shack009 said:

---

Cyprian said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

True, he is the Rights version of someone like Biden claiming to be a devot Catholic, while he is pro abortion - Nick just goes hard in the opposite direction, and can't help but lash out at "the jews" at lot of the time.

Ironically if you were going to pin some conspiracy about a religious groups money and control, Catholicism has a lot more people, influence and power than anything Jewish. What rabbi compares to the power and influence of the Pope on a worldwide scale?

---

Amazing contradiction in your own post. The Pope has so much control on American society but we have "Catholics" like Pelosi and Biden that lead our country who flout Catholic dogma. I wish we had Catholics who governed like Catholics.

Meanwhile, any Jew with power, on either side, is doing whatever they can to ensure Israel can do whatever it wants.

---

Not so far, you need to think this through. My point wasn't about the Pope's political control, but about the absurdity of a figure like Fuentes, who claims to be a devout Catholic, constantly attacking a religious minority. Just as I believe pro-abortion Catholics are hypocritical, I view Fuentes' antisemitic rhetoric as a fundamental contradiction of Catholic teachings on love and dignity, which many highly hypocritical with regards to his public persona.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

I don't want to live in the hood just like I don't want to live in a trailer trash meth den. If a nice black family moves in next door, I'm not moving out because they're black.

There are lies, damn lies, and statistics. Are black men in America much more likely to commit crimes? Yes. Is there a crisis of culture in the black community? Yes. Is the black family man next door to you necessarily more likely to harm you? No.

The individual and circumstance matters. The majority of black crime is black on black, but I wouldn't draw the conclusion that I'd be safer if I had a black man next to me at all times so that he would draw the violence to himself.

Identitarianism forces you to group the individual based on immutable characteristics. It completely extinguishes the individual. There's a difference in saying that I will cross the street if I'm walking towards a group of black teenage boys at night and saying I don't want to live near black people.

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

I don't want to live in the hood just like I don't want to live in a trailer trash meth den. If a nice black family moves in next door, I'm not moving out because they're black.

There are lies, damn lies, and statistics. Are black men in America much more likely to commit crimes? Yes. Is there a crisis of culture in the black community? Yes. Is the black family man next door to you necessarily more likely to harm you? No.

The individual and circumstance matters. The majority of black crime is black on black, but I wouldn't draw the conclusion that I'd be safer if I had a black man next to me at all times so that he would draw the violence to himself.

Identitarianism forces you to group the individual based on immutable characteristics. It completely extinguishes the individual. There's a difference in saying that I will cross the street if I'm walking towards a group of black teenage boys at night and saying I don't want to live near black people.

---

Yes dude I've heard this argument for like a decade now. We would all rather live in a neighborhood of Thomas Sowells than skinheads. This is not what we are talking about. Having a black neighbor in your gated white community is not living around black people.

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

shack009 said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Cyprian said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

True, he is the Rights version of someone like Biden claiming to be a devot Catholic, while he is pro abortion - Nick just goes hard in the opposite direction, and can't help but lash out at "the jews" at lot of the time.

Ironically if you were going to pin some conspiracy about a religious groups money and control, Catholicism has a lot more people, influence and power than anything Jewish. What rabbi compares to the power and influence of the Pope on a worldwide scale?

---

Amazing contradiction in your own post. The Pope has so much control on American society but we have "Catholics" like Pelosi and Biden that lead our country who flout Catholic dogma. I wish we had Catholics who governed like Catholics.

Meanwhile, any Jew with power, on either side, is doing whatever they can to ensure Israel can do whatever it wants.

---

As a Catholic I wish we didn't have "members" who literally blame Jews for everything. Even their right to protect themselves. You'd have a better time convincing if you'd just state you were Hamas, maybe you can move to NYC and join the NYC Jew hate club after the election. Also, my Jewish relatives spend their time ensuring America can do whatever it wants.

---

The people you are describing in your first sentence don't exist outside of Candace and a couple of her followers. And I'm partially convinced Candace converted to Catholicism to "stick it to the Jews" somehow.

