I will definitely be raging if they **** that up.


Dude, it's Netflix. You should already be raging against the machine or self medicating!
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chap said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.


His board, his rules.


JFC.
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.
Roughly half of the signers of the Declaration of independence ranged from like 18-25. That being said, people are much less mature these days. I personally think the age of voting should be raised to 25, because most 23 yr olds are basically lost kids nowadays.
According to the National Archives, ZERO of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were 18-25. Which leads to the natural followup question of: How much of the other stuff you're claiming as fact is also total BS?

https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/signers-factsheet

Signers of the Declaration of Independence



The D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

chap said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.


His board, his rules.


JFC.


Would a judge or the military call a 23 year old a kid ? Only in the entertainment world.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Frankly, I consider a not insignificant amount of those in their early twenties these days to be coddled, immature morons.

Hence using "kid" as an off-handed figure of speech on a message board.

My apologies for not treating this forum as the on-the-record court room you so clearly see it as.

Regardless, the deranged pettiness of these gotcha games from a handful of you who are clearly obsessed with me will never not be so ****ing weird.
tomtomdrumdrum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
love to see it
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The D said:

TCTTS said:

chap said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.


His board, his rules.


JFC.


Would a judge or the military call a 23 year old a kid ? Only in the entertainment world.


Probably at some level. "Kid" is a relative term. 23 is certainly not a child, but to someone who's 40-50+, yeah, 23 is basically a kid. The typical 23 year old hasn't done a damn thing in their life and doesn't know a damn thing about life. They're a legal adult and have been for awhile, but in terms of life experience they're just as immature and naive as pretty much any teen.

Hell, I'm not that old, and I don't see much of a difference.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You wouldn't BELIEVE the number of couches I had slept on by 23. Truly a remarkable accomplishment I'd put against the great young Italian Renaissance artists any day.
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Original Houston 1836 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.
Roughly half of the signers of the Declaration of independence ranged from like 18-25. That being said, people are much less mature these days. I personally think the age of voting should be raised to 25, because most 23 yr olds are basically lost kids nowadays.
According to the National Archives, ZERO of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were 18-25. Which leads to the natural followup question of: How much of the other stuff you're claiming as fact is also total BS?

https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/signers-factsheet

Signers of the Declaration of Independence






Hold up! Ben Franklin was 70?! Even back then freaking Boomers refused to relinquish power to the next generation!
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean, he didn't say that they were 18-25 when they signed the Declaration, just that they were in that age range. Not sure what that means for the other half, though
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

I see the Hamas support as, more than anything, the current "trendy" cause among the far left in her age group. Personally, I don't view it as anything real or lasting. Rather, it's the perfect encapsulation of the world we currently live in, where certain terminally online morons can only view damn near every interaction in terms of the "oppressed" vs the "oppressor." They see innocent people being bombed, can't compute any geo-political situation more complex than that, and react in childish, uninformed fashion. To me, in that regard, it feels more like stupidity and a fad rather than any kind of legit "terrorist support" (which it definitely still is, don't get me wrong).

That said, I *do* see a lot of the left increasingly speaking out against people like her. In other words, I don't see the Hamas support ballooning. I could always be wrong, though.

As for the Disney question, I don't know what the answer is. I guess they could dock pay in some form or fashion contractually, for speaking out politically during Disney-paid press tours? Otherwise, I don't see how Disney could control their stars' social media or whatever else they say out outside of the Disney ecosystem.
Can totally see that point of view. And like you said, being young and dumb is probably the smoking gun here regarding her.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gun to my head, I honestly think I would choose this Snow White vs the all female Ghostbusters.
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQRyno said:

You caught me - I prefer my 3 young children not see alphabet soup propaganda. I'm such a bigot.


Parent here. I agree.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The D said:

TCTTS said:

chap said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.


His board, his rules.


JFC.


Would a judge or the military call a 23 year old a kid ? Only in the entertainment world.
So come this fall, I fully expect someone to say "they're kids" when the Aggies inevitably step on their own dicks.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

The D said:

TCTTS said:

chap said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.


His board, his rules.


JFC.


Would a judge or the military call a 23 year old a kid ? Only in the entertainment world.
So come this fall, I fully expect someone to say "they're kids" when the Aggies inevitably step on their own dicks.


You can do that now at Olsen.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
maroon barchetta said:

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

The D said:

TCTTS said:

chap said:

The D said:

Did TTCCS just call a 23 year old a kid ?

I guess if that is what you think, then you can explain everything else he posts on here.


His board, his rules.


JFC.


Would a judge or the military call a 23 year old a kid ? Only in the entertainment world.
So come this fall, I fully expect someone to say "they're kids" when the Aggies inevitably step on their own dicks.


You can do that now at Olsen.
That's unfortunately true.
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
declaration of independence smacktalk had escaped my bingo card for this thread, I'm impressed.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
swimmerbabe11 said:

declaration of independence smacktalk had escaped my bingo card for this thread, I'm impressed.


Can I get partial credit if I had the Magna Carta on my scorecard?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.