Did you know who Nick Fuentes was before all this?

52,204 Views | 967 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by Shooter McGavin
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

He is hyper-sensitive, to a very feminine degree...and he sometimes argues like a female




Of course, he blamed the Jews.

I'm Gipper
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

shack009 said:

Woke Right thinks the worst thing you can be is racist (actually, just being labeled racist, not truly being racist) while they celebrate the destruction of our country.

I don't know a single person who thinks this. Thinking mainstream racism and hatred is damaging to your political party or causes though, I can see.


Fuentes is not MAGA. Far from it. He does not like Trump and worked against him.



So funny that Boomers think this is an own. Yeah, we know.

Loyalty to Trump is not the highest value.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Build the wall, mass deportations, no new wars, draining the swamp, ending H1-B, ending corruption, Americanism, not globalism, and most importantly-

Looks like you have not paid attention. He has done or is working on doing all those things.

Quote:

NOT BEHOLDEN TO FOREIGN AND SPECIAL INTERESTS.

There it is folks.

The Jews control Trump! You just can't help yourself.

I'm Gipper
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

So funny that Boomers think this is an own.

I am not a boomer, but you are acting just like a millennial.

You can't call yourself MAGA and be against Trump. That just doesn't work.

I'm Gipper
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

Im Gipper said:

Keyno said:

Nick Fuentes is MAGA from 2016, what Trump originally was. Fuentes supported Trump in 2016 and 2020- even leading "Stop the Steal" rallies for Trump in 2020. Fuentes went against Trump in 2024 because Trump's new policies are unrecognizable from the 2016 message. It was just the boilerplate GOP establishment party line at that point.

BS.

Fuentes tried to make Trump something he was not.

This has to be a joke:

Quote:

Fuentes went against Trump in 2024 because Trump's new policies are unrecognizable from the 2016 message. It was just the boilerplate GOP establishment party line at that point.



You obviously do not remember the original MAGA 2016 message- build the wall, mass deportations, no new wars, draining the swamp, ending H1-B, ending corruption, Americanism, not globalism, and most importantly- NOT BEHOLDEN TO FOREIGN AND SPECIAL INTERESTS.

Does any of that sound like 2024 Trump? Does Trump talk about any of that stuff anymore, besides the deportations, which he is not doing?

What new wars is Trump starting? I am sorry, but blowing up foreign drug boats loaded with fentanyl and cocaine does not count...in fact, I'd go so far as to say it is effing awesome...and great military training.

He's the most anti-war POTUS of any of our lifetimes.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Build the wall, mass deportations, no new wars, draining the swamp, ending H1-B, ending corruption, Americanism, not globalism, and most importantly-

Looks like you have not paid attention. He has done or is working on doing all those things.

Quote:

NOT BEHOLDEN TO FOREIGN AND SPECIAL INTERESTS.

There it is folks.

The Jews control Trump! You just can't help yourself.

Well since you brought it up, in 2015 Trump actually went before the Republican Jewish Coalition and said "You're not going to support me because I don't want your money." You remember that??

Now he is taking money from Israel First Miriam Adelson.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

So funny that Boomers think this is an own.

I am not a boomer, but you are acting just like a millennial.

You can't call yourself MAGA and be against Trump. That just doesn't work.

He calls himself America First. Good job not knowing the very first thing about the subject you are commenting on.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Build the wall, mass deportations, no new wars, draining the swamp, ending H1-B, ending corruption, Americanism, not globalism, and most importantly-

Looks like you have not paid attention. He has done or is working on doing all those things.

Quote:

NOT BEHOLDEN TO FOREIGN AND SPECIAL INTERESTS.

There it is folks.

The Jews control Trump! You just can't help yourself.

Well since you brought it up, in 2015 Trump actually went before the Republican Jewish Coalition and said "You're not going to support me because I don't want your money." You remember that??

Now he is taking money from Israel First Miriam Adelson.

We hate the Jews so much you can't take their money! LOL
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Good job not knowing the very first thing about the subject you are commenting on.

I know he likes gay porn and is not MAGA.


I'm Gipper
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Build the wall, mass deportations, no new wars, draining the swamp, ending H1-B, ending corruption, Americanism, not globalism, and most importantly-

Looks like you have not paid attention. He has done or is working on doing all those things.

