shack009 said:
Kvetch said:
shack009 said:
Kvetch said:
shack009 said:
Kvetch said:
shack009 said:
Old McDonald said:
tucker interviewing fuentes is more evidence of tucker's waning influence than fuentes increasing influence. tucker is addicted to attention, which at this point he can only achieve by wading deeper and deeper into sewage.
There would not be a large collective wailing and gnashing of teeth if two irrelevant people talked to each other on the internet.
The problem with your argument is that the video has 17 million+ views on X and 5.1 million views on YT.
People watching does not equal people agreeing. HTH
It's ridiculous to think the overwhelming majority of viewers don't agree with at least one of the people in the interview. Of course there are a handful of Right Wing Police watching.
Look at Tucker's other recent interviews. He did an interview with some lady a couple of weeks ago and it has less than 1 million views. The Alex Jones interview from 3 weeks ago has 3 million views. I think y'all have your collective heads in the sand about the existing and growing popularity of Fuentes.
He takes no responsibility for anything he's ever said.
Blatantly false.
Quote:
He's a loser just like Vance said. He is obviously intelligent, but a vast number of his conclusions are just identitarian tripe that appeals to angry people that want someone to blame. The vast majority of what I've heard him espouse is useless grievance politics, which is the most leftist tactic of them all. Horseshoe theory is alive and well.
Yeah, he's a white identitarian, he says as much lol. He has grievances with specific government policy. Doesn't everybody? If you aren't supposed to say what you disagree with about government policy then what is the point of any political show or even this forum?
Identitarianism is not a coherent political philosophy, nor is it a respectable worldview.
You can assert this as if it is self-evident, but you probably can't explain why it isn't coherent. America is a white, Christian country. Being pro-America requires a level of being pro-white and pro-Christian.
Quote:
Unless he has a fundamental transformation in his political philosophy, he'll always be a loser incel that caters to the worst amongst us. Sorry that you can't see through his schtick.
It's funny that it must be that his followers can't see through something. It can't be that people who are told not to like him can't see through the other bs.
Also it's clear that nobody knows what the word "incel" means...
Explain how the "white" classification is relevant on a political level. Also, define "white." Are Italians white? Jews? Greeks? Then, to what level of "white" do you have to be to be qualify? If you have one drop of Arab or black on your lineage, are you disqualified? Hell, Fuentes is half Mexican.
Immutable characteristics are not the source of American values. There are plenty of minorities that are great American Christians. There are also plenty of whites that are useless heathens. If ethnic background is a qualifier, you're already on the wrong side of the argument.
Western civilization is the culmination of the philosophies of mostly "white" historical nations, but that is not why western civilization is great. Western civilization is great because it is built off the fundamental Judeo-Christian values that allow for human prosperity.
"White" has nothing to do with it unless you are making the claim that only whites are capable of taking the teachings of Christ to heart. Which is abhorrent and fundamentally against the Christian teachings that you claim to revere.
Identitarianism is garbage, and Nick Fuentes is a loser. You can't look at history in a vacuum and say that immutable characteristics are the reason something happened.