After Jeb Boasberg upheld her decision not to keep Edward Dana in custody after threatening President Trump and a DC grand jury refused to indict, Mag Judge Moxila Upadhyaya has ordered the removal of Dana's ankle monitor. https://t.co/qcvj8FlEbc
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) September 3, 2025
***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****
320,690 Views |
3068 Replies |
Last: 21 hrs ago by fasthorse05
They are hoping she will carry out her threat.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Fox News just announced that Trump has to give Harvard over $2 billion dollars that was blocked due to them allowing the pro-Hamas terrorists to run amok on campus.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
will25u said:After Jeb Boasberg upheld her decision not to keep Edward Dana in custody after threatening President Trump and a DC grand jury refused to indict, Mag Judge Moxila Upadhyaya has ordered the removal of Dana's ankle monitor. https://t.co/qcvj8FlEbc
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) September 3, 2025
Sounds like sedition by a foreign judge to me
Rapier108 said:
Fox News just announced that Trump has to give Harvard over $2 billion dollars that was blocked due to them allowing the pro-Hamas terrorists to run amok on campus.
It's too bad no one at the judiciary has access to the treasury accounts.
Should read that "a judged has ruled that they think Trump should hand over $2 billion to Harvard, Trump team will appeal another poor decision".
In the 84-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs said the Trump administration "used antisemitism as a smokescreen" to illegally block off the billions in research funding for Harvard University. "We must fight against antisemitism, but we equally need to protect our rights, including our right to free speech, and neither goal should nor needs to be sacrificed on the altar of the other," she said in her order. "Now it is the job of the courts to similarly step up, to act to safeguard academic freedom and freedom of speech as required by the Constitution, and to ensure that important research is not improperly subjected to arbitrary and procedurally infirm grant terminations, even if doing so risks the wrath of a government committed to its agenda no matter the cost," she added.
This judge is off her rocker fu***** Harvard doesn't have the First Amendment right to these funds. Where in the hell are these liberal judges getting any sort of case law to back up these absurd rulings
This judge is off her rocker fu***** Harvard doesn't have the First Amendment right to these funds. Where in the hell are these liberal judges getting any sort of case law to back up these absurd rulings
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Obama judge
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:
In the 84-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs said the Trump administration "used antisemitism as a smokescreen" to illegally block off the billions in research funding for Harvard University. "We must fight against antisemitism, but we equally need to protect our rights, including our right to free speech, and neither goal should nor needs to be sacrificed on the altar of the other," she said in her order. "Now it is the job of the courts to similarly step up, to act to safeguard academic freedom and freedom of speech as required by the Constitution, and to ensure that important research is not improperly subjected to arbitrary and procedurally infirm grant terminations, even if doing so risks the wrath of a government committed to its agenda no matter the cost," she added.
This judge is off her rocker fu***** doesn't have the First Amendment right to these funds. Where in the hell are these liberal judges getting any sort of case law to back up these absurd rulings
Another dumbass activist opinion that will get crumbled up and tossed in the trash bin of partisan stupidity on appeal.
Thread.
First, the basics. The Constitution creates only one court--the Supreme Court. It authorizes Congress to create "inferior courts," but does not mandate them. And the judicial power of these subordinate courts is entirely subordinate to the Supreme Court's. 2/ pic.twitter.com/aafRRaTg5c
— James Burnham (@BurnhamDC) September 4, 2025
OMgosh....💀💀💀Mandate issues and moments later district court issues it's new decision granting another injunction! pic.twitter.com/YVPNRa8ztp
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 4, 2025
3/3 Full opinion. https://t.co/oJ8vQ80mbu
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 4, 2025
And Trump has already filed a notice of appeal. https://t.co/w4pdxXtx3Y pic.twitter.com/OoVhQPaCqG
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 4, 2025
This isn’t the first time Faruqui has gone off on the administration and Trump DOJ.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) September 4, 2025
Also keep in mind — Edward Dana was on probation when he was arrested. He has 9 prior convictions and 23 prior arrests. pic.twitter.com/c5COPuNGxH
Wait! Why does a Supreme Court justice have an "adviser"? Or do they mean "clerk"--in which case he shouldn't be disclosing anything Justice Robert's told him. https://t.co/aRhC6GzPHo
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 4, 2025
So Soros is leaking about his convos with Roberts to Politico? Go figure.
