JLD's necklace
I can tell when its bad. As far as what seperates good from great, I imagine the average viewer probably can't.Muy said:
Sorry, not a film genius, but how do we as viewers discern how great the editing of a film is while watching it?
Muy said:
Sorry, not a film genius, but how do we as viewers discern how great the editing of a film is while watching it?
Muy said:
Sorry, not a film genius, but how do we as viewers discern how great the editing of a film is while watching it?
A lot of it is also about shot selection. How do you choose the best angle of a scene, show the reaction of one character when another is talking, cut a conversation so it feels like it flows naturally, etc.PatAg said:I can tell when its bad. As far as what seperates good from great, I imagine the average viewer probably can't.Muy said:
Sorry, not a film genius, but how do we as viewers discern how great the editing of a film is while watching it?
My guess would be that people in the industry would know how something was shot originally.
Rick Dalton said:
Long overdue win for Laura Dern, especially after being passed over for The Last Jedi.
PDEMDHC said:
I saw that Scar Jo was nominated for both leading and supporting roles same year. Is that the first time that's ever happened?
Someone being gutshot, for instanceMBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
My wife was just like "Dang, spoiler" during that last montage.MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
Are you just a troll?MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
PatAg said:Someone being gutshot, for instanceMBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
Or set on fire in a swimming poolPatAg said:Someone being gutshot, for instanceMBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
Nope, I know the same happened with Kate Winslet.PDEMDHC said:
I saw that Scar Jo was nominated for both leading and supporting roles same year. Is that the first time that's ever happened?
MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
VFX is always such a weird category. Personally I wouldn't have given it to Lion King as they really didn't do anything that innovative or unique, it was simply an animated film.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Honestly, that VFX win was the biggest WTF of the night so far.
The award is strictly for the VFX, regardless of the quality of the movie itself.
1917 was probably the least deserving of those nominees. Personally, I'd have given it to Lion King.
Like Leo's action in the poolside scene at the end of OUATIH. That caught me totally off-guard when I saw it in the theater and I would have been upset if I had been robbed of the surprise.MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
Buck Compton said:Are you just a troll?MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
It's kind of your own fault at this point if the Oscars spoils it for you.
.Bunk Moreland said:MBAR said:
They should be more careful with the scenes they choose honestly. Not everyone watching will have seen all the films yet.
If you aren't trolling then I sort of respect how ridiculous this post is.
Its the celebration of the past year of films. Should the NFL hide the score when they show all the best plays of the year at the end of the season just in case you missed that game?