Titan: he's not a "Vatican I Catholic". He's a racist POS.

Here are some samples

THREAD*

Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.

It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.

Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”

Let’s let Nick speak for himself:

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019

He's vile.

Im Gipper said:

---

Titan: he's not a "Vatican I Catholic". He's a racist POS.

Here are some samples

THREAD*

Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.

It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.

Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”

Let’s let Nick speak for himself:

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019

He's vile.

---

End of thread. Anyone that supports this piece of **** should rethink their life choices.

Im Gipper said:

---

Titan: he's not a "Vatican I Catholic". He's a racist POS.

Here are some samples

THREAD*

Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.

It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.

Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”

Let’s let Nick speak for himself:

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019

He's vile.

---

Thanks for the receipts. He is vile. I appreciate the concise thread. I want to always verify the truth before I assume the narratives.

I'm still searching through everything I can to see how horrible Kirk was. Cannot find anything.

I was leary that Fuentes was as bad as the narrative suggests. But it seems he is.

Kirk wasn't horrible at all. His focus was politics informed by Christianity. He was a brilliant man and not remotely mean-spirited. Leftists have circulated tons of lies about things he said, using quotes out of context to make their points.

He believed in the nuclear family and the rule of law. Marxists hate both.

SquirrellyDan said:

---

First, this is in no way related to Charlie Kirk and I'm not saying the killer was alt right.

I'm wondering who here knew about Nick Fuentes prior to this happening? I've watched a few of his videos and the conservative movement needs to do everything they can to separate themselves from this guy and those like him. Guys like this are the problem and allow the left to group the right with people like Nick Fuentes, and we absolutely need to do more than what's already been done (if anything) to draw the line between the right and extremists like Nick Fuentes. Curious to see how others here view this guy.

---

There are numerous, if not the overwhelming majority, of Conservative commentators who DO distance themselves from Fuentes. Particularly Jason Whitlock who constantly is calling Fuentes out.

From what I understand, Fuentes has an extremely high IQ. However, natural intelligence does not equal have sound thinking or a solid moral foundation.

jeremy said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Titan: he's not a "Vatican I Catholic". He's a racist POS.

Here are some samples

THREAD*

Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.

It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.

Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”

Let’s let Nick speak for himself:

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019

He's vile.

---

Thanks for the receipts. He is vile. I appreciate the concise thread. I want to always verify the truth before I assume the narratives.

I'm still searching through everything I can to see how horrible Kirk was. Cannot find anything.

I was leary that Fuentes was as bad as the narrative suggests. But it seems he is.

---

The link didn't lead to anything or a bunch of examples as half-expected, but digging through some past threads even here starting to get a picture. Maybe even more important than some of his beliefs is the indications is something like Spencer, and a manipulator. Its all the more important that people not think Kirk is like Shapiro, Shapiro like Fuentes, etc. It doesn't work that way. Its a wide spectrum.

What are valid discussions is the whole forced multiculturalism failure and things like that. Topics can be separate from their shrillest voices.

Jason Whitlock lol

TheEternalOptimist said:

---

SquirrellyDan said:

---

First, this is in no way related to Charlie Kirk and I'm not saying the killer was alt right.

I'm wondering who here knew about Nick Fuentes prior to this happening? I've watched a few of his videos and the conservative movement needs to do everything they can to separate themselves from this guy and those like him. Guys like this are the problem and allow the left to group the right with people like Nick Fuentes, and we absolutely need to do more than what's already been done (if anything) to draw the line between the right and extremists like Nick Fuentes. Curious to see how others here view this guy.

---

There are numerous, if not the overwhelming majority, of Conservative commentators who DO distance themselves from Fuentes. Particularly Jason Whitlock who constantly is calling Fuentes out.

From what I understand, Fuentes has an extremely high IQ. However, natural intelligence does not equal have sound thinking or a solid moral foundation.

---

Oh, I agree. I've just been diving deeper since his assassination (i watched many Kirk videos before) just to prove the point. The left lies to justify their ends and Charlie Kirk was better than many of us. He did it right.

