Political fallout and arguments regarding the US-Israeli action against Iran 022824

117,062 Views | 1322 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by nortex97
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlackGold said:

Phatbob said:

Israel was not the only source is the point. We didn't go to war because Israel told us to. That's just dumb.


Giving the order of going to war and providing fake bs intelligence are two separate things, but you can see how one would impact the other.


So your assertion is they made it all up? And the other sources did too? It was all a conspiracy, then?
BlackGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phatbob said:

BlackGold said:

Phatbob said:

Israel was not the only source is the point. We didn't go to war because Israel told us to. That's just dumb.


Giving the order of going to war and providing fake bs intelligence are two separate things, but you can see how one would impact the other.


So your assertion is they made it all up? And the other sources did too? It was all a conspiracy, then?


My assertion and something we should all understand now, is that there were NO WMDS IN IRAQ. I'm also saying that Israel and its representatives came before the US Congress (see the video) and stated with 100% certainty, there were WMDs in Iraq. The whole pretense for us invading Iraq was that were WMDs and that was very clearly a LIE. What do you conclude from that? Just bad intel? No, it was more seditious than that.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iran leadership are one of the anti-Christ leaders in our world today. Satan's minions.
Marvin J. Schiller
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlackGold said:

Phatbob said:

BlackGold said:

Phatbob said:

Israel was not the only source is the point. We didn't go to war because Israel told us to. That's just dumb.


Giving the order of going to war and providing fake bs intelligence are two separate things, but you can see how one would impact the other.


So your assertion is they made it all up? And the other sources did too? It was all a conspiracy, then?


My assertion and something we should all understand now, is that there were NO WMDS IN IRAQ. I'm also saying that Israel and its representatives came before the US Congress (see the video) and stated with 100% certainty, there were WMDs in Iraq. The whole pretense for us invading Iraq was that were WMDs and that was very clearly a LIE. What do you conclude from that? Just bad intel? No, it was more seditious than that.


Hmm, maybe because he had them and used them in the past... could that have been part of it or was that also an Israeli conspiracy?
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Y'all are derailing this thread
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phatbob said:

Israel was not the only source is the point. We didn't go to war because Israel told us to. That's just dumb.

No...it's always the Jews...

But they're not anti-semite...
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM said:

Y'all are derailing this thread

Sorry...

Could the mods please clean up our posts?

I apologize for getting sucked into that BS argument...
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll get us back on track in regards to the thread topic by stating my view.

The political ramifications for this conflict depend on the outcome. Israel's goal is to topple the regime, because they have a policy of taking out all their regional enemies as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Report.

Politically, if this happens, then Israel will become a defacto worldwide superpower. They would control regional oil shipping lanes, trade routes, have military superiority over the region, and have a huge stockpile of nukes (while no one else in the region has them). America will have effectively created a rival superpower.

It is problematic for America, politically, because our government is littered with men and women of questionable loyalty (Ted Cruz- "If you will not stand with Israel, I will not stand with you" comes to mind).

Politically, this war is going to wreck the GOP in the midterms. Nobody wanted or voted for this and the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed- so everyday Americans are going to be eating the costs of that.
ChrisTAMU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

I'll get us back on track in regards to the thread topic by stating my view.

The political ramifications for this conflict depend on the outcome. Israel's goal is to topple the regime, because they have a policy of taking out all their regional enemies as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Report.

Politically, if this happens, then Israel will become a defacto worldwide superpower. They would control regional oil shipping lanes, trade routes, have military superiority over the region, and have a huge stockpile of nukes (while no one else in the region has them). America will have effectively created a rival superpower.

It is problematic for America, politically, because our government is littered with men and women of questionable loyalty (Ted Cruz- "If you will not stand with Israel, I will not stand with you" comes to mind).

Politically, this war is going to wreck the GOP in the midterms. Nobody wanted or voted for this and the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed- so everyday Americans are going to be eating the costs of that.


How do you know the strait will remain closed?
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

I'll get us back on track in regards to the thread topic by stating my view.

The political ramifications for this conflict depend on the outcome. Israel's goal is to topple the regime, because they have a policy of taking out all their regional enemies as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Report.

