Nothing Ever Happens said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

And here I thought you barely post here anymore because your hate speech keeps getting you perma'ed.

---

I only stay here because of premium and it's fun to post here every so often.

---

You yourself once stated you had over 50 socks. What happened to your last one Stone Choir ?

Incels lmao.

“Nick Fuentes isn’t badass enough to be like Hitler” is one of the funniest ConInc takes of this whole debacle. https://t.co/rwa2TYpX9N

— Dissident Soaps (@DissidentSoaps) November 4, 2025

We shifted the discourse so much that it’s become acceptable to now discuss who is alpha enough to be a real nazi 😂 https://t.co/EM1LMAhlxj

— Andrew Torba (@BasedTorba) November 4, 2025

At this rate, he's going to post an AI picture of a jacked Hitler pushing away Nick saying "Get away beta!"

I don't understand the strategy.

— 9mmSMG (@9mm_smg) November 4, 2025

You gotta be a true Chad to be a Nazi!

Charlie Kirk was that guy and they shot him in the neck for it. So now we have the other guy.

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) November 4, 2025

I think Fuentes is a closeted FBI honeypot. That and an empty soda can will get me a nickel. He will say anything for attention, but his core message is landing because his core message is relevant. https://t.co/OXdLNjoqNl

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) November 4, 2025

"We should pause Visas because 40% of American college graduates and most laid off tech people can't find work" is not a radical position. It is basic common sense.

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) November 4, 2025

"That's protectionism and unfair competition."

Yes the core point of government is to protect its citizens. Thanks for the update.

— Upstate Federalist (@upstatefederlst) November 4, 2025

Kirk was the guy who was mediating the two competing groups and helping to push a lot of these issues into the mainstream. He got murdered for it and now the youth have turned to Fuentes because no one else is saying these things or focusing on them.

The mainstream GOP couldn't give a damn about what young white men are going through at all. They get told to suck it up while they can't find jobs, can't own anything, and are systematically eliminated from being able to live. Fuentes gives them a coherent core message about America First.

They murdered Kirk so now they get to deal with Fuentes. If you murder Fuentes, there are others waiting in the wings even more radical.

Ross Douthat says watch what Vance does or doesn't say about Fuentes and the Groypers. Because the MAGA coalition is so small now that they can't afford to lose anyone. And that includes the Groypers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/opinion/nick-fuentes-antisemitism-republicans.html

Just some short comments.

A great split, and indeed yes, a Left-style cancel drive is underway within the Right.

Over Tucker interview with Fuentes. Just an interview. A two hour discussion.

This was so startling, with a known figure so befriended by Dan Bongino on live shows as well as radio, had to see for self.

Watched it, to sample the primary evidence, as are wont to do. Its not how its being put out. And the beginnings make a startling story. Its not Charlie Kirk in the least, but there is some similarities.

One thing can say for sure -- you won't have the right information to discern the matters in play without it.

shiftyandquick said:

---

Ross Douthat says watch what Vance does or doesn't say about Fuentes and the Groypers. Because the MAGA coalition is so small now that they can't afford to lose anyone. And that includes the Groypers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/opinion/nick-fuentes-antisemitism-republicans.html

---

You love using the New York Times OPINION section as fact, and use it to bash Republicans.

And you wonder why no one believes you've ever been a Republican.

Quote:

---

A great split, and indeed yes, a Left-style cancel drive is underway within the Right.

---

FALSE


Not even remotely true! You are too smart to believe such things!

Criticizing and chastising Carlson for promoting/felating Fuentes is NOT canceling.


The Left would have him deplatformed and banished. This is nothing close to canceling!

NYT is running with pushing Fuentes as mainstream on the right. Hmmmmmm wonder why that is???


They want to destroy the Republican Party.

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

A great split, and indeed yes, a Left-style cancel drive is underway within the Right.

---

FALSE


Not even remotely true! You are too smart to believe such things!

Criticizing and chastising Carlson for promoting/felating Fuentes is NOT canceling.


The Left would have him deplatformed and banished. This is nothing close to canceling!

---

Okay, if want to revise that I am game. It also referred to some internal examples in it. I realize cancel has a pretty defined nature on the threads of late.
I will withdraw it.

Call it instead, a call for suppression --- a `driven from the tribe' kind of response.

Its just startling when you recall Bongino and Tucker's shows and Megyn Kelly's interaction, and all these figures. And yes, even Charlie Kirk.

There isn't even a call for suppression.

It's conservatives saying loudly that the garbage Fuentes is not something that represents the Republican Party.

Do you think abortionists should be a part of the Republican Party? Those wanting to tax the rich? Of course not on both.

