***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

289,262 Views | 2901 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by txags92
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:50p, 3/27/25
will25u said:
So she is still not doing it right.


Has Trump Admin challenged jurisdiction in District Court?

28 USC 1361 provides jurisdiction to district courts for Mandamus actions.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:33p, 3/27/25
Reply Quote
fredfredunderscorefred
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:40p, 3/27/25
AG
will25u said:

They granted leave to file amicus briefs in opposition to the stay.

They denied the emergency motion to stay the district court's preliminary injunction.

Dissent: I would grant the emergency motion to stay. therefore, I dissent.
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fredfredunderscorefred • 8:00p, 3/27/25
Yes she read it wrong.

Reply Quote
4
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:21p, 3/27/25
AG
will25u said:
Yes she read it wrong.


Hope they review them for years.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
9
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 9:54p, 3/27/25
S
techno-ag said:
will25u said:
Yes she read it wrong.


Hope they review them for years.
Exactly. The encouraging thing about all this is keep seeing terms like the admin statements are `carefully worded' -- so some of them has spent the years learning from the abuse of power by the activist lawfare the past years.
Reply Quote
6
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:14a, 3/28/25
AG
will25u said:
Yes she read it wrong.

Everybody knows government can't "review" anything in less than 90 days, right?
Reply Quote
1
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 12:42a, 3/28/25
S

That's how they need to act. Or like the FBI with J6 text requests.
Reply Quote
2
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to titan • 12:49a, 3/28/25
AG
titan said:

That's how they need to act. Or like the FBI with J6 text requests.
Just tell them you lost their invoices and ask them to resubmit. Worked for FBI when they had inconvenient files from Hillary's hard drive and aides cell phones.
Reply Quote
6
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:17a, 3/28/25
AG
Long, but very good post here. The DoJ is sometimes, ok almost always slow-moving, but these reorganizations and re-prioritizations are essential and good to see.


To the above posters notes, yes, individual reviews of grants etc. are what will 'slow walk' them to death, and likely are the plan. Very FBI-ish, like 'ongoing investigation.'
Reply Quote
4
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:25a, 3/28/25
AG
will25u said:
Yes she read it wrong.



Another example of: we are going to do what we want, and still claim we are following your order. Do you have a more specific order? Would you like to order us to pay these grants without review? Would you like to micromanage the project timelines of when these grants should be paid out by judicial order?

Team Trump seems to fight judges being too cute by far by being too cutier by farther.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
3
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 4:39a, 3/28/25
AG
One point of distinction here on the money laundering thing. Treasury has a special department dedicated to civil forfeiture of fraudulent assets that is very good, and has been around since at least 2000. A group of LEO's, accountants, and testifying experts that will absolutely take all of a drug lords money during trial, and then all the houses he bought his aunts, uncles, and cousins after conviction.

Having a similar department in DOJ was just a way to shake down international crime bosses. It was duplicative of Treasuy's department for most other things. Focusing DOJ on criminal activities that impact US is reducing illegal scope creep, imo.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
3
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:05a, 3/28/25
AG
One thing to note here is that the government in these cases are giving these judges zero deference and zero amount of respect, while maintaining docurum deceptively well.

They are almost goading these judges into making mistakes for the government to take advantage of, and treating the judges like they are children playing go fish at a table full of poker sharks.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
4
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:13a, 3/28/25
AG
Doesn't this make the opinion even more potent? Plaintiffs can no longer appeal, so the binding precident is final, final. The only way to get around it now is for SCOTUS to rule on some other districts appeal opinion which conflicts? All other cases in the district on reinstatement are dead immediately, not just put on hold, since Dellinger is at a final resolution?

Need some education here.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
1
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 5:34a, 3/28/25
AG
Not really, primary, secondary and mandatory/persuasive authority on an issue are a longer form discussion/class than we really can safely get into on a message board. Briefly, sure, it stands in that circuit 'for now' but it was not a full appeal on the merits, but on a TRO/injunction 90% of the cases, with a limited review by the app. Court.