Politically, if this happens, then Israel will become a defacto worldwide superpower. They would control regional oil shipping lanes, trade routes, have military superiority over the region, and have a huge stockpile of nukes (while no one else in the region has them). America will have effectively created a rival superpower.

It is problematic for America, politically, because our government is littered with men and women of questionable loyalty (Ted Cruz- "If you will not stand with Israel, I will not stand with you" comes to mind).

Politically, this war is going to wreck the GOP in the midterms. Nobody wanted or voted for this and the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed- so everyday Americans are going to be eating the costs of that.


You think this is "getting back on track"? This is one of the most outlandish posts I've seen in a while
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phatbob said:

Keyno said:

I'll get us back on track in regards to the thread topic by stating my view.

The political ramifications for this conflict depend on the outcome. Israel's goal is to topple the regime, because they have a policy of taking out all their regional enemies as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Report.

Politically, if this happens, then Israel will become a defacto worldwide superpower. They would control regional oil shipping lanes, trade routes, have military superiority over the region, and have a huge stockpile of nukes (while no one else in the region has them). America will have effectively created a rival superpower.

It is problematic for America, politically, because our government is littered with men and women of questionable loyalty (Ted Cruz- "If you will not stand with Israel, I will not stand with you" comes to mind).

Politically, this war is going to wreck the GOP in the midterms. Nobody wanted or voted for this and the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed- so everyday Americans are going to be eating the costs of that.


You think this is "getting back on track"? This is one of the most outlandish posts I've seen in a while

These are my views regarding the "Political fallout and arguments regarding the US-Israeli action against Iran", which is the stated topic of this thread. You are free to agree or disagree; that is your prerogative.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Reports from Oman claim the Islamic Republic's elite families are relocating there as the crisis deepens.

A message circulating from an Iranian in Muscat, Oman, alleges that the families of senior regime figures including Ali Larijani, Abbas Araghchi, and Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei are currently staying in two major hotels in the city.

The message also claims that others who managed to leave Iran through the Van border crossing into Turkey have been moved into safe houses connected to the Iranian embassy in Muscat.

According to the account, shopping centers in Muscat are now filled with chador-wearing women and men with clerical appearances, believed to be families connected to regime officials.

It further alleges that the family of police commander Ahmad Reza Radan also arrived in Oman via Turkey.

The message also claims that figures involved in financial networks linked to the regime, including the Shamkhani family, have long maintained offices in Oman, allegedly overseen by Naji Shamkhani, a cousin of Ali Shamkhani.



hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


At the end of this war, after we've secured the Iranian uranium capable of making 12 nuclear bombs, we finish enrichment and use those bombs with the old Iranian flag to create a new canal. Call it the Strait Around Iran and put it on every map in the world.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ChrisTAMU said:

Keyno said:

I'll get us back on track in regards to the thread topic by stating my view.

The political ramifications for this conflict depend on the outcome. Israel's goal is to topple the regime, because they have a policy of taking out all their regional enemies as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Report.

Politically, if this happens, then Israel will become a defacto worldwide superpower. They would control regional oil shipping lanes, trade routes, have military superiority over the region, and have a huge stockpile of nukes (while no one else in the region has them). America will have effectively created a rival superpower.

It is problematic for America, politically, because our government is littered with men and women of questionable loyalty (Ted Cruz- "If you will not stand with Israel, I will not stand with you" comes to mind).

Politically, this war is going to wreck the GOP in the midterms. Nobody wanted or voted for this and the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed- so everyday Americans are going to be eating the costs of that.


How do you know the strait will remain closed?

Looking at the current state of affairs, the US cannot reopen the Strait. Obviously things can change in war. It would probably require troops and a sustained naval presence. Which would be constantly attacked by missiles. Trump recently sent out a "truth" (which was reposted to twitter because nobody reads truth social) calling for more countries to come help him secure the Strait. Which conveys that currently he has no idea how to reopen it.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Looking at the current state of affairs, the US cannot reopen the Strait. Obviously things can change in war. It would probably require troops and a sustained naval presence. Which would be constantly attacked by missiles. Trump recently sent out a "truth" (which was reposted to twitter because nobody reads truth social) calling for more countries to come help him secure the Strait. Which conveys that currently he has no idea how to reopen it.