Quote:

NOT BEHOLDEN TO FOREIGN AND SPECIAL INTERESTS.

There it is folks.

The Jews control Trump! You just can't help yourself.

Well since you brought it up, in 2015 Trump actually went before the Republican Jewish Coalition and said "You're not going to support me because I don't want your money." You remember that??

Now he is taking money from Israel First Miriam Adelson.

We hate the Jews so much you can't take their money! LOL

I am showing the contrast between 2015 MAGA and 2024 MAGA for anyone who still thinks they are the same thing.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Build the wall, mass deportations, no new wars, draining the swamp, ending H1-B, ending corruption, Americanism, not globalism, and most importantly-

Looks like you have not paid attention. He has done or is working on doing all those things.

Quote:

NOT BEHOLDEN TO FOREIGN AND SPECIAL INTERESTS.

There it is folks.

The Jews control Trump! You just can't help yourself.

Well since you brought it up, in 2015 Trump actually went before the Republican Jewish Coalition and said "You're not going to support me because I don't want your money." You remember that??

Now he is taking money from Israel First Miriam Adelson.

We hate the Jews so much you can't take their money! LOL

When your largest donors are Israel First Jews and you go to the wall and wear the hat it's perfectly reasonable to question where your priorities are.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I am showing the contrast between 2015 MAGA and 2024 MAGA for anyone who still thinks they are the same thing.

What you are doing is lying.

Trump was trying to self finance his campaign. He has the EXACT SAME position on Israel today as 2015

I'm Gipper
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

Build the wall, mass deportations, no new wars, draining the swamp, ending H1-B, ending corruption, Americanism, not globalism, and most importantly-

Looks like you have not paid attention. He has done or is working on doing all those things.

Quote:

NOT BEHOLDEN TO FOREIGN AND SPECIAL INTERESTS.

There it is folks.

The Jews control Trump! You just can't help yourself.

Well since you brought it up, in 2015 Trump actually went before the Republican Jewish Coalition and said "You're not going to support me because I don't want your money." You remember that??

Now he is taking money from Israel First Miriam Adelson.

We hate the Jews so much you can't take their money! LOL

I am showing the contrast between 2015 MAGA and 2024 MAGA for anyone who still thinks they are the same thing.

It's hard when these things are so obvious but these people are just stuck in bot mode.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

I am showing the contrast between 2015 MAGA and 2024 MAGA for anyone who still thinks they are the same thing.

What you are doing is lying.

Trump was trying to self finance his campaign. He has the EXACT SAME position on Israel today as 2015

This is so painfully false.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

I am showing the contrast between 2015 MAGA and 2024 MAGA for anyone who still thinks they are the same thing.

What you are doing is lying.

Trump was trying to self finance his campaign. He has the EXACT SAME position on Israel today as 2015

What did I lie about? I quoted Trump. Yeah- Trump was self financed. That is the point. He was not beholden to foreign or special interests because he wouldn't take their money. That is different from current Trump
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

He is hyper-sensitive, to a very feminine degree...and he sometimes argues like a female




Of course, he blamed the Jews.

I would be shocked if he was not gay TBH. I didn't know about the gay p0rn stuff and will have to fact check that, but when Candace Owens asked him about a future possibly dating ior settling down with a female and maybe having kids, he got all flustered and you could tell he had never really truly pondered it like most ordinary straight males would have by then. He then got all "fake angry/offended" and acted like it was an "ambush" type question from Candace and, after she explained that it was just a question that followed the flow of the interview since he had just went on a rant against inerracial marriage, basically explained that he is perfectly happy with his life and that he doesn't want to ever do anything for others. Was truly weird. He knows NOTHING about women and wants nothing to do with them.

He's either homosexual or has some type of weird complex that would likely take years of therapy to possibly fix.
Nothing Ever Happens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shack009 said:

The worst thing that can happen to the right is that they are America First instead of Israel First? Or that they think the country will be better off as mostly white and Christian?

I think you're a fed (or really dumb or really evil) if you don't believe those things.


I have major issues with Fuentes as a whole. I agree with him on this issue but he's often a turncoat when things don't go exactly the way he wants. He rarely ever sticks with someone if it doesn't go perfectly right from the start.