Top advisor? A clerk is not an advisor.
Quote:
Or do they mean "clerk"--in which case he shouldn't be disclosing anything Justice Robert's told him.
Bizarre question from Cleveland. She knows the answer. Or could ascertain it in 3 seconds.
I like her overall, but even she has a penchant to the dramatic at times. But she's very smart and does know what she's talking about, which is refreshing change from others popular on X
will25u said:Wait! Why does a Supreme Court justice have an "adviser"? Or do they mean "clerk"--in which case he shouldn't be disclosing anything Justice Robert's told him. https://t.co/aRhC6GzPHo
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 4, 2025
He kind of lost all authority on this when he threw a temper tantrum related to the Trump and Paxton lawsuit related to the 2020 election to make sure he got his way.
Roberts is a coward that likes his power and fame, nothing more.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ordered Plaintiffs in USAID/Global Health to respond to Trump's emergency motion for a stay by 5 p.m. This is case where court within moments reissued injunction after Court of Appeals returned case to it. pic.twitter.com/FeA4kTR9sm
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 5, 2025
Quote:
He kind of lost all authority on this when he threw a temper tantrum
It's been awhile, can you remind me on this?
I'm Gipper
Here is Hecox's Supreme Court filing (formally styled Suggestion of Mootness). https://t.co/VvyYDqfTLq
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 4, 2025
Kathleen Hartnett, who is counsel of record for Hecox in the Supreme Court, and James Esseks, also on the brief, were found to have engaged in improper judge-shopping (including via voluntary dismissals of cases) in their attack on an Alabama law that bars providing puberty…
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) September 4, 2025
Im Gipper said:Quote:
He kind of lost all authority on this when he threw a temper tantrum
It's been awhile, can you remind me on this?
i'm guessing he means the story from a televangelist that Roberts yelled at everyone, prompting Thomas to say "Its the end of Democracy, John!"
Very believable.
https://mycharisma.com/news/washington-insider-reports-shouting-conflict-in-supreme-court-over-refusal-to-hear-texas-lawsuit-2/
roberts' problem is that in his desire to remain non-partisan and keep the court above the fray has resulted in just the opposite. sometimes you have to take a stand and get in the mix.
BusterAg is sharp guy, so doubt it is that. Has to be something else.
I do remember that thread though! People will believe anything if its on the internet! lol
I'm Gipper
I do remember that thread though! People will believe anything if its on the internet! lol
I'm Gipper
Im Gipper said:Quote:
He kind of lost all authority on this when he threw a temper tantrum
It's been awhile, can you remind me on this?
Lots of late night yelling in the SCOTUS building as SCOTUS decided whether or not Texas and the states that joined Texas had the right to sue based on election irregularities in PA and GA.
SCOTUS punted like every other black robed, yellow panty wearing coward in the judiciary in 2020.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
BMX Bandit said:Im Gipper said:Quote:
He kind of lost all authority on this when he threw a temper tantrum
It's been awhile, can you remind me on this?
i'm guessing he means the story from a televangelist that Roberts yelled at everyone, prompting Thomas to say "Its the end of Democracy, John!"
Very believable.
https://mycharisma.com/news/washington-insider-reports-shouting-conflict-in-supreme-court-over-refusal-to-hear-texas-lawsuit-2/
roberts' problem is that in his desire to remain non-partisan and keep the court above the fray has resulted in just the opposite. sometimes you have to take a stand and get in the mix.
Regardless if you believe the reports of the disagreements, SCOTUS was an absolute coward not to take that case.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Wait, you believe that story? Really? From when the justices weren't even meeting in person?
Yeah, they punted the case, but this "temper tantrum" story is, to put it gently, hilariously stupid.