---

Actually, this board is full of those I just describe. She converted for 2 reasons. 1) Her husband 2) You can't claim to be a far right conservative if your church has openly gay ministers, which what really means is she's looking for clicks. And her time is about up.

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

I don't want to live in the hood just like I don't want to live in a trailer trash meth den. If a nice black family moves in next door, I'm not moving out because they're black.

There are lies, damn lies, and statistics. Are black men in America much more likely to commit crimes? Yes. Is there a crisis of culture in the black community? Yes. Is the black family man next door to you necessarily more likely to harm you? No.

The individual and circumstance matters. The majority of black crime is black on black, but I wouldn't draw the conclusion that I'd be safer if I had a black man next to me at all times so that he would draw the violence to himself.

Identitarianism forces you to group the individual based on immutable characteristics. It completely extinguishes the individual. There's a difference in saying that I will cross the street if I'm walking towards a group of black teenage boys at night and saying I don't want to live near black people.

---

Yes dude I've heard this argument for like a decade now. We would all rather live in a neighborhood of Thomas Sowells than skinheads. This is not what we are talking about. Having a black neighbor in your gated white community is not living around black people.

---

Yes, by definition it is. You're saying you don't want to live in the hood which is overwhelmingly black. Fair enough. Nobody does, and nobody is forcing you to do it.

The problem becomes when you switch the cause and effect around and say because the hood is predominantly black, the characteristics of the hood are endemic to black people. That's the same game that the left plays when they come up with dumb **** like intersectionality.

Fuentes is being financially rewarded for saying provocative things, clout chasing, and trolling. He has gained most of his name recognition early on from CNN and MSNBC, who tried to use him as the face of MAGA/GOP to smear the right.

He doesn't really bring anything new to table, and doesnt articulate his points to change hearts and minds. He is like the catholic alter boy version of Andrew Tate.

But good for him in aquiring wealth legally.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

---

Everybody with a brain who is being honest knows exactly what he's saying. Trying to pretend like you don't know what he's saying or that your exact life isn't a reflection of the point he's making is just being dishonest.

1. Does Sub Saharan Africa suck?

2. Why?

Both answers are obvious.

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

---

Everybody with a brain who is being honest knows exactly what he's saying. Trying to pretend like you don't know what he's saying or that your exact life isn't a reflection of the point he's making is just being dishonest.

---

What, exactly, is he saying then?

Cyprian said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Cyprian said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

True, he is the Rights version of someone like Biden claiming to be a devot Catholic, while he is pro abortion - Nick just goes hard in the opposite direction, and can't help but lash out at "the jews" at lot of the time.

Ironically if you were going to pin some conspiracy about a religious groups money and control, Catholicism has a lot more people, influence and power than anything Jewish. What rabbi compares to the power and influence of the Pope on a worldwide scale?

---

Amazing contradiction in your own post. The Pope has so much control on American society but we have "Catholics" like Pelosi and Biden that lead our country who flout Catholic dogma. I wish we had Catholics who governed like Catholics.

Meanwhile, any Jew with power, on either side, is doing whatever they can to ensure Israel can do whatever it wants.

---

Not so far, you need to think this through. My point wasn't about the Pope's political control, but about the absurdity of a figure like Fuentes, who claims to be a devout Catholic, constantly attacking a religious minority. Just as I believe pro-abortion Catholics are hypocritical, I view Fuentes' antisemitic rhetoric as a fundamental contradiction of Catholic teachings on love and dignity, which many highly hypocritical with regards to his public persona.

---

But his point is that Jews have outsized political control over America. That's what matters in this context.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

---

Everybody with a brain who is being honest knows exactly what he's saying. Trying to pretend like you don't know what he's saying or that your exact life isn't a reflection of the point he's making is just being dishonest.

---

What, exactly, is he saying then?

---

Already been answered by both me and Keyno. And you know, you're just playing a weird game where you pretend not to.

shack009 said:

---

1. Does Sub Saharan Africa suck?

2. Why?

Both answers are obvious.

---

Yes, for a variety of reasons related to tribal and religious warfare, cultural rot, political corruption, disease, and foreign conquest. I'm not offering Africa as a beacon of civilization.