I don't mind him being brash or upfront but he's done a lot of things wrong over the years and has a lot of skeletons from his association with certain people.

It's one thing to be racist, antisemitic, etc. but his skeletons are not good. Unfortunately, he's what we have because he's charismatic and Zoomers love the guy.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.
and? twitter is all bots, and there are videos of chocolate covered strawberries with more views than that
Nothing Ever Happens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

There is a generational thing going on here. If you are over 40, you wouldn't get it. Gen Z does not care about racism. They grew up calling each other racial slurs on Call of Duty and reading 4chan. They grew up in a time when liberalism and George Floyd worship was being shoved down everyones throats. This is the way Gen Z talks. It's shocking to older people, I am sure, but it is what it is.


I would say it's a millennial cut off. Anyone who is a millennial and is now extremely online grew up as all of this infrastructure began. We made all of it.

Additionally, there is also extreme fatigue of anything Middle Eastern related due to GWOT experiences. I know numerous millennial GWOT vets who are among the most jaded people I know about Israel and anything middle eastern related. A very large portion of the dissident right is GWOT vets.

Most of this group is separate from Fuentes and began prior to Fuentes even being known, so it's all separate from him but no less influential.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

If Tucker didn't have massive influence, there wouldn't be a massive propaganda campaign currently happening to destroy him.
tucker's influence has cratered since fox gave him the boot. that's why he's in a vicious cycle of seeking out further and further controversy just to stay relevant. male candace owens.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

There is a generational thing going on here. If you are over 40, you wouldn't get it. Gen Z does not care about racism. They grew up calling each other racial slurs on Call of Duty and reading 4chan. They grew up in a time when liberalism and George Floyd worship was being shoved down everyones throats. This is the way Gen Z talks. It's shocking to older people, I am sure, but it is what it is.

I know, I get it, and sympathize with them. I can almost guarantee me and my buddies were more racist and said more racist things in the 90's. We formed a white gang to protect ourselves from the cholos back in the day lol. Only diff being our grievances were more with local gangs and hoodlums and not the powerful elite working night and day to suppress us.

I just don't think outward racism and 4chan language is a recipe for success, as you absolutely need a solid contingent of minorities to win.

I agree with this as well. Nick Fuentes made an effort to clean up some of that back in like 2023 I think. But he still slips up from time to time on his personal show. The people watching his show are mostly hardcore supporters, so they dont care. But it is further fodder for the left (or GOP right) to use against him.Obviously he doesn't talk like that when he's infront of a more general audience. It's the same as how you presumably talk differently when you are around close personal friends.


I dont think the majority of us have racist conversations when amongst close personal friends.

And it's not a slip up if it's what you believe.

By "slip up" he means using the n word. Fuentes has tried to clean up the use of it recently. But either way, it isn't racist to use it.



Holy hell!!! You guys are just giddy with the feeling it's time to start crawling out from under your rocks.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

There is a generational thing going on here. If you are over 40, you wouldn't get it. Gen Z does not care about racism. They grew up calling each other racial slurs on Call of Duty and reading 4chan. They grew up in a time when liberalism and George Floyd worship was being shoved down everyones throats. This is the way Gen Z talks. It's shocking to older people, I am sure, but it is what it is.

I know, I get it, and sympathize with them. I can almost guarantee me and my buddies were more racist and said more racist things in the 90's. We formed a white gang to protect ourselves from the cholos back in the day lol. Only diff being our grievances were more with local gangs and hoodlums and not the powerful elite working night and day to suppress us.

I just don't think outward racism and 4chan language is a recipe for success, as you absolutely need a solid contingent of minorities to win.

I agree with this as well. Nick Fuentes made an effort to clean up some of that back in like 2023 I think. But he still slips up from time to time on his personal show. The people watching his show are mostly hardcore supporters, so they dont care. But it is further fodder for the left (or GOP right) to use against him.Obviously he doesn't talk like that when he's infront of a more general audience. It's the same as how you presumably talk differently when you are around close personal friends.


I dont think the majority of us have racist conversations when amongst close personal friends.

And it's not a slip up if it's what you believe.

As I said earlier, its a generational thing.



