Did you know who Nick Fuentes was before all this?

52,203 Views | 967 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by Shooter McGavin
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shack009 said:

The BoomerCons are going to get a heavy dose of Nick today when they watch their Ben Shapiro daily upload. Some awesome clips played from Nick's show.

Poor Ben having a full blown meltdown over Tucker and Nick talking and the Heritage Foundation backing Tucker doing so.

shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's awesome. Great chance for the Boomers to learn something if they want to watch tonight's show.
Nothing Ever Happens
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Conservatism only means the above at this point. Absolutely nothing else matters. Why? Because you can have beliefs that are outside of the norm on any issue except the above and still be considered part of the group. Go against any of the above and you get cancelled.
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Still don't know who Nick Fuentes is and won't be going to learn.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ANYONE and EVERYONE who supports gay groyper Fuentes at this point

is an enemy of Charlie Kirk, TPUSA and MAGA.

Charlie himself called Fuentes "vermin" and wanted him banished from any influence in the Conservative movement!

LITERALLY the words out of Fuentes' own mouth showing the hatred he had for Charlie and TPUSA:

J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shack009 said:

That's awesome. Great chance for the Boomers to learn something if they want to watch tonight's show.


Thanks for the reminder to listen to Shapiro's episode. Was mostly directed at Tucker but I can see why Fuentes is trying to glom onto the attention too.

For anyone who wants to watch, the whole thing is a solid listen. Good showcase of the difference in conservative grownups like Shapiro (and Charlie) and unserious groyper trolls like Fuentes or grifters like Tucker.


Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

shack009 said:

That's awesome. Great chance for the Boomers to learn something if they want to watch tonight's show.


Thanks for the reminder to listen to Shapiro's episode. Was mostly directed at Tucker but I can see why Fuentes is trying to glom onto the attention too.

For anyone who wants to watch, the whole thing is a solid listen. Good showcase of the difference in conservative grownups like Shapiro (and Charlie) and unserious groyper trolls like Fuentes or grifters like Tucker.




The Ben Shapiro tweet has 41K likes. Here is Nick Fuentes response tweet.



Currently at 117K likes. The people are with Nick.
shiftyandquick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYTimes opinion piece on how Fuentes has inherited Kirk's position and officially entered the mainstream of MAGA.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/opinion/nick-fuentes-kirk-successor.html
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shiftyandquick said:

NYTimes opinion piece on how Fuentes has inherited Kirk's position and officially entered the mainstream of MAGA.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/opinion/nick-fuentes-kirk-successor.html



J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

shack009 said:

That's awesome. Great chance for the Boomers to learn something if they want to watch tonight's show.


Thanks for the reminder to listen to Shapiro's episode. Was mostly directed at Tucker but I can see why Fuentes is trying to glom onto the attention too.

For anyone who wants to watch, the whole thing is a solid listen. Good showcase of the difference in conservative grownups like Shapiro (and Charlie) and unserious groyper trolls like Fuentes or grifters like Tucker.




The Ben Shapiro tweet has 41K likes. Here is Nick Fuentes response tweet.



Currently at 117K likes. The people are with Nick.


Twitter =\= real life. And once they grow up and move out of their parent's basement they'll realize that Fuentes is a troll.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.
austinAG90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shiftyandquick said:

NYTimes opinion piece on how Fuentes has inherited Kirk's position and officially entered the mainstream of MAGA.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/opinion/nick-fuentes-kirk-successor.html

LMAO. NYT. Just another prop story from the left NOW championing a racist, trying to paint MAGA (Trump) as the same.

Fuentes is a Holocaust denier and a racist along with Tucker and BSC Candance, and it seems quite a few of our socks posting here.

So to our resident Fuentes supporters, do you, overloads of the right also deny the Holocaust along with the thought, Hitler didn't want to fight as Fuentes and other proclaim ?
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.

You're right. There is a massive coordinated campaign to cancel him and also Tucker for interviewing him because Fuentes is not a threat whatsoever and is irrelevant. Makes sense to me
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.

You're right. There is a massive coordinated campaign to cancel him and also Tucker for interviewing him because Fuentes is not a threat whatsoever and is irrelevant. Makes sense to me


I mean he has basically 2-3 supporters total on this board which is 95% conservative. Wouldn't be my strategy - I'd just ignore him because he's not a serious person (and neither are his followers), but I can see how Shapiro takes it personally given his friendship with Charlie.

