aggiehawg said:
The rest:Quote:
Despite being notified by the government of the high likelihood of fast-moving litigation, the First Circuit clerk's office refused to answer its phones until this morning, and refused to offer any means of filing this emergency request until it processed certain paperwork during regular business hours.
First rule of law: There is no appeal from Court Clerk's law. They can do what they do with no accountability.
Rapier108 said:
1st Circuit sided with the commie judge.
Trump has appealed to SCOTUS.
txags92 said:Rapier108 said:
1st Circuit sided with the commie judge.
Trump has appealed to SCOTUS.
Hopefully Roberts' clerk didn't shut down his phone.
Rapier108 said:txags92 said:Rapier108 said:
1st Circuit sided with the commie judge.
Trump has appealed to SCOTUS.
Hopefully Roberts' clerk didn't shut down his phone.
Jackson is the Justice who hears appeals from the 1st Circuit so we know what she'll do.
Trump will have to have the full court issue a ruling, assuming enough of them will vote to put a stop to it.
even she stayed it.TRM said:
Even if we know how Jackson would rule, she should refer the application to the full court for something like this.
Un.Real. Federal court in Oregon rules Trump's federalizing of National Guard violated 10th Amendment because protests were predominantly peaceful. pic.twitter.com/XXr0CC9Bsw
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) November 8, 2025
BREAKING: Supreme Court issues emergency order temporarily blocking full SNAP food aid payments - AP
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 8, 2025
techno-ag said:BREAKING: Supreme Court issues emergency order temporarily blocking full SNAP food aid payments - AP
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 8, 2025
BREAKING: The U.S. Department of Agriculture ordered states to immediately reverse any actions taken to issue full SNAP benefits for November 2025. pic.twitter.com/UPc7S2o5eI
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 9, 2025
2/ SCOTUS put a 48 hour delay on it, though, by which time the normal funds should have been transferred. That is horrible precedent though, so I'm thinking Trump will try to appeal to have it vacated. Not sure if that works though. https://t.co/ymHxbbzXzl
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) November 10, 2025
Oh, SNAP: pic.twitter.com/90f87yWJZM
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) November 10, 2025
BREAKING: The Supreme Court will take up the case of Watson v. Republican National Committee-- which will decide if mail-in ballots received after Election Day can be counted.
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 10, 2025
At least 18 states allow this-- including Nevada, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. pic.twitter.com/bpZXO4cTkU
will25u said:Oh, SNAP: pic.twitter.com/90f87yWJZM
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) November 10, 2025
LAWFARE: The crisis created by federal district judges is unlike anything in American history. The last 11 presidents averaged only 6 nationwide injunctions each, almost all upheld by the Supreme Court. President Trump has faced 106, which is 63% more than the total number issued… pic.twitter.com/GrHobAbFBf
— @amuse (@amuse) November 10, 2025
will25u said:LAWFARE: The crisis created by federal district judges is unlike anything in American history. The last 11 presidents averaged only 6 nationwide injunctions each, almost all upheld by the Supreme Court. President Trump has faced 106, which is 63% more than the total number issued… pic.twitter.com/GrHobAbFBf
— @amuse (@amuse) November 10, 2025
Quote:
LAWFARE: The crisis created by federal district judges is unlike anything in American history. The last 11 presidents averaged only 6 nationwide injunctions each, almost all upheld by the Supreme Court. President Trump has faced 106, which is 63% more than the total number issued against all 11 of his predecessors combined. Nearly 90% of those have been overturned by the Supreme Court, proving that Democrat-appointed judges are using their benches as partisan weapons to obstruct the president and his agenda. Congress must begin impeaching these rogue judges before the judiciary loses all credibility.
txags92 said:will25u said:Oh, SNAP: pic.twitter.com/90f87yWJZM
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) November 10, 2025
Hardly seems fair to give them until 4pm to file their supplemental arguments, then only give the respondents until 8am the next morning to respond to whatever the plaintiffs come up with.
Errata - This is going to be chaired by Senator Cruz. (And I hear he has a crack new Chief Counsel at the helm.)
— Eric W. (@EWess92) November 10, 2025
flown-the-coop said:
Do impeachment (to include actual removal) require 2/3's of Senate?
flown-the-coop said:
Wasn't sure if judge removal was a lower threshold than let's say POTUS.
They are not getting to 67 votes. Sort of makes the impeachment clause worthless when Dems lack any and all moral character and adherence to the founding principles of these United States of America.
flown-the-coop said:
Wasn't sure if judge removal was a lower threshold than let's say POTUS.
They are not getting to 67 votes. Sort of makes the impeachment clause worthless when Dems lack any and all moral character and adherence to the founding principles of these United States of America.
2/ Trump Administration calls out 1st Cir.'s ridiculous reasoning. This in essence is the problem: pic.twitter.com/YefupW9HAm
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) November 11, 2025
4/ In this case, SCOTUS needs to issue the stay just to make clear lower courts can never do this! https://t.co/6SvZSmrQab
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) November 11, 2025
Again -- the offender is the "standard of review" that was jerry-rigged into place.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) November 11, 2025
Because the District Judge issued his second order to "enforce" his earlier TRO that he claimed had been violated, such an enforcement order is subject to "abuse of discretion" review by the… https://t.co/Y49HM0oA4s
NY AG TISH JAMES: "If you are denied at a store that accepts EBT, you should tell them, 'I have a balance on my EBT card, and I am able to use it.'"
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) November 11, 2025
"If they still refuse your card, file a complaint." pic.twitter.com/e8tBWVnyNq