***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

288,865 Views | 2899 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by will25u
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:04a, 9/9/25
AG
Long post from Chuck Cooper here, on the ICA/rescission case before SCOTUS;

TLDR, concluding graf:
Quote:
The Court specifically rejected the notion that the power to cancel an item of appropriation was indistinguishable from the President's "traditional authority to decline to spend appropriated funds," emphasizing that the problem with the Line Item Veto Act was that it gave the President "the unilateral power to change the text of duly enacted statutes."

But here, the presidential act of requesting congressional rescission of spending authority obviously does not change the text of an appropriation act. Nor is any lapse of spending authority the result of the President's unilateral action; it is the result of the joint action of the President's request for rescission and the Congress's failure to act on the request within the time limit that Congress has set by law for itself.

Pocket rescissions under the ICA are constitutional, and the Court should grant Solicitor General Sauer's request for an emergency stay of the district court's injunction.

So, congress gave themselves 45 days to act (once the request was made), they didn't, and that means Trump/America should win. I didn't realize that was part of the statute. Good news/sounds right to me.
Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:29p, 9/9/25

Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:51p, 9/9/25
Not federal, but good to see.


Reply Quote
5
1 edit
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:37p, 9/9/25
AG
Reply Quote
3
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Prosperdick • 3:39p, 9/9/25
AG
I assume that will be oral arguments?
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:45p, 9/9/25
Money off... Money on.... Money off again.

Reply Quote
6
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 4:33p, 9/9/25
aggiehawg said:
I assume that will be oral arguments?

Yes
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:25p, 9/9/25
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:02p, 9/9/25
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:22p, 9/9/25
Reply Quote
10
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 3:58a, 9/10/25
AG
This will be swiftly reversed but the mortgage fraud queen here gets to attend/vote at the next fed board of governors meeting in the interim unfortunately.

In delusion media world they will undoubtedly see this as a great victory for the swamp.

Judge Illston does not want to let go of the AARP (reductions in force) case.

Reply Quote
7
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:02a, 9/10/25
AG

Democrats DC circuit strikes again.
Reply Quote
9
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:39a, 9/10/25
AG
As others have pointed out before, this is all going to boil down to SCOTUS in the fall. And I think the consensus so far is that will not go the way the Dems wanted.

This is all part of Trump's strategy to greatly strengthen the Executive, for better (as I believe) or for worse.
Reply Quote
5
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:23p, 9/11/25
AG

Nice.
Reply Quote
17
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:59p, 9/11/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
6
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:30p, 9/12/25
AG
This could be a big one. The biggest, even.

Trump calls for Rico investigation into Soros funding network. He has the ability to order such an investigation.
Quote:
Quote:
But you know they have professional agitators. They're professional. I had one the other night. I went into a restaurant and this woman stood up. I look at her immediately, she had money, she wasn't...they get paid it, their profession. From Soros and other people. And we're going to look into Soros, because I think it's a RICO case against him and other people. Because this is more than like protests. This is real agitation. This is riots in the street. And we're going to look into it.

This is the second time in just a few weeks that Trump has indicated that the Soros family and its shadowy network of subversive and anti-American activities may be under the gun. In a "truth" on his Truth Social platform, Trump said on August 27:
Quote:
George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America. We're not going to allow these lunatics to rip apart America any more, never giving it so much as a chance to "BREATHE," and be FREE. Soros, and his group of psychopaths, have caused great damage to our Country! That includes his Crazy, West Coast friends. Be careful, we're watching you! Thank you for your attention to this matter!


Yes, please. And Norm Eisen, Mr. Trump.
Reply Quote
9
ttha_aggie_09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 1:33p, 9/12/25
AG
Please god yes
Reply Quote
6
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ttha_aggie_09 • 1:39p, 9/12/25
AG
If actually brought, in the right way, it would take years (10+), but would dwarf the impact of the anti-trust cases against for instance Standard Oil from back in the 30's which are presently the most famous/significant cases the DoJ has ever brought.

Soros senior would almost certainly die in the interim anyway, but disempowering his son Alex and their network of NGO's is a significant national/global security interest.
Reply Quote
9
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:39p, 9/12/25
Appeals Court Overturns Ruling That Blocked Deportation of 500,000 Migrants - Newsweek https://share.google/GEjjBhvir3p7KjkbI

An appeals court ruled on Friday that the Trump administration can begin deporting around 500,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.

...

The three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston delivered a final decision Friday evening. Immigrants who entered the U.S. under the program will now lose their permits to work and are at immediate risk of deportation.