Also, as Shapiro correctly points out - disagreeing with someone is not canceling.
austinAG90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.

You're right. There is a massive coordinated campaign to cancel him and also Tucker for interviewing him because Fuentes is not a threat whatsoever and is irrelevant. Makes sense to me

Per the NYT correct ? Seems to me that this massive campaign is only being championed by his hardened supporters and continued coverage by the left media. I never heard of Fuentes until this thread and after some research I'm just waiting for him to show up on CNN dressed in a Nazi uniform and proclaim his support for Mamdani
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I took some time to listen to a bit of Fuentes and he comes off as an edge lord troll attention seeker. He's pretty unserious. He throws out shallow reactionary rhetoric and offers not much else insofar as solving real world problems goes.

Blaming every problem on "others" in conspiratorial fashion with out a real comprehensive case and then offering an effective coherent alternative is not a solution to problems. I get that it is simple minded and easy but it just isn't reality. Mixing in a few arguably valid views with a bunch of fantastical conspiracies and defiant anti establishment rhetoric and a dose of narcissistic bigotry is an easy way to grab attention of the naive who want to be told their problems are someone else's fault instead of their own responsibility.

Fortunately edgelords only grab the edges for the most part so for all the noise they make, they're usually not a big problem. The bot armies and social media attraction to noisy controversy makes them seem bigger than they are.

I suppose for every Ilhan Omar you get a Nick Fuentes.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
austinAG90 said:

Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.

You're right. There is a massive coordinated campaign to cancel him and also Tucker for interviewing him because Fuentes is not a threat whatsoever and is irrelevant. Makes sense to me

Per the NYT correct ? Seems to me that this massive campaign is only being championed by his hardened supporters and continued coverage by the left media. I never heard of Fuentes until this thread and after some research I'm just waiting for him to show up on CNN dressed in a Nazi uniform and proclaim his support for Mamdani


And what has he said that would make you think that?
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

Blaming every problem on "others" in conspiratorial fashion with out a real comprehensive case and then offering an effective coherent alternative is not a solution to problems. I get that it is simple minded and easy but it just isn't reality. Mixing in a few arguably valid views with a bunch of fantastical conspiracies and defiant anti establishment rhetoric and a dose of narcissistic bigotry is an easy way to grab attention of the naive who want to be told their problems are someone else's fault instead of their own responsibility.

Everybody who discusses politics online blames bad policy on "others." Bad government policy quite factually isn't my fault.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.

You're right. There is a massive coordinated campaign to cancel him and also Tucker for interviewing him because Fuentes is not a threat whatsoever and is irrelevant. Makes sense to me


I mean he has basically 2-3 supporters total on this board which is 95% conservative.

Ohhh ok. Twitter is not real life, but texags forum 16 is. Thank you for clarifying.

MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
True, but some people are specific on how and why it is bad and what is necessary to fix problems instead of just broadly castigating identity groups as part of some ongoing conspiracy. There's too much of that going around lately and it's shallow and creates new problems instead of solving existing ones.

I understand the cynicism behind it, and the more subtle nihilism underlaying that from the youth, with all the doom casting that goes on today in media. But I don't think extremism is a solution, rather it is just an emotional outlet.
austinAG90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

austinAG90 said:

Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.

You're right. There is a massive coordinated campaign to cancel him and also Tucker for interviewing him because Fuentes is not a threat whatsoever and is irrelevant. Makes sense to me

Per the NYT correct ? Seems to me that this massive campaign is only being championed by his hardened supporters and continued coverage by the left media. I never heard of Fuentes until this thread and after some research I'm just waiting for him to show up on CNN dressed in a Nazi uniform and proclaim his support for Mamdani


And what has he said that would make you think that?

While I know you are trolling and you know exactly what I am referring to I give you these quotes.

"I think the Holocaust is exaggerated,"

"I don't hate Hitler. I think there's a Jewish conspiracy. I believe in race realism,"

"Hitler is awesome. Hitler was right. And the Holocaust didn't happen."


But once again, you know this. Answer my question, do you or do you not agree with his comments and beliefs? It's a simple question. Go ahead, you can just come back with a new sock.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

ANYONE and EVERYONE who supports gay groyper Fuentes at this point

is an enemy of Charlie Kirk, TPUSA and MAGA.