I'm Gipper
Yeah, they punted the case, but this "temper tantrum" story is, to put it gently, hilariously stupid.
I'm Gipper
Im Gipper said:
BusterAg is sharp guy, so doubt it is that. Has to be something else.
I do remember that thread though! People will believe anything if its on the internet! lol
I know quite a bit about a lot of things, because my career has trained me to come up to speed on technical things very quickly. And, I do believe I am smarter than the average bear.
I'm also quick to learn from experts who are willing to challenge my beliefs if they are able to provide sources, do the math and show their work instead of leaning on their credentials.
About the only thing I am an absolute expert on is patent litigation and patent valuation. Hence the need to understand a lot of different technical fields.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Im Gipper said:
Wait, you believe that story? Really? From when the justices weren't even meeting in person?
Yeah, they punted the case, but this "temper tantrum" story is, to put it gently, hilariously stupid.
I have no solid sources to cite, but some friends that were working at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit at the time that also believed the story. The only reason why they would know was through the DC court rumor mill.
I probably put more credibility into it than most, but not a hill for me to die on. Roberts is due an enormous amount of criticism for plenty of other things that are not really contested as fact.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Judge stops Trump admin from removing protections from 1M Haitian and Venezuelan immigrants
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/05/politics/tps-venezuelans-haitians-noem
Article doesn't say what legal basis for the injunction just that Noem overstepped and that her decision to remove temporary protections that had already been extended three times by Biden was capricious and arbitrary.
Seems to me that if Homeland Security can extend temporary status under one admin then it shouldn't be overstepping for homeland security to remove or not extend it in another admin and shouldn't be up to a judge to interfere
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/05/politics/tps-venezuelans-haitians-noem
Article doesn't say what legal basis for the injunction just that Noem overstepped and that her decision to remove temporary protections that had already been extended three times by Biden was capricious and arbitrary.
Seems to me that if Homeland Security can extend temporary status under one admin then it shouldn't be overstepping for homeland security to remove or not extend it in another admin and shouldn't be up to a judge to interfere
Quote:
About the only thing I am an absolute expert on is patent litigation and patent valuation. Hence the need to understand a lot of different technical fields.
WOWZA! Hats off for that! Limited but very tough field.
The 2025-26 term of the Supreme Court will be the most consequential term in the Court's history.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 6, 2025
Pres. Trump is determined to redefine the relationship between the three branches, and to push Executive powers to the boundaries set by the Constitution.
That is the essence of…
Bold calls, will see if he's right next year.
Edward Chen (Obama judge, UC Berkeley, an enemy of the republic) appears to think SCOTUS doesn't matter re: Administration ending TPS for Venezuelans and Haitians.
Quote:
Chen found that Noem's "actions in vacating the orders of the prior administration and terminating TPS exceeded the Secretary's statutory authority and was arbitrary and capricious, and thus must be set aside under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA")."
Chen also accused the administration of terminating TPS "on an unprecedentedly rapid timeline," describing it as "highly truncated and condensed," which occurred in a short amount of time.
These designations can last for six, 12, or 18 months. Administrations can extend the protections "so long as conditions remain dire."
It's ridiculous in my opinion.
The government designated Haiti in 2010 after the devastating earthquake.
"The government has not submitted any evidence substantiating 'there are notable improvements in several areas such as the economy, public health, and crime that allow for these nationals to be safely returned to their home country,'" added Chen. "And, as this Court found in its postponement order, the government failed to provide any evidence that Venezuelan TPS holders constitute a threat to national security."
This lawsuit began in February. It's already been to the Supreme Court, which lifted the injunction preventing the administration from terminating TPS designations.
Chen said SCOTUS's decision prevented him from making a permanent ruling.
The judge acknowledged that Trump's administration will likely appeal the decision, bringing the case back to the Ninth Circuit and potentially to the Supreme Court.
Another out of control judge;
"Rule of Law" (Norm Eisen) chat with judges;
"The RBG Legacy." LOL.