You know what else was a generational thing. Hearing my racist AF grandparents from East Texas use the n-word all the time. And they definately said it out of the most deep hatred possible.

They were pretty trash people, and being racist as hell was only a small part of it.
Colonel Kurtz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You boomers are so brainwashed by the television it's comical.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

There is a generational thing going on here. If you are over 40, you wouldn't get it. Gen Z does not care about racism. They grew up calling each other racial slurs on Call of Duty and reading 4chan. They grew up in a time when liberalism and George Floyd worship was being shoved down everyones throats. This is the way Gen Z talks. It's shocking to older people, I am sure, but it is what it is.

I know, I get it, and sympathize with them. I can almost guarantee me and my buddies were more racist and said more racist things in the 90's. We formed a white gang to protect ourselves from the cholos back in the day lol. Only diff being our grievances were more with local gangs and hoodlums and not the powerful elite working night and day to suppress us.

I just don't think outward racism and 4chan language is a recipe for success, as you absolutely need a solid contingent of minorities to win.

I agree with this as well. Nick Fuentes made an effort to clean up some of that back in like 2023 I think. But he still slips up from time to time on his personal show. The people watching his show are mostly hardcore supporters, so they dont care. But it is further fodder for the left (or GOP right) to use against him.Obviously he doesn't talk like that when he's infront of a more general audience. It's the same as how you presumably talk differently when you are around close personal friends.


I dont think the majority of us have racist conversations when amongst close personal friends.

And it's not a slip up if it's what you believe.

As I said earlier, its a generational thing.



You know what else was a generational thing. Hearing my racist AF grandparents from East Texas use the n-word all the time. And they definately said it out of the most deep hatred possible.

They were pretty trash people, and being racist as hell was only a small part of it.

It's so funny how y'all become so woke so quickly. Hatred of your grandparents for being a product of their time and place is about as lefty woke as it gets.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.

and? twitter is all bots, and there are videos of chocolate covered strawberries with more views than that

More head in the sand rhetoric.

It was so popular that the Israel First lobby has had to address it, including one of their biggest leaders on his show today. The people who talk about the Streisand Effect wouldn't be doing that if the video wasn't popular on its own.
Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.


People watching does not equal people agreeing. HTH

It's ridiculous to think the overwhelming majority of viewers don't agree with at least one of the people in the interview. Of course there are a handful of Right Wing Police watching.

Look at Tucker's other recent interviews. He did an interview with some lady a couple of weeks ago and it has less than 1 million views. The Alex Jones interview from 3 weeks ago has 3 million views. I think y'all have your collective heads in the sand about the existing and growing popularity of Fuentes.


I listened to him on PBD, and I don't particularly strong have interest in either one of them. Sometimes you listen to people to determine whether they have anything important to say and to see whether the public perception of them is accurate, not because you agree with them.

And that interview was just Fuentes trying to play the victim that has been done wrong at every turn. He takes no responsibility for anything he's ever said. It was a part of an image rehab campaign. At a certain point, if everyone of significance that crosses paths with you has a problem with you, you are the problem.

He's a loser just like Vance said. He is obviously intelligent, but a vast number of his conclusions are just identitarian tripe that appeals to angry people that want someone to blame. The vast majority of what I've heard him espouse is useless grievance politics, which is the most leftist tactic of them all. Horseshoe theory is alive and well.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

There is a generational thing going on here. If you are over 40, you wouldn't get it. Gen Z does not care about racism. They grew up calling each other racial slurs on Call of Duty and reading 4chan. They grew up in a time when liberalism and George Floyd worship was being shoved down everyones throats. This is the way Gen Z talks. It's shocking to older people, I am sure, but it is what it is.

I know, I get it, and sympathize with them. I can almost guarantee me and my buddies were more racist and said more racist things in the 90's. We formed a white gang to protect ourselves from the cholos back in the day lol. Only diff being our grievances were more with local gangs and hoodlums and not the powerful elite working night and day to suppress us.

I just don't think outward racism and 4chan language is a recipe for success, as you absolutely need a solid contingent of minorities to win.