Charlie himself called Fuentes "vermin" and wanted him banished from any influence in the Conservative movement!

LITERALLY the words out of Fuentes' own mouth showing the hatred he had for Charlie and TPUSA:



I am honestly not sure if Trump wins without Charlie Kirk and everything he has done.

Can you imagine how bad we would get curb stomped though if we had hitched our wagons to someone like Nick Fuentes LOL?

Anyone who makes such a proposition cannot be taken seriously. Again, I am not saying he's wrong about everything...no one is. But he is absolute poison, they way he goes about things. He is just a virgin, closeted gay troll who wants to see the world burn...but really more than anything, wants attention. He'd kill himself without attention.

Charlie Kirk was more of a man than this punk could ever be. I personally think he suicides himself within the next 5 yrs because being an aging closeted gay (type of person he rails against) will just be too much. And he's a fake Christian who probably doesn't know how to rely on God for peace and strength. Just a complete mess.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

True, but some people are specific on how and why it is bad and what is necessary to fix problems instead of just broadly castigating identity groups as part of some ongoing conspiracy. There's too much of that going around lately and it's shallow and creates new problems instead of solving existing ones.

I understand the cynicism behind it, and the more subtle nihilism underlaying that from the youth, with all the doom casting that goes on today in media. But I don't think extremism is a solution, rather it is just an emotional outlet.


Well said, as always.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

I suppose for every Ilhan Omar you get a Nick Fuentes.

And she is an actual mainstream, elected official, almost universally beloved by the left. My most rational and sane liberal "friends" think she's rock solid and that all of the hubbub is just hatred and bigotry from the right.

I mean, how f-ing psycho is the modern left? Unreal. She is honestly infinitely worse than bozos like Nick Fuentes...and more genuinely hateful and dangerous. Even though we have some abrasive noisemakers, let's all unite for a second to acknowledge that we will NEVER be as MF PSYCHO as the grotesque freakshow that is the modern mainstream left. Look at who they are about to elect in NYC.

Let's not beat ourselves up too much.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

True, but some people are specific on how and why it is bad and what is necessary to fix problems instead of just broadly castigating identity groups as part of some ongoing conspiracy. There's too much of that going around lately and it's shallow and creates new problems instead of solving existing ones.

I understand the cynicism behind it, and the more subtle nihilism underlaying that from the youth, with all the doom casting that goes on today in media. But I don't think extremism is a solution, rather it is just an emotional outlet.



America First isn't extremism. And he isn't a nihilist, he talks about how bad nihilism is all the time.

You would know that if you actually watched the show like you claimed. It's fine that people don't watch it, it's just weird that several have claimed to watch it when they only see clips.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

Wishcasting is a bold strategy. Let's see if it pays off.


I mean someone with Fuentes' views will never come close to winning an election, so he's irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Outside of selling doomsday kits and continually getting more extreme and desperate for views and followers.

You're right. There is a massive coordinated campaign to cancel him and also Tucker for interviewing him because Fuentes is not a threat whatsoever and is irrelevant. Makes sense to me


I mean he has basically 2-3 supporters total on this board which is 95% conservative.

Ohhh ok. Twitter is not real life, but texags forum 16 is. Thank you for clarifying.




In terms of people who actually pay attention to politics, vote, donate, etc and don't just spread memes on Reddit? Absolutely.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shack009 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

True, but some people are specific on how and why it is bad and what is necessary to fix problems instead of just broadly castigating identity groups as part of some ongoing conspiracy. There's too much of that going around lately and it's shallow and creates new problems instead of solving existing ones.

I understand the cynicism behind it, and the more subtle nihilism underlaying that from the youth, with all the doom casting that goes on today in media. But I don't think extremism is a solution, rather it is just an emotional outlet.



America First isn't extremism. And he isn't a nihilist, he talks about how bad nihilism is all the time.

You would know that if you actually watched the show like you claimed. It's fine that people don't watch it, it's just weird that several have claimed to watch it when they only see clips.

Literally no one on here, aside from pantywaste liberals, thinks this is a bad thing.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

shack009 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

True, but some people are specific on how and why it is bad and what is necessary to fix problems instead of just broadly castigating identity groups as part of some ongoing conspiracy. There's too much of that going around lately and it's shallow and creates new problems instead of solving existing ones.