You obviously have not been watching closely, nor watching the streams I post that explain what is really happening. LOL.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Looking at the current state of affairs, the US cannot reopen the Strait. Obviously things can change in war. It would probably require troops and a sustained naval presence. Which would be constantly attacked by missiles. Trump recently sent out a "truth" (which was reposted to twitter because nobody reads truth social) calling for more countries to come help him secure the Strait. Which conveys that currently he has no idea how to reopen it.

You obviously have not been watching closely, nor watching the streams I post that explain what is really happening. LOL.

Link them- I'd be happy to watch them and discuss (but not if they are hours long, I do not have time for that)

If you'd like to make your own point with your own words, that may be better
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

ChrisTAMU said:

Keyno said:

I'll get us back on track in regards to the thread topic by stating my view.

The political ramifications for this conflict depend on the outcome. Israel's goal is to topple the regime, because they have a policy of taking out all their regional enemies as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Report.

Politically, if this happens, then Israel will become a defacto worldwide superpower. They would control regional oil shipping lanes, trade routes, have military superiority over the region, and have a huge stockpile of nukes (while no one else in the region has them). America will have effectively created a rival superpower.

It is problematic for America, politically, because our government is littered with men and women of questionable loyalty (Ted Cruz- "If you will not stand with Israel, I will not stand with you" comes to mind).

Politically, this war is going to wreck the GOP in the midterms. Nobody wanted or voted for this and the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed- so everyday Americans are going to be eating the costs of that.


How do you know the strait will remain closed?

Looking at the current state of affairs, the US cannot reopen the Strait. Obviously things can change in war. It would probably require troops and a sustained naval presence. Which would be constantly attacked by missiles. Trump recently sent out a "truth" (which was reposted to twitter because nobody reads truth social) calling for more countries to come help him secure the Strait. Which conveys that currently he has no idea how to reopen it.

No it does not.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Link them- I'd be happy to watch them and discuss (but not if they are hours long, I do not have time for that)

If you'd like to make your own point with your own words, that may be better

I already have linked ,many of them in this thread. Along with a description of what they contain.

Unlike you, I do my research because I want to know what is really going on, strategy versus tactical.

LOL. Not even worth responding to anymore.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116235861005528220

Iran has long been known as a Master of Media Manipulation and Public Relations. They are Militarily ineffective and weak, but are really good at "feeding" the very appreciative Fake News Media false information. Now, A.I. has become another Disinformation weapon that Iran uses, quite well, considering they are being annihilated by the day. They showed phony "Kamikaze Boats," shooting at various Ships at Sea, which looks wonderful, powerful, and vicious, but these Boats don't exist It's all false information to show how "tough" their already defeated Military is! The five U.S. Refueling Planes that were supposedly struck down and badly damaged, according to The Wall Street Journal's false reporting, and others, are all in service, with the exception of one, which will soon be flying the skies. Buildings and Ships that are shown to be on fire are not It's FAKE NEWS, generated by A.I. For instance, Iran, working in close coordination with the Fake News Media, shows our great USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier, one of the largest and most prestigious Ships in the World, burning uncontrollably in the Ocean. Not only was it not burning, it was not even shot at Iran knows better than to do that! The story was knowingly FAKE and, in a certain way, you can say that those Media Outlets that generated it should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for the dissemination of false information! The fact is, Iran is being decimated, and the only battles they "win" are those that they create through AI, and are distributed by Corrupt Media Outlets. The Radical Leftwing Press knows this full well, but continues to go forward with false stories and LIES. That's why their Approval Rating is so low, and I can win a Presidential Election, IN A LANDSLIDE, getting only 5% positive Press They have no credibility! I am so thrilled to see Brendan Carr, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), looking at the licenses of some of these Corrupt and Highly Unpatriotic "News" Organizations. They get Billions of Dollars of FREE American Airwaves, and use it to perpetuate LIES, both in News and almost all of their Shows, including the Late Night Morons, who get gigantic Salaries for horrible Ratings, and never get, as I used to say in The Apprentice, "FIRED." Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump should just tell Iran "stop attacking ships in the straits or Tehran gets turned into a parking lot."
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is so ****ing embarrassing. The most predictable thing happened and we have a raging idiot at the helm
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So true!