At the same time, some of the most successful immigrants in America are African. The problem with Africa cannot just be reduced to "they're black" like you're implying.

Yeah, the ones we take are generally at the far right of the bell curve. At least that's how it was until very recently.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

shack009 said:

---

1. Does Sub Saharan Africa suck?

2. Why?

Both answers are obvious.

---

Any prominent leader who leans into this type of stuff will be DOA campaign-wise lol. Yet that is what yall want. I swear some of yall are Chinese bots or somethin.

You think Charlie Kirk didn't know that different groups of people in different regions didn't have differing IQ's? Constantly parroting that crap serves zero purpose...actually it is extremely counter-productive, so the left is praying to their fruity little pagan gods that we run with racial identitarianism. It is literally about the only chance they have got...for us to lose our minds and step on our d*cks.

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

I wouldn't expect any politician to lean in to it.

Could we get a politician who says we are good on all immigration to this country both legal and illegal? That would suffice. Can we get a politician saying we need to deport all foreign illegals? Trump basically ran on that in 2015 but we didn't really get it.

Would also be nice if we could get a politician talking about ending birthright citizenship. That's obviously ******ed and needs to end yesterday.

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

---

It is quite implicit in the beliefs he espouses, whether he says those words directly or not. It's the fundamental precept of white Identitarianism. You're literally stating that one group is inherently superior to another on the basis of skin color.

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

---

It is quite implicit in the beliefs he espouses, whether he says those words directly or not. It's the fundamental precept of white Identitarianism. You're literally stating that one group is inherently superior to another on the basis of skin color.

---

Identitarianism does not mean you believe in superiority. But it does acknowledge that there are differences between the races, which is just true.

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

---

It is quite implicit in the beliefs he espouses, whether he says those words directly or not. It's the fundamental precept of white Identitarianism. You're literally stating that one group is inherently superior to another on the basis of skin color.

---

Identitarianism does not mean you believe in superiority. But it does acknowledge that there are differences between the races, which is just true.

---

I'll play along. What are the differences between the races which is "just true"?

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

1. Does Sub Saharan Africa suck?

2. Why?

Both answers are obvious.

---

Yes, for a variety of reasons related to tribal and religious warfare, cultural rot, political corruption, disease, and foreign conquest. I'm not offering Africa as a beacon of civilization.

At the same time, some of the most successful immigrants in America are African. The problem with Africa cannot just be reduced to "they're black" like you're implying.

---

You could actually argue this proves the point.

If you bring a small handful of blacks in to a predominantly white society, those blacks can survive well and even thrive. But on a societal and regional level, when blacks are the predominant group, you get worse (gasp) outcomes.

jacketman03 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

---

It is quite implicit in the beliefs he espouses, whether he says those words directly or not. It's the fundamental precept of white Identitarianism. You're literally stating that one group is inherently superior to another on the basis of skin color.

---

Identitarianism does not mean you believe in superiority. But it does acknowledge that there are differences between the races, which is just true.

---

I'll play along. What are the differences between the races which is "just true"?

---

Tune in to Aggie basketball tonight and see how Ruben Dominguez plays and contrast with how Rylan Griffin plays.

shack009 said:

---

jacketman03 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

---

It is quite implicit in the beliefs he espouses, whether he says those words directly or not. It's the fundamental precept of white Identitarianism. You're literally stating that one group is inherently superior to another on the basis of skin color.

---

Identitarianism does not mean you believe in superiority. But it does acknowledge that there are differences between the races, which is just true.

---

I'll play along. What are the differences between the races which is "just true"?

---

Tune in to Aggie basketball tonight and see how Ruben Dominguez plays and contrast with how Rylan Griffin plays.

---

I have YTTV so I can't watch, so why can't you just tell me in concrete terms?

SquirrellyDan said:

---

First, this is in no way related to Charlie Kirk and I'm not saying the killer was alt right.

I'm wondering who here knew about Nick Fuentes prior to this happening? I've watched a few of his videos and the conservative movement needs to do everything they can to separate themselves from this guy and those like him. Guys like this are the problem and allow the left to group the right with people like Nick Fuentes, and we absolutely need to do more than what's already been done (if anything) to draw the line between the right and extremists like Nick Fuentes. Curious to see how others here view this guy.