I understand the cynicism behind it, and the more subtle nihilism underlaying that from the youth, with all the doom casting that goes on today in media. But I don't think extremism is a solution, rather it is just an emotional outlet.



America First isn't extremism. And he isn't a nihilist, he talks about how bad nihilism is all the time.

You would know that if you actually watched the show like you claimed. It's fine that people don't watch it, it's just weird that several have claimed to watch it when they only see clips.

Literally no one on here, aside from pantywaste liberals, thinks this is a bad thing.


He said "I don't think extremism is a solution." So obviously that's false.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ya know I'm no fan of this Nick Fuentes character and to answer the premise of this thread I didn't even know who he was until all this nonsense. But Ben Shapiro is a hypocrite POS, and I've had about enough of his condescending crap. I'm old enough to remember back in December 2011, during a GOP presidential debate in Sioux City, Iowa, Newt Gingrich nearly dropped his pen while onstage with other candidates, including Ron Paul. Paul politely picked it up off the floor and handed it back to Gingrich without any fuss, a simple act of courtesy in the midst of a tense primary race.

Ben Shapiro was live-tweeting the event and turned the mundane moment into something sinister by tweeting "Gingrich almost drops his pen. Ron Paul grabs it and wrings it like the neck of a Joo." The "Joo" is a thinly veiled slur for "Jew," to avoid the old filters of twitter, serving as an antisemitic label to smear Paul, tying into Shapiro's long-standing criticism of Paul's non-interventionist foreign policy as somehow anti-Israel or isolationist. And the tweet is still live!!!



Shapiro has a long history of going after and smearing people that disagree with him policy wise when it comes to Israel. He plays coy and tries to claim victimhood when he's confronted over his BS. Disagreeing on foreign policy matters involving Israel doesn't make you an antisemite. Has Shapiro ever apologized for implying Paul harbored violent antisemitic intent over a pen? Hell no. I'm not defending anything that comes out of this Fuentes kid's mouth but Shapiro is a hypocrite SOB and gets no grace from me ever. There are plenty more examples of little Ben's tropes smearing people who don't bow to his BS.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do genuinely wonder if some agency found a way to poison Candace O and Tucker Carlson with some type of chemical substance that can make you go crazy. They are both just borderline psycho shells of their former selves at this point. Truly how they come across to me. I don't think it is just "grifting" like some others have said.

Tucker literally thinks angels and spirits are toying around with us in advanced spacecraft. Candace O has 4 small children at home, and a husband worth $250MM, and she just cannot stop wh00ring for attention by saying crazy sh** and making downright insane allegations.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He is losing popularity by the minute. It was always apparent that he was Israel First, but since 10/7 it's been belligerently so. People are sick of it.

As evidenced in this thread, most of his viewers are Israel First Boomers.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

Ya know I'm no fan of this Nick Fuentes character and to answer the premise of this thread I didn't even know who he was until all this nonsense. But Ben Shapiro is a hypocrite POS, and I've had about enough of his condescending crap. I'm old enough to remember back in December 2011, during a GOP presidential debate in Sioux City, Iowa, Newt Gingrich nearly dropped his pen while onstage with other candidates, including Ron Paul. Paul politely picked it up off the floor and handed it back to Gingrich without any fuss, a simple act of courtesy in the midst of a tense primary race.

Ben Shapiro was live-tweeting the event and turned the mundane moment into something sinister by tweeting "Gingrich almost drops his pen. Ron Paul grabs it and wrings it like the neck of a Joo." The "Joo" is a thinly veiled slur for "Jew," to avoid the old filters of twitter, serving as an antisemitic label to smear Paul, tying into Shapiro's long-standing criticism of Paul's non-interventionist foreign policy as somehow anti-Israel or isolationist. And the tweet is still live!!!



Shapiro has a long history of going after and smearing people that disagree with him policy wise when it comes to Israel. He plays coy and tries to claim victimhood when he's confronted over his BS. Disagreeing on foreign policy matters involving Israel doesn't make you an antisemite. Has Shapiro ever apologized for implying Paul harbored violent antisemitic intent over a pen? Hell no. I'm not defending anything that comes out of this Fuentes kid's mouth but Shapiro is a hypocrite SOB and gets no grace from me ever. There are plenty more examples of little Ben's tropes smearing people who don't bow to his BS.