"We recognize the risks of irreparable harm persuasively laid out in the district court's order: that parolees who lawfully arrived in this country were suddenly forced to choose between leaving in less than a month a choice that potentially includes being separated from their families, communities, and lawful employment and returning to dangers in their home countries," the judges wrote.

"But absent a strong showing of likelihood of success on the merits, the risk of such irreparable harms cannot, by itself, support a stay," they added.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
7
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:16a, 9/13/25
AG
Awesome win! 3-0 in the 1st Circuit is something I didn't have on my bingo card this weekend.

Opinion;
Reply Quote
9
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:19a, 9/15/25
AG

Eye role.

She will lose.
Reply Quote
10
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 11:23a, 9/15/25
AG
Top prosecutors don't massively overcharge and completely botch a very long and high profile case such as P. Diddy's. Incompetence is always cause for termination.

Good luck, Mo but don't hold your breath.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:51p, 9/15/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:03p, 9/15/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:43p, 9/15/25
AG
An old maid who divorced 42 years ago and never had children… wrote a children's book.

Ironically, her ex husband was a biologist.
Reply Quote
8
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:56p, 9/15/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
1
SA68AG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:21p, 9/15/25
AG
will25u said:

Amy Coney Barrett should do an interview about the DEI dunces that can't even understand the legal issues before them.
Reply Quote
6
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SA68AG • 9:28p, 9/15/25
AG
ACB just did meet the press a week or two ago.

She also wrote a book, about the process of the Supreme Court, and said that things are not nearly as worked up there as it seems and referenced RBG and Scalia friendship.

She also has a whole slew of kids so maybe she was the ghost writer for the wise Latina.
Reply Quote
1
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 10:29p, 9/15/25
AG
flown-the-coop said:
An old maid who divorced 42 years ago and never had children… wrote a children's book.

Ironically, her ex husband was a biologist.

Maybe he knew what a woman was???
Reply Quote
2
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:19a, 9/16/25
AG
LOL, Chutkan finally on remand waiving her white flag, in disgust.

Run for president if you want to run the executive branch of the US Gov't, you four letter word.
Reply Quote
5
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:33a, 9/16/25
AG
Press is slamming Trump today, the day ahead of the Fed rate cut, saying she followed rules.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/lisa-cook-federal-reserve-bank-documents-mortgage-fraud-allegations-rcna230964

1) If she claimed the Michigan home as a vacation home when applying for a loan on the 2nd home, it was the right thing for her to do.

2) If she claimed the Michigan home as a primary residence weeks before also buying her 2nd home, she likely still committed Bank Fraud.

3) This seems to be cover to take the focus off the the historically high adjustments to unemployment data after Trump fired the person in charge of providing those estimates. That unemployment data was very important in the Fed's analysis of rate cuts in 2025.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
2
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 7:43a, 9/16/25
She committed fraud. Period.
Reply Quote
8
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 7:48a, 9/16/25
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
She committed fraud. Period.

Thank you for that excellent, reasoned, and well documented analysis.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Reply Quote
1
dvldog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:01a, 9/16/25
AG
Not sure this qualifies for the thread, but didn't know where else to put it and didn't deserve its own thread:

Reply Quote
5
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 8:02a, 9/16/25
AG
BusterAg said:
Press is slamming Trump today, the day ahead of the Fed rate cut, saying she followed rules.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/lisa-cook-federal-reserve-bank-documents-mortgage-fraud-allegations-rcna230964

1) If she claimed the Michigan home as a vacation home when applying for a loan on the 2nd home, it was the right thing for her to do.

2) If she claimed the Michigan home as a primary residence weeks before also buying her 2nd home, she likely still committed Bank Fraud.

3) This seems to be cover to take the focus off the the historically high adjustments to unemployment data after Trump fired the person in charge of providing those estimates. That unemployment data was very important in the Fed's analysis of rate cuts in 2025.

Yes but those are just too complex an analysis. She said initially it was a vacation home to get a loan estimate, then when filing the legal paperwork for the loan it came back at a higher rate when she switched to making it her primary residence, and what do you know, that fraud got her a lower rate.

She is losing her job. The only issue the appellate majority got hung up on was whether she received adequate notice of the 'for cause,' not whether she can be fired for it. She can vote however she wants this week, the fed will almost certainly cut at least a quarter point, so the pressure of this meeting is off anyway.

She will also be able to litigate in her defense later, at trial for the fraud, though at that point she will be an irrelevant unemployed footnote, politically.
Reply Quote
4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.