Quote:

One thing the Iran War has demonstrated is that the overwhelming majority of journalists and commentators on the war are blindingly ignorant of the basics of military operations, they are unacquainted with the staff process, and they are so eaten alive by the all-devouring TDS virus that they have lost the ability to reason when Trump is involved.





https://redstate.com/streiff/2026/03/15/president-trump-made-a-courageous-and-correct-call-on-hormuz-and-irans-actions-prove-it-n2200247
13B
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

ChrisTAMU said:

Keyno said:

I'll get us back on track in regards to the thread topic by stating my view.

The political ramifications for this conflict depend on the outcome. Israel's goal is to topple the regime, because they have a policy of taking out all their regional enemies as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan and the Clean Break Report.

Politically, if this happens, then Israel will become a defacto worldwide superpower. They would control regional oil shipping lanes, trade routes, have military superiority over the region, and have a huge stockpile of nukes (while no one else in the region has them). America will have effectively created a rival superpower.

It is problematic for America, politically, because our government is littered with men and women of questionable loyalty (Ted Cruz- "If you will not stand with Israel, I will not stand with you" comes to mind).

Politically, this war is going to wreck the GOP in the midterms. Nobody wanted or voted for this and the Strait of Hormuz is going to remain closed- so everyday Americans are going to be eating the costs of that.


How do you know the strait will remain closed?

Looking at the current state of affairs, the US cannot reopen the Strait. Obviously things can change in war. It would probably require troops and a sustained naval presence. Which would be constantly attacked by missiles. Trump recently sent out a "truth" (which was reposted to twitter because nobody reads truth social) calling for more countries to come help him secure the Strait. Which conveys that currently he has no idea how to reopen it.

If you are being genuine then read the Gaelige post on page 113 of the military action thread. Explains it quite well.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan Scott said:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116235861005528220

Iran has long been known as a Master of Media Manipulation and Public Relations. They are Militarily ineffective and weak, but are really good at "feeding" the very appreciative Fake News Media false information. Now, A.I. has become another Disinformation weapon that Iran uses, quite well, considering they are being annihilated by the day. They showed phony "Kamikaze Boats," shooting at various Ships at Sea, which looks wonderful, powerful, and vicious, but these Boats don't exist It's all false information to show how "tough" their already defeated Military is! The five U.S. Refueling Planes that were supposedly struck down and badly damaged, according to The Wall Street Journal's false reporting, and others, are all in service, with the exception of one, which will soon be flying the skies. Buildings and Ships that are shown to be on fire are not It's FAKE NEWS, generated by A.I. For instance, Iran, working in close coordination with the Fake News Media, shows our great USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier, one of the largest and most prestigious Ships in the World, burning uncontrollably in the Ocean. Not only was it not burning, it was not even shot at Iran knows better than to do that! The story was knowingly FAKE and, in a certain way, you can say that those Media Outlets that generated it should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for the dissemination of false information! The fact is, Iran is being decimated, and the only battles they "win" are those that they create through AI, and are distributed by Corrupt Media Outlets. The Radical Leftwing Press knows this full well, but continues to go forward with false stories and LIES. That's why their Approval Rating is so low, and I can win a Presidential Election, IN A LANDSLIDE, getting only 5% positive Press They have no credibility! I am so thrilled to see Brendan Carr, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), looking at the licenses of some of these Corrupt and Highly Unpatriotic "News" Organizations. They get Billions of Dollars of FREE American Airwaves, and use it to perpetuate LIES, both in News and almost all of their Shows, including the Late Night Morons, who get gigantic Salaries for horrible Ratings, and never get, as I used to say in The Apprentice, "FIRED." Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP

W…T…F




TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Nato is unquestionably a one-way street we pay to participate in. A side-impact of this conflict should be serious debate in congress about giving POTUS authority to withdraw from the treaty.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRM said:



nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Makes sense to me. Cleaning up our leftist propaganda industry (which oddly just chooses which wars/combatants it pulls/lies for) is something Trump has had some limited success with but more tools to use, imho:
Quote:

Carr is right: The public has lost faith and confidence in the media. The FCC, however, can only do so much about the scourge of Fake News, and the reason is that they have jurisdiction over the public airwaves but not over what newspapers print or what slop cable news puts on air. That leaves most of the major leftist outlets, such as CNN, MS NOW, The NY Times, and The Washington Post, et al., unaffected by his announcement.