I agree with this as well. Nick Fuentes made an effort to clean up some of that back in like 2023 I think. But he still slips up from time to time on his personal show. The people watching his show are mostly hardcore supporters, so they dont care. But it is further fodder for the left (or GOP right) to use against him.Obviously he doesn't talk like that when he's infront of a more general audience. It's the same as how you presumably talk differently when you are around close personal friends.


I dont think the majority of us have racist conversations when amongst close personal friends.

And it's not a slip up if it's what you believe.

As I said earlier, its a generational thing.



You know what else was a generational thing. Hearing my racist AF grandparents from East Texas use the n-word all the time. And they definately said it out of the most deep hatred possible.

They were pretty trash people, and being racist as hell was only a small part of it.

It's so funny how y'all become so woke so quickly. Hatred of your grandparents for being a product of their time and place is about as lefty woke as it gets.


It's funny how you think we've become woke. Most of us were raised to not be hateful human beings. Not hating people for looking and worshipping different isn't woke, isn't being a non-****ty human.

And the fact that they used to beat my mother, aunt, and uncle as kids, treated their grandkids like ****, and used to scream and yell at each other at night because both of them were sleeping around were the main reasons their entire family hated them.

Yelling at me as a young teen for watching monkeys play basketball on TV was just extra.

Your kinda people though!

shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.


People watching does not equal people agreeing. HTH

It's ridiculous to think the overwhelming majority of viewers don't agree with at least one of the people in the interview. Of course there are a handful of Right Wing Police watching.

Look at Tucker's other recent interviews. He did an interview with some lady a couple of weeks ago and it has less than 1 million views. The Alex Jones interview from 3 weeks ago has 3 million views. I think y'all have your collective heads in the sand about the existing and growing popularity of Fuentes.


He takes no responsibility for anything he's ever said.


Blatantly false.

Quote:

He's a loser just like Vance said. He is obviously intelligent, but a vast number of his conclusions are just identitarian tripe that appeals to angry people that want someone to blame. The vast majority of what I've heard him espouse is useless grievance politics, which is the most leftist tactic of them all. Horseshoe theory is alive and well.

Yeah, he's a white identitarian, he says as much lol. He has grievances with specific government policy. Doesn't everybody? If you aren't supposed to say what you disagree with about government policy then what is the point of any political show or even this forum?
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ol_Ag_02 said:

shack009 said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

Ol_Ag_02 said:

Keyno said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Keyno said:

There is a generational thing going on here. If you are over 40, you wouldn't get it. Gen Z does not care about racism. They grew up calling each other racial slurs on Call of Duty and reading 4chan. They grew up in a time when liberalism and George Floyd worship was being shoved down everyones throats. This is the way Gen Z talks. It's shocking to older people, I am sure, but it is what it is.

I know, I get it, and sympathize with them. I can almost guarantee me and my buddies were more racist and said more racist things in the 90's. We formed a white gang to protect ourselves from the cholos back in the day lol. Only diff being our grievances were more with local gangs and hoodlums and not the powerful elite working night and day to suppress us.

I just don't think outward racism and 4chan language is a recipe for success, as you absolutely need a solid contingent of minorities to win.

I agree with this as well. Nick Fuentes made an effort to clean up some of that back in like 2023 I think. But he still slips up from time to time on his personal show. The people watching his show are mostly hardcore supporters, so they dont care. But it is further fodder for the left (or GOP right) to use against him.Obviously he doesn't talk like that when he's infront of a more general audience. It's the same as how you presumably talk differently when you are around close personal friends.


I dont think the majority of us have racist conversations when amongst close personal friends.

And it's not a slip up if it's what you believe.

As I said earlier, its a generational thing.



You know what else was a generational thing. Hearing my racist AF grandparents from East Texas use the n-word all the time. And they definately said it out of the most deep hatred possible.

They were pretty trash people, and being racist as hell was only a small part of it.

It's so funny how y'all become so woke so quickly. Hatred of your grandparents for being a product of their time and place is about as lefty woke as it gets.


It's funny how you think we've become woke. Most of us were raised to not be hateful human beings. Not hating people for looking and worshipping different isn't woke, isn't being a non-****ty human.

We all were. But y'all love yelling "racist" and "antisemite" at any person who notices patterns or criticizes certain group's preferred policies based on Jewish identitarianism. That's the definition of woke.
Nothing Ever Happens
How long do you want to ignore this user?