---

I don't think you have listened enough to judge him. Nick Fuentes is extremely smart and passionate. He is also still young and has said some very stupid things that are regrettable, pretty much like every politician. He also likes to troll people. However, Nick is not the problem because he has no influence and won't until he becomes more mainstream conservative. You lose credibility if you say anyone is the problem but the far left. He is Christian, believes in America first, eliminating liberism, and a common culture for our country. What do you hate about those objectives? Like him or not he is gaining in popularity with young Americans.

jacketman03 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

---

It is quite implicit in the beliefs he espouses, whether he says those words directly or not. It's the fundamental precept of white Identitarianism. You're literally stating that one group is inherently superior to another on the basis of skin color.

---

Identitarianism does not mean you believe in superiority. But it does acknowledge that there are differences between the races, which is just true.

---

I'll play along. What are the differences between the races which is "just true"?

---

White western people have contributed by far the most to the world in terms of, well, pretty much everything. The memes showing "Rome 200 years ago" with giant coliseums and advanced architecture, and "Africa 30 minutes ago" with a bunch of mud huts, comes to mind.

There do seem to be built in traits that are prevalent along racial lines. Asians are very intelligent, but from my experience and observations, they tend to trend overly cautious and risk-averse (in general), whereas maybe white europeans were a solid or more healthy combination of intelligent and fearless (in general), giving way to boldness and risk-taking in terms of things like exploration, innovation, creativity, art, inventing the best systems of economics and governance. etc etc.

Western culture is largely defined by risk taking and thinking outside of the box. Intertwining that with Christianity being the prevailing religion gave it wings.

Really the only thing that makes me kind of "proud to be white" is the American Revolution. I don't think any other race or culture pulls that off.

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

---

Everybody with a brain who is being honest knows exactly what he's saying. Trying to pretend like you don't know what he's saying or that your exact life isn't a reflection of the point he's making is just being dishonest.

---

What, exactly, is he saying then?

---

Already been answered by both me and Keyno. And you know, you're just playing a weird game where you pretend not to.

---

It actually hasn't. But feel free to repeat if it's so simple.

As a reminder - his actual words:

"I'm not living around blacks. Sorry."

Why didn't he say what you and Keyno keep twisting yourself into pretzels to pretend he said? Seems like that would have been a lot easier.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

---

Everybody with a brain who is being honest knows exactly what he's saying. Trying to pretend like you don't know what he's saying or that your exact life isn't a reflection of the point he's making is just being dishonest.

---

What, exactly, is he saying then?

---

Already been answered by both me and Keyno. And you know, you're just playing a weird game where you pretend not to.

---

It actually hasn't. But feel free to repeat if it's so simple.

As a reminder - his actual words:

"I'm not living around blacks. Sorry."

Why didn't he say what you and Keyno keep twisting yourself into pretzels to pretend he said? Seems like that would have been a lot easier.

---

Guess what. I'm not living around blacks either lol. Most of my neighbors are white. I'd bet most of yours are also.

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

jacketman03 said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

Keyno said:

---

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

Literally no one in here has said this. Nor has Fuentes.

---

It is quite implicit in the beliefs he espouses, whether he says those words directly or not. It's the fundamental precept of white Identitarianism. You're literally stating that one group is inherently superior to another on the basis of skin color.

---

Identitarianism does not mean you believe in superiority. But it does acknowledge that there are differences between the races, which is just true.

---

I'll play along. What are the differences between the races which is "just true"?

---

White western people have contributed by far the most to the world in terms of, well, pretty much everything. The memes showing "Rome 200 years ago" with giant coliseums and advanced architecture, and "Africa 30 minutes ago" with a bunch of mud huts, comes to mind.

There do seem to be built in traits that are prevalent along racial lines. Asians are very intelligent, but from my experience and observations, they tend to trend overly cautious and risk-averse (in general), whereas maybe white europeans were a solid or more healthy combination of intelligent and fearless (in general), giving way to boldness and risk-taking in terms of things like exploration, innovation, creativity, art, inventing the best systems of economics and governance. etc etc.

