***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

294,851 Views | 2929 Replies | Last: 23 hrs ago by techno-ag
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 10:09a, 4/22/25
AG
No argument from me but that is one of those things that won't happen, unfortunately, as with Hillary being marched of to prison.

Some more winning, in of all places, the 9th circuit (which actually has a lower reversal rate nowadays vs. 20-30 years ago):

Not many asylum seekers with flight plans made before Jan 20th left.
Reply Quote
5
MagnumLoad
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 10:35a, 4/22/25
nortex97 said:
Lot's of judges are happily/willfully compromised. Boasberg definitely will never admit to a voicemail from Gelernt on a Saturday morning at 7:30 or so.
When said judges time and again block the will of the people, we the people should consider the precepts detailed in the Declaration of Independence.
I hate tu. It's in my blood.
Reply Quote
6
MagnumLoad
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:21a, 4/22/25
Now, back to my question. I know there is no constitutional basis for federal district judges, and they were established by congress. Did the establishing statute or any precedent decision of SCOTUS grant district judges national jurisdiction?
I hate tu. It's in my blood.
Reply Quote
1
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MagnumLoad • 11:23a, 4/22/25
MagnumLoad said:
Now, back to my question. I know there is no constitutional basis for federal district judges, and they were established by congress. Did the establishing statute or any precedent decision of SCOTUS grant district judges national jurisdiction?
No. And the number of rulings the district courts falsely apply to the nation have skyrocketed.
Reply Quote
6
MagnumLoad
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:27a, 4/22/25
And SCOTUS sits impotently by.
I hate tu. It's in my blood.
Reply Quote
11
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MagnumLoad • 11:57a, 4/22/25
AG
Because SCOTUS is, net, on MS-13/CCP's side (which is the Democrats, but I repeat myself).

None of this is really about the pretenses being made of 'due process.' Quite the opposite, actually.
Reply Quote
12
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 12:13p, 4/22/25
Due process is merely a talking point they are hoping will appeal to the American public. They know that defending illegals who are in terrorist gangs is not a winning argument. That is still what they're doing, they just want to call it something else.

Maybe they should look in a mirror and examine their values, but the ends justify the means. They don't care who gets killed, they're bound and determined to destroy America.
Reply Quote
2
MagnumLoad
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 3:24p, 4/22/25
Ellis Wyatt said:
MagnumLoad said:
Now, back to my question. I know there is no constitutional basis for federal district judges, and they were established by congress. Did the establishing statute or any precedent decision of SCOTUS grant district judges national jurisdiction?
No. And the number of rulings the district courts falsely apply to the nation have skyrocketed.


And why hasn't this jurisdiction issue been taken to SCOTUS a long time ago?
I hate tu. It's in my blood.
Reply Quote
1
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MagnumLoad • 3:27p, 4/22/25
AG
MagnumLoad said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
MagnumLoad said:
Now, back to my question. I know there is no constitutional basis for federal district judges, and they were established by congress. Did the establishing statute or any precedent decision of SCOTUS grant district judges national jurisdiction?
No. And the number of rulings the district courts falsely apply to the nation have skyrocketed.


And why hasn't this jurisdiction issue been taken to SCOTUS a long time ago?
SCOTUS has to be willing to accept a case where they can rule on it and they have steadfastly refused to take it up so far.
Reply Quote
5
MagnumLoad
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:29p, 4/22/25
Who on SCOTUS makes that call?

Also, Congress can solve it. I must say, however, that the ONLY way Congress will be able to accomplish anything meaningful and beneficial, on this or anything else, is to ditch the cloture rule in the senate. They can change senate rules with a simple majority. Courage is necessary, so I am not optimistic.
I hate tu. It's in my blood.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:32p, 4/22/25
AG
Any day now, Bondi. This guy, still bragging about his lawfare wins:
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:04p, 4/22/25
Supreme Court lack of concrete direction is causing problems.


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:07p, 4/22/25


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
ttha_aggie_09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:09p, 4/22/25
AG
I look forward to a constant barrage of lawsuits when the next liberal president is in office. F this noise
Reply Quote
12
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:29p, 4/22/25
Royce Lamberth is another piece of **** with a history of trying to destroy anyone associated with Trump.
Reply Quote
11
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:33p, 4/22/25
AG
OK….in the reconciliation bill Congress needs to reduce the size of the federal judiciary.
Reply Quote
8
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 5:25a, 4/23/25
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
Royce Lamberth is another piece of **** with a history of trying to destroy anyone associated with Trump.
A sip, oh btw. One of Reagan's mistakes, incredibly.

Separately, a slam on Boasberg in the Hill yesterday:
Quote:
After wheels went up pursuant to the Trump's agreement with El Salvador, federal courts lost jurisdiction full stop. There is simply no platform for a trial judge in Washington to inject himself into this relationship between heads of state.

Further, the judge will probably never live down his flippant remark that the administration "turn the planes around" a comment which reveals a remarkably tone-deaf detachment from reality and the grave risks attached to transporting some of the most violent criminals on the planet. That kind of courtroom bravado is the comment of a partisan actor, not a sober-minded judge.

