Brian Earl Spilner said:Nope, I know the same happened with Kate Winslet.PDEMDHC said:
I saw that Scar Jo was nominated for both leading and supporting roles same year. Is that the first time that's ever happened?

Same with Jamie and the Foxx
Brian Earl Spilner said:Nope, I know the same happened with Kate Winslet.PDEMDHC said:
I saw that Scar Jo was nominated for both leading and supporting roles same year. Is that the first time that's ever happened?

MBAR said:.Bunk Moreland said:MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
If you aren't trolling then I sort of respect how ridiculous this post is.
Its the celebration of the past year of films. Should the NFL hide the score when they show all the best plays of the year at the end of the season just in case you missed that game?
You think movies and sports events are equivalent? Lol ok. You do you.
A fine wine.Bunk Moreland said:
Penelope Cruz. Oh my.
Bunk Moreland said:MBAR said:.Bunk Moreland said:MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
If you aren't trolling then I sort of respect how ridiculous this post is.
Its the celebration of the past year of films. Should the NFL hide the score when they show all the best plays of the year at the end of the season just in case you missed that game?
You think movies and sports events are equivalent? Lol ok. You do you.
It's entertainment. You chose to not seek the entertainment all year. Don't be annoyed you didn't keep up but watched a celebration of that and got spoiled about what happened when you aren't watching.
I didn't get pissed when I just checked who won the pebble Beach pro am.
I think you are more upset about than he was. He just said they probably shouldnt include scenes with critical events in them at the Oscars. Pretty reasonable.Bunk Moreland said:MBAR said:.Bunk Moreland said:MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
If you aren't trolling then I sort of respect how ridiculous this post is.
Its the celebration of the past year of films. Should the NFL hide the score when they show all the best plays of the year at the end of the season just in case you missed that game?
You think movies and sports events are equivalent? Lol ok. You do you.
It's entertainment. You chose to not seek the entertainment all year. Don't be annoyed you didn't keep up but watched a celebration of that and got spoiled about what happened when you weren't watching.
I didn't get pissed when I just checked who won the pebble Beach pro am.
PDEMDHC said:Brian Earl Spilner said:Nope, I know the same happened with Kate Winslet.PDEMDHC said:
I saw that Scar Jo was nominated for both leading and supporting roles same year. Is that the first time that's ever happened?
Same with Jamie and the Foxx
Bunk Moreland said:
Not upset at all. I just find it funny someone would watch the Oscars and feel an inkling of annoyance that they got spoiled about a movie the show is featuring.
Say what? It was the most innovative of all the nominees. The movie was 100% CGI.fig96 said:VFX is always such a weird category. Personally I wouldn't have given it to Lion King as they really didn't do anything that innovative or unique, it was simply an animated film.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Honestly, that VFX win was the biggest WTF of the night so far.
The award is strictly for the VFX, regardless of the quality of the movie itself.
1917 was probably the least deserving of those nominees. Personally, I'd have given it to Lion King.
I love the work that was done on TROS, and I'm still amazed how flawless the massive amount of VFX in Endgame was.
It would be simple to just show scenes that aren't critical to the story, no? The Oscars are, in some sense, also an advertisement to get people to rent or purchase a film they had not yet seen.Bunk Moreland said:
Not upset at all. I just find it funny someone would watch the Oscars and feel an inkling of annoyance that they got spoiled about a movie the show is featuring.
PatAg said:It would be simple to just show scenes that aren't critical to the story, no? The Oscars are, in some sense, also an advertisement to get people to rent or purchase a film they had not yet seen.Bunk Moreland said:
Not upset at all. I just find it funny someone would watch the Oscars and feel an inkling of annoyance that they got spoiled about a movie the show is featuring.
Which makes it...an animated film. The way they did it working with the director was interesting (from speaking with a friend that worked on it) but the work itself really isn't anything we haven't seen before.Brian Earl Spilner said:Say what? It was the most innovative of all the nominees. The movie was 100% CGI.fig96 said:VFX is always such a weird category. Personally I wouldn't have given it to Lion King as they really didn't do anything that innovative or unique, it was simply an animated film.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Honestly, that VFX win was the biggest WTF of the night so far.