I am not sure what the `groyper' bit is about or that movement either, but here's the deal. On prior page 3 outlined what our early GenX grew up with, felt, as much as was taught. That was no illusion and was experienced. Yet it is true that with the 21st C that has seemed to fray. Read through all 13 pages of the Ukraine girl murder thread there are revelations and claims that are more than little jarring if they are correct not to mention simple observing of daily events these years. This makes the whole issue more complicated.

titan said:

---

I am not sure what the `groyper' bit is about or that movement either, but here's the deal. On prior page 3 outlined what our early GenX grew up with, felt, as much as was taught. That was no illusion and was experienced. Yet it is true that with the 21st C that has seemed to fray. Read through all 13 pages of the Ukraine girl murder thread there are revelations and claims that are more than little jarring if they are correct not to mention simple observing of daily events these years. This makes the whole issue more complicated.

---

If you want to get an idea of Fuentes's beliefs on race, watch his first show on Rumble after the Ukraine girl was killed.

Okay, and that would be immediately current too.

shack009 said:

---

jeremy said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Titan: he's not a "Vatican I Catholic". He's a racist POS.

Here are some samples

THREAD*

Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.

It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.

Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”

Let’s let Nick speak for himself:

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019

He's vile.

---

Thanks for the receipts. He is vile. I appreciate the concise thread. I want to always verify the truth before I assume the narratives.

I'm still searching through everything I can to see how horrible Kirk was. Cannot find anything.

I was leary that Fuentes was as bad as the narrative suggests. But it seems he is.

---

Keep in mind those videos are from 2019 or earlier when he was 21 or younger. He's a different person now. He laments a lot of the things he said in his early years.

He's abrasive, and uses exaggerated language and politically incorrect jokes to prove a point. The stuff he actually talks about on his daily news show isn't all that controversial, in my opinion.

Everybody here who has a negative opinion of him hasn't watched one of his shows. They formed an opinion based on what a Con, Inc commentator like Benny Johnson or a leftist clipped and told them to think.

---

Has his take on the Holocaust shifted over the years?

Cyprian said:

---

shack009 said:

---

jeremy said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Titan: he's not a "Vatican I Catholic". He's a racist POS.

Here are some samples

THREAD*

Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.

It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.

Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”

Let’s let Nick speak for himself:

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019

He's vile.

---

Thanks for the receipts. He is vile. I appreciate the concise thread. I want to always verify the truth before I assume the narratives.

I'm still searching through everything I can to see how horrible Kirk was. Cannot find anything.

I was leary that Fuentes was as bad as the narrative suggests. But it seems he is.

---

Keep in mind those videos are from 2019 or earlier when he was 21 or younger. He's a different person now. He laments a lot of the things he said in his early years.

He's abrasive, and uses exaggerated language and politically incorrect jokes to prove a point. The stuff he actually talks about on his daily news show isn't all that controversial, in my opinion.

Everybody here who has a negative opinion of him hasn't watched one of his shows. They formed an opinion based on what a Con, Inc commentator like Benny Johnson or a leftist clipped and told them to think.

---

Has his take on the Holocaust shifted over the years?

---

He was on a YouTubers show semi recently and was asked about the holocaust. I think the question may have been phrased along the lines of "did it happen the way it's taught in schools," and his answer was "yes."

It was 2023 when he said Holocaust was an exaggerated Jewish conspiracy and that he loved Hitler. He hasn't changed.

Red Pill Ninja said:

---

I encourage ya'll to start watching his show and welcome you if you are new. Groypers are everywhere and are inevitable.

Some of us on here were at groyper war 2019, so about 6 years.

Tons of lies about Nick, which is expected.

I can't have any political discourse on here without getting banned, so it's hard to respond to anyone. I'd love to hang out and be able to browse and comment. You can grill me all you want it doesn't bother me. It's annoying seeing fellow conservatives get lied to about a lot of things though and we hate seeing that.

---

Fuentes said that Israel was happy about the October 7 slaughter because it gave Israel an excuse to take over Gaza. That's an insane perspective. He lacks discernment and apparently lacks the Holy Spirit.

Quote:

---

Some of us on here were at groyper war 2019,

---

So edgy.

Like bragging at being at a BLM rally in '20.

shack009 said:

---

jeremy said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Titan: he's not a "Vatican I Catholic". He's a racist POS.

Here are some samples

THREAD*

Recently, there has been some confusion about who Nick Fuentes is.

It’s time for the authoritative deep-dive on Fuentes.

