She got cop privilege, I don't see how she got white privilege
MW03 said:
If I'm not mistaken, Cruzot served as a criminal judge for a couple of decades in district court, winning elections running as both a democrat and republican, depending on which way the political pendulum swung. I don't know that's he's beholden to any ideology other than his own. In other words, if he's a true believer, then he's doubly dangerous with what he's saying because he won't back down out of principle, no matter how much the police union complains.
ElephantRider said:
She got cop privilege, I don't see how she got white privilege
Bocephus said:
I honestly don't think he is pandering for votes. I think he believes that he is right. That's even worse
PJYoung said:
Glad to see it's on the lower end.
I Am Mine said:
10 years in protective custody. Yikes.
What do people getting 10 years actually serve these days?
PJYoung said:
Odds it gets overturned on appeal?
Brad 98 said:
What does Protective Custody entail?
Brad 98 said:
What does Protective Custody entail?
Duncan Idaho said:
Throw her in gen pop for the next 5. If she keeps her nose clean, and shows remorse let her out on parole in 5.
But I'd bet against her being a model inmate or sympathetic to a parole board.
powerbelly said:Duncan Idaho said:
Throw her in gen pop for the next 5. If she keeps her nose clean, and shows remorse let her out on parole in 5.
But I'd bet against her being a model inmate or sympathetic to a parole board.
I dont think they usually throw former cops in gen pop
If you want to subject some prison guards to constant acts of attempted and possibly successful violence, then put her in gen pop.Duncan Idaho said:
Throw her in gen pop for the next 5. If she keeps her nose clean, and shows remorse let her out on parole in 5.
But I'd bet against her being a model inmate or sympathetic to a parole board.
Why is that?Duncan Idaho said:
Throw her in gen pop for the next 5. If she keeps her nose clean, and shows remorse let her out on parole in 5.
But I'd bet against her being a model inmate or sympathetic to a parole board.
She has to serve minimum 5 years because it involved a gun.I Am Mine said:
10 years in protective custody. Yikes.
What do people getting 10 years actually serve these days?
proc said:If you want to subject some prison guards to constant acts of attempted and possibly successful violence, then put her in gen pop.Duncan Idaho said:
Throw her in gen pop for the next 5. If she keeps her nose clean, and shows remorse let her out on parole in 5.
But I'd bet against her being a model inmate or sympathetic to a parole board.
Keeping her in protective custody does more to make the lives of the guards easier and safer.Duncan Idaho said:proc said:If you want to subject some prison guards to constant acts of attempted and possibly successful violence, then put her in gen pop.Duncan Idaho said:
Throw her in gen pop for the next 5. If she keeps her nose clean, and shows remorse let her out on parole in 5.
But I'd bet against her being a model inmate or sympathetic to a parole board.
She is murderer. She should get thr same treatment/protections as any other murderer.
Ervin Burrell said:Why is that?Duncan Idaho said:
Throw her in gen pop for the next 5. If she keeps her nose clean, and shows remorse let her out on parole in 5.
But I'd bet against her being a model inmate or sympathetic to a parole board.