Similarly, antisemities into gay porn can start their own political party.

Have you watched the Tucker interview?

Not saying anything other than to look at the reaction to what is discussed there, and see if it looks warranted.

Where does Tucker interviewing someone translate suddenly into "represents the Republican Party" anyway?

That angle assumption itself sounds more fraught with problems than many.

titan said:

---

Have you watched the Tucker interview?

Not saying anything other than to look at the reaction to what is discussed there, and see if it looks warranted.

---

You do understand this one interview is not the entirety of what Fuentes has said/done correct?

The DESERVED backlash against Carlson is because he gives softball interviews to enemies of conservative values like Fuentes, the Iran leader etc but attacks people like Cruz and Levin

Carlson passed on every opportunity to ask Fuentes tough questions.

Keyno said:

---

Boomer is more than just an age. It's also a state of mind

---

No it's literally just an age range. When you find yourself calling Millenials "boomers" you should probably just accept it has no meaning.

shiftyandquick said:

---

Ross Douthat says watch what Vance does or doesn't say about Fuentes and the Groypers. Because the MAGA coalition is so small now that they can't afford to lose anyone. And that includes the Groypers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/opinion/nick-fuentes-antisemitism-republicans.html

---

Ya so small it won the popular vote

titan said:

---

Where does Tucker interviewing someone translate suddenly into "represents the Republican Party" anyway?

---

No one said it did. Read this thread and others. Many want to claim this type of garbage is the future of the party. It's not. For that we should all be thankful because it's a path to losing.

Im Gipper said:

---

titan said:

---

Have you watched the Tucker interview?

Not saying anything other than to look at the reaction to what is discussed there, and see if it looks warranted.

---

You do understand this one interview is not the entirety of what Fuentes has said/done correct?

The DESERVED backlash against Carlson is because he gives softball interviews to enemies of conservative values like Fuentes, the Iran leader etc but attacks people like Cruz and Levin

Carlson passed on every opportunity to ask Fuentes tough questions.

---

Yes, do understand that. Just talking about interview process and getting the other point of view itself.

It might help to know at this point I think of Tucker as something like Greenwald--- someone who just somewhat goes for the answer from whomever, and isn't always on one side or another. Don't see him as "conservative" or representative of the Republican Party or even MAGA.

It might have been softball had it been that kind of thing.

By the way, for example of the conflicting elements-- you mention abortionists --- if a line in there is true, we are funding just that in places. So this is a bit of what is riling up the next generation.

Im Gipper said:

---

titan said:

---

Where does Tucker interviewing someone translate suddenly into "represents the Republican Party" anyway?

---

No one said it did. Read this thread and others. Many want to claim this type of garbage is the future of the party. It's not. For that we should all be thankful because it's a path to losing.

---

Yes, El Gallo Blanco and MouthBQ have excellently outlined why that is so.

But that remark came from your post there

Quote:

---

It's conservatives saying loudly that the garbage Fuentes is not something that represents the Republican Party.

Do you think abortionists should be a part of the Republican Party? Those wanting to tax the rich? Of course not on both.

---

What I am saying is, don't act like Tucker interviewing somebody makes the SUBJECT a Republican. That seems the tactical error.

The error may be assuming Tucker is Republican. I no longer do if did.

titan said:

---

What I am saying is, don't act like Tucker interviewing somebody makes the SUBJECT a Republican. That seems the tactical error.

The error may be assuming Tucker is Republican. I no longer do if did.

---

Wisdom is when you finally realize that MAGA is not Republican. At least not the conservativism of the past 50 years.

Oh, I know MAGA is not. Its fair to call it a type of populism. But the prior brand was way too impotent. Remember their resistance even to Ted Cruz as he started out? Ted actually before Trump had started the precedent of pushing back against the roll-overs.

But the regressive left or illiberal left is far worse, and that is what have to choose from now. As said an another thread, would choose a Heinlein meritocracy. But you work with what given.

Hey goys, hope you are having a fine evening. Carry on

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

A great split, and indeed yes, a Left-style cancel drive is underway within the Right.

---

FALSE


Not even remotely true! You are too smart to believe such things!

Criticizing and chastising Carlson for promoting/felating Fuentes is NOT canceling.


The Left would have him deplatformed and banished. This is nothing close to canceling!

---

Lolol did you not see the freak out by the Israel Firsters when the Heritage Foundation didn't condemn Tucker for having Nick on? Then Kevin Roberts' chief of staff had to step down because he defended the speech. Then Kevin Roberts had to go on a groveling tour the day after because the Jews were so upset. A man lost his job, so there was an actual cancellation. And Roberts felt the need to do a round of apologies so he didn't lose too much support from the Israel Firsters and $7,000 club.