It also makes no difference how much "consensus" there is on the Court. Dissents have zero legal significance. What five justices pronounce as law is the law. And district courts citing Jackson dissents to support their defiance are hardly even trying anymore.
— James Burnham (@BurnhamDC) September 5, 2025
"Rule of Law" (Norm Eisen) chat with judges;
These are the type of partisan hack judges that rule based on democracy which is progressivism and globalism. All of them should be identified and removed from the bench. https://t.co/lsfVj3L8f9
— The Researcher (@listen_2learn) September 4, 2025
"The RBG Legacy." LOL.
aggiehawg said:Quote:
About the only thing I am an absolute expert on is patent litigation and patent valuation. Hence the need to understand a lot of different technical fields.
WOWZA! Hats off for that! Limited but very tough field.
I hold this as really high praise, coming from you. I really appreciate what you bring to the board around the legal field.
It was a great industry that really helped entrepreneurs right up until Obama got the America Invents Act passed, and put Michelle Lee (former "head of patents" at Google) in charge of setting up the PTAB. The amount of corruption in PTAB in the first decade of its existence is remarkable, and really shaped my opinion on DC in general. The usefulness of patents to entrepreneurs went downhill on a rocket sled after that, and it made it a lot easier for all of the companies on Sand Hill rd (read, Google, Cisco, Facebook, etc) to simply steal the technology that they wanted to integrate into their products.
The field is very limited though, and shrinking, hence my reluctance to chat about it too often.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Quote:
The usefulness of patents to entrepreneurs went downhill on a rocket sled after that, and it made it a lot easier for all of the companies on Sand Hill rd (read, Google, Cisco, Facebook, etc) to simply steal the technology that they wanted to integrate into their products.
The field is very limited though, and shrinking, hence my reluctance to chat about it too often.
Sad to hear that as I was unaware of that level of dilution in patent law starting under Obama. Reminds me of Atlas Shrugged as getting rid of patents and copyrights figured prominently in the takeover of American industry and why the best people dropped out to Galt's Gulch.
aggiehawg said:Quote:
The usefulness of patents to entrepreneurs went downhill on a rocket sled after that, and it made it a lot easier for all of the companies on Sand Hill rd (read, Google, Cisco, Facebook, etc) to simply steal the technology that they wanted to integrate into their products.
Sad to hear that as I was unaware of that level of dilution in patent law starting under Obama. Reminds me of Atlas Shrugged as getting rid of patents and copyrights figured prominently in the takeover of American industry and why the best people dropped out to Galt's Gulch.
Funny. I have compared Michelle Lee to James Taggart a number of times.
AIA invented the patent trial and appeals board, which invalidates about 50% of the claims it reviews, makes patent litigation too long and too expensive for outside investors in most cases (which are required to help entrepreneurs protect their patented inventions, because your average patent litigation is going to cost you $5M to $10M just to get through DCT, and contingency lawyers typically don't want to fund the $2 - $5M out-of-pocket for experts), and was rampantly abused by at least Apple, Google, and Facebook with blatant corruption.
The pendulum is swinging back slowly thanks to some helpful rulings from the CAFC related to PTAB, and changes to administration of PTAB by USPTO directors appointed by Biden (to protect pharma) and Trump (again, mostly to protect pharma). Now that the powers that be are actually inventing tech (AI) as opposed to stealing and incorporating tech into their products (see smartphones and social media), and are seeing decent foreign competition (see China) it might swing back quite a bit.
Patent litigation still exists, but now is primarily a game of kings between technology juggernauts. Patents have ceased to be useful to entrepreneurs except in the rarest of cases.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Quote:
Funny. I have compared Michelle Lee to James Taggart a number of times.
Great minds think alike, darlin'.
Featured Stories
See All
Texas A&M adds former Tennessee CB Rickey Gibson III via transfer portal
by Ryan Brauninger
Thursday (1/8) Portal Storylines: So much for a 'quiet' day
by TexAgs Recruiting
13:11
20m ago
459