The award is strictly for the VFX, regardless of the quality of the movie itself.
1917 was probably the least deserving of those nominees. Personally, I'd have given it to Lion King.
I love the work that was done on TROS, and I'm still amazed how flawless the massive amount of VFX in Endgame was.
I tend to agree with you. To me its much harder to make a true live action film and mix in big time vfx seamlessly than it is to make an almost entirely animated film.fig96 said:Which makes it...an animated film. The way they did it working with the director was interesting (from speaking with a friend that worked on it) but the work itself really isn't anything we haven't seen before.Brian Earl Spilner said:Say what? It was the most innovative of all the nominees. The movie was 100% CGI.fig96 said:VFX is always such a weird category. Personally I wouldn't have given it to Lion King as they really didn't do anything that innovative or unique, it was simply an animated film.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Honestly, that VFX win was the biggest WTF of the night so far.
The award is strictly for the VFX, regardless of the quality of the movie itself.
1917 was probably the least deserving of those nominees. Personally, I'd have given it to Lion King.
I love the work that was done on TROS, and I'm still amazed how flawless the massive amount of VFX in Endgame was.
I'm rooting for Parasite but 1917 - as much as I enjoyed it - does not deserve to win it over most of the nominees.Rick Dalton said:
That would be amazing, but if it's not OUATIH then I hope that Parasite wins it.
Bingo. You're lighting an entire environment and characters, rather than having to light, texture, and composite elements to match existing footage.MBAR said:I tend to agree with you. To me its much harder to make a true live action film and mix in big time vfx seamlessly than it is to make an almost entirely animated film.fig96 said:Which makes it...an animated film. The way they did it working with the director was interesting (from speaking with a friend that worked on it) but the work itself really isn't anything we haven't seen before.Brian Earl Spilner said:Say what? It was the most innovative of all the nominees. The movie was 100% CGI.fig96 said:VFX is always such a weird category. Personally I wouldn't have given it to Lion King as they really didn't do anything that innovative or unique, it was simply an animated film.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Honestly, that VFX win was the biggest WTF of the night so far.
The award is strictly for the VFX, regardless of the quality of the movie itself.
1917 was probably the least deserving of those nominees. Personally, I'd have given it to Lion King.
I love the work that was done on TROS, and I'm still amazed how flawless the massive amount of VFX in Endgame was.
And they didn't even invite Steve Miller up to accept it!GiveEmHellBill said:
I've seen Joker twice, and at no point during either viewing did any part of the score resonate at all to me. I doubt I would recognize it right now if you played it to me.
Didn't she also write the music for Chernobyl?Sex Panther said:
This Hildur Gudnadottir lady is really talented. I remember the music from Joker being the thing that really stood out and stuck with me. I looked her up and listened to some of her other stuff afterwards. She's fantastic.
That's really odd. I feel the exact opposite.GiveEmHellBill said:
I've seen Joker twice, and at no point during either viewing did any part of the score resonate at all to me. I doubt I would recognize it right now if you played it to me.
So?fig96 said:Which makes it...an animated film. The way they did it working with the director was interesting (from speaking with a friend that worked on it) but the work itself really isn't anything we haven't seen before.Brian Earl Spilner said:Say what? It was the most innovative of all the nominees. The movie was 100% CGI.fig96 said:VFX is always such a weird category. Personally I wouldn't have given it to Lion King as they really didn't do anything that innovative or unique, it was simply an animated film.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Honestly, that VFX win was the biggest WTF of the night so far.
The award is strictly for the VFX, regardless of the quality of the movie itself.
1917 was probably the least deserving of those nominees. Personally, I'd have given it to Lion King.
I love the work that was done on TROS, and I'm still amazed how flawless the massive amount of VFX in Endgame was.