Western culture is largely defined by risk taking and thinking outside of the box. Intertwining that with Christianity being the prevailing religion gave it wings.

Really the only thing that makes me kind of "proud to be white" is the American Revolution. I don't think any other race or culture pulls that off.

---

Okay, so what inherent traits do white people have that other races are missing that led to these different outcomes? Because if it's "just true" that there are differences between races, then you should be able to point me towards these inherent traits, no?

Kvetch said:

---

shack009 said:

---

Yeah, the ones we take are at the far right of the bell curve.

Again with the leftist talking point of "the outlier disproves the rule."

---

Ok? So there's proof that skin color is not the determining factor in individual character. Glad we cleared that up.

Why don't you stop being coy and explicitly state what you're implying.

---

They can't because it would mean permabans.

Instead they tap dance around the edges, and toss out ad hominems when they have nothing else.

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

---

Everybody with a brain who is being honest knows exactly what he's saying. Trying to pretend like you don't know what he's saying or that your exact life isn't a reflection of the point he's making is just being dishonest.

---

What, exactly, is he saying then?

---

Already been answered by both me and Keyno. And you know, you're just playing a weird game where you pretend not to.

---

It actually hasn't. But feel free to repeat if it's so simple.

As a reminder - his actual words:

"I'm not living around blacks. Sorry."

Why didn't he say what you and Keyno keep twisting yourself into pretzels to pretend he said? Seems like that would have been a lot easier.

---

Guess what. I'm not living around blacks either lol. Most of my neighbors are white. I'd bet most of yours are also.

---

Majority of them, sure. But I live around, work with, go to church with and interact with plenty of people of different races and backgrounds (and even political affiliations). I can see how that's scary for someone who only interacts with white conservatives though.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Keyno said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

shack009 said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Stymied said:

---

Keyno said:

---

He regularly says this on his nightly show. He is a devout Catholic.

---

His actions speak louder than his words. He may call himself a devout Catholic but he doesn't act like one.

---

His words also speak for him. Don't worry I'm sure he was just kidding according to Shack.

---

If you would play the clip in context, he spent most of the time around that segment talking about crime statistics and single motherhood rates and poverty rates. He's talking about statistical data, then that one clip gets snipped. It's also completely natural to want your children and grandchildren to look like you.

Boomers love posting the Scott Adams thing, but somehow find this abhorrent when it's the same exact thing.

---

If you say you don't want to live around black people that's the definition of a racist statement. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it less racist.

---

Bro- do you want to live around black people? Does anyone on this board live in the hood?

Or is only Fuentes the racist because he just says it?

---

He didn't say he didn't want to live in the hood. He said he doesn't want to live around black people. That's the definition of being racist, even if you agree.

---

If he said, "I don't want to live around black people because I hate them", then that would be racist. But in this clip he is talking about crime and poverty stats. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Is reality racist? Of course you didn't know that because you took the clip out of context

---

I took his exact words out of context? He said it, you can whitewash it all you want to defend him, doesn't make it any less of a racist comment. He could have easily said "I don't want to live in poor/dangerous/high crime neighborhoods," if that's what he meant to say. But he didn't. Sorry for interpreting his actual words.

---

Everybody with a brain who is being honest knows exactly what he's saying. Trying to pretend like you don't know what he's saying or that your exact life isn't a reflection of the point he's making is just being dishonest.

---

What, exactly, is he saying then?

---

Already been answered by both me and Keyno. And you know, you're just playing a weird game where you pretend not to.

---

It actually hasn't. But feel free to repeat if it's so simple.

As a reminder - his actual words:

"I'm not living around blacks. Sorry."

Why didn't he say what you and Keyno keep twisting yourself into pretzels to pretend he said? Seems like that would have been a lot easier.

---

Guess what. I'm not living around blacks either lol. Most of my neighbors are white. I'd bet most of yours are also.

---

Majority of them, sure.

---

Stopped reading at this racist baloney.