People who are not Millennials or Zoomers just do not get it and will never get it.
Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.


People watching does not equal people agreeing. HTH

It's ridiculous to think the overwhelming majority of viewers don't agree with at least one of the people in the interview. Of course there are a handful of Right Wing Police watching.

Look at Tucker's other recent interviews. He did an interview with some lady a couple of weeks ago and it has less than 1 million views. The Alex Jones interview from 3 weeks ago has 3 million views. I think y'all have your collective heads in the sand about the existing and growing popularity of Fuentes.


He takes no responsibility for anything he's ever said.


Blatantly false.

Quote:

He's a loser just like Vance said. He is obviously intelligent, but a vast number of his conclusions are just identitarian tripe that appeals to angry people that want someone to blame. The vast majority of what I've heard him espouse is useless grievance politics, which is the most leftist tactic of them all. Horseshoe theory is alive and well.

Yeah, he's a white identitarian, he says as much lol. He has grievances with specific government policy. Doesn't everybody? If you aren't supposed to say what you disagree with about government policy then what is the point of any political show or even this forum?


Identitarianism is not a coherent political philosophy, nor is it a respectable worldview. His critiques are formulated on that basis. Even if our views align in specific areas of government policy, that does not mean he is right about those issues.

Unless he has a fundamental transformation in his political philosophy, he'll always be a loser incel that caters to the worst amongst us. Sorry that you can't see through his schtick.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.


People watching does not equal people agreeing. HTH

It's ridiculous to think the overwhelming majority of viewers don't agree with at least one of the people in the interview. Of course there are a handful of Right Wing Police watching.

Look at Tucker's other recent interviews. He did an interview with some lady a couple of weeks ago and it has less than 1 million views. The Alex Jones interview from 3 weeks ago has 3 million views. I think y'all have your collective heads in the sand about the existing and growing popularity of Fuentes.


He takes no responsibility for anything he's ever said.


Blatantly false.

Quote:

He's a loser just like Vance said. He is obviously intelligent, but a vast number of his conclusions are just identitarian tripe that appeals to angry people that want someone to blame. The vast majority of what I've heard him espouse is useless grievance politics, which is the most leftist tactic of them all. Horseshoe theory is alive and well.

Yeah, he's a white identitarian, he says as much lol. He has grievances with specific government policy. Doesn't everybody? If you aren't supposed to say what you disagree with about government policy then what is the point of any political show or even this forum?


Identitarianism is not a coherent political philosophy, nor is it a respectable worldview.


You can assert this as if it is self-evident, but you probably can't explain why it isn't coherent. America is a white, Christian country. Being pro-America requires a level of being pro-white and pro-Christian.

Quote:

Unless he has a fundamental transformation in his political philosophy, he'll always be a loser incel that caters to the worst amongst us. Sorry that you can't see through his schtick.

It's funny that it must be that his followers can't see through something. It can't be that people who are told not to like him can't see through the other bs.

Also it's clear that nobody knows what the word "incel" means...
Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.


People watching does not equal people agreeing. HTH

It's ridiculous to think the overwhelming majority of viewers don't agree with at least one of the people in the interview. Of course there are a handful of Right Wing Police watching.

Look at Tucker's other recent interviews. He did an interview with some lady a couple of weeks ago and it has less than 1 million views. The Alex Jones interview from 3 weeks ago has 3 million views. I think y'all have your collective heads in the sand about the existing and growing popularity of Fuentes.


He takes no responsibility for anything he's ever said.


Blatantly false.

Quote:

He's a loser just like Vance said. He is obviously intelligent, but a vast number of his conclusions are just identitarian tripe that appeals to angry people that want someone to blame. The vast majority of what I've heard him espouse is useless grievance politics, which is the most leftist tactic of them all. Horseshoe theory is alive and well.

Yeah, he's a white identitarian, he says as much lol. He has grievances with specific government policy. Doesn't everybody? If you aren't supposed to say what you disagree with about government policy then what is the point of any political show or even this forum?


Identitarianism is not a coherent political philosophy, nor is it a respectable worldview.


You can assert this as if it is self-evident, but you probably can't explain why it isn't coherent. America is a white, Christian country. Being pro-America requires a level of being pro-white and pro-Christian.