Yep, it is possible to criticize both the Nick Fuentes types and the whiny fragile Jews like Shapiro who see themselves as perpetual victims and act like any criticism of Jews or Israel is utmost bigotry and tpretty much the worst thing you can do.

Shapiro is also right about a lot of things, and has a solid grasp of conservatism, but goodness, I am sick of hearing about "how bad jewish people have it".

But if you do not despise white liberals and Islam and its followers more than both of these individuals (Fuentes and Shapiro), not sure we can be friends.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

Ya know I'm no fan of this Nick Fuentes character and to answer the premise of this thread I didn't even know who he was until all this nonsense. But Ben Shapiro is a hypocrite POS, and I've had about enough of his condescending crap. I'm old enough to remember back in December 2011, during a GOP presidential debate in Sioux City, Iowa, Newt Gingrich nearly dropped his pen while onstage with other candidates, including Ron Paul. Paul politely picked it up off the floor and handed it back to Gingrich without any fuss, a simple act of courtesy in the midst of a tense primary race.

Ben Shapiro was live-tweeting the event and turned the mundane moment into something sinister by tweeting "Gingrich almost drops his pen. Ron Paul grabs it and wrings it like the neck of a Joo." The "Joo" is a thinly veiled slur for "Jew," to avoid the old filters of twitter, serving as an antisemitic label to smear Paul, tying into Shapiro's long-standing criticism of Paul's non-interventionist foreign policy as somehow anti-Israel or isolationist. And the tweet is still live!!!



Shapiro has a long history of going after and smearing people that disagree with him policy wise when it comes to Israel. He plays coy and tries to claim victimhood when he's confronted over his BS. Disagreeing on foreign policy matters involving Israel doesn't make you an antisemite. Has Shapiro ever apologized for implying Paul harbored violent antisemitic intent over a pen? Hell no. I'm not defending anything that comes out of this Fuentes kid's mouth but Shapiro is a hypocrite SOB and gets no grace from me ever. There are plenty more examples of little Ben's tropes smearing people who don't bow to his BS.


Yep, it is possible to criticize both the Nick Fuentes types and the whiny fragile Jews like Shapiro who see themselves as perpetual victims and act like any criticism of Jews or Israel is utmost bigotry and tpretty much the worst thing you can do.

Shapiro is also right about a lot of things, and has a solid grasp of conservatism, but goodness, I am sick of hearing about "how bad jewish people have it".


Bro, what have you even been arguing against in this thread then lol. That's basically Nick Fuentes' position to a T. The Jews do see themselves as perpetual victims and that's why they do whatever they can, including influencing our politics, to ensure the continuance of the Jewish State. And they claim bigotry about anybody who points that out. Yall have been doing it this entire thread on their behalf.

I'm so confused now lol.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shack009 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

shack009 said:

MouthBQ98 said:

True, but some people are specific on how and why it is bad and what is necessary to fix problems instead of just broadly castigating identity groups as part of some ongoing conspiracy. There's too much of that going around lately and it's shallow and creates new problems instead of solving existing ones.

I understand the cynicism behind it, and the more subtle nihilism underlaying that from the youth, with all the doom casting that goes on today in media. But I don't think extremism is a solution, rather it is just an emotional outlet.



America First isn't extremism. And he isn't a nihilist, he talks about how bad nihilism is all the time.

You would know that if you actually watched the show like you claimed. It's fine that people don't watch it, it's just weird that several have claimed to watch it when they only see clips.

Literally no one on here, aside from pantywaste liberals, thinks this is a bad thing.


He said "I don't think extremism is a solution." So obviously that's false.

You really think he is talking about an "America First" approach being "extremism"? Come on, don't be intentionally dense. We are all longing for America first. That's what Charlie Kirk embodied...well, Christ first (and he actually acted like a Christian, unlike Nick Fuentes), then America. The Fuentes idolaters seem to think he holds a monopoly on "America First". That's insane to me.

Some of us have been around here for a long time...just a heads up that MouthBQ's brain sprints circles around yours. That is not an insult, but this is a debate you won't win. You're already resorting to twisting his words, like an emotional female does when confronted with logic that upsets her feelings.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.