Cornyn stamped and approved ad… Crooked Ken and noting a so called Christian/conservative cheated on his wife. Fighting Back…
Paxton vs Cornyn
142,259 Views |
1430 Replies |
Last: 4 days ago by coolerguy12
Im Gipper said:
Paxton 53
Talaweirdo 47
Not much defense in that game!
LOL
The two most dangerous domestic terrorists groups in the USA are the modern democrat party and the main stream media.
Class of ‘73
F-16 FWS
Class of ‘73
F-16 FWS
So you're saying Paxton shouldn't have run?
Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
Quote:
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT,
SINCERELY,
We could have had our own "RINO" that would have sleepwalked to a win against Talarico.
Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
Just curious; did you abstain from voting for Paxton as AG?
You attempt to sit on this moral high ground all while the liberals would throw you in prison for misgendering freak shows.
Your political piety is foolish in this day and age.
You attempt to sit on this moral high ground all while the liberals would throw you in prison for misgendering freak shows.
Your political piety is foolish in this day and age.
Gaeilge said:
Just curious; did you abstain from voting for Paxton as AG?
First election back in Texas since I retired from the military.
Well, morality in office is important to me and my faith.
Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
And Talarico everything
Paxton better than Cornyn
Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
That's fine. But, if Talarico wins, don't complain since you helped him do it...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
That's fine. But, if Talarico wins, don't complain since you helped him do it...
No. Actually it's not my fault. I didn't nominate him. The GOP did. Blaming voters for bad candidates is a recipe for disaster.
Did you vote for Trump?
If Talarico would happen to win (I don't think he will), hopefully it sends a message to Texas republicans to not nominate ****ty people.
So is holding your vote and risking something 1000x worse than Paxton stepping out on his wife.
Gaeilge said:
So is holding your vote and risking something 1000x worse than Paxton stepping out on his wife.
I'm not big on Cornyn by any means. but I will vote for him tomorrow. If Paxton wins, I will hold my nose in November and vote for him. Paxton's negatives are a heck of a lot more than infidelity. He is rotten to the core, through and through.
Gaeilge said:
Did you vote for Trump?
I didn't vote while I was on active duty.
Gaeilge said:
So is holding your vote and risking something 1000x worse than Paxton stepping out on his wife.
That's not all he did.
Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
That's fine. But, if Talarico wins, don't complain since you helped him do it...
No. Actually it's not my fault. I didn't nominate him. The GOP did. Blaming voters for bad candidates is a recipe for disaster.
Cornyn has 10x the baggage of Paxton. I don't know why you think Cornyn is the standard of virtue considering how he legislates and lies to Texans every year.
Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
That's fine. But, if Talarico wins, don't complain since you helped him do it...
No. Actually it's not my fault. I didn't nominate him. The GOP did. Blaming voters for bad candidates is a recipe for disaster.
Voters decide who a party's nominated candidate is, no?
Quote:
Voters decide who a party's nominated candidate is, no?
That how Kamala got nominated?
Ask Bernie how that worked in 2016.
I'm Gipper
SociallyConditionedAg said:
Cornyn has 10x the baggage of Paxton. I don't know why you think Cornyn is the standard of virtue considering how he legislates and lies to Texans every year.
Laughable. Paxton is a crook.
Martin Cash said:SociallyConditionedAg said:
Cornyn has 10x the baggage of Paxton. I don't know why you think Cornyn is the standard of virtue considering how he legislates and lies to Texans every year.
Laughable. Paxton is a crook.
Name something Cornyn has done for his constituents. If anything, Cornyn is a crook for stealing 24 years in our senate seat and delivering nothing. Look at all the old guard that's on his side. That is the problem and everything we're trying to get away from!
Martin Cash said:SociallyConditionedAg said:
Cornyn has 10x the baggage of Paxton. I don't know why you think Cornyn is the standard of virtue considering how he legislates and lies to Texans every year.
Laughable. Paxton is a crook.
He's not, but Cornyn is also a crook, a gun grabber, soft on the border and immigration, and liberal. He's been an embarrassment to the state from day 1 and I wouldn't want him at my dinner table. Paxton isn't perfect but he fights for Texans and has done a great job as AG, which you can't say for Cornyn as Senator.
Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
The voters have spoken and will speak again tomorrow nobody is just put out there to be the nominee. They have to run and be elected.
Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
That's fine. But, if Talarico wins, don't complain since you helped him do it...