Quote:

Unless he has a fundamental transformation in his political philosophy, he'll always be a loser incel that caters to the worst amongst us. Sorry that you can't see through his schtick.

It's funny that it must be that his followers can't see through something. It can't be that people who are told not to like him can't see through the other bs.

Also it's clear that nobody knows what the word "incel" means...


Explain how the "white" classification is relevant on a political level. Also, define "white." Are Italians white? Jews? Greeks? Then, to what level of "white" do you have to be to be qualify? If you have one drop of Arab or black on your lineage, are you disqualified? Hell, Fuentes is half Mexican.

Immutable characteristics are not the source of American values. There are plenty of minorities that are great American Christians. There are also plenty of whites that are useless heathens. If ethnic background is a qualifier, you're already on the wrong side of the argument.

Western civilization is the culmination of the philosophies of mostly "white" historical nations, but that is not why western civilization is great. Western civilization is great because it is built off the fundamental Judeo-Christian values that allow for human prosperity.

"White" has nothing to do with it unless you are making the claim that only whites are capable of taking the teachings of Christ to heart. Which is abhorrent and fundamentally against the Christian teachings that you claim to revere.

Identitarianism is garbage, and Nick Fuentes is a loser. You can't look at history in a vacuum and say that immutable characteristics are the reason something happened.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Kvetch said:

shack009 said:

Old McDonald said:

tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.

There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.

The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.


People watching does not equal people agreeing. HTH

It's ridiculous to think the overwhelming majority of viewers don't agree with at least one of the people in the interview. Of course there are a handful of Right Wing Police watching.

Look at Tucker's other recent interviews. He did an interview with some lady a couple of weeks ago and it has less than 1 million views. The Alex Jones interview from 3 weeks ago has 3 million views. I think y'all have your collective heads in the sand about the existing and growing popularity of Fuentes.


He takes no responsibility for anything he's ever said.


Blatantly false.

Quote:

He's a loser just like Vance said. He is obviously intelligent, but a vast number of his conclusions are just identitarian tripe that appeals to angry people that want someone to blame. The vast majority of what I've heard him espouse is useless grievance politics, which is the most leftist tactic of them all. Horseshoe theory is alive and well.

Yeah, he's a white identitarian, he says as much lol. He has grievances with specific government policy. Doesn't everybody? If you aren't supposed to say what you disagree with about government policy then what is the point of any political show or even this forum?


Identitarianism is not a coherent political philosophy, nor is it a respectable worldview.


You can assert this as if it is self-evident, but you probably can't explain why it isn't coherent. America is a white, Christian country. Being pro-America requires a level of being pro-white and pro-Christian.

Quote:

Unless he has a fundamental transformation in his political philosophy, he'll always be a loser incel that caters to the worst amongst us. Sorry that you can't see through his schtick.

It's funny that it must be that his followers can't see through something. It can't be that people who are told not to like him can't see through the other bs.

Also it's clear that nobody knows what the word "incel" means...


Explain how the "white" classification is relevant on a political level. Also, define "white." Are Italians white? Jews? Greeks? Then, to what level of "white" do you have to be to be qualify? If you have one drop of Arab or black on your lineage, are you disqualified? Hell, Fuentes is half Mexican.

Immutable characteristics are not the source of American values. There are plenty of minorities that are great American Christians. There are also plenty of whites that are useless heathens. If ethnic background is a qualifier, you're already on the wrong side of the argument.

Western civilization is the culmination of the philosophies of mostly "white" historical nations, but that is not why western civilization is great. Western civilization is great because it is built off the fundamental Judeo-Christian values that allow for human prosperity.

"White" has nothing to do with it unless you are making the claim that only whites are capable of taking the teachings of Christ to heart. Which is abhorrent and fundamentally against the Christian teachings that you claim to revere.

Identitarianism is garbage, and Nick Fuentes is a loser. You can't look at history in a vacuum and say that immutable characteristics are the reason something happened.

Blue diamond for you.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's just BoomerCon pron nonsense. Several strawmen in there but America as an institution and its values are derived from White Christians.

ETA: Oh look, the biggest BoomerCon on the board loved the post lol. Makes perfect sense.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.