The national networks like NBC, ABC, and CBS aren't required to have licenses, either, but their local affiliates are, so they might want to pay attention to what Carr has to say.

Meanwhile, Trump has been quite successful at punishing purveyors of misinformation; he's secured settlements for tens of millions of dollars from ABC News (for anchor George Stephanopoulos' false on-air assertion that Trump had been found civilly liable for "rape") and CBS News (for its doctored Kamala Harris interview). He has other pending litigation as well, although some cases have been thrown out of court.

The best way to combat fake news, however, is for audiences to tune away in droves and ignore the worst of the worst mainstream media outlets. We've seen plenty of that happening, and we need to see even more.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Europe may be forced to respond with/pursue common sense energy policies as a result of the price shock Iran has caused with shipping disruptions:

700 IRGC folks residing/fleeing to the Carney Canadian caliphate:
Quote:

A news site called Justice In Conflict reported in January that "in 2021, a Tehran police chief was spotted at a Toronto-area gym. In 2024, it was reported that 700 Iranian nationals linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) resided in Canada the same group that has been designated as a terrorist entity by the Canadian government. That same year, five Iranian regime figures faced deportation back to Iran."

Now, thanks to the X platform, we have almost real-time proof that the IRGC rats are fleeing the ship.

Quote:

Lantsman got into greater detail in an op-ed she penned for a Canadian news site called Todayville, where she said that hundreds of IRGC agents may be in Canada.
While she acknowledged that Mark Carney, Canada's prime minister, called that number inaccurate, he won't confirm any number.

"This week we learned from the Minister's own agency that at least 239 people linked to the Iranian regime are living here in Canada and have had their visas revoked," Lantsman wrote. "Yet of the 239 whose visas have been revoked, only one single person has actually been deported."
Lantsman's numbers are based on news media reports, which she says suggests that 700 IRGC agents may be in Canada.

When discussing the Canadian government's seeming paralysis on the issue and the notion of deporting potential hostile residents from Iran, Lantsman said "senior bureaucrats blamed a lack of flights to Iran for the government's inaction, as if the regime was not already a listed sponsor of terrorism long before the current hostilities."

She added that the government "went on about protecting 'privacy,' and suggested that some of these individuals might even be able to claim asylum. This is very much another self-own from Canada's broken and abused refugee system, which is supposed to protect those fleeing violence, not protect those importing it."

Carney has gone on record as saying he won't support the U.S. and Israel in their attacks on Iran. In light of these reports of IRGC members setting up shop in Canada, you have to wonder if Carney's motives were tied to his desire for peace in the form of the status quo, or has he taken a side in this conflict?

More tariffs and a much more secure border are desperately needed vs. the Canucks.
eater of the list
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan Scott said:



One challenge with this request is the broader diplomatic context.

Many of the countries being asked to help secure the Strait of Hormuz are long-standing U.S. allies, but relations with several of them have been strained in recent years due to trade disputes, tariffs, and political criticism.

Regardless of one's view of those policies, they inevitably affect trust and cooperation. When alliances feel transactional or adversarial, it becomes harder to rally partners around high-risk military or security initiatives.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Love it. LOL.
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now Trump is blaming Ai for us not being able to win. This was a unwinnable war from the start no matter what happens Iran wins Israel could win but the American people loose. Trump tweeting about mines won't help the insurance rate on those ships all Iran has to do is hold out and get the win. We have to have boots on ground to win and the second he does that Trump looses. Have no clue who advised him or why we are in this position but the second it started was a loss for the American people.
docb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In all fairness I really don't think what we just did with Israel warrants a NATO response. I'm quite certain NATO is a defense alliance. And why are we asking for help? Maybe we should have planned this out better and brought what we needed to the fight.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.