Apparently not content merely to control the president's foreign affairs authority, the judge's latest stunt threatens the unprecedented appointment of a special counsel to hold the Department of Justice in contempt for the crime of failing to obey his jurisdictionally-thirsty command to turn an airplane around midflight. The judge purports to believe that this matter is about "the rule of law"; yet it seems much more like a game of "gotcha" that a vengeful judge with the help of the Trump-hating media is going to milk in the court of public opinion for all it's worth.

If Boasberg wants to run the executive branch, nobody is stopping him from leaving the bench and running for office. I would encourage him to do so Trump has a lengthy list of candidates qualified to fill Boasberg's seat who actually understand the broad range of executive authority in the realm of foreign affairs and the limited role of federal courts.

But until that day comes, Boasberg should show some humility as tough as that may be and stick to adjudicating disputes within the confines of his territorial jurisdiction.
Good news; more lawfare scum who didn't think the AG could tell them what to do resign from the SDNY DoJ (USA) office.
Reply Quote
3
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:26a, 4/23/25
AG
"You see, your honor, dozens upon dozens of kids were opting out of our wondrous gender and sexuality training and that was making it hard to find space for them all in the library, so we pragmatically just killed the opt-out program as it was infeasible."
Reply Quote
10
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 7:24a, 4/23/25
Maybe the degenerates should recognize they should accommodate the students whose parents want them to be indoctrinated with a perverse agenda and put them in the library.

Or they could just teach them and stop social engineering. I realize that's not why liberals enter the education industry, but still…
Reply Quote
3
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 7:24a, 4/23/25
nortex97 said:
Any day now, Bondi. This guy, still bragging about his lawfare wins:



Don't you just know that based on the appearance of Jennifer Rubin's dark stained teeth that she absolutely wreaks of stale cigarettes and cheap coffee. Geez
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Reply Quote
4
RED AG 98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 8:30a, 4/23/25
AG
nortex97 said:
Any day now, Bondi. This guy, still bragging about his lawfare wins:
Rachel Zegler looks terrible.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:03p, 4/23/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:32p, 4/23/25
They have no standing, I am sure. But a judge will enter a TRO/INJUNCTION shortly.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
ttha_aggie_09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:34p, 4/23/25
AG
12 states sue Trump administration for living in White House

So stupid….
Reply Quote
9
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ttha_aggie_09 • 6:13p, 4/23/25
AG
Quote:
12 states sue Trump administration for living in White House

So stupid….
I want the comms amongst the AGs and their advisors.

So tired of this garbage.
Reply Quote
6
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:32p, 4/23/25
AG
Turns out the removal withholding was for Guatemala, not El Salvador. Oopsie.
Reply Quote
4
Ag87H2O
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SgtStiglitz • 6:37p, 4/23/25
AG
Banks Monkey said:
The United States has three branches of government:

1. The guy who does whatever he wants
2. The people too scared to stop him
3. The courts he openly ignores
Now this is leftist projection coupled with TDS at its finest. Amazing.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:32p, 4/23/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ThunderCougarFalconBird • 8:46p, 4/23/25
AG
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:
Turns out the removal withholding was for Guatemala, not El Salvador. Oopsie.
No minute order appears in the record, meaning that order and memorandum opinion control.

He wanted not to be sent back to Guatemala.
Reply Quote
3
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:49p, 4/23/25
AG
Fox is indicating that DHS has confirmed the SUV Garcia was driving when pulled over in Tennessee with a load of "migrants" was owned by another guy who is a confessed human smuggler.

Makes me wonder if any of this new info or even more details is included.
Reply Quote
7
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SgtStiglitz • 10:24p, 4/23/25
Banks Monkey said:
The United States has three branches of government:

1. The guy who does whatever he wants
2. The people too scared to stop him
3. The courts he openly ignores
Sarcasm duly noted.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
2
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 10:37p, 4/23/25
AG
Aggie Jurist said:
Quote:
12 states sue Trump administration for living in White House

So stupid….
I want the comms amongst the AGs and their advisors.

So tired of this garbage.
Discovery could be very juicy...
Reply Quote
1
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 10:40p, 4/23/25
AG
flown-the-coop said:
Fox is indicating that DHS has confirmed the SUV Garcia was driving when pulled over in Tennessee with a load of "migrants" was owned by another guy who is a confessed human smuggler.

Makes me wonder if any of this new info or even more details is included.
I hope the admin is slow rolling some of this info so that the upper courts can ***** slap some of these dumbass rulings into outer space...
Reply Quote
7
SgtStiglitz
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:08a, 4/24/25
AG
Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a court filing last week basically says that only the Trump administration can hold the Trump administration accountable for criminal actions.

In other words, "Authoritarian Rule"
Reply Quote
dvldog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SgtStiglitz • 12:29a, 4/24/25
AG
Seems like she's flying blind. No references to prior court cases or judgements.

"She's a witch!"
Reply Quote
1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.