No. Actually it's not my fault. I didn't nominate him. The GOP did. Blaming voters for bad candidates is a recipe for disaster.
What's bad about Paxton? The RINOs had a chance to produce actual evidence and it was all 3rd and 4th hand hearsay. Totally stupid.
LegalDrugPusher said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
The voters have spoken and will speak again tomorrow nobody is just put out there to be the nominee. They have to run and be elected.
Yes. I'm aware how primaries work. The GOP/its voters nominated him and I'm not sure why that obliges me to vote for him. He's unethical and a serial philanderer. Next time put someone up who wasn't impeached by a good share of GOP Texas republicans
Aggie-Clausewitz said:LegalDrugPusher said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
The voters have spoken and will speak again tomorrow nobody is just put out there to be the nominee. They have to run and be elected.
Yes. I'm aware how primaries work. The GOP/its voters nominated him and I'm not sure why that obliges me to vote for him. He's unethical and a serial philanderer. Next time put someone up who wasn't impeached by a good share of GOP Texas republicans
You do know that "impeachment" was a hit job by the Bush wing of the GOP right? They were pissed when Paxton beat Jeb Bush's son in that election for AG. Also, many Texas republicans are dems that ran as republicans to get elected.
Aggie-Clausewitz said:LegalDrugPusher said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
The voters have spoken and will speak again tomorrow nobody is just put out there to be the nominee. They have to run and be elected.
Yes. I'm aware how primaries work. The GOP/its voters nominated him and I'm not sure why that obliges me to vote for him. He's unethical and a serial philanderer. Next time put someone up who wasn't impeached by a good share of GOP Texas republicans
Again, in what universe is Cornyn considered ethical? I'm voting for Paxton based upon how he would vote and I know Cornyn has sold out Texas and America from the first day he was in office. If ethics is what your vote is based on, Cornyn's the wrong man.
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:LegalDrugPusher said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
The voters have spoken and will speak again tomorrow nobody is just put out there to be the nominee. They have to run and be elected.
Yes. I'm aware how primaries work. The GOP/its voters nominated him and I'm not sure why that obliges me to vote for him. He's unethical and a serial philanderer. Next time put someone up who wasn't impeached by a good share of GOP Texas republicans
You do know that "impeachment" was a hit job by the Bush wing of the GOP right? They were pissed when Paxton beat Jeb Bush's son in that election for AG. Also, many Texas republicans are dems that ran as republicans to get elected.
Maybe you forgot that four of Paxton's AAG's sued him for violating the Whistleblower Act, and he settled for seven figures before it got to discovery. Then he tried to get the legislature to pay for it.
Paxton will manage to hustle backwards into an ethics complaint before his first term is over.
How did Cornyn sell out Texas and America?
Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:Ag with kids said:Aggie-Clausewitz said:
I think Paxton will win but I wouldn't get too cocky. The fact that this race is competitive doesn't bode well for the GOP's chances across the country. The GOP will have to spend here instead of in more important races that are historically competitive, like Maine.
I'll never understand why Cornyn is a RINO but I do think he would clean Talarico's clock, especially with independents.
Should be interesting.
No...
This race is a microcosm race if Paxton wins in the primary.
A Republican with a lot of baggage vs a milquetoast Dem candidate that suburban white women might be willing to vote for.
It is NOT anything more than that.
I WILL agree that the Republicans will have to spend more if Paxton is the candidate than if Cornyn was the candidate, though.
Again: the fact that this is competitive does not bode well for the GOP bc they will have to spend more on this race.
I don't like Paxton at all. And I will sit out the general election rather than voting between the two.
Nevertheless, the GOP will need RINOs in Maine & Alaska to hold onto their majority. Spending more in deep red Texas makes that less likely. Seems like a silly risk to take.
This lowers the vote total that Talarico needs to win.
If your goal is to have a Democrat Senator for 6 years, you're doing the right thing to advance that.
Then the GOP shouldn't nominate someone with so much baggage. My vote is earned; I owe the GOP nothing.
That's fine. But, if Talarico wins, don't complain since you helped him do it...
That kid ain't winning a Senate seat in Texas. Ever.
They can spend $100 million and he'll still lose.
Won't happen.
Featured Stories
See All
6:02
11h ago
3.6k
In-Home Visit: 'Explosive' Kerns brings speed to the secondary
by TexAgs Recruiting
36:01
12h ago
3.6k
21:12
5h ago
1.4k