Disturbing videos of Fuentes have surfaced. Fuentes claims he is being “smeared” & “taken out of context.”

Let’s let Nick speak for himself:

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 19, 2019

He's vile.

---

Thanks for the receipts. He is vile. I appreciate the concise thread. I want to always verify the truth before I assume the narratives.

I'm still searching through everything I can to see how horrible Kirk was. Cannot find anything.

I was leary that Fuentes was as bad as the narrative suggests. But it seems he is.

---

Keep in mind those videos are from 2019 or earlier when he was 21 or younger. He's a different person now. He laments a lot of the things he said in his early years.

He's abrasive, and uses exaggerated language and politically incorrect jokes to prove a point. The stuff he actually talks about on his daily news show isn't all that controversial, in my opinion.

Everybody here who has a negative opinion of him hasn't watched one of his shows. They formed an opinion based on what a Con, Inc commentator like Benny Johnson or a leftist clipped and told them to think.

---

Nope. We're basing it on his own words. He either believes those things, which makes him a piece of **** that no one should be following, or he's only doing it for engagement, which is probably worse.

Quote:

---

and apparently lacks the Holy Spirit.

---

100% this.

Attached Kirk as a fake Christian, now wants to act like they were buds.

Happy about the Oct 7th slaughter? Lol nice bait dude. Send a link or something from his x/twitter or show, then and I will take a look at it.

He doesn't lack either of those things. My guess is that you are being fed mainstream conserative views and are just rolling with it. Who are those people funded by? Sounds to me like you lack discernment.

It's also suspicious to me you chose to bring up Israel out of any other topic.

Edit: I meant to "reply" to Patriot25

Patriot25 said:

---

Red Pill Ninja said:

---

I encourage ya'll to start watching his show and welcome you if you are new. Groypers are everywhere and are inevitable.

Some of us on here were at groyper war 2019, so about 6 years.

Tons of lies about Nick, which is expected.

I can't have any political discourse on here without getting banned, so it's hard to respond to anyone. I'd love to hang out and be able to browse and comment. You can grill me all you want it doesn't bother me. It's annoying seeing fellow conservatives get lied to about a lot of things though and we hate seeing that.

---

Fuentes said that Israel was happy about the October 7 slaughter because it gave Israel an excuse to take over Gaza. That's an insane perspective. He lacks discernment and apparently lacks the Holy Spirit.

---

Charlie Kirk was recently wondering out loud if there was a stand down order

Im Gipper said:

---

It was 2023 when he said Holocaust was an exaggerated Jewish conspiracy and that he loved Hitler. He hasn't changed.

---

Remember when Dean Withers asked if Nick would rather vote for his wife or Нitlеr 😂💀 pic.twitter.com/1uD0TDUeKq

— 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬 (@ImperiumFirst) September 6, 2025

Reminded me of this clip of him debating some soy liberal in 2024

Why did that little bit upset you that much? The topic was literally asking if people have known who Nick was before all of the recent events.

Quote:

---

Charlie Kirk was recently wondering out loud if there was a stand down order

---

Stop lying.

He said that right after the attack happened

He was an unapologetic defender of Israel

You and your ilk will NOT ruin his legacy. You are no better than Libs.

Red Pill Ninja said:

---

Why did that little bit upset you that much? The topic was literally asking if people have known who Nick was before all of the recent events.

---

Nothing upset me. Why the sock account?

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Charlie Kirk was recently wondering out loud if there was a stand down order

---

Stop lying.

He said that right after the attack happened

He was an unapologetic defender of Israel

You and your ilk will NOT ruin his legacy. You are no better than Libs.

---

Oh sorry. He wondered it after the attack. You are correct. After the attack, Charlie Kirk was skeptical that Israel had no foreknowledge of October 7 and wondered if there was a stand down order. In this clip, Kirk says Bibi is "going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza".

Charlie Kirk suggested Bibi Netanyahu or someone in his government issued a stand-down order on October 7th. pic.twitter.com/fk9BUjDjUU

— The Disruptor💥 (@IWashington) September 14, 2025

Kvetch said:

---

No real conservatives take him seriously. He's a loser.

---

The guy has made a fortune off of his show

Tucker Carlson thinks he's gay.

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

and apparently lacks the Holy Spirit.

---

100% this.