Some of these opinions are incredibly long, which is tiresome to dig through but ironically the lack of brevity sometimes works against the authors in providing so many words it actually limits the impact/authority/scope of the holding itself, as well.

Minor aside, I find it pretty funny that folks are just asking Grok to get answers about what happens next in cases online nowadays. Not a big deal, but entertaining mainly.


I know this will sound absurd (and we have a requirement to set reasonably low bail in Texas too), but I hope Bondi/Homan's team etc. go after these scum bags in court (not just the prospective Dem voter illegal aliens sexually assaulting kids, but the prosecutors) in short order;
Reply Quote
4
GenericAggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 6:56a, 3/28/25
AG
txags92 said:
titan said:

That's how they need to act. Or like the FBI with J6 text requests.
Just tell them you lost their invoices and ask them to resubmit. Worked for FBI when they had inconvenient files from Hillary's hard drive and aides cell phones.


And…….? Tell us more.
Reply Quote
GenericAggie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:01a, 3/28/25
AG
I really appreciate the attorneys on this forum who are deciphering these long written X posts. I don't follow that woman on X and I when I do read her posts, I'm not understanding the so-what / what does this mean?

Thank you.
Reply Quote
9
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:17a, 3/28/25
AG
will25u said:
Extending a TRO makes it look a lot more like a PI, than a TRO...
Reply Quote
3
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 9:29a, 3/28/25
Ag with kids said:
will25u said:
Extending a TRO makes it look a lot more like a PI, than a TRO...
That is the intention. Delay. Delay. Delay. They want to obstruct by any means.
Reply Quote
2
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 10:32a, 3/28/25
AG
Ag with kids said:
will25u said:
Extending a TRO makes it look a lot more like a PI, than a TRO...
If they are deporting them under authority other than the AEA, they can do it as long as they want, correct?
Reply Quote
2
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 10:38a, 3/28/25
AG
txags92 said:
Ag with kids said:
will25u said:
Extending a TRO makes it look a lot more like a PI, than a TRO...
If they are deporting them under authority other than the AEA, they can do it as long as they want, correct?
I believe so.
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 10:56a, 3/28/25
txags92 said:
Ag with kids said:
will25u said:
Extending a TRO makes it look a lot more like a PI, than a TRO...
If they are deporting them under authority other than the AEA, they can do it as long as they want, correct?
YES!

The "TRO" ONLY prevents removal under AEA!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
1
TacosaurusRex
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:31p, 3/28/25
Reply Quote
14
HTownAg98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:03p, 3/28/25
WilmerHale is suing after Trump's EO banned them from representing government clients. And they're not messing around; they hired Paul Clement to represent them, and his complaint is a doozy. https://aboutblaw.com/bhF2
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:45p, 3/28/25

Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:46p, 3/28/25
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:47p, 3/28/25


Reply Quote
3
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:58p, 3/28/25
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:03p, 3/28/25
Not a good sign.

Reply Quote
3
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:03p, 3/28/25
AG
Margot doing great work.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:08p, 3/28/25
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:36p, 3/28/25
This sums it up nicely.



Reply Quote
6
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:40p, 3/28/25
Reply Quote
3
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:03a, 3/29/25
AG
An en banc review of an appellate stay is pretty absurd, but we're talking about the DC circuit here so I suppose anything is always possible, if not probable, when the Democrats want it.

Is Bondi going to actually file motions for these 3 to be removed from cases (I think this is proper) or to recuse themselves as she said on TV should happen?
Quote:
Attorney General Pam Bondi argued several judges ruling on Trump administration cases need to be removed from their positions because "they cannot be objective" in their decisions.

District court judges have halted many of President Donald Trump's executive actions, highlighting the legal battles taking place as the new administration aims to shrink the size of the federal government. Three of those judges are Washington, D.C., district judges: Beryl Howell, Ana Reyes, and James Boasberg.
That was a couple days ago, but I've seen nothing indicating it was anything but TV tough talk.
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:04p, 3/29/25
Reply Quote
4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.