Wings of the Sun NambaWan said:

---

Hey goys, hope you are having a fine evening. Carry on

---

Held off on saying anything about this til after the election but HOLY SH*T A JAMAICAN WOMAN? YOU RAN A JAMAICAN WOMAN IN A DIXIECRAT STATE ON THE GOP SLOT IN 2025? https://t.co/KZh4SmLqoa

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) November 5, 2025

I can't imagine why young men don't care about what octogenarian boomers think anymore.

shack009 said:

---

Twelve minutes of Nick Fuentes rejecting racial hatred in favor of forgiveness and love with orchestral hymns playing softly in the background.

"We're duty-bound out of a sense of justice, (...) not out of a sense of hatred." pic.twitter.com/eCvqNMxloI

— 𝔼𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣-𝕎𝕒𝕧𝕖 (@etherXwave) April 17, 2025

Nick calls out people who harbor genuine racial hatred

"It's one thing to say there are Whites and blacks, it's a whole other thing to have this persistent antipathy for vast groups of people. That is a low-IQ, dysfunctional thing." pic.twitter.com/QvwcsyJP2F

— 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬 (@ImperiumFirst) September 5, 2025

Nick Fuentes says that harboring genuine racial hatred is a bad thing

“As a country, we can survive being racist. We can’t survive ontologically hating each other.” pic.twitter.com/jXnyM2qBYg

— 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬 (@ImperiumFirst) October 8, 2025

---

So all the BoomerCons, Israel Firsters, and low-IQ anti-antisemites aren't going to comment on this?

Complete refutation of everything y'all accused Nick of in this thread, and nobody wants to come forward and say they shouldn't have spoken out of ignorance?

The @nytimes could have easily chosen a photo that makes Nick look like the queer basement dweller he is, but instead they chose to do the exact opposite.

Democrats salivate over nothing more than the thought of him running the Right, as it means more election wins for them. https://t.co/rEDIHetdrw pic.twitter.com/vwxfsLIMc6

— Jaimee Michell (@JaimeeUSA) November 4, 2025

Nothing Ever Happens said:

---

Wings of the Sun NambaWan said:

---

Hey goys, hope you are having a fine evening. Carry on

---

Held off on saying anything about this til after the election but HOLY SH*T A JAMAICAN WOMAN? YOU RAN A JAMAICAN WOMAN IN A DIXIECRAT STATE ON THE GOP SLOT IN 2025? https://t.co/KZh4SmLqoa

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) November 5, 2025

I can't imagine why young men don't care about what octogenarian boomers think anymore.

---

I remember when she won the LG spot a few years ago and the Boomers were so happy she won so they could show the left how anti-racist they were. Worked so well.

He already runs the young right men. That's what we've been trying to tell you.

Per a report I received -

Mamdani has 32 percent of the Jewish vote in New York, Sliwa the Republican has 4 percent.

Trump kissing the Wall and groveling to Israel has done nothing.

— RAMZPAUL (@ramzpaul) November 5, 2025

Maybe if the GOP prayed at the wailing wall harder and more often it would work better.

shack009 said:

---

He already runs the young right men. That's what we've been trying to tell you.

---

You can keep making things up, doesn't make it true

Just like liberals, your ilk just makes things up. We get it. You and your buddies on Fortnite love him. Good for you!

“This is the ideal Republican candidate. You may not like it, but this is what peak conservative performance looks like.” pic.twitter.com/FMZEgUgw5R

— Scott Greer 6’2” IQ 187 (@ScottMGreer) November 5, 2025

*loses*

Yeah this is what the GOP wants to be sure. Who cares if we don't have a nation, gotta import more skilled foreign workers legally so they can vote left at 80%. I need my pension higher and my house to go up in value so my reverse mortgage will give me more money.

Fuentes and your god the Hitler loving Mahler aren't worthy to clean dog poop from Sears' shoes.

Im Gipper said:

---

shack009 said:

---

He already runs the young right men. That's what we've been trying to tell you.

---

You can keep making things up, doesn't make it true

Just like liberals, your ilk just makes things up. We get it. You and your buddies on Fortnite love him. Good for you!

---

"Just like liberals"

New and inspiring tactic that we've never heard

"We" being you and your other 5 user names?

Rapier108 said:

---

Fuentes and your god the Hitler loving Mahler aren't worthy to clean dog poop from Sears' shoes.

---

She lost lol.

A Republican lost in a democrat state???? OMG!!! That's nuts!! Let's nominate Fuentes! He can swing that beltway vote for sure!