Attached Kirk as a fake Christian, now wants to act like they were buds.

---

He didn't act like they were buds. Actually said they were "adversaries" in his show about the assassination.

It's perfectly reasonable to question someone's Christian bonafides if they support the war in Gaza.

Quote:

---

It's perfectly reasonable to question someone's Christian bonafides if they support the war in Gaza.

---

False!

Red Pill Ninja said:

---

I encourage ya'll to start watching his show and welcome you if you are new. Groypers are everywhere and are inevitable.

Some of us on here were at groyper war 2019, so about 6 years.

Tons of lies about Nick, which is expected.

I can't have any political discourse on here without getting banned, so it's hard to respond to anyone. I'd love to hang out and be able to browse and comment. You can grill me all you want it doesn't bother me. It's annoying seeing fellow conservatives get lied to about a lot of things though and we hate seeing that.

---

I'm not a groyper but I am in that arena. There are a lot more frens than just groypers out there as well. This board is way behind the times. The racist claims don't mean anything at all anymore. The answer is and always will be "yes I am" and "so?"

These guys here have no idea what is brewing among the right at all. It's not just men following him either, a lot of young women do now as well.

Ive been telling people that moms, and just a lot of women in general, are getting really hooked on Nick's show for like a year and a half. Nobody believed me. https://t.co/oS8oSqZkjN

— Cassandra MacDonald (@CassandraRules) September 14, 2025

Before all of this I had never heard Kirk once (either audio or video). Had heard of his name and had a vague idea who he was.

Fuentes on the other hand I knew of. He was caught up in the controversy when he visited Trump at Mar lago. And Drudge has linked many articles about Fuentes and tweets from Fuentes.

In terms of what the algorithm threw at me, Fuentes>>>>>>Kirk.

Keyno said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

Charlie Kirk was recently wondering out loud if there was a stand down order

---

Stop lying.

He said that right after the attack happened

He was an unapologetic defender of Israel

You and your ilk will NOT ruin his legacy. You are no better than Libs.

---

Oh sorry. He wondered it after the attack. You are correct. After the attack, Charlie Kirk was skeptical that Israel had no foreknowledge of October 7 and wondered if there was a stand down order. In this clip, Kirk says Bibi is "going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza".

Charlie Kirk suggested Bibi Netanyahu or someone in his government issued a stand-down order on October 7th. pic.twitter.com/fk9BUjDjUU

— The Disruptor💥 (@IWashington) September 14, 2025

---

And he recently expressed concern about his safety after asking questions regarding Israel. He definitely was more skeptical of the Israeli government after October 7.

The day before his assassination, Charlie Kirk objected to Bibi Netanyahu’s assertion that “you can’t be MAGA if you’re anti-Israel” during an interview with Ben Shapiro.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/smGok2Ti79

— AF Post (@AFpost) September 13, 2025

Keyno said:

---

Patriot25 said:

---

Red Pill Ninja said:

---

I encourage ya'll to start watching his show and welcome you if you are new. Groypers are everywhere and are inevitable.

Some of us on here were at groyper war 2019, so about 6 years.

Tons of lies about Nick, which is expected.

I can't have any political discourse on here without getting banned, so it's hard to respond to anyone. I'd love to hang out and be able to browse and comment. You can grill me all you want it doesn't bother me. It's annoying seeing fellow conservatives get lied to about a lot of things though and we hate seeing that.

---

Fuentes said that Israel was happy about the October 7 slaughter because it gave Israel an excuse to take over Gaza. That's an insane perspective. He lacks discernment and apparently lacks the Holy Spirit.

---

Charlie Kirk was recently wondering out loud if there was a stand down order

---

Yes. This is a case where some kind of conservative knee-jerk reaction to censor is also out of line. The 21st C has taught us major governments are self-serving more than anything else and capable of evil and the Western not much less than any other. When you have fiascos of that level, its not fair to brand any questioning of it as a crackpot theory. Government hasn't earned that benefit of the doubt--in fact, this century, it has lost whatever reservoir of that which kind of existed. Shown itself unworthy of it. UK, Australia, Bush/Obamian/Bidenite DC, France, yes Israel, Germany -- the list is long. No real exceptions.

Questions like that are not extreme. Holocaust denial is if this is true. So far in the present video nothing wildly